Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Fluoride Supplements: Another Ineffective Drug with Unwanted Side Effects
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  1 message - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
NYSCOF  
View profile  
 More options Jun 2, 10:16 am
From: NYSCOF <nys...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 07:16:21 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Jun 2 2009 10:16 am
Subject: Fluoride Supplements: Another Ineffective Drug with Unwanted Side Effects
New York - June 2 -- "There is weak and inconsistent evidence that the
use of fluoride supplements prevents dental caries [cavities] in
primary teeth," according to a systematic review of fluoride
supplement research published in the November 2008 Journal of the
American Dental Association.

The authors could find only one study, from China, showing any
fluoride cavity-preventing benefit to primary teeth and that study was
probably biased with a high withdrawal rate, the authors write.

Mild -to-moderate dental fluorosis (white spotted and/or yellow teeth)
is a significant fluoride supplement side effect, they report.

Fluoride supplements, although a prescription drug, were never FDA
[Food and Drug Administration] tested for safety or effectiveness
because sodium fluoride was on the market pre-1938 before FDA testing
laws were enacted. (1)

In 2007, the American Dental Association (ADA) reported on its web
site that fluoride supplements put children six and under at
significant risk of permanently discolored teeth; but never shared
that information with the American public, pediatricians or MD's who
still  prescribe fluoride supplements to toddlers. (2)

"This review confirmed that, in non-fluoridated communities, the use
of fluoride supplements during the first 6 years of life is associated
with a significant increase in the risk of developing dental
fluorosis, write researchers Ismail & Bandekar and first published in
Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, February 1999, (3) but
posted to the ADA's website July 2007.

Fluoride supplements sought to achieve a similar effect  as
fluoridation of the water supplies when it was believed that ingested
fluoride reduced tooth decay. However, the Centers for Disease Control
now reports that fluoride's purported beneficial effects are topical
(4). Swallowing fluoride only exposes children to fluoride's adverse
health effects ( http://www.FluorideAction.Net/health ), such as
dental fluorosis.

"So there is no good reason to swallow fluoride via supplements or the
water supply," says attorney Paul Beeber, President, New York State
Coalition Opposed to Fluoridation, Inc.

Studies link dental fluorosis to children's kidney damage (5) and bone
fractures (6).

"While fluoride ingestion is proclaimed a significant cavity reducer,
there is no valid science to support that," says Beeber.

Up to 48% of school children sport dental fluorosis, the outward sign
of fluoride toxicity, according to the Centers for Disease Control
(CDC). (7)

In the Fall 1999 Journal of Public Health Dentistry, dental researcher
and former dental journal editor Brian A. Burt, Ph.D., M.P.H.,
B.D.Sc., University of Michigan Emeritus Professor, writes:

"It is therefore concluded that the risks of using supplements in
infants and young children outweigh the benefits. Because alternative
forms of fluoride for high-risk individuals exist, fluoride
supplements should no longer be used for young children in North
America."(8)

References:

1) August 2000 letter from NJ Assemblyman Kelly to Senator Robert
Smith http://www.fluoridealert.org/fda.htm

2) http://www.ada.org/prof/resources/ebd/reviews/fluoride_supplements.asp

3) "Fluoride supplements and fluorosis: a meta-analysis," Community
Dentistry & Oral Epidemiology, 1999 Feb;27(1):48-56, by Ismail &
Bandekar .

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=...

4)  http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5014a1.htm

5) "Dose-effect relationship between drinking water fluoride levels
and damage to liver and kidney functions in children," Environmental
Research,2007 Jan;103(1):112-6. Epub 2006 Jul 10, by Xiong, et. al

http://tinyurl.com/34lj92

6) "Dental and Early-State Skeletal Fluorosis in Children Induced by
Fluoride in Brick-Tea," Fluoride 2005;38(1):44-47 Cao, et. al
http://www.fluorideresearch.org/381/files/38144-47.pdf

7) http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/figures/s403a1t23.gif

8) "The case for eliminating the use of dietary fluoride supplements
for young children," Journal of Public Health Dentistry, Fall 1999, by
Burt

http://tinyurl.com/2bnoff


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google