Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Romney Kills Obama/Wright Message
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Unknown
May 17, 2012, 3:59:29 PM5/17/12
to
Mitt Romney's campaign staff was just about to release a commercial,
attacking Obama for attending the *wrong* kind of church.
The ad featured a crazy, preacher (whom Obama has publicly denounced) and
says that Obama is one of his followers.
But Mitt Romney stepped in at the last minute, begging his Super PAC to not
run the ad.
After all, it's he, not Obama, who's representing anti-government and
religious extremists.
And when he had that ad pulled - he was wearing his magic underwear, as
required by the Mormon church.
attacking Obama for attending the *wrong* kind of church.
The ad featured a crazy, preacher (whom Obama has publicly denounced) and
says that Obama is one of his followers.
But Mitt Romney stepped in at the last minute, begging his Super PAC to not
run the ad.
After all, it's he, not Obama, who's representing anti-government and
religious extremists.
And when he had that ad pulled - he was wearing his magic underwear, as
required by the Mormon church.
Bill Shatzer
May 17, 2012, 6:49:37 PM5/17/12
to
Sanders Kaufman wrote:
> Mitt Romney's campaign staff was just about to release a commercial,
> attacking Obama for attending the *wrong* kind of church.
> The ad featured a crazy, preacher (whom Obama has publicly denounced)
> and says that Obama is one of his followers.
> But Mitt Romney stepped in at the last minute, begging his Super PAC to
> not run the ad.
I thought Super PACs were supposed to be completely separate from the
> Mitt Romney's campaign staff was just about to release a commercial,
> attacking Obama for attending the *wrong* kind of church.
> The ad featured a crazy, preacher (whom Obama has publicly denounced)
> and says that Obama is one of his followers.
> But Mitt Romney stepped in at the last minute, begging his Super PAC to
> not run the ad.
candidates and their campaigns?
peace and justice,
Bert
May 17, 2012, 6:57:52 PM5/17/12
to
In news:DMctr.19966$TC4....@newsfe14.iad "Sanders Kaufman"
Surely you can provide some evidence to back up this assertion.
But then, you are a liar.
--
be...@iphouse.com St. Paul, MN
<[bu...@kaufman.net]> wrote:
> Mitt Romney's campaign staff was just about to release a commercial,
> attacking Obama for attending the *wrong* kind of church.
Romney's campaign staff?
> Mitt Romney's campaign staff was just about to release a commercial,
> attacking Obama for attending the *wrong* kind of church.
Surely you can provide some evidence to back up this assertion.
But then, you are a liar.
--
be...@iphouse.com St. Paul, MN
Sid9
May 17, 2012, 7:53:35 PM5/17/12
to
"Bill Shatzer" <ww...@NOcornell.edu> wrote in message
news:jp3va1$e6e$2...@dont-email.me...
the military while Romney got religious exemptions and sat Viet Nam out in
France.
hal lillywhite
May 17, 2012, 8:26:20 PM5/17/12
to
It appears he used that freedom to express his position on such ads.
"I want to make it very clear: I repudiate that effort," Romney told
reporters after a campaign stop in Florida. "I think it's the wrong
course for a PAC or a campaign. I hope that our campaigns can be
respectively about the future and about issues and about vision for
America."
http://www.kten.com/story/18486510/super-pac-preparing-ads-tying-obama-to-pastor
Look for some real information instead of the obviously confused
original post on this thread. When the poster confuses his campaign
staff with a PAC you ought to be just a bit suspicious.
clw
May 17, 2012, 8:42:32 PM5/17/12
to
In article
<7cd01527-3af7-4abb...@l5g2000pbo.googlegroups.com>,
that has been branded as a cult by fundamentalist religions that
comprise the right wing. And, (except to not be Obama) he has not
defused that in any way. Romneys worst mistake would be to open the
religion argument in this campaign.
And, as front runner the Super PACS will not deter this.
> Look for some real information instead of the obviously confused
> original post on this thread. When the poster confuses his campaign
> staff with a PAC you ought to be just a bit suspicious.
But,the repubs are replacing the candidate and his campaign thoughts
with their vision of America. Romney and the repubs are just wall paper
for the party which is now run by the Super PACS and billionaires who
will dictate the agenda and platform of the repubs. Romney has no power
in the face of this.
--
I think Congressmen should wear uniforms like NASCAR
drivers so we could identify their corporate sponsors.
<7cd01527-3af7-4abb...@l5g2000pbo.googlegroups.com>,
hal lillywhite <hlil...@juno.com> wrote:
> On May 17, 5:49 pm, Bill Shatzer <ww...@NOcornell.edu> wrote:
> > Sanders Kaufman wrote:
> > > Mitt Romney's campaign staff was just about to release a commercial,
> > > attacking Obama for attending the *wrong* kind of church.
>
> On May 17, 5:49 pm, Bill Shatzer <ww...@NOcornell.edu> wrote:
> > Sanders Kaufman wrote:
> > > Mitt Romney's campaign staff was just about to release a commercial,
> > > attacking Obama for attending the *wrong* kind of church.
>
> He can't control the PAC but surely he retains his freedom of speech.
