You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to fityk...@googlegroups.com
Is there a way to define a new function that uses integrals? I searched for it all over and found no mention of an integration command.
Thanks
Marcin Wojdyr
unread,
Feb 7, 2013, 12:51:01 PM2/7/13
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to fityk...@googlegroups.com
On 7 February 2013 17:25, Pierre-Louis de Assis <plo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is there a way to define a new function that uses integrals? I searched for
> it all over and found no mention of an integration command.
It depends. What function do you have in mind?
Marcin
Pierre-Louis de Assis
unread,
Feb 8, 2013, 4:49:41 AM2/8/13
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to fityk...@googlegroups.com
I would like to fit a curve that corresponds to the integral of a lorentzian with a central frequency that oscilates as cos(Theta*t), over one period.
Pierre-Louis de Assis
unread,
Feb 8, 2013, 4:52:34 AM2/8/13
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to fityk...@googlegroups.com
Actually it's more accurate to say that omega_0=omega_00+Amplitude*cos(frequency*T).