hello google groups i am just stating linux and now nothing...can u say me what is teh extension file for linux and do linux really don;t support .exe files....???if linux is free from .exe file the virus do exist in different form except .exe fiels..then what abt those types of files in linux...can anyone give me answer abt it???
Linux supports almost every file-system but ext* family in most
popularly used across various distribution. Read Something about file
system you might get much better idea.
While Linux, and Unix in general, has always natively blocked normal
users from having access to make changes to the operating system
environment, Windows users are generally not. This difference has
continued partly due to the widespread use of administrator accounts in
contemporary versions like XP. In 1997, when a virus for Linux was
released known as "Bliss" leading antivirus vendors issued warnings
that Unix-like systems could fall prey to viruses just like Windows.[31]
The Bliss virus may be considered characteristic of viruses as opposed
to worms on Unix systems. Bliss requires that the user run it
explicitly, and it can only infect programs that the user has the access
to modify. Unlike Windows users, most Unix users do not log in as an
administrator user except to install or configure software; as a result,
even if a user ran the virus, it could not harm their operating system.
The Bliss virus never became widespread, and remains chiefly a research
curiosity. Its creator later posted the source code to Usenet, allowing
researchers to see how it worked.[32]
> Linux supports .exe only via wine. And linux doenot need any extention
> to seperate file types. For example if you rename a .jpg file to .mp3,
> it will still be run via an image viewer.
> And about viruses, i believe it is quite impossible for any app to
> automatically make drastic changes to the system due to the various
> permissions. Only a root can make such changes and you cannot boot as a
> root. You can only become root to run certain commands. So unless you
> sudo a "virus" yourself, i dont think it can work. And again it'll need
> root permissions to migrate automatically. So we cannot quite call it a
> virus, can we?
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 6:43 AM, rhoit <the.n...@gmail.com> wrote:
> redirecting!
> On 03/07/12 06:32, Shreya Dahal wrote:
> > Linux supports .exe only via wine. And linux doenot need any extention
> > to seperate file types. For example if you rename a .jpg file to .mp3,
> > it will still be run via an image viewer.
> > And about viruses, i believe it is quite impossible for any app to
> > automatically make drastic changes to the system due to the various
> > permissions. Only a root can make such changes and you cannot boot as a
> > root. You can only become root to run certain commands. So unless you
> > sudo a "virus" yourself, i dont think it can work. And again it'll need
> > root permissions to migrate automatically. So we cannot quite call it a
> > virus, can we?
On Monday, July 2, 2012 4:07:04 PM UTC+2, salina wrote:
> hello google groups i am just stating linux and now nothing...can u say me > what is teh extension file for linux and do linux really don;t support .exe > files....???if linux is free from .exe file the virus do exist in different > form except .exe fiels..then what abt those types of files in linux...can > anyone give me answer abt it???
Dear Bishwa ji,
Its rather not a valid question to ask for the user to say why you want
to use linux except they wanna run some MICROSOFT GAMES!
The is no boundary for the usages of linux!
Regards
Rhoit
I don't agree that it's an invalid question. I asked that question to salina ji so that we can help her better understand the advantages of linux ... instead of just pondering about .exe files.
On Tuesday, July 3, 2012 11:41:18 AM UTC+2, Rho wrote:
> Dear Bishwa ji, > Its rather not a valid question to ask for the user to say why you want > to use linux except they wanna run some MICROSOFT GAMES! > The is no boundary for the usages of linux! > Regards > Rhoit
Yes Linux don't support windows .exe (executable files) But Linux do have
Viruses ..... Moreover Linux is designed in a way to either avoid viruses
or if one machine is infected, it try to immunize itself or don't let
spread to other machine of network........ welcome to Linux / Open Source
World (The Future) .... Best Regards :)
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 7:37 PM, salina <rajata....@gmail.com> wrote:
> hello google groups i am just stating linux and now nothing...can u say me
> what is teh extension file for linux and do linux really don;t support .exe
> files....???if linux is free from .exe file the virus do exist in different
> form except .exe fiels..then what abt those types of files in linux...can
> anyone give me answer abt it???