> It appears he used that freedom to express his position on such ads.
Yep, Romney is just protecting his back side. He belongs to a church
> It appears he used that freedom to express his position on such ads.
that has been branded as a cult by fundamentalist religions that
comprise the right wing. And, (except to not be Obama) he has not
defused that in any way. Romneys worst mistake would be to open the
religion argument in this campaign.
And, as front runner the Super PACS will not deter this.
> Look for some real information instead of the obviously confused
> original post on this thread. When the poster confuses his campaign
> staff with a PAC you ought to be just a bit suspicious.
with their vision of America. Romney and the repubs are just wall paper
for the party which is now run by the Super PACS and billionaires who
will dictate the agenda and platform of the repubs. Romney has no power
in the face of this.
--
I think Congressmen should wear uniforms like NASCAR
drivers so we could identify their corporate sponsors.
Sid9
May 17, 2012, 9:20:30 PM5/17/12
to
"hal lillywhite" <hlil...@juno.com> wrote in message
news:7cd01527-3af7-4abb...@l5g2000pbo.googlegroups.com...
.
.
Romney: "I stand by what I said, whatever it was"
Sid9
May 17, 2012, 9:22:23 PM5/17/12
to
"clw" <c...@ohsu.gov> wrote in message
news:clw-668C65.1...@news.dsl-only.net...
.
.
Romney: ‘I stand by what I said, whatever it was’
What the f....?
Oglethorpe
May 17, 2012, 11:46:41 PM5/17/12
to
"Sanders Kaufman" <[bu...@kaufman.net]> wrote in message
news:DMctr.19966$TC4....@newsfe14.iad...
Bill Shatzer
May 18, 2012, 1:05:37 AM5/18/12
to
hal lillywhite wrote:
> On May 17, 5:49 pm, Bill Shatzer <ww...@NOcornell.edu> wrote:
>
>>Sanders Kaufman wrote:
>>
>>>Mitt Romney's campaign staff was just about to release a commercial,
>>>attacking Obama for attending the *wrong* kind of church.
>>>The ad featured a crazy, preacher (whom Obama has publicly denounced)
>>>and says that Obama is one of his followers.
>>>But Mitt Romney stepped in at the last minute, begging his Super PAC to
>>>not run the ad.
>>
>>I thought Super PACs were supposed to be completely separate from the
>>candidates and their campaigns?
> He can't control the PAC but surely he retains his freedom of speech.
> It appears he used that freedom to express his position on such ads.
Yet when Willard's super pac was bombarding Florida with millions of
> On May 17, 5:49 pm, Bill Shatzer <ww...@NOcornell.edu> wrote:
>
>>Sanders Kaufman wrote:
>>
>>>Mitt Romney's campaign staff was just about to release a commercial,
>>>attacking Obama for attending the *wrong* kind of church.
>>>The ad featured a crazy, preacher (whom Obama has publicly denounced)
>>>and says that Obama is one of his followers.
>>>But Mitt Romney stepped in at the last minute, begging his Super PAC to
>>>not run the ad.
>>
>>I thought Super PACs were supposed to be completely separate from the
>>candidates and their campaigns?
> He can't control the PAC but surely he retains his freedom of speech.
> It appears he used that freedom to express his position on such ads.
dollars of rather nasty anti-Gingrich ads, he declined to speak out -
claiming he was powerless to do so.
peace and justice,
Sid9
May 18, 2012, 7:24:35 AM5/18/12
to
"Bill Shatzer" <ww...@NOcornell.edu> wrote in message
Unknown
May 18, 2012, 10:52:29 AM5/18/12
to
"Bill Shatzer" wrote in message news:jp3va1$e6e$2...@dont-email.me...
But that's an Earthly law, and Mormon's don't believe themselves to be bound
by Earthly laws.
> Sanders Kaufman wrote:
>> But Mitt Romney stepped in at the last minute, begging his Super PAC to
>> not run the ad.
>I thought Super PACs were supposed to be completely separate from the
>candidates and their campaigns?
Yeah, it was a little bit illegal for him to do that.
>> But Mitt Romney stepped in at the last minute, begging his Super PAC to
>> not run the ad.
>I thought Super PACs were supposed to be completely separate from the
>candidates and their campaigns?
But that's an Earthly law, and Mormon's don't believe themselves to be bound
by Earthly laws.
Unknown
May 18, 2012, 10:55:27 AM5/18/12
to
"hal lillywhite" wrote in message
news:7cd01527-3af7-4abb...@l5g2000pbo.googlegroups.com...
> He can't control the PAC
Not only CAN he control them, he DID control them
They were running with the ad, and only stopped after he told them to.
That's control.
Sure, you could say it's not the driver that turns the car; that the power
steering is what turns it.
But decent people know better.
news:7cd01527-3af7-4abb...@l5g2000pbo.googlegroups.com...
> He can't control the PAC
They were running with the ad, and only stopped after he told them to.
That's control.
Sure, you could say it's not the driver that turns the car; that the power
steering is what turns it.
But decent people know better.
