November 12, 2009 -- State University of New York (SUNY) researchers
found more premature births in fluoridated than non-fluoridated
upstate New York communities, according to a presentation made at the
American Public Health Association’s annual meeting on November 9,
2009 in Philadelphia. (1)
Fluoridation is the addition of fluoride chemicals into public water
supplies ostensibly to prevent tooth decay. Many groups oppose
fluoridation because of its scientifically-documented health risks.
(2)
Human pregnancy lasts about 40 weeks or just more than 9 months. A
baby born before 37 weeks of pregnancy is considered a preterm (or
premature) birth. About 12 percent of US pregnancies are preterm and
this is one of the top causes of infant death in the US, according to
the US National Institutes of Health. (3)
The SUNY researchers used 1993-2002 data from the NY Statewide
Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS), which collects
patient characteristics, diagnoses, treatments, services and charges
for every hospital discharge, ambulatory surgery patient and emergency
department admission in New York State. They recorded fluoridation
residence status (under or over 1 milligram fluoride per Liter of
water) and adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, neighborhood poverty
level, hypertension and diabetes.
“Domestic water fluoridation was associated with an increased risk of
PTB [preterm birth]. This relationship was most pronounced among women
in the lowest SES [socio-economic-status] groups (>10% poverty) and
those of non-white racial origin,” write Rachel Hart, et al.
Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, SUNY School of Public
Health.
Previous published research by others has shown that fluoride can
interfere with the reproductive system. (4)
“It would be wise to follow the lead of the 7,000 Environmental
Protection Agency scientists and public health professionals (5) who
asked Congress to place a moratorium on fluoridation until definitive
studies are conducted to prove fluoridation is safe for every human
consuming it,” says attorney Paul Beeber, President, New York State
Coalition Opposed to Fluoridation, Inc. “Clearly fluoridation is not
safe for everyone," says Beeber.
At the request of the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), a
National Research Council (NRC) panel of experts reviewed current
fluoride toxicology. In 2006 they concluded that the maximum amount
of fluoride allowed in drinking water is too high to be protective of
health. At least three NRC panel members believe water fluoride
levels should be as close to zero as possible. The EPA has yet to
perform a fluoride risk assessment based on the NRC's findings leaving
millions of Americans at risk of fluoride's adverse health effects.
According to Dr. Bill Hirzy, Chair of American University’s Chemistry
Department and former EPA scientist from 1981 to 2008, the EPA fears
“setting a maximum contaminant level goal of zero because that would
mean the EPA is going to be responsible for the end of the water
fluoridation program. EPA knows that there will be enormous political
flak for doing that.” (6)
SOURCE: New York State Coalition Opposed to Fluoridation, Inc
(NYSCOF)
http://www.orgsites.com/ny/nyscof
http://www.FluorideAction.Net
Follow NYSCOF on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/nyscof
References:
1) 197468 Relationship between municipal water fluoridation and
preterm birth in Upstate New York Rachel Hart, BA, MPH, et al.
Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Public Health,
University at Albany, State University of New York, Rensselaer, NY
http://apha.confex.com/apha/137am/webprogram/Paper197468.html
(2) Fluoride Action Network – Health Effects Database
http://www.fluoridealert.org/health/sitemap.html
(3) National Institutes of Health, “Preterm Labor and Birth,”
http://www.nichd.nih.gov/health/topics/Preterm_Labor_and_Birth.cfm
(4) Fluoride Action Network - HEALTH EFFECTS: Fluoride & the
Reproductive System http://www.fluoridealert.org/health/repro/index.html
(5) Why EPA Headquarters Union of Scientists Opposes Fluoridation
http://nteu280.org/Issues/Fluoride/NTEU280-Fluoride.htm
(6) The Eagle, “Hirzy: EPA drags feet on fluoride.” by Howie Perlman,
October 28, 2009
http://www.theeagleonline.com/news/story/hirzy-epa-drags-feet-on-flou...
|