I am pretty new user of LInux. I recently installed CENT-OS 6 (86x64) on
my toshiba-satellite notebook. The problem is that the mouse touch-pad does
not seem to work properly. I can move the mouse cursor with the help of the
touch-pad but the touch-pad doesn't function for clicks(single / double).
Is there any package available for it(Synaptic Pointing Device)??? Any sort
of information would be very helpful.
Hi as a newbie I suggest better use distribution like Linux Mint, Ubuntu,
Fedora ....... Linux Mint is all ready to go...
On Jul 9, 2012 10:35 AM, "bigyan shrestha" <bigyan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am pretty new user of LInux. I recently installed CENT-OS 6 (86x64) on
> my toshiba-satellite notebook. The problem is that the mouse touch-pad does
> not seem to work properly. I can move the mouse cursor with the help of the
> touch-pad but the touch-pad doesn't function for clicks(single / double).
> Is there any package available for it(Synaptic Pointing Device)??? Any sort
> of information would be very helpful.
Actually, I am using redhat for my work in the office and I don't want to
get confused with the differences present in the distribution. So, I chose
CENTOS for my laptop.
@Manoj
i just got curious about line: " Linux is designed in a way to either
avoid viruses or if one machine is infected, it try to immunize itself or
don't let spread to other machine of network"
I knew " Linux is designed in a way to either avoid viruses", but did not
knew "it try to immunize itself or don't let spread to other machine of
network" , how did you knew this?
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 11:01 AM, bigyan shrestha <bigyan...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Actually, I am using redhat for my work in the office and I don't want to
> get confused with the differences present in the distribution. So, I chose
> CENTOS for my laptop.
> Isn't there any other solution to my problem ???
For the most part, Linux is engineered in a fashion that makes it hard
for viruses to run (click here for more info). However, there are many
reasons you might want a virus scanner on your Linux PC:
[1] to scan a Windows drive in your PC
[2] to scan a Windows-based network attached server or hard drive
[3] to scan Windows machines over a network
[4] to scan files you are going to send to other people
[5] to scan e-mail you are going to forward to other people
[6] some Windows viruses can run with Wine.
[7] Linux virus infections are theoretically possible.
WHY? WE DO?
ITS JUST THAT WE DON'T WANNA FIX POOR GUY'S COMPUTER (mswin users) EVEN
IF HE REFUSED TO USE LINUX.
no, ClamAV cannot be answer because it a third party software and i was
talking about the code design architecture of Linux it self.
In my opinion , there is no operating system free from virus mac,linux [
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Linux_computer_viruses#Threats ]
,windows . Its just , how secure is one form other. Linux and mac are
more secure then most of windows OS. It also depends on user himself how he
use the operating system . If one is always using system as super user then
he is more like to get virus and it is true for both windows and Linux and
mac. So at the end no matter how secure operating system is , in the end
user also has to play his part.
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 5:27 PM, rhoit <the.n...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Isn't Linux virus-free?
> For the most part, Linux is engineered in a fashion that makes it hard
> for viruses to run (click here for more info). However, there are many
> reasons you might want a virus scanner on your Linux PC:
> [1] to scan a Windows drive in your PC
> [2] to scan a Windows-based network attached server or hard drive
> [3] to scan Windows machines over a network
> [4] to scan files you are going to send to other people
> [5] to scan e-mail you are going to forward to other people
> [6] some Windows viruses can run with Wine.
> [7] Linux virus infections are theoretically possible.
> WHY? WE DO?
> ITS JUST THAT WE DON'T WANNA FIX POOR GUY'S COMPUTER (mswin users) EVEN
> IF HE REFUSED TO USE LINUX.
I guess you arn't getting the point. The Case is theoretically possible
when some one has the accesss to your system the enough privalage to do
some mischif.
And comes the Security! As hempal sir said - "Novice User's is the Most
safest User.", You can remove the case the Novice user will ever get
viruses.
If you presume people run linux as superuser does'nt makes him more
likely to be infected by virus because by default any external imported
to your system can't be exectuded (except using sftp or scp which is
entirely diffrent story).
