Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Fortran
Home
+ new post
About this group
Join this group
should not g95 be downward compatible?
Options
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
   1 message - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
W0PBV  
View profile  
 More options Jan 23 2010, 10:43 pm
From: W0PBV <mcalh...@ksu.edu>
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 19:43:32 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat, Jan 23 2010 10:43 pm
Subject: should not g95 be downward compatible?
Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
I've recently been forced to change from g77 to g95, and
g95 flags declaration statements which contain initialization values,
such as
   INTEGER x/5/
to be errors.  Is there a compile-time option I can use to
cause this to NOT be an error?
--Myron.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2013 Google