Re: George Zimmerman had a current coon stamp on his hunting license, he was legal.

[Obama means GAY In Kenyan]

In article <5dspr7d49fg1v8url...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Tue, 22 May 2012 21:55:44 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 22 May 2012 16:22:54 -0700, Randal Scripter
> ><kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
> >
> >>On 5/22/2012 3:47 PM, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 22 May 2012 14:56:19 -0500, RD Sandman
> >>> <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>> I posted TWO links, one from the local paper and one from the
> >>>>> neighborhood association that announced his appointment as captain.
> >>>>
> >>>> He was a *SELF* appointed captain, you moron.
> >>>
> >>> Then you agree.....Mr. Zimmerman had absolutely NO authority to do what
> >>> he did,
> >>
> >>He had all the authority he needed: he is a free American resident and
> >>citizen.
> >
> >No citizen has a right to self-determine they're law enforcement,
> >chase down, confront a legal, non criminal citizen, assault them then
> >kill them.

George Zimmerman didn't do that. Just because you say he did
doesn't make it fact.

> Indeed.
>
> >Are you stupid?
>
> Slurp slurp slurp. Can you pull your zipper down just a bit more?
>

Zimmerman prevented a life of crime by Traycon Martin.

Give that man a medal.


--
Trayvon Martin's typical negro behavior got him killed. Let
that be a lesson to the rest of you liberals.

Donate: George Zimmerman Defense Fund

http://gzlegalcase.com/index.php/defense-fund

[Obama means GAY In Kenyan]

In article <n3rpr7p0ugrsl4fl6...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Tue, 22 May 2012 18:47:57 -0700, Randam Slurper <lick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >...will benefit Zimmerman.
>
> You want him to get away with his crime, don't you.

He committed no crime.

> >... Zimmerman acted "like [the shooting] was nothing"...
>
> Of course he did. That's telling.

What's the big deal over shooting a coon? It's just an animal
with big white teeth.

[Obama means GAY In Kenyan]

In article <b9rpr7tteh1raavn4...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 04:16:34 -0400, Steven Capon <steven...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> ><chuckle> race baiting
>
> You find a lynching funny.

Effective too.

> >... clowns and their wild-eyed fantasies...
>
> You hope more people get away with lynchings.

They do it in South Africa all the time.

The U.S.A. should be learning from the experience.

> >... have a right to have those fantasies.. I'd ...
>
> You'd do so much better if you shot them like Zimmerman did.

Agreed.

> On Tue, 22 May 2012 06:58:36 -0600, de...@dudu.org wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 22 May 2012 08:30:05 -0400, * US * wrote:
> >>On Mon, 21 May 2012 10:06:11 -0400, Steven Capon <steven...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>>On Mon, 21 May 2012 07:18:15 -0600, de...@dudu.org wrote:
> >>>>On Mon, 21 May 2012 09:06:29 -0400, * US * wrote:
> >>>>>On Sun, 20 May 2012 09:43:07 -0700, Randal Scripter <kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
> >>>>>>No, no doubt at all.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Zimmerman was on the offensive as soon
> >>>>>as he spotted his victim.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>There's no doubt that Zimmerman caused
> >>>>>the incident.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>It's what he wanted.
> >>>>
> >>>>Yep, exactly. And I think the jury is going to see it that way. That
> >>>>guy is going to prison. And he is going to be very popular there.
> >>>
> >>><LOL> @
> >>
> >>One man is dead and another faces criminal charges.
> >>
> >>Yuk it up, you moron.
> >>
> >>>...loons and their wild-eyed fantasies...
> >>
> >>You want it to be open season on innocent teens,
> >>don't you.
> >
> >Just black ones.

When you locate an innocent black teen, be sure and let the
media know.

> Too true.

Fact.

[Obama means GAY In Kenyan]

In article <bcrpr7p1ckuis94oo...@4ax.com>

* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 04:16:34 -0400, Steven Capon <steven...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>

> >... I'm laughing ... a race baiting clown
> >...race baiting clowns are... always wrong...
>
> You do have problems.

>
> On Tue, 22 May 2012 09:15:12 -0400, Steven Capon <steven...@yahooooo.com> wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 22 May 2012 08:30:05 -0400, * US * wrote:
> >>On Mon, 21 May 2012 10:06:11 -0400, Steven Capon <steven...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>>On Mon, 21 May 2012 07:18:15 -0600, de...@dudu.org wrote:
> >>>>On Mon, 21 May 2012 09:06:29 -0400, * US * wrote:
> >>>>>On Sun, 20 May 2012 09:43:07 -0700, Randal Scripter <kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
> >>>>>>No, no doubt at all.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Zimmerman was on the offensive as soon
> >>>>>as he spotted his victim.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>There's no doubt that Zimmerman caused
> >>>>>the incident.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>It's what he wanted.
> >>>>
> >>>>Yep, exactly. And I think the jury is going to see it that way. That
> >>>>guy is going to prison. And he is going to be very popular there.
> >>>
> >>><LOL> @
> >>
> >>One man is dead and another faces criminal charges.
> >>
> >>Yuk it up, you moron.
> >

> >Laughing
>
> You do that because I'm an idiot.

Every time.

> >>>...loons and their wild-eyed fantasies...
> >>
> >>You want it to be open season on innocent teens,
> >>don't you.
> >

> >No one ...
>
> You are right to support lynching.

If that's what it takes to keep the streets safe from drug
crazed negroes.

[Obama means GAY In Kenyan]

In article <53rpr7hhmf9pp2m7f...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Tue, 22 May 2012 20:28:37 -0500, Dakota <ma...@NOSPAMmail.com> wrote:
>
> >On 5/22/2012 8:16 PM, * US * wrote:
> >> More witnesses are recanting their stories.
> >>
> >> http://newsone.com/2016878/george-zimmerman-witness/
> >>
> >It's likely that a few of Zimmerman's fans who post here will dismiss
> >the story at your link because it comes from News One for Black
> >Americans. I've posted the link cited at the News One story below.
> >
> >http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/os-george-zimmerman-key-witnesses-20120522,0,3635603.story
>
> Good point and thank you.

Two of the biggest leftard kooks on the Internet stroking each
other.

There's something new...

[Obama means GAY In Kenyan]

In article <2tqpr7d3bf4ijd9ha...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Tue, 22 May 2012 22:45:01 -0700, Pimples <geo...@si.not> wrote:
>
> >... proper...
>
> How would you know?
>
> >... blacks are silent about many thousands of blacks
> >killed by other blacks...

We can't have the media or local police forces correctly
reporting the savage tendencies of negroes and their black on
white hate crimes.

It would be counterproductive to liberal apologists.

> Zimmerman was innocent, and had the right to defend himself
> from the violent aggression of his stalker.

Correct.

[Obama means GAY In Kenyan]

In article <d2spr7dltpgm5lpb5...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Tue, 22 May 2012 22:01:16 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 22 May 2012 16:26:38 -0700, Randal Scripter
> ><kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
> >
> >>> Easy one that.
> >>>
> >>> Mr. Zimmerman
> >>
> >>You have no evidence of that.
> >
> >Sure I do
> >
> >Zimmerloon <flush>

There goes another one with no credibility.

Let's take this opportunity to say Traycon Martin would be alive
today if he had greater than below average intelligence.

[Obama means GAY In Kenyan]

In article <04spr79n54bp2ncqp...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> Zimmerman

saved his own life.

What's wrong with that?