Unknown
May 18, 2012, 10:59:51 AM5/18/12
to
"Sid9" wrote in message news:jp488i$496$1...@dont-email.me...
> Romney: ‘I stand by what I said, whatever it was’
> What the f....?
That's what a Romney presidency would look like, as well - a befuddled
president, not entirely sure of what he's doing, much less what anyone else
is doing.
> Romney: ‘I stand by what I said, whatever it was’
> What the f....?
president, not entirely sure of what he's doing, much less what anyone else
is doing.
Unknown
May 18, 2012, 11:02:50 AM5/18/12
to
"Bert" wrote in message
news:XnsA056B6BE67F...@216.250.188.141...
news:XnsA056B6BE67F...@216.250.188.141...
> In news:DMctr.19966$TC4....@newsfe14.iad "Sanders Kaufman"
>> Mitt Romney's campaign staff was just about to release a commercial,
>> attacking Obama for attending the *wrong* kind of church.
>Romney's campaign staff?
>Surely you can provide some evidence to back up this assertion.
Whose campaign staff do you think put this out - Rick Perry's?
>> attacking Obama for attending the *wrong* kind of church.
>Romney's campaign staff?
>Surely you can provide some evidence to back up this assertion.
Unknown
May 18, 2012, 11:06:47 AM5/18/12
to
"Oglethorpe" wrote in message
news:G7adnR5OEb6bNyjS...@mchsi.com...
> Hey, dipshit, the truth will still get out about that POS, Obama.
If you want this message to get out - you'll have to remove Romney from the
equation.
He's the one that quashed the commercial.
They're conspiring together to take your guns away and give them to
Socialist homosexuals in Israel.
news:G7adnR5OEb6bNyjS...@mchsi.com...
> Hey, dipshit, the truth will still get out about that POS, Obama.
equation.
He's the one that quashed the commercial.
They're conspiring together to take your guns away and give them to
Socialist homosexuals in Israel.
clw
May 18, 2012, 12:42:49 PM5/18/12
to
In article <Mtttr.14896$3y3....@newsfe20.iad>,
hey had no idea how to do. They just wanted the job and perks. We have
had too many failed presidents.
"Sanders Kaufman" <[bu...@kaufman.net]> wrote:
> "Sid9" wrote in message news:jp488i$496$1...@dont-email.me...
>
> > Romney: ŚI stand by what I said, whatever it wasą
> "Sid9" wrote in message news:jp488i$496$1...@dont-email.me...
>
> > What the f....?
>
> That's what a Romney presidency would look like, as well - a befuddled
> president, not entirely sure of what he's doing, much less what anyone else
> is doing.
Sadly American politics is saturated with people who ran for a job that
>
> That's what a Romney presidency would look like, as well - a befuddled
> president, not entirely sure of what he's doing, much less what anyone else
> is doing.
hey had no idea how to do. They just wanted the job and perks. We have
had too many failed presidents.
Bill Shatzer
May 18, 2012, 5:28:37 PM5/18/12
to
peace and justice,
Unknown
May 18, 2012, 9:28:37 PM5/18/12
to
"Bill Shatzer" wrote in message news:jp6eu5$td$1...@dont-email.me...
> We had eight years of a befuddled president. That didn't work out well.
He may be befuddled now, but Cheney was clear-headed when he was president.
> We had eight years of a befuddled president. That didn't work out well.
Oglethorpe
May 21, 2012, 11:21:12 PM5/21/12
to
"Bill Shatzer" <ww...@NOcornell.edu> wrote in message
news:jp4lb2$3dr$1...@dont-email.me...
listened to them in his car and quoted Wright in his book.
Sid9
May 21, 2012, 9:49:38 PM5/21/12
to
"Oglethorpe" <anti...@go.com> wrote in message
news:3PSdnQRWtIOOdyfS...@mchsi.com...
.
.
Jeremiah Wright served six years in our military
Willard M. Romney spent the war deferred as a missionary in France. (safer
than getting your ass shot off)
.
.
.
Unknown
May 22, 2012, 10:52:10 AM5/22/12
to
"Sid9" wrote in message news:jperbk$3qm$1...@dont-email.me...
> Willard M. Romney spent the war deferred as a missionary in France.
> (safer than getting your ass shot off)
In Romney's defense, his duty to his church is superior to his duty to his
country or his family.
Serving his country would have damned him to hell.
> Willard M. Romney spent the war deferred as a missionary in France.
> (safer than getting your ass shot off)
country or his family.
Serving his country would have damned him to hell.
hal lillywhite
May 22, 2012, 2:20:11 PM5/22/12
to
On May 22, 9:52 am, "Sanders Kaufman" <[bu...@kaufman.net]> wrote:
> Serving his country would have damned him to hell.
Hah! Your record of consistent prevarication remains intact.
> Serving his country would have damned him to hell.
Mitchell Holman
May 23, 2012, 10:06:18 PM5/23/12
to
"Sanders Kaufman" <[bu...@kaufman.net]> wrote in
news:XbDtr.23195$Nh4....@newsfe17.iad:
evil or even mean. Just naive and gullable. Cheney
and Rove, on the other hand............
0 new messages