Tell me the situation when the people try to send the exectables is
linux without using packet manager. Thats why it theoretically.
And if you manage to get viruses in Linux and make it spread to other
linux then you will be so called "One of most Genious people in the earth".
> I guess you arn't getting the point. The Case is theoretically possible
> when some one has the accesss to your system the enough privalage to do
> some mischif.
> And comes the Security! As hempal sir said - "Novice User's is the Most
> safest User.", You can remove the case the Novice user will ever get
> viruses.
> If you presume people run linux as superuser does'nt makes him more
> likely to be infected by virus because by default any external imported
> to your system can't be exectuded (except using sftp or scp which is
> entirely diffrent story).
> Tell me the situation when the people try to send the exectables is
> linux without using packet manager. Thats why it theoretically.
> And if you manage to get viruses in Linux and make it spread to other
> linux then you will be so called "One of most Genious people in the earth".
There will not gonna be that differences ( just some different
windows manager, packages, configurations files locations / names, some
commands etc.) & @ home i guess you not gonna be doing lots of server
configurations & stuff....
But if you like identical distro. like Red Hat Enterprise Linux ( RHEL) &
CentOS, Try Fedora
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Syangjali Thito Magar <
If you try Fedora, always remember you will get most of the latest stuff
from Red Hat ( Fedora Projects is sponsored by Red Hat Inc.) But try to not
to install all the latest / Beta ver. of software .. most of them will be
unstable only install Stabled ver. of packages...
& Fedora ( although its for client usage with most of Graphics, multimedia
codec etc) ... its Red Hat R&D platform & mostly used by Developer
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Syangjali Thito Magar <
> There will not gonna be that differences ( just some different
> windows manager, packages, configurations files locations / names, some
> commands etc.) & @ home i guess you not gonna be doing lots of server
> configurations & stuff....
> But if you like identical distro. like Red Hat Enterprise Linux ( RHEL) &
> CentOS, Try Fedora
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Syangjali Thito Magar <
> manoj.singhj...@gmail.com> wrote:
- All the software packages that end up in default Fedora repositories
are not beta or unstable, they have been tested. Although you have the
option to install alpha or under-test versions from the rawhide
repositories. By most-latest, here, means that Fedora Engineering committe
is dedicated in bringing the bleeding-edge to the distribution, but not
without testing.
- Fedora not only brings latest stuffs from Red Hat, but from various
Open Source projects, as do the other Linux distributions
- Fedora is used on client side applications, as well as for server side
usage and deploymeents
- Self Immunization (in case of Viruses) is a whole different thing, and
I don't see if a general Liux distribution does that. It just restricts the
virus from self replicating to other locations (due to permission and lack
of support for Windows PE Executables).
On the other note, I would like to request to adhere to common
communication etiquette and Mailing List guidelines. As for e xample,
please don't post a message with a generic subject like "Question" as it is
unable to predict what the email contains. Also please do not deviate from
the context of the originator thread; for other
question/queries/discussion/suggestion/... send it in a different email
thread. This helps maintain a healthy Mailing List and encourage
communication.
Again, this is not to discourage you all from using this mailing list for
FOSS related (and sometimes off-topic) issues, but it's a hard job for ML
maintainers to make it an aspiring communication platform for all FOSSians.
As always, expecting help, cooperation and suggestions from you all.
Ahh. Virus, Malware and MS Windows. A perfect combination. Haha.
Not every OS is free from them to be honest; and majority of linux
users probably know
about these already so nothing substantial in my post.
Every now and then a new user of Linux comes along and says "now I am
virus free cool! because I use Linux :-)". No.
Sorry bud, but that's not entirely true but rest assured, you are
indeed using a modern kernel and a great OS ;)
You can try these at minimum:
- harden and keep your kernel patched and software up-to date
- learn about software security updates, infection vectors and why they matter
- don't click random links on the interweb and use general common sense.
- .....
I see that FossNepal has become a huge list now! :-)
Good stuff.
Later
-- Best regards,
Ishwor