> On Tue, 22 May 2012 08:33:07 -0500, David Hartung <da...@hotmaiil.com> wrote:
>
> >Not the issue.
>
> The issue is that Zimmerman

shot a black thug and it offends you liberals because no negro
can ever do anything wrong.

> On Mon, 21 May 2012 21:13:49 -0700, Pimples <geo...@si.not> wrote:
>
> >... Zimmerman followed Martin ...
>
> He had no valid reason to do that.

Sure he did. Traycon was stalking Zimmerman as he sat in his
vehicle.

Glass car windows won't stop an attacker, but space gives
opportunity for defense.

[Obama means GAY In Kenyan]

In article <3frpr7dku5v5k9h86...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Tue, 22 May 2012 18:34:09 -0700, Randam Slurper <lick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >There is, of course.
>
> I suck cocks.
>
> There's no evidence that Traycon's victim
> was anything but an innocent armed man
> who he shouldn't have fucked with.

See how easy reason works?

Traycon was black, out after dark, and he thought he could get
away with intimidating George Zimmerman.

Hey Traycon! How did that Black Panther / Cripp test run turn
out for you?

[Obama means GAY In Kenyan]

In article <gqrpr79a9qkv66ovo...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> Zimmerman never had any valid reason to

shoot Traycon until he was forced to.

Traycon wasn't very smart.

[Obama means GAY In Kenyan]

In article <mtrpr71jud50bfq9n...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> Zimmerman considered the police to be incompetent.

Now Zimmerman is smarter than an entire police department.

Mor(on)e liberal humor.

I guess Traycon found out he wasn't bullet proof. BWAHAHAHAH!

[Obama means GAY In Kenyan]

In article <2orpr7lg2sqpenri3...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Tue, 22 May 2012 22:00:25 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 22 May 2012 18:33:46 -0700, Randal Scripter
> ><kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
> >
> >>On 5/22/2012 6:26 PM, * US * wrote:
> >>> Zimmerman should have waited for the police,
> >>> but he wanted to shoot his victim, instead.
> >>
> >>No, there is no evidence to support the fatuous claim that Mr. Zimmerman
> >>set out to shoot anyone.
> >
> >Of course there is

not.

> >He had armed himself
> >
> >He was pissed because "those assholes always get away"

Coons can be very devious.

> >He

defended himself and you panty pissing liberals don't like how
it turned out.

>
> Exactly.
>
> Slurper

Yes you are a slurper. Traycon was too, but he's stone cold and
in the ground.

[Obama means GAY In Kenyan]

In article <uuspr7tt39j09f12l...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Tue, 22 May 2012 22:24:42 -0400, "Lout" <me4...@verizon.net> wrote:
>
> >... racist ...
>
> Otherwise you'd object to a lynching, wouldn't you.

Is it lynching when blacks do it?

[Obama means GAY In Kenyan]

In article <2irpr7t8lv7nsdr18...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Tue, 22 May 2012 18:33:46 -0700, Randam Slurper <lick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >... fatuous claim that Mr. Zimmerman ...
>
> Your

defense of Zimmerman doesn't involve a bunch of nutbag liberals
screaming racism.

> Zimmerman should have

emptied his magazine into Traycon Martin.

But he didn't.

One shot one kill.

[Obama means GAY In Kenyan]

In article <b5spr7psvt7k8c5u0...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Tue, 22 May 2012 19:04:07 -0700, Randam Slurper <lick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >... the U.S. Library of Medicine ...
>
> Let us know when they

find a way to make ghetto apes like Traycon bulletproof?

>
> My desperate fantasy

Yes that's exactly what it is.

> On Tue, 22 May 2012 08:49:21 -0700 (PDT), SlopPlopJohnJohnsn <TopCo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >100% opinionated...
>
> "According to the U.S. Library of Medicine <flush>

When you find an excuse in there for Traycon Martin's use of
drugs, theft of jewelry, drug dealing, truancy and all around
poor behavior.

Let us know.

[Obama means GAY In Kenyan]

In article <99spr7h3l071ibg0l...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Tue, 22 May 2012 19:03:16 -0700, Randam Slurper <lick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >...Zimmerman wasn't doing it.
>
> Zimmerman wasn't <flush>

the one who initiated violence.

Traycon Martin did.

> On Tue, 22 May 2012 16:22:54 -0700, Randam Slurper <lick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >...monitoring one's
> >neighborhood.
>
> That doesn't include stalking, terrorizing, or shooting anyone.

Traycon was guilty of stalking and terrorizing.

Zimmerman shot him one time and put an end to his poor behavior.

That was very efficient shooting on his part.

[Obama means GAY In Kenyan]

In article <3uspr79t0jodjrur2...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 05:35:25 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
> >... tpg's resident bigot.
>
> You

are right.

How's being wrong working out for you and Traycon?

[Obama means GAY In Kenyan]

In article <gsrpr7hmmmiri5ga8...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Tue, 22 May 2012 22:49:37 -0700, Randal Scripter <kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >... he shot Martin...
>
> That's after he stalked and terrorized Martin.

That's very funny.

A 5'9" man terrorizing a 6'3" negro football player.

[Obama means GAY In Kenyan]

In article <i8tpr79gni9vrp5ga...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> Zimmerman was irrational <flush>

More hate inciting liberal hysteria.

You need some new material. Bleating racist all the time is
getting old.

[Obama means GAY In Kenyan]

In article <ltspr7dlkn4klequ7...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 06:33:44 -0600, de...@dudu.org wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 22 May 2012 22:25:19 -0400, "Scout" <me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
> >><de...@dudu.org> wrote in message news:3j8or71l65iv9e72d...@4ax.com...
> >>> On Tue, 22 May 2012 17:18:02 -0500, RD Sandman <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote:
> >>>>de...@dudu.org wrote in news:492or79chsvi2ojeh...@4ax.com:
> >>>>> On Tue, 22 May 2012 14:33:04 -0700, Pimples the Racist Idiot <geo...@si.not> wrote:
> >>>>>>Scheisskopf, lying crybaby, cried and lied and whined:
> >>>>>>> On Tue, 22 May 2012 13:51:31 -0500, David Hartung<da...@hotmaiil.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On 05/22/2012 01:29 PM, de...@dudu.org wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 22 May 2012 11:17:56 -0700, Pimples the Racist Idiot <geo...@si.not> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2012 11:12 AM, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 22 May 2012 09:32:22 -0700, Pimples the Racist Idiot <geo...@si.not> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Florida's CCW law is intended to allow people to defend themselves,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> ...fuckwit...
> >>>>>>>>>>>> fuckwit ...
> >>>>>>>>>>>> ... wrong....
> >>>>>>>>>>> No one has a right to be armed with intent to "get" some
> >>>>>>>>>> ... out to "get" ...
> >>>>>>>>> Obviously he was. He pursued Martin for no reason other than that he was black.
> >>>>>>>> A claim which you cannot prove.
> >>>>>>> He profiled him
> >>>>>>A claim you can't prove.
> >>>>>>> as trouble because he was a black kid.
> >>>>>>A claim you can't prove.
> >>>>>>> He had no other reason.
> >>>>>>A claim you can't prove.
> >>>>>>Zero for three.
> >>>>>>You are only saying this bullshit because it is the natural left-wing
> >>>>>>narrative. The left are obsessed with race, and that's always the
> >>>>>>easiest - and almost always wrong - explanation for you.
> >>>>> If it walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck...
> >>>>Yep....quack like a racist.....or least as one who is driven by ideas of racism.
> >>> recognizing racism in another is not racism.
> >>When you recognize what isn't there...you only show your own racism.
> >>
> >Oh, but it is there. Yet you demand that others that recognize and
> >condemn your racism is somehow a racist merely for seeing you for what
> >you are. That is not racism.
>
> Exactly.

