The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
From: Dong Wang 王东 <dongw.perso...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 05:38:08 +0800
Local: Wed, May 2 2012 5:38 pm
Subject: Re: Thread blocking vs Future async
Thanks James.
~Dong
在 May 3, 2012，4:30 AM，James Waldrop <j...@twitter.com> 写道：
> Given the way you've described it, yes, your db would have 100 connections.
> Sent from my iPhone
> On May 2, 2012, at 12:06 PM, Dong Wang <dongw.perso...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I have a twitter util.Future based application that needs to read data from DB. I'd like to see 100 concurrent reads from the database using Future, I don't think I need to create a FuturePool with 100 threads but I do need to make sure the db client has at least 100 connections, do I? Thanks.
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||