Message from discussion
Rome Atom library
Received: by 10.115.60.1 with SMTP id n1mr922549wak.8.1215189410126;
Fri, 04 Jul 2008 09:36:50 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <richard.d.jo...@hp.com>
Received: from g5t0007.atlanta.hp.com (g5t0007.atlanta.hp.com [15.192.0.44])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v36si175379wah.1.2008.07.04.09.36.47;
Fri, 04 Jul 2008 09:36:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of richard.d.jo...@hp.com designates 15.192.0.44 as permitted sender) client-ip=15.192.0.44;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of richard.d.jo...@hp.com designates 15.192.0.44 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=richard.d.jo...@hp.com
Received: from mailstation.cce.hp.com (mailstation.zcce.gate.cpqcorp.net [16.104.192.124])
(using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by g5t0007.atlanta.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32742144E7
for <foresite@googlegroups.com>; Fri, 4 Jul 2008 16:36:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.0.8] (112.29.169.217.in-addr.arpa [217.169.29.112])
by mailstation.cce.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C72AC039
for <foresite@googlegroups.com>; Fri, 4 Jul 2008 11:36:17 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <486E5181.4060702@hp.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2008 17:36:17 +0100
From: Richard Jones <richard.d.jo...@hp.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
To: "foresite@googlegroups.com" <foresite@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [foresite] Rome Atom library
References: <486E3934.3040806@hp.com>
In-Reply-To: <486E3934.3040806@hp.com>
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI=
X-Whitelist: TRUE
That said, I've had a lot more luck this afternoon, and have "resolved"
all but one of the serialisation problems. It appears that some
elements do not render unless some other elements (unrelated as far as I
can tell) are present. I have only one outstanding problem with regard
to Rome, which is that it does not serialise the title attribute of a
link tag. grr.
Anyway, I've checked in today's changes and you will find a
significantly improved atom serialisation
Cheers,
Richard
> Folks, I've done my level best to get ATOM serialisation for ORE
> resource maps to work through the ROME library, but it just simply isn't
> up to the job. It fails to serialise parts of the model, despite their
> presence, and has an appalling abstraction over all syndication feed
> types. I'm going to have to migrate to an atom library that works; does
> anyone have any suggestions (Apache Abdera experience anyone? Restlet
> ATOM model?).
>
> Cheers,
>
> Richard
>
> --
> =======================================================================
> Richard Jones | Hewlett-Packard Limited
> Research Engineer, HP Labs | registered office:
> Bristol, UK | Cain Road, Bracknell,
> | Berks, RG12 1HN.
> | Registered No: 690597 England
> eml: richard.d.jo...@hp.com -------------------------------------
> blg: http://chronicles-of-richard.blogspot.com/
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> The contents of this message and any attachments to it are confidential
> and may be legally privileged. If you have received this message in
> error, you should delete it from your system immediately and advise the
> sender. To any recipient of this message within HP, unless otherwise
> stated you should consider this message and attachments as "HP
> CONFIDENTIAL".
> ========================================================================
>
>
> >
>
--
=======================================================================
Richard Jones | Hewlett-Packard Limited
Research Engineer, HP Labs | registered office:
Bristol, UK | Cain Road, Bracknell,
| Berks, RG12 1HN.
| Registered No: 690597 England
eml: richard.d.jo...@hp.com -------------------------------------
blg: http://chronicles-of-richard.blogspot.com/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The contents of this message and any attachments to it are confidential
and may be legally privileged. If you have received this message in
error, you should delete it from your system immediately and advise the
sender. To any recipient of this message within HP, unless otherwise
stated you should consider this message and attachments as "HP
CONFIDENTIAL".
========================================================================