That went right over your pointy little head.

[Obama means GAY In Kenyan]

In article <ihspr71393lesrmut...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Tue, 22 May 2012 22:22:05 -0400, "Lout" <me4...@verizon.net> wrote:
>
> >... a racist.
>
> That's why you idolize a racist

it's only racist because you got nothing else and it's the last
pebble in your pouch.

How's "wrong and helpless" working out for you?

[Obama means GAY In Kenyan]

In article <h3spr714vcvfbl026...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> Zimmerman had no right to stalk, terrorize, or shoot his victim.

More lies.

[Obama means GAY In Kenyan]

In article <c9tpr711r0na2pi9a...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Tue, 22 May 2012 21:50:12 -0500, Mitchell Holman <nomailcomcast.net> wrote:
>
> >"Scout" <me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in news:jphhk3$dnj$1...@dont-email.me:
> >> <de...@dudu.org> wrote in message news:f40or7pgankp7jj5d...@4ax.com...
> >>> Zimmerman
> >>> just assumed a black kid didn't belong in his neighborhood.
> >>
> >> He was right. Martin was a stranger there.
> >
> > A law abiding stranger.
> >
> > An unarmed law abiding stranger.
> >
> > Who was minding his own business.
> >
> > Now dead.
>
> Exactly.

Explain why he first stalked Zimmerman in his vehicle, then
attacked him, one more time.

Other than just being a typical agressive negro punk.

[Obama means GAY In Kenyan]

In article <80tpr7pfqg1397ogf...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 04:04:38 -0700, Kluts Schattenpantz <klausscha...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
> >... a bigoted hate-criminal...
>
> Otherwise <flush>

Get some new material. Racemongering just doesn't do anything
for us anymore.

[Obama means GAY In Kenyan]

In article <obtpr7pl7pb7oafng...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> Zimmerman should never <flush>

have to worry about black thugs questioning his accuracy again.

One shot, one kill.

[Obama means GAY In Kenyan]

In article <retpr7h5hu0dp96ge...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> Zimmerman is a threat <flush>

To whom?

Black thugs like Traycon Martin?

[ANTONIN SCALIA]

Hypocritical to kiss Mexican butts?

Downright distasteful!

Not to mention smelly!

[Obama means GAY In Kenyan]

In article <v2tpr7dbga6tcovg8...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Tue, 22 May 2012 22:10:50 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
> >
> >>*****************************************************************************
> >
> >http://www.nytimes.com

Now there's a good liberal panty peeing source of propaganda.

> Good one.

Maybe they'll dig Traycon up and use him in the next Macy's
parade.

[Obama means GAY In Kenyan]

In article <sctpr7dgcdm1u3qqd...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> "They <flush>

They don't get away when George Zimmerman puts some lead in them.

[Obama means GAY In Kenyan]

In article <7ntpr7toect9cp845...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Tue, 22 May 2012 10:58:41 -0700, Randam Slurper <lick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >Mr. Zimmerman, of course, was out of his car ...
>
> He shouldn't have been.

So he should have stayed trapped in the car and let Traycon bust
the windows out?

> More witnesses <flush>

You got nothing, chump.

[Obama means GAY In Kenyan]

In article <vftpr79aq8rpnslpp...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Tue, 22 May 2012 18:28:40 -0700, "lax headfool" <maxhe...@localnet.com> wrote:
>
> >... profound ignorance... again.
>
> Otherwise there'd be no way you'd approve of a lynching.

Is it lynching when blacks do it?

[Obama means GAY In Kenyan]

In article <b6tpr7pu5opbbf65j...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 02:04:46 -0500, Lookout <mrloo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >Zimmerman WAS a member of the Neighborhood Watch.
> >
> >HOWEVER
> >
> >He was NOT ON DUTY when this happened. Therefore he was LEGALLY
> >carrying a gun.
>
> That's a non sequitur.

What he was doing is irrelevant in the state of Florida.

> He was legally carrying the gun because he had a permit.

Sure was.

> He was illegally <flush>

thinking that it would be a buen día to find some dumb black kid
and shoot him for the heck of it is what you were going to say.

[Obama means GAY In Kenyan]

In article <uhtpr7pnta3v96b7q...@4ax.com>

* US * wrote:
>
> Otherwise there'd be no way you'd approve of a lynching.

Where was the rope and bonfire?

You can't have a good old Southern lynching with no rope and no
bonfire.

It must be that fertile imagination of yours working overtime.

[Obama means GAY In Kenyan]

In article <cltpr7tgmtlek48ca...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> Martin almost made it home.

Where he was going to sit for another week or so because he got
booted from school.

How much do you want to bet the neighborhood robberies would
increase with him being home and no adult supervision?

[Obama means GAY In Kenyan]

In article <64tpr7lqh3abveod7...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Tue, 22 May 2012 22:45:22 -0700, Pimples <geo...@si.not> wrote:
>
> >... dismissed.
>
> I should try being honest for a change.
>
> Your hate-filled racist <flush>

There you go with "r" word again.

Loser...

[Obama means GAY In Kenyan]

In article <uotpr799afr3drohs...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Tue, 22 May 2012 18:32:50 -0700, Randam Slurper <lick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >... he had every right to be out of our car...
>
> Are you saying you were in there with him, Moron?

Don't put words in his post to support your stupid fantasy.

> On Tue, 22 May 2012 10:58:41 -0700, Randam Slurper <lick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >Mr. Zimmerman, of course, was out of his car ...
>
> He shouldn't have been.

Who says? It's a free country.

> More witnesses are recanting <flush>

That's great news. Maybe Traycon will dig himself out of the
ground and resume drug dealing, robbing and gang banging.

[Obama means GAY In Kenyan]

In article <frtpr7hb2k7mm8418...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 01:57:39 +0000 (UTC), Grotty Gooft <No_email...@wahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >... niglet ...
>
> You're mentally defective, racist.

PKB, loser.

> On Tue, 22 May 2012 10:58:41 -0700, Randam Slurper <lick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >Mr. Zimmerman, of course, was out of his car ...
>
> He shouldn't have been.

It's a free country. Who are you to say he can't get out of his
car?

> More witnesses <flush>

Cite the official witness statements not the media, loser.

[Obama means GAY In Kenyan]

In article <butpr7d1oojuhcbnv...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Tue, 22 May 2012 22:47:35 -0700, Randam Slurper <lick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >No, following someone to keep an eye on him is not ...
>
> That doesn't involve shooting, you idiot.

It did when 6' 3" Traycon jumped on 5' 9" Zimmerman and tried to
smash his skull.

[Obama means GAY In Kenyan]

In article <tttpr7pih1pcqhfus...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Tue, 22 May 2012 22:10:16 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 22 May 2012 16:21:33 -0700, Randal Scripter
> ><kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
> >
> >>>>> Then he had no authority to chase down, confront, assault and kill a
> >>>>> citizen not doing anything wrong.
> >>>>
> >>>> He didn't do any of those things. There was no "chasing down", he
> >>>> didn't "confront", he didn't "assault" - Martin is the one who did all
> >>>> those.
> >>>
> >>> How could he---if Mr. Zimmerman was: a) not authorized to do that;
> >>
> >>Do what - follow Martin? Of *coures* Mr. Zimmerman was "authorized" to
> >>do that - nothing in the law prohibits it.
> >
> >It makes Zimmerloon the obvious agressor. You simply cannot argue out
> >of that fact.
> >
> >>b) not on duty (to do that);
> >>
> >>He doesn't have to be "on duty" to keep an eye on his neighborhood.
> >
> >THen he has no justification for chasing down, confronting, assaulting
> >and then murdering somone not doing anything wrong.
> >
> >>> c) Doing so was NOT authorized by any known rules
> >>
> >>I know you statist leftists believe all of life should be regulated, but
> >>here in a free country, it isn't.
> >
> >You now saying that Zimmerloon had the right (as a member of a free
> >country) to chase down, confront, assault---then when being
> >ass-whipped---kill his intended victim?
> >
> >How conservative of you to say.

Negroes hunt down and kill people in their neighborhoods. Why
is it wrong for whites and Mexicans to do it?

[Obama means GAY In Kenyan]

In article <70upr7tbeckp7mmvq...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Tue, 22 May 2012 23:25:04 -0700, "lax headdump" <maxhe...@localnet.com> wrote:
>
> >... impure speculation ...
>
> Otherwise Zimmerman wouldn't have stalked <flush>

Zimmer didn't stalk anybody except in your warped imagination.

[Obama means GAY In Kenyan]

In article <f3upr7tvb99kfcako...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Tue, 22 May 2012 19:04:30 -0700, Randam Slurper <lick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >... he had every right ...
>
> No, it's illegal to stalk, much less terrorize or shoot,
> an innocent teenager, you idiot.
>
> On Tue, 22 May 2012 07:47:03 -0700, Randam Slurper <lick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >...Mr. Zimmerman was *already* out of his car
> >and following Martin when ...
>
> He never should have done that.

Who are you to make that decision for Zimmerman?

[Obama means GAY In Kenyan]

In article <f3upr7tvb99kfcako...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Tue, 22 May 2012 19:04:30 -0700, Randam Slurper <lick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >... he had every right ...
>

> No, it's illegal to stalk, <flush>

It should be illegal to be stupid like you but it's not.

> On Tue, 22 May 2012 07:47:03 -0700, Randam Slurper <lick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >...Mr. Zimmerman was *already* out of his car
> >and following Martin when ...
>
> He never should have done that.

You don't make the rules. It's a free country. Who are you to
say someone can't get out of their car?

[Obama means GAY In Kenyan]

In article <tttpr7pih1pcqhfus...@4ax.com>

[.USA!..not..USSR.]

In article <jg3sr7dfjaa8n0jjh...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 11:39:43 -0400, Steven Capon <steven...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >... race baiting ...
>
> You do that because you're inferior.
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 04:16:34 -0400, Steven Capon <steven...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> ><chuckle> race baiting
>
> You find a lynching funny <flush>

No, but it's a real hoot slapping you around.

[.USA!..not..USSR.]

In article <jv2sr7ltt0f6g69cv...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 17:38:36 -0500, deadrat <a...@b.com> wrote:
>
> >Are you sure?
>
> I'm quite certain that it's inappropriate to profile,
> or stalk, or harass, or shoot an innocent kid.

An innocent kid yes. A drug dealing black burglar and truant,
no.

> >And if he didn't act they way you judge proper
>
> Do you approve of profiling, stalking, harassing,
> and shooting an innocent kid?

Do you really expect an answer to that question?

> >, might he
> >just have bene [sic] an ordinary person stunned by the fact that he'd just
> >killed someone? If not, why not?
>
> He was known to hate <flush>

Grow up. You're immature and pathetic.

[.USA!..not..USSR.]

In article <uh3sr7hjkg9ct27bt...@4ax.com>

* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 11:39:43 -0400, Steven Capon <steven...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>

> ><BIG CHUCKLE> ... an ignorant fool.
>
> Otherwise you'd object to a lynching.

>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 04:16:34 -0400, Steven Capon <steven...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>

> >... I'm laughing ... a race baiting clown
> >...race baiting clowns are... always wrong...
>
> You do have problems.

Nope. It's you.

> On Tue, 22 May 2012 09:15:12 -0400, Steven Capon <steven...@yahooooo.com> wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 22 May 2012 08:30:05 -0400, * US * wrote:
> >>On Mon, 21 May 2012 10:06:11 -0400, Steven Capon <steven...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>>On Mon, 21 May 2012 07:18:15 -0600, de...@dudu.org wrote:
> >>>>On Mon, 21 May 2012 09:06:29 -0400, * US * wrote:
> >>>>>On Sun, 20 May 2012 09:43:07 -0700, Randal Scripter <kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
> >>>>>>No, no doubt at all.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Zimmerman was on the offensive as soon
> >>>>>as he spotted his victim.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>There's no doubt that Zimmerman caused
> >>>>>the incident.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>It's what he wanted.
> >>>>
> >>>>Yep, exactly. And I think the jury is going to see it that way. That
> >>>>guy is going to prison. And he is going to be very popular there.
> >>>
> >>><LOL> @
> >>
> >>One man is dead and another faces criminal charges.
> >>
> >>Yuk it up, you moron.
> >
> >Laughing
>
> You do that because you're an idiot.

PKB.

> >>>...loons and their wild-eyed fantasies...
> >>
> >>You want it to be open season on innocent teens,
> >>don't you.
> >
> >No one ...
>
> You are no one, but that doesn't make it right
> for you to support lynching.

Where was the lynching? I have yet to see evidence of Traycon
with a noose around his neck and a roaring bonfire next to a
tall tree.

[.USA!..not..USSR.]

In article <jg3sr7dfjaa8n0jjh...@4ax.com>

* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 11:39:43 -0400, Steven Capon <steven...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>

> >... race baiting ...
>
> You do that because you're inferior.

He pegged you. Loser.

[.USA!..not..USSR.]

In article <fc3sr7tacr866tckc...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 00:10:26 -0400, "Lout" <me4...@verizon.net> wrote:
>
> >... he was perfectly justified...
>
> Martin had every right to stand his ground

So why didn't he?

Why did he start the incident by casing George Zimmerman's
vehicle and then jumping him when he got out of it?

Why didn't Traycon just run away and go home?

[.USA!..not..USSR.]

In article <pp3sr71dpf0td7qg6...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 10:46:09 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
> >(in response to: Zimmerloon had a RIGHT to chase Martin down)
>
> >Intimidation may be employed consciously or unconsciously, and a
> >percentage of people who employ it consciously may do so as the result
> >of selfishly rationalized notions of its appropriation, utility or
> >self-empowerment. Intimidation related to prejudice and discrimination
> >may include conduct "which annoys, threatens, intimidates, alarms, or
> >puts a person in fear of their safety...because of a belief or
> >perception regarding such person's race, color, national origin,
> >ancestry, gender, religion, religious practice, age, disability or
> >sexual orientation, regardless of whether the belief or perception is
> >correct."[6]
> >
> >Intimidation may be manifested in such manner as physical contacts,
> >glowering countenance, emotional manipulation, verbal abuse, making
> >someone feel lower than you, purposeful embarrassment and/or actual
> >physical assault. “Behavior may include, but is not limited to,
> >epithets, derogatory comments or slurs and lewd propositions, assault,
> >impeding or blocking movement, offensive touching or any physical
> >interference with normal work or movement, and visual insults, such as
> >derogatory posters or cartoons.”[6]
> >
> >There is no legal definition in English law as to what behavior
> >constitutes "Intimidation", so it is up to the courts to decide on a
> >case by case basis. However, if somebody threatens violence against
> >somebody, then this may be a criminal offence.
> >
> >In most U.S. jurisdictions, the crime remains a misdemeanor unless a
> >deadly weapon is involved or actual violence is committed, in which
> >case it is usually considered a felony.
> >
> >Criminal threatening can be the result of verbal threats of violence,
> >physical conduct (such as hand gestures or raised fists), actual
> >physical contact, or even simply the placing of a sign,[7] an object
> >or graffiti on the property of another person with the purpose of
> >coercing or terrorizing.
> >
> >Criminal threatening is also defined by arson, vandalism, the delivery
> >of noxious biological or chemical substances (or any substance that
> >appears to be a toxic substance), or any other crime against the
> >property of another person with the purpose of coercing or terrorizing
> >any person in reckless disregard for causing fear, terror or
> >inconvenience. Coercion is the use of “pressure, threats, or
> >intimidation”[8] to compel or “force somebody to do something” or
> >“make something to happen.”[9]
> >
> >"Terrorizing" generally means to cause alarm, fright, or dread in
> >another person or inducing apprehension of violence from a hostile or
> >threatening event, person or object. “It is not requisite, in order to
> >constitute this crime, that personal violence should be
> >committed.”[10]
>
> Indeed.

Indeed what? You just "indeeded" an entire laundry basket full
of "if's." Which if's are you indeeding?

> Zimmerman wanted to frighten, oppress, and assault his victim.

You're so full of liberal crap you need your own zipcode.

[.USA!..not..USSR.]

In article <8s3sr7hbb1mkjat7q...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 12:52:55 -0500, Lookout <mrloo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >... He has a LEGAL RIGHT to carry.
>
> Do try to calm yourself. No one said otherwise.
>
> The point you've missed is that a permit doesn't
> begin to justify profiling, stalking, harassing, or
> shooting an innocent unarmed pedestrian.

Do try to calm yourself. None of that happened.

Traycon Martin jumped George Zimmerman and got his dumb ass
blown away.

That's what did happen.

[.USA!..not..USSR.]

In article <6k3sr714u200foqc8...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 08:31:39 -0700, Randam Slurper <lick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >... have no evidence ...
>
> So you believe you should hunt down and scare and shoot a teenager ...

While you believe it's okay for a negro drug dealing burglar who
got kicked out of school to wander around casing vehicles and
homes.

[.USA!..not..USSR.]

In article <i93sr79rck8k5uohe...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 17:37:39 -0600, de...@dudu.org wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 23 May 2012 19:09:55 -0400, "Scout" <me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
> >><de...@dudu.org> wrote in message news:tmaqr7lidokge5q53...@4ax.com...
> >>> On Wed, 23 May 2012 07:43:19 -0700, Randal Scripter <kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
> >>>>This was much more than someone "taking a swing" at someone. Zimmerman
> >>>>has stated that Martin initiated the fight by slugging him in the face,
> >>>>then knocked him down and continued beating on him, then was slamming
> >>>>his head on the concrete walkway. He may or may not be telling the
> >>>>truth, but if he is, that clearly is *far* beyond "takes a swing at
> >>>>you." If that happened to you, and if you were armed, you would use
> >>>>your weapon against your assailant - guaranteed.
> >>> Bullshit. Not everyone is such a helpless coward that they have to
> >>> shoot to death an unarmed teenager just to defend themselves. That
> >>> was not at all an appropriate response considering the threat level.
> >>Right...let me climb on your chest, and start pounding your head against a
> >>sidewalk and without using skills and training that Zimmerman lacked, we'll
> >>see if you can get me off before your brain starts spilling out on the
> >>sidewalk.
> >>
> >If Zimmerman lacked the necessary skills to prevent what you described
> >then he shouldn't have been out there playing cop. He shouldn't have
> >been carrying a gun and without it he wouldn't have the balls to be
> >out there unarmed.
>
> Absolutely.

And after Traycon Martin broke into an 80-year-old woman's home
and raped her, then robbed her, you'd call her a racist for
reporting the crimes.

[.USA!..not..USSR.]

In article <6q4sr75isj065vhup...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 02:14:33 -0700 (PDT), SlopPlopJohnJohnsn <TopCo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >... posting in an Ambien-affected state of mind... feel it necessary to constantly LIE to the readers of this
> >news group...
>
> Tell us about how you should <flush>

Tell us the lynching story again. I want to hear about the
roaring bonfire, mean men in white sheets, a tall tree with a
noose, and Traycon Martin hanging from it.

[.USA!..not..USSR.]

In article <3t4sr71h48puf7qg8...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:

>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 09:35:41 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 23 May 2012 02:04:46 -0500, Lookout <mrloo...@yahoo.com>
> >wrote:
> >

> >>He was NOT ON DUTY when this happened. Therefore he was LEGALLY
> >>carrying a gun.
> >

> >The issue isn't whether he was legally carrying a weapon.
> >
> >His actions (while carrying said weapon) were tied to: a) acting as a
> >watch (911 call); b) stated motivation to not allow "those assholes to
> >get away"; c) presupposition of guilt (targeting) of a black person;
> >d) stated defense of acting legitimately as an adjuct of being a
> >"watch".
> >
> >You have no argument.

Neither do you. He doesn't have to be under the color of any
authority when a savage negro thug is trying to take his life.
All he has to do is defend himself and blow that beast to hell.
Which he did with one shot.

If I were you, I wouldn't fuck with a man who can shoot like
that.

Which is what Traycon Martin should have done, but did not.

> Exactly.

Your dumb ass "exactly..."

[.USA!..not..USSR.]

In article <ct4sr7dolk77c56ra...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 08:38:21 -0700, Randam Slurper <lick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >... to keep them in sight until the police arrive...
>
> That doesn't include harassing and shooting.

The harrassing and assault is what precipitated the shooting.
Traycon assaulted Zimmerman and got a nice bullet hole for his
trouble.

"Look Mommy! I got a bullet hole! Uhhnnn...THUMP!"

[.USA!..not..USSR.]

In article <bj4sr7he6hm1lrfge...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 07:30:22 -0700, Pimples <geo...@si.not> wrote:
>
> >... irrational ...
>
> That's why I can't understand why it's wrong
> to profile, stalk, threaten, provoke, terrorize and

assault a man with a loaded weapon.

I suggest you further your education as soon as possible by
placing yourself in the same situation so you can share
Traycon's experience.

Be sure and report back here afterwards.

[.USA!..not..USSR.]

In article <bm4sr7pjmjdkd02nq...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 20:50:42 -0400, "Lout" <me4...@verizon.net> wrote:
>
> >... racism...racism ... racism.
>
> Otherwise you'd object to the lynching of a black kid.

Find one who got lynched and maybe the objection will be
forthcoming.

Keep using Traycon Martin as your "victim" and you'll lose every
time.

[.USA!..not..USSR.]

In article <h54sr7th88fvgnous...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 08:26:46 -0700, Randam Slurper <lick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >...He *did* wait for the police...
>
> He needed to do that instead of awk, bleat, whine
> and shooting his attacker though.

No he didn't. When under attack, one defends against it.

Unless you're some diaper wearing liberal snotnose who has to
have someone else fight every battle for them.

In that case, liberals simply get their asses beat or killed.

George Zimmerman evidently was not a surrender monkey liberalm,
and took out his assailant the way a man should.

[.USA!..not..USSR.]

In article <6o4sr7dkj431k8cig...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 17:43:26 -0500, RD Sandman <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> >I didn't say I was racist ...
>
> Zimmerman is definitely <flush>

Alive.

Traycon isn't.

Why is that?

[.USA!..not..USSR.]

In article <uf4sr7t7v00nkdj3t...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 16:48:23 -0500, RD Sandman <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> >... he
> >gathered Zimmerman's attention...
>
> Blame the victim much?

Why not? You are.

> >...Was it possible
> >that Zimmerman noticed him because he didn't recognize him as living
> >there?...
>
> So Zimmerman was totally incompetent at neighborhood watch.

That not what you claimed in your earlier posts. You claimed
Zimmerman was a skillful cunning stalker, targeted his victim,
laid in wait, then cut him down like a tree.

> Check.

Yes, check yourself. Into a mental hospital.

[.USA!..not..USSR.]

In article <mb4sr7l4d0sph8gpa...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 01:37:53 -0700 (PDT), SlopPlopJohnJohnsn <TopCo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >...race-baiting "authoritarian" Unglaublich Dumme
> >Schleppangel ... Troll.. my ... racist troll ... is 100% opinionated racist crap...
>
>
> "According to the U.S. Library of Medicine, <flush>

You've already tried that bucket load of crap.

Get a clue, you useless loser.

[.USA!..not..USSR.]

In article <q05sr7hcpaju94edd...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> Zimmerman definitely stalked <flush>

You're full of it. Get some new schtick.

[.USA!..not..USSR.]

In article <g35sr7pghh3egpvvk...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 21:22:37 -0700, Randam Slurper <lick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >...about what he intended.
>
> It obviously wasn't protection of his neighborhood.

The priority was to protect himself first.

When that violent wild negro Traycon Martin jumped on him,
Zimmerman was forced to defend himself.

[.USA!..not..USSR.]

In article <s15sr7l0ibo2grfse...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> Zimmerman had no valid basis for profiling his victim,
> much less subsequently stalking him, harassing him,
> terrorizing him and shooting him.

You just said not three posts ago that Zimmerson was not smart
enough to do that.

Make up your mind.

When you find it.

[.USA!..not..USSR.]

In article <kv4sr7hd2to047m0e...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> Zimmerman wanted to make his victim grovel in fear.

Maybe someone will give him your home address so that theory can
be tested.

[.USA!..not..USSR.]

In article <i65sr75haeqie6qh3...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 07:14:54 -0600, de...@dudu.org wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 22 May 2012 22:23:18 -0400, "Scout" <me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
> >><de...@dudu.org> wrote in message news:3q7or71ufckoj0aa3...@4ax.com...
> >>> On Tue, 22 May 2012 16:22:55 -0500, RD Sandman <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote:
> >>>>de...@dudu.org wrote in news:f40or7pgankp7jj5d...@4ax.com:
> >>>>> On Tue, 22 May 2012 15:58:14 -0500, RD Sandman <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>de...@dudu.org wrote in news:00tnr7lj2u70db5ml...@4ax.com:
> >>>>>>> On Tue, 22 May 2012 14:52:27 -0500, RD Sandman <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>de...@dudu.org wrote in news:6omnr71th5toq7tp2...@4ax.com:
> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 22 May 2012 11:17:56 -0700, Pimples the Racist Idiot <geo...@si.not> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>On 5/22/2012 11:12 AM, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 22 May 2012 09:32:22 -0700, Pimples the Racist Idiot <geo...@si.not> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Florida's CCW law is intended to allow people to defend themselves,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> We're not talking about CCW at all, fuckwit.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> saying that Mr. Zimmerman merely having followed Martin puts him
> >>>>>>>>>>>> <chortle> "outside the law." He is wrong. So are you, as usual.
> >>>>>>>>>>> No one has a right to be armed with intent to "get" some
> >>>>>>>>>>He had a permit to carry the gun, and he wasn't out to "get"anyone.
> >>>>>>>>> Obviously he was. He pursued Martin for no reason other than that he was black.
> >>>>>>>>And you know this.......how?
> >>>>>>> What other reason did he have?
> >>>>>>Try8ing to find who he was and what he was doing in the community.
> >>>>>>had had some breakins in the recent past. I don't know, I am not in
> >>>>>>Zimmerman's head. Oh, wait, come to think of it, neither are you.
> >>>>>> And now he's a known racist.
> >>>>>>There have been claims to that. There are also countermanding claims
> >>>>>>from other quarters. I assume that the truth will come out in sworn
> >>>>>>testimony in the trial not here in a newsgroup.
>
> It's quite obvious that Zimmerman is a racist.

Zimmerman no. You, yes.

<flush>

Let's get back to the lynching story with the roaring bonfire,
tall trees with nooses and Traycon hanging everywhere.

Maybe you can flipflop between how cunning and intelligent
Zimmerman is, and next post how he's so dumb he can't pour piss
out of a boot.

Like you're doing now.

[.USA!..not..USSR.]

In article <7j5sr75d3iuvr0nad...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 16:57:04 -0500, RD Sandman <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> >Zimmerman would have had to leave his vehicle to keep track of Martin...
>
> Not really.

How else would he have done it, dumbass? Pluck his own eyes and
throw them after Traycon?

[.USA!..not..USSR.]

In article <c16sr79deobv919cc...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> Zimmerman threatened <flush>

Obama sucked the cocks of 45 zoo elephants today.

That has the same degree of accuracy of anything you were about
to say.

[.USA!..not..USSR.]

In article <pn5sr7p6fvevrekf2...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 11:21:41 -0700, Randam Slurper <lick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >What would you do ...
>
> I wouldn't profile, stalk, provoke, or shoot a kid.

Of course not. You'd lie and impune someone else.

> If only you could understand even that much.

Why waste time on something so simple?

[.USA!..not..USSR.]

In article <4i5sr7laimbgeudnh...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> The racist wants <flush>

Aren't you even the slightest bit embarrassed when you use that
word incorrectly?

[.USA!..not..USSR.]

In article <v36sr7pqumcbrm0fv...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 16:59:57 -0500, RD Sandman <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> >... who precipitated that violence.
>
> It couldn't have happened without Zimmerman.

What a brilliant observation. Not.

> Martin wasn't looking to bother anyone.

He certainly wasn't after he jumped on Zimmerman and tried to
bash his skull in. Zimmerman put a stop to that gangsta shit
real quick.

Traycon won't be pulling any more gangsta crap with that bullet
hole keeping him down. Way down. In the ground.

[.USA!..not..USSR.]

In article <av4sr7pevus4f7re3...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 10:49:13 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:

>
> >On Wed, 23 May 2012 08:38:21 -0700, Randal Scripter
> ><kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
> >
> >>>> He was NOT ON DUTY when this happened. Therefore he was LEGALLY
> >>>> carrying a gun.
> >>>
> >>> The issue isn't whether he was legally carrying a weapon.
> >>

> >>Earlier you said it *was* the issue.
> >
> >Because his actions were not authorized as a watch, nor are they
> >authorized as a private citizen.

Since when is a man not allowed to defend himself against attack?

> Indeed.

Indeed what, clueless wonder?

[.USA!..not..USSR.]

In article <cl5sr75lajuggaujk...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 08:28:30 -0500, Mitchell Holman <nomailcomcast.net> wrote:
>
> > Is that what we have come to? Everytime someone
> >takes a swing at you you don't need to swing back or
> >even retreat, you just shoot them?

Only an idiot would bring just their fists to a gunfight.

> Plus that's after you <flush>

There's no need to replicate the same lies you keep telling over
and over.

They won't ever be the truth or accepted as truth.

[.USA!..not..USSR.]

In article <sg6sr7hr7vbj0aluk...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 10:47:41 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 23 May 2012 08:32:34 -0700, Randal Scripter.<kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
> >>> Close enough
> >>
> >>...the distance...
> >
> >Then you agree:
> >
> >He chased down (insert # of feet here), confronted, assaulted and then
> >killed an innocent law-abiding person.

Odd how Traycon Martin sitting on George Zimmerman's chest is
turned into the inverse to fit the delusional state of liberal
needs.

> Exactly.

Yes, exactly.

[.USA!..not..USSR.]

In article <gv5sr7h5lhn6sfa77...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 18:14:34 -0400, Harold Burton <hal.i....@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >... one of the dimmer candles on the cake.
>
> You'd stalk and harass <flush>

Get a clue you dipstick.

[.USA!..not..USSR.]

In article <5b6sr7pl5okr86djr...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 09:25:18 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
> >"Chase down" is the relevant issue
>
> Exactly.

That's exactly what Traycon Martin did to George Zimmerman.
Chased him down and tried to smash his skull.

[.USA!..not..USSR.]

In article <366sr7hhofg9pnn0q...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> Martin wanted nothing to do with Zimmerman

That's why he jumped on Zimmerman and tried to smash his skull
with the ground.

> but Zimmerman posed a clear threat.

When he pulled his gun and blew Traycon off of him. Leaving a
nice well defined bullet hole with a single well placed shot and
saving his own life.

But you didn't want to hear that did you? Loser.

[.USA!..not..USSR.]

In article <s86sr7luermmlri67...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 08:22:23 -0700, Pimples <geo...@si.not> wrote:
>
> >... abysmal ignorance.

> You can't even figure out why it's wrong to profile <flush>

The bain of liberalism. Lie. Lie about everything. Lie when
there is no need to, but lie.

[.USA!..not..USSR.]

In article <a26sr7peg29l6b3bu...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> Zimmerman didn't want to protect the neighborhood.

Zimmerman didn't want his skull cracked by a violent black drug
dealing thug burglar.

> Zimmerman wanted a victim.

Now you're a mind reader.

Tell us what Traycon was thinking when that bullet zoomed
through his body.

[.USA!..not..USSR.]

In article <vb6sr75qb3sg8e6to...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 08:47:44 -0700, Randam Slurper <lick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >... stupid...being stupid... me... fucking douche. I'm...fucking race-obsessed racist liar... utterly
> >irrational and out of control.

* US * post vandalism noted.

> You <sneck>

know that Traycon Martin was sitting on George Zimmerman
smashing his head into the ground trying to kill him.

Traycon was sure surprised when that bullet tore through his
body and put his lights out.

Permanently.

[.USA!..not..USSR.]

In article <4i6sr7lgdmg5nisgr...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 21:27:28 -0700, Randam Slurper <lick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >He followed Martin.
>
> Otherwise <flush>

You need to work on your credibility.

[.USA!..not..USSR.]

In article <ak6sr798b37p4q00f...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 08:19:37 -0700, "lax headoof" <maxhe...@localnet.com> wrote:
>
> >... impure speculation ...
>
> Otherwise Zimmerman wouldn't have

all those cuts and scratches on the back of his head.

[.USA!..not..USSR.]

In article <2f6sr75l0u013scb5...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 10:13:18 -0600, de...@dudu.org wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 23 May 2012 09:04:34 -0700, Randal Scripter <kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
> >> have no evidence he's a racist...
> >
> >Guess you missed the part about one of the witnesses filed a complaint
> >against Zimmerman for racial harassment at work.
> >
> >http://btx3.wordpress.com/2012/05/18/george-zimmerman-complaint-filed-about-racial-harassment-from-coworker/
> >
> >but no surprise, since you clearly have missed so much. Including an
> >education in ethics and morality.

Oh look. Here's doodoo to dribble in the thread and ignore the
part where Traycon was pounding Zimmerman's skull into the
ground.

Instead of focusing on the present, doodoo thinks dragging up
trash from the past is somehow going to change the fact that
Traycon was trying to kill Zimmerman until a bullet changed his
mind.

> Indeed.

You just can't help but set yourself up for failure every single
time.

[Bang! Thump.]

In article <qkasr7len487rhaqf...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 06:26:07 -0600, de...@dudu.org wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 24 May 2012 00:10:26 -0400, "Scout" <me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
> >><de...@dudu.org> wrote in message news:g3tqr7lrmh13e1cmn...@4ax.com...
> >>> On Wed, 23 May 2012 19:09:55 -0400, "Scout" <me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
> >>>><de...@dudu.org> wrote in message news:tmaqr7lidokge5q53...@4ax.com...
> >>>>> On Wed, 23 May 2012 07:43:19 -0700, Randal Scripter <kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Yep - he's dead. The precise course of events that led to his death is
> >>>>>>>> not known. Mr. Zimmerman says that Martin assaulted and beat him, and
> >>>>>>>> that he (Zimmerman) only shot Martin in self defense.

> >>>>>>> Is that what we have come to? Everytime someone
> >>>>>>> takes a swing at you you don't need to swing back or
> >>>>>>> even retreat, you just shoot them?

> >>>>>>This was much more than someone "taking a swing" at someone. Zimmerman
> >>>>>>has stated that Martin initiated the fight by slugging him in the face,
> >>>>>>then knocked him down and continued beating on him, then was slamming
> >>>>>>his head on the concrete walkway. He may or may not be telling the
> >>>>>>truth, but if he is, that clearly is *far* beyond "takes a swing at
> >>>>>>you." If that happened to you, and if you were armed, you would use
> >>>>>>your weapon against your assailant - guaranteed.
> >>>>> Bullshit. Not everyone is such a helpless coward that they have to
> >>>>> shoot to death an unarmed teenager just to defend themselves. That
> >>>>> was not at all an appropriate response considering the threat level.
> >>>>Right...let me climb on your chest, and start pounding your head against a
> >>>>sidewalk and without using skills and training that Zimmerman lacked, we'll
> >>>>see if you can get me off before your brain starts spilling out on the sidewalk.
> >>> If Zimmerman lacked the necessary skills to prevent what you described
> >>...then he was perfectly justified in using whatever other means were required.
> >
> >Only in the mind of sick, hate freaks like you.

Glad you'd feel perfectly okay to let a negro jump you in the
dark and beat your skull against the ground until your brains
leaked out.

> Indeed.
>
> >>In case you missed that Dudu....you don't get to make the law.
> >
> >Unlike you, I've actually studied university level ethics and morality
> >so I am capable of seeing what went wrong here. You clearly aren't.

A course in ethics while pursuing a liberal arts degree will get
you a job at Starbucks. Because that's about all you liberal
arts losers are qualified for.

> True.
>
> It's all the more reason to correct the subject line.

Done.

[Bang! Thump.]

In article <cecsr79b25j6j20q4...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 05:55:41 -0700, Kluts Schattenpantz <klausscha...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
> >Hate freaks...Like ...
>
> I like fantasizing about lynching.

Yes, that's quite a lynching story you tell. Roaring bonfires,
strong white men in sheets, tall oak trees with thousands of
nooses hanging from every branch.

And Traycon Martin hanging from each and every one of them.

Al Sharpton must love you.

[Bang! Thump.]

