Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon.
Switch to the new Google Groups.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Dentists Spread False Fluoride Data
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  1 message - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
NYSCOF  
View profile  
 More options Aug 21 2007, 5:59 pm
From: NYSCOF <nys...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 14:59:16 -0700
Local: Tues, Aug 21 2007 5:59 pm
Subject: Dentists Spread False Fluoride Data
ADA Distributing Misleading Information on Two Federal Fluoride
Reports, Says Fluoride Action Network

    NEW YORK, Aug. 21 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The Fluoride Action
Network (FAN) charges the American Dental Association (ADA) with
circulating false and misleading information in its newsletter (8/15)
that
expressed concern over professional "opposition to community water
fluoridation."(1)

    ADA misrepresented important findings in the 2006 National
Research
Council (NRC)(2) report and trivialized the significance of the dental
fluorosis epidemic afflicting American children (CDC, 2005).

    "We don't understand why the ADA won't deal honestly with the
science
that caused 600 professionals to urge fluoridation be ended,"(3) says
Paul
Connett, PhD, FAN Director.

    The ADA says the NRC report is not relevant to water fluoridation,
but,
according to its website, made this statement before it had reviewed
the
report. In March, 2006 it wrote: "Additional information will appear
on
ADA.org after the report has been reviewed"(4) but no further
information
has appeared.

    Connett says, "The ADA assessment is totally superficial, in
contrast
to statements from three NRC panel members who wrote important
chapters in
the report."

    Kathleen Thiessen, PhD says, "I have become increasingly convinced
that
deliberate exposure of a large fraction of the U.S. population ... to
uncontrolled and unmonitored intake of fluoride in their drinking
water is
unwise at best, and probably harmful to a substantial number of
people."(5)

    Hardy Limeback, PhD, DDS, writes, " ... it is obvious that the
benefit
of fluoridation is next to nil. ... I am even more convinced that
fluoride
should be banned as a systemic drug (which includes water
fluoridation)
..."(6)

    Robert L. Isaacson, PhD adds, "The health of the entire country is
at
risk as long as fluoridation of the drinking water remains
uncurbed."(6)

    The ADA claims that dental fluorosis, which now impacts 32% of
American
children, is "so slight that only trained professionals can notice
it."

However, very mild fluorosis affects up to 25% of tooth surfaces and
mild
up to 50%(7). The CDC reports that 4% of children have moderate or
severe
fluorosis(8), in which all tooth surfaces are affected, frequently
with
brown staining and sometimes pitting.

    "These categories are easy to identify and can result in
psychological
harm," says Connett. "We urge citizens to sign the ONLINE MESSAGE
calling
for an end to fluoridation and Congressional hearings at:
http://www.FluorideAction.net."

    References:

    (1)
    http://www.ada.org/prof/resources/pubs/adanews/adanewsarticle.asp?art...

    (2) http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11571

    (3) http://www.fluoridealert.org/statement.august.2007.html

    (4) http://www.ada.org/prof/resources/topics/fluoride_report_response.pdf

    (5) http://www.fluoridealert.org/thiessen-letter.pdf

    (6) http://www.fluorideaction.org/statement.quotes.aug.2007.pdf

    (7) http://www.ada.org/public/topics/fluoride/facts/fluoridation_facts.pdf

    (8) http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/figures/s403a1t23.gif

SOURCE Fluoride Action Network  http://www.FluorideAction.Net


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »