Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: Trayvon Martin will go the way of Tawana Brawley and other negro failures
2 views
Skip to first unread message
124 Grains
May 29, 2012, 3:21:05 AM5/29/12
to
In article <107sr798amsn87p4c...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> Obviously Zimmerman wants to claim he'd have stalked
Woops! There's that liberal lie again.
I know. Let's review your lynching story with the huge roaring
bonfires as big as a house and trees filled with nooses on every
branch where Traycon Martin will surely be hung on every one.
--
Trayvon Martin's typical negro behavior got him killed. Let
that be a lesson to the rest of you liberals.
Donate: George Zimmerman Defense Fund
http://gzlegalcase.com/index.php/defense-fund
* US * wrote:
>
> Obviously Zimmerman wants to claim he'd have stalked
Woops! There's that liberal lie again.
I know. Let's review your lynching story with the huge roaring
bonfires as big as a house and trees filled with nooses on every
branch where Traycon Martin will surely be hung on every one.
--
Trayvon Martin's typical negro behavior got him killed. Let
that be a lesson to the rest of you liberals.
Donate: George Zimmerman Defense Fund
http://gzlegalcase.com/index.php/defense-fund
124 Grains
May 29, 2012, 3:21:04 AM5/29/12
to
In article <jo6sr7p4l71a8nmjn...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 08:40:15 -0700, Randam Slurper <lick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >... Following someone and
> >observing his location ...
>
> That doesn't involve prov <flush>
Traycon attacked George Zimmerman and tried to smash his skull
on the ground. That's provocation.
Zimmerman showed great restraint by only firing his weapon one
time. Apparently George Zimmerman is a better shot than most
police officers because it only took him one shot to put down a
belligerent and violent negro thug. It may take 10 police
officers over a hundred rounds to put down one guy in a car.
Good shooting George!
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 08:40:15 -0700, Randam Slurper <lick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >... Following someone and
> >observing his location ...
>
> That doesn't involve prov <flush>
Traycon attacked George Zimmerman and tried to smash his skull
on the ground. That's provocation.
Zimmerman showed great restraint by only firing his weapon one
time. Apparently George Zimmerman is a better shot than most
police officers because it only took him one shot to put down a
belligerent and violent negro thug. It may take 10 police
officers over a hundred rounds to put down one guy in a car.
Good shooting George!
124 Grains
May 29, 2012, 3:21:03 AM5/29/12
to
In article <os6sr79d8oh96mapl...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> What if Martin had been a teenage girl, even your daughter?
That's just plain bullshit you're trying to sell now.
> What if she told you on the phone that she was being followed
> by a creepy older man in a vehicle?
If it was my daughter she'd pull out her piece and shoot
Traycon's dad or uncle in the head, then call the cops.
* US * wrote:
>
> What if Martin had been a teenage girl, even your daughter?
That's just plain bullshit you're trying to sell now.
> What if she told you on the phone that she was being followed
> by a creepy older man in a vehicle?
If it was my daughter she'd pull out her piece and shoot
Traycon's dad or uncle in the head, then call the cops.
124 Grains
May 29, 2012, 3:26:48 AM5/29/12
to
In article <hq6sr79a8nh0gih2d...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 09:54:35 -0600, de...@dudu.org wrote:
> >
> >If the person feels threatened by the pursuit than hell yes it's an
> >act of aggression. Martin told Zimmerman to stop following him and he
> >refused to do so. Martin was justified in feeling threatened.
Interesting how you ignore Traycon casing Zimmerman's vehicle,
no doubt looking for something to steal.
> Exactly. The threat from Zimmerman was real, beyond doubt.
Only a fool would have thought otherwise. Apparently Traycon
was a fool.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 09:54:35 -0600, de...@dudu.org wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 23 May 2012 08:40:15 -0700, Randal Scripter <kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
> >>... Following someone and
> >>observing his location is not an act of aggression.
> >On Wed, 23 May 2012 08:40:15 -0700, Randal Scripter <kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
> >>... Following someone and
> >
> >If the person feels threatened by the pursuit than hell yes it's an
> >act of aggression. Martin told Zimmerman to stop following him and he
> >refused to do so. Martin was justified in feeling threatened.
Interesting how you ignore Traycon casing Zimmerman's vehicle,
no doubt looking for something to steal.
> Exactly. The threat from Zimmerman was real, beyond doubt.
Only a fool would have thought otherwise. Apparently Traycon
was a fool.
.USA!..not..USSR.
May 29, 2012, 4:11:52 PM5/29/12
to
In article <8m6sr7ldh5rhg861n...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 07:59:05 -0700, "Oglethorpe" <anti...@go.com> wrote:
>
> >NOPE. Hey, explain why Martin's ...
>
> Explain why he was
sitting on top of George Zimmerman smashing his head against the
ground just before he got his ass blown away.
Let's hear the lynching story again. You know. The one with
the tall trees, roaring bonfire, big strong men with big guns
and white sheets over their faces, tying nooses all over trees
so they could hang Traycon a couple zillion times just to piss
in your cornflakes.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 07:59:05 -0700, "Oglethorpe" <anti...@go.com> wrote:
>
> >NOPE. Hey, explain why Martin's ...
>
> Explain why he was
sitting on top of George Zimmerman smashing his head against the
ground just before he got his ass blown away.
Let's hear the lynching story again. You know. The one with
the tall trees, roaring bonfire, big strong men with big guns
and white sheets over their faces, tying nooses all over trees
so they could hang Traycon a couple zillion times just to piss
in your cornflakes.
Bang! Thump.
May 29, 2012, 7:36:53 PM5/29/12
to
In article <grbsr71jm62tn1bu3...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 06:43:12 -0600, de...@dudu.org wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 23 May 2012 20:56:15 -0400, "Scout" <me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
> >><de...@dudu.org> wrote in message news:1a5qr7h7qsm81epeq...@4ax.com...
> >>> On Wed, 23 May 2012 09:35:07 -0700, Randal Scripter <kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
> >>>>On 5/23/2012 9:17 AM, de...@dudu.org wrote:
> >>>>> On Wed, 23 May 2012 09:08:43 -0700, Randal Scripter <kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
> >>>>>> On 5/23/2012 9:06 AM, de...@dudu.org wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Wed, 23 May 2012 08:58:52 -0700, Randal Scripter <kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> It is not established as a fact - period. Following someone and observing his location is not an act of aggression.
> >>>>>>> Like you and your kind trying to say he wasn't pursuing only following, therefore it is ok?
> >>>>>> There is a meaningful difference between following and pursuing...
> >>>>> No, definitions were provided with the word "follow" intentionally cut out. That's lying.
> >>>>The definitions of these other loaded and inapplicable words and terms
> >>>>you're using all incorporate some additional meaning beyond following.
> >>> Because I tried to explain to you there was no significant difference between follow and pursue in this case and
> >>Yes, there is a significant difference (at least you finally admit there is a difference)...it has to do with intent.
> >>pursue includes an intent to close with, capture, confront or otherwise meet up with.
> >>Follow does not include that intent.
> >>Since intents are very much an important factor of this case, your attempt
> >>to imply intents not shown to exist is dishonest at best and an out right
> >>lie at worst.
> >
> >You're obsessed. Too funny. Maybe you need to go get your adult
> >diapers changed. The stink is getting too much.
Inability to respond noted.
> All the more reason to remove the rac <flush>
Impotent response noted.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 06:43:12 -0600, de...@dudu.org wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 23 May 2012 20:56:15 -0400, "Scout" <me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
> >><de...@dudu.org> wrote in message news:1a5qr7h7qsm81epeq...@4ax.com...
> >>> On Wed, 23 May 2012 09:35:07 -0700, Randal Scripter <kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
> >>>>On 5/23/2012 9:17 AM, de...@dudu.org wrote:
> >>>>> On Wed, 23 May 2012 09:08:43 -0700, Randal Scripter <kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
> >>>>>> On 5/23/2012 9:06 AM, de...@dudu.org wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Wed, 23 May 2012 08:58:52 -0700, Randal Scripter <kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On 5/23/2012 8:54 AM, de...@dudu.org wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, 23 May 2012 08:40:15 -0700, Randal Scripter <kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, 23 May 2012 08:40:15 -0700, Randal Scripter <kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> On 5/23/2012 8:36 AM, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 23 May 2012 07:59:05 -0700, "Oglethorpe"<anti...@go.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> It makes Mr. Zimmerman the obvious agressor. You simply cannot argue out of that fact.
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 23 May 2012 07:59:05 -0700, "Oglethorpe"<anti...@go.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> It is not established as a fact - period. Following someone and observing his location is not an act of aggression.
> >>>>>>>>> If the person feels threatened by the pursuit than hell yes it's an act of aggression.
> >>>>>>>> No, it is not an act of aggression. Once again, you are trying to redefine words in order to fit a political agenda.
> >>>>>>> Like you and your kind trying to say he wasn't pursuing only following, therefore it is ok?
> >>>>>> There is a meaningful difference between following and pursuing...
> >>>>> No, definitions were provided with the word "follow" intentionally cut out. That's lying.
> >>>>The definitions of these other loaded and inapplicable words and terms
> >>>>you're using all incorporate some additional meaning beyond following.
> >>> Because I tried to explain to you there was no significant difference between follow and pursue in this case and
> >>Yes, there is a significant difference (at least you finally admit there is a difference)...it has to do with intent.
> >>pursue includes an intent to close with, capture, confront or otherwise meet up with.
> >>Follow does not include that intent.
> >>Since intents are very much an important factor of this case, your attempt
> >>to imply intents not shown to exist is dishonest at best and an out right
> >>lie at worst.
> >
> >You're obsessed. Too funny. Maybe you need to go get your adult
> >diapers changed. The stink is getting too much.
Inability to respond noted.
> All the more reason to remove the rac <flush>
Impotent response noted.
Neighborhood Thug Watch
May 29, 2012, 9:37:21 PM5/29/12
to
In article <hl6tr712aqmfn9ruu...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> Zimmerman should have
emptied his clip into Traycon.
But that would have been murder not self defense.
One shot, one kill.
Enjoy that dirt nap, Traycon.
* US * wrote:
>
> Zimmerman should have
emptied his clip into Traycon.
But that would have been murder not self defense.
One shot, one kill.
Enjoy that dirt nap, Traycon.
Paging Al Sharpton
May 29, 2012, 9:59:11 PM5/29/12
to
In article <ii6tr7lu157okt57f...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 08:44:55 -0700, "lax headlump" <maxhe...@localnet.com> wrote:
>
> >... You're an asshole.
>
> No doubt you'd say
Everybody says that about you.
Get used to it.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 08:44:55 -0700, "lax headlump" <maxhe...@localnet.com> wrote:
>
> >... You're an asshole.
>
> No doubt you'd say
Everybody says that about you.
Get used to it.
Paging Al Sharpton
May 29, 2012, 10:09:28 PM5/29/12
to
In article <9k6tr7t7sbbn94v25...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 14:01:58 -0500, RD Sandman <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> >HE's obsessed??
>
> Zimmerman
wasn't.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 14:01:58 -0500, RD Sandman <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> >HE's obsessed??
>
> Zimmerman
wasn't.
Thugs 'R' Us
May 30, 2012, 3:41:26 AM5/30/12
to
In article <oo2vr7p8amkuml8ae...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 15:07:43 -0500, RD Sandman <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> >... implies intent ...
>
> "They <flush>
knew Traycon was a useless black slug?
Is that what you were trying to say?
Don't be shy, spit it out.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 15:07:43 -0500, RD Sandman <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> >... implies intent ...
>
> "They <flush>
knew Traycon was a useless black slug?
Is that what you were trying to say?
Don't be shy, spit it out.
Thugs 'R' Us
May 30, 2012, 3:52:04 AM5/30/12
to
In article <sq2vr7taq0dli53ut...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 18:52:43 -0400, "Lout" <me4...@verizon.net> wrote:
>
> >... keep wishing to put a spin in there...
>
> My racist druggie idol
got his black ass killed.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 18:52:43 -0400, "Lout" <me4...@verizon.net> wrote:
>
> >... keep wishing to put a spin in there...
>
> My racist druggie idol
got his black ass killed.
Thugs 'R' Us
May 30, 2012, 3:57:35 AM5/30/12
to
In article <in2vr7lghph7uu0b4...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 14:00:35 -0600, de...@dudu.org wrote:
>
> >Someone going on and on about the difference between pursue and follow
> >as if Zimmerman was only following but not pursuing that somehow makes
> >it ok what he did? That's not obsession? No logical argument. Just
> >obsessing over that it was not pursuit, but following. Too ridiculous
> >for words.
Well DooDoo when you finally figure it out you just trot right
on back in here and tell us.
Your felching buddy, * US * will be eternally grateful for the
help.
> Indeed.
>
> Subject line corrected.
Didn't do you much good though did it?
Lets dig Traycon up and lynch him next to a roaring bonfire
under the old oak tree.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 14:00:35 -0600, de...@dudu.org wrote:
>
> >Someone going on and on about the difference between pursue and follow
> >as if Zimmerman was only following but not pursuing that somehow makes
> >it ok what he did? That's not obsession? No logical argument. Just
> >obsessing over that it was not pursuit, but following. Too ridiculous
> >for words.
Well DooDoo when you finally figure it out you just trot right
on back in here and tell us.
Your felching buddy, * US * will be eternally grateful for the
help.
> Indeed.
>
> Subject line corrected.
Didn't do you much good though did it?
Lets dig Traycon up and lynch him next to a roaring bonfire
under the old oak tree.
Thugs 'R' Us
May 30, 2012, 4:19:04 AM5/30/12
to
In article <543vr7pt7m7bkfbsb...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 18:48:30 -0400, "Lout" <me4...@verizon.net> wrote:
>
> >...kicked the shit out of me.
>
> I think I'll run away and masturbate while looking at pictures of George Bush on the Internet.
>
> I miss violent, drug-addled, racist idol Traycon.
Zimmerman didn't miss. He shot that little bastard one time and
he went down like a sack of dog shit.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 18:48:30 -0400, "Lout" <me4...@verizon.net> wrote:
>
> >...kicked the shit out of me.
>
> I think I'll run away and masturbate while looking at pictures of George Bush on the Internet.
>
> I miss violent, drug-addled, racist idol Traycon.
Zimmerman didn't miss. He shot that little bastard one time and
he went down like a sack of dog shit.
Thugs 'R' Us
May 30, 2012, 4:29:39 AM5/30/12
to
In article <t63vr75g5nl4l3eu9...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> Zimmerman should have <flush>
emptied a clip into Traycon but that would have been murder.
One shot, one kill.
That's self defense.
* US * wrote:
>
> Zimmerman should have <flush>
emptied a clip into Traycon but that would have been murder.
One shot, one kill.
That's self defense.
Gator Bait
Jun 1, 2012, 3:48:47 AM6/1/12
to
In article <6alvr7p75sdeuqtgl...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 10:02:11 -0500, RD Sandman <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> >...Per the girlfriend, Martin asked Zimmerman, "Why are
> >you following me for?" ...
>
> Zimmerman shouldn't have been <flush>
annoyed by Traycon's demented and brain dead racist supporters.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 10:02:11 -0500, RD Sandman <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> >...Per the girlfriend, Martin asked Zimmerman, "Why are
> >you following me for?" ...
>
> Zimmerman shouldn't have been <flush>
annoyed by Traycon's demented and brain dead racist supporters.
Gator Bait
Jun 1, 2012, 4:09:57 AM6/1/12
to
In article <hclvr7960f048q8v9...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> Zimmerman was told not <flush>
Police dispatchers can call the moon green cheese and it doesn't
mean shit.
* US * wrote:
>
> Zimmerman was told not <flush>
Police dispatchers can call the moon green cheese and it doesn't
mean shit.
Singing' wid a sword in ma han'
Jun 1, 2012, 6:27:04 PM6/1/12
to
In article <4130s7h1t3v9omed5...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> Zimmerman shouldn't have been
assaulted by a black thug trying to silence a witness.
* US * wrote:
>
> Zimmerman shouldn't have been
assaulted by a black thug trying to silence a witness.
0 new messages