In article <c35tr7h2sr3pdhq58...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 08:57:10 -0700, Randam Slurper <lick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >... a low-wage fuckwit ... a marginal; a null.
>
> You kicked my ass again.
>
> So does my violent drug-addict <flush>

drug dealing, burglar of a punk Traycon Martin.

Where did Traycon get the money to pay for that gold grill in
his mouf?

[Bang! Thump.]

In article <8s4tr7llmjsuu17kg...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 09:23:21 -0600, de...@dudu.org wrote:
>
> >It was Zimmerman who did not do the right thing here. Martin may
> >have been stupid, and gone back to see who and why some "weird crazy
> >person" was following him when he shouldn't have, but he did nothing
> >wrong to initiate the chain of events that lead to this tragic
> >outcome. That was totally the blame on Zimmerman. Who is a proven
> >racist with mental health issues (seeing a psychiatrist),
> >authority/insecurity issues (wondering the streets at night playing
> >watch captain) and was actively taking two powerful mood altering
> >drugs with serious potential side effects.

Traycon was all drugged up on crack and casing homes so he could
break in, steal things, and buy more crack.

> Exactly.

Like I said, you're easy.

[Bang! Thump.]

In article <sb5tr75v8a8595rq6...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> Zimmerman had to <flush>

shoot a violent drug crazed negro who was trying to kill him by
smashing his skull on the ground.

[Bang! Thump.]

In article <85isr755fi90o2sqm...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> Zimmerman is definitely a rac <flush>.

Only a loser tries to make his main argument by crying "racist."

[Neighborhood Thug Watch]

In article <sf5tr7tpifk6ng8l4...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 11:55:34 -0400, Steven Capon <steven...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >...do have fantasies...
>
> Your problems aren't the subject, though.

Problems? There are no problems here. Traycon got a nice round
bullet hole for being a thug.

He's dead. Everybody is happy.

> I support lynching.

Still waiting for another lynching fairy tale.

[Neighborhood Thug Watch]

In article <g95tr71ekl5vke0g3...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 11:27:36 -0400, Steven Capon <steven...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >Laughing... loons and...fantasies.. and ... inability
>
> You

are making fun of you and every other idiot who is kissing
Traycon's dead black butt.

The black scumbag is dead.

He's got a hole in his chest big enough for Obama to cook a dog
in.

He's not coming back no matter how many lies you tell.

[Neighborhood Thug Watch]

In article <015tr7d8h2k9rr68g...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 13:53:28 -0500, RD Sandman <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> >...There is no proof that he is
> >a racist.
>
> Well, except for Traycon's racist rantings online ...

That's right. Traycoon was a junior gang member.

He was supposed to beat up or kill someone as part of the
initiation.

[Neighborhood Thug Watch]

In article <vu4tr75of5ivhgv11...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 08:48:50 -0700, Randam Slurper <lick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >... no exposure to ethics.
>
> Otherwise you'd object to Zimmerman's lyn <flush>

Same 5-year-old pouty-pout.

Traycon wasn't lynched. He got his worthless black ass shot.

Please learn the difference.

[Neighborhood Thug Watch]

In article <825tr79vqn4fc5q58...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> Zimmerman was so cow <flush>

The brave liberal who fears the lynching tree squeaked but we
didn't hear him.

[Neighborhood Thug Watch]

In article <am5tr79rajmots2ev...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 09:08:00 -0700, "Oglethorpe" <anti...@go.com> wrote:
>
> >He intended to see what Martin was up to ...
>
> Correction: he intended to make sure Martin

didn't kill him by bashing his skull on the ground.

[Bang! Thump.]

In article <e7isr7100g5h8inhb...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 07:54:29 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 23 May 2012 21:27:28 -0700, Randal Scripter
> ><kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
> >
> >>> Are you now saying he "Stayed put"?
> >>
> >>He followed Martin.

And 6' 3" Traycon Martin jumped 5' 9" George Zimmerman trying to
smash his skull on the ground.

> >That's all we need to know
>
> Indeed.
>
> Traycon had absolutely no right to stalk,

Traycon has the same right to stalk that you do to lie about it.

[Neighborhood Thug Watch]

In article <ti5tr7tcme69vl9tv...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 14:00:44 -0500, RD Sandman <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> >... if the evidence supports a claim of self defense ...
>
> The valid claim of self-defense would not have been Martin's.

That's correct. He was pounding Zimmerman's head on the ground
trying to smash his skull.

[Neighborhood Thug Watch]

In article <9n5tr71e8i13f08fu...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:

>
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 09:49:54 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 24 May 2012 09:08:00 -0700, "Oglethorpe" <anti...@go.com> wrote:

> >><Yoor...@Jurgis.net> wrote in message news:4cdrr75dnf9b9ojhe...@4ax.com...
> >>> On Wed, 23 May 2012 13:26:41 -0500, Lookout <mrloo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>>>Zimmerman had every right to be carrying. PERIOD.
> >>> Not as as a back up for what he intended
> >>
> >>He intended to see what Martin was up to. He has a CCWP so you're moot.
> >>
> >
> >He is not authorized to go beyond "see what Martin was up to", which
> >he clearly did. He reported (correctly) what he "saw". Then his
> >actions went beyond what the law allows.

That's the loonbat Yooghis version folks. Let's see what else
this nutsack has to say.

> >He chased down, confronted, assaulted and murdered an innocent,
> >law-abiding citizen based on nothing, or a belief that: "The assholes
> >always get away"

There's a laugher. Yoorghis can read minds remotely just like
poor old dimwit * US * can.

> >Citizens have no right to stalk, chase, create fear, harass, or
> >intimidate someone doing nothing wrong

They don't have the right to steal, possess stolen property,
deal drugs and and break into homes either, Yoorghis.

Traycon did all that and more.

> >The minute Zimmerloon left his truck to "Find" Martin---he was heading
> >for a situation where HE was in legal jepoardy

Wrong.

> >Zimmerloon was the agressor---and had Martin had a weapon
> >himself---could legally have shot zimmerloon twixt the eyes and not
> >been charged. Zimmerloon was the agressor---Martin was the victim.

There's some twisted liberal logic for you, folks.

If Traycon had been the shooter regardless of circumstances
according to Yoorghis, he would still be the injured party.

Why is that Yoorghis? Because he's black?

> >When Martin fought back---Zimmerloon was losing--not only because he
> >(then) was getting his ass whupped, but because he committed murder
> >and a felony with possession of a deadly weapon.

There's more cart before the horse liberal logic. The "murder"
as they refer to it has occurred, and there's a dead body
whupping ass because that's the way they want it to be in their
minds.

> Exactly.

You are such the sap.

[Neighborhood Thug Watch]

In article <no5tr75t9ikre44e1...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> Martin had to disobey the operator's instructions

That's right. Obey the instructions of an operator and sit
there while Traycon Martin throws a rock through the window and
bashes your skull.

That's real thinking liberal logic there.

He didn't have to "obey" that operator, dimbulb.

See how stupid you liberals are now? You have to be told what
to do, or what not do everything. You can't even think your way
out of a situation involving your life without help.

What a pathetic existence you lead.

[Neighborhood Thug Watch]

In article <lr5tr795c47jdv2cv...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 13:15:53 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
> >NO ONE (carrying legal or not) can intimidate, cause fear, harass, or
> >in anyway do what zimmerloon

Loonspeak flushed.

> Exactly.
>
> Subject line updated.

What a pair of saps...

How about that hole in Traycon Martin? Zimmerman was a good
shot.

One shot, one kill.