Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon.
Switch to the new Google Groups.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Academy Awards
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  Messages 1 - 25 of 36 - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)   Newer >
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
anne  
View profile  
 More options Jan 24, 3:39 am
From: anne <waj...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 08:39:39 +0000
Local: Tues, Jan 24 2012 3:39 am
Subject: Academy Awards
Are we goinmg to have an Oscar competition this year?  I'd like to see if I can retain my wooden spoon  :-D
Anne

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Thorkell A. Ottarsson  
View profile  
 More options Jan 24, 3:45 am
From: "Thorkell A. Ottarsson" <thork...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:45:40 +0100
Local: Tues, Jan 24 2012 3:45 am
Subject: Re: Academy Awards
Yes, most most definitely Anne. It is a tradition dating back to 2009.
By the way, here are previous winners ( would like to point out that
Stephen & I won last year and we intend to defend our title!):

The winners from 2009 are:

1) Linda
2) Steve
3) Thorkell

The winners from 2010 are:

1) Jake
2) Linda
3) Srikanth & Bobby

The winners from 2011 are:

1) Stephen & Thorkell
2) Linda
3) Wayne


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Zelia Trueb  
View profile  
 More options Jan 24, 3:51 am
From: Zelia Trueb <zxtr...@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 03:51:19 -0500
Local: Tues, Jan 24 2012 3:51 am
Subject: Re: Academy Awards
Wow, Linda can hold herself pretty good...

Zelia

Sent from my iPad

On Jan 24, 2012, at 3:45 AM, "Thorkell A. Ottarsson" <thork...@gmail.com> wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Thorkell A. Ottarsson  
View profile  
 More options Jan 24, 3:59 am
From: "Thorkell A. Ottarsson" <thork...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:59:23 +0100
Local: Tues, Jan 24 2012 3:59 am
Subject: Re: Academy Awards
She cheats every time. Does not count! ;)


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Linda Key  
View profile  
 More options Jan 24, 10:07 am
From: Linda Key <linda...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 10:07:41 -0500
Local: Tues, Jan 24 2012 10:07 am
Subject: Re: Academy Awards

Haha! Thanks Zelia! I've been quite lucky. Is Stephen same as Steve? I
think it may be but I'm not sure. If so, he's quite a competition.

-Linda

On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 3:59 AM, Thorkell A. Ottarsson
<thork...@gmail.com>wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Bobby Beksinski  
View profile  
 More options Feb 3, 7:49 pm
From: Bobby Beksinski <BBeksin...@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 16:49:52 -0800 (PST)
Local: Fri, Feb 3 2012 7:49 pm
Subject: Re: Academy Awards
Hey can we post the rules to The Oscar Game again for those who have
never played and those like myself who have forgotten. lol, I figure
its getting pretty close now and since the nominations are in, we
might as well begin submitting our predictions.

On Jan 24, 10:07 am, Linda Key <linda...@gmail.com> wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Linda Key  
View profile  
 More options Feb 3, 10:13 pm
From: Linda Key <linda...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 22:13:12 -0500
Local: Fri, Feb 3 2012 10:13 pm
Subject: Re: Academy Awards

Well, we did it a little differently last year than the years before. Last
year, we put all the movies in the order from "Most likely to win" to
"Least likely to win". You get points based on how correct you are. For
example, if the winner was the first on your list, you get most points (4
or 9, depends on category), if it is the second on your list, you get one
point less, so on and so forth. If your "least likely to win" happen to be
the winner, you would end up with 0 points. We also filled out who we think
deserves to win, just for fun.

The years before, we chose a "WILL WIN" and "WILL NOT WIN" for each
category. We get 1 point for guessing correctly, and lose 1 point for
guessing completely wrong (when WILL NOT WIN actually wins).

I do like the simplicity of the old system, but I also like the fairness of
the new system. It's up to all of you which system we should do this year.
However, if we are using the new system, I have one suggestion - instead of
listing the movies from MOST LIKELY TO WIN to LEAST LIKELY TO WIN, let's
list it the other way around, from LEAST LIKELY TO WIN to MOST LIKELY TO
WIN, and instead of giving 0 points for being completely wrong, let's do 1
point, the rest stays the same. (So the most you can earn would be 5 or 10
for each category.) The reason for this is, when you list them in order,
the placement of the winning movie on your order would correspond to the
number of points you get. For example, for the Best Actress category, I
could hypothetically have my list like this:

From LEAST LIKELY TO WIN to MOST LIKELY TO WIN:
1. Viola Davis
2. Glenn Close
3. Rooney Mara
4. Michelle Williams
5. Meryl Streep

See, if Meryl Streep wins, I get 5 points, because it's 5th on my list.
This would make tallying up the score a lot easier and less room for
mistakes.

I hope I made a little bit of sense. lol.

-Linda

On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Bobby Beksinski <BBeksin...@hotmail.com>wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Linda Key  
View profile  
 More options Feb 4, 12:06 am
From: Linda Key <linda...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2012 00:06:26 -0500
Local: Sat, Feb 4 2012 12:06 am
Subject: Re: Academy Awards

I just realized the BEST PICTURE category "only" has 9 movies this year.
Thus the point values I quoted was not accurate. Sorry for the confusion!

-Linda


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Thorkell A. Ottarsson  
View profile  
 More options Feb 4, 12:40 am
From: "Thorkell A. Ottarsson" <thork...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2012 06:40:57 +0100
Local: Sat, Feb 4 2012 12:40 am
Subject: Re: Academy Awards
Sounds great Linda. Good work!

THorkell


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Bobby Beksinski  
View profile  
 More options Feb 4, 8:33 pm
From: Bobby Beksinski <BBeksin...@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2012 17:33:03 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat, Feb 4 2012 8:33 pm
Subject: Re: Academy Awards
makes sense with the new way and how you explained it.

OK, Well I'm ready to start it off to get the ball rolling. my
predictions are (drumroll......)

BEST PICTURE

1. Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close (Least Likely to Win)
2. Warhorse
3. The Help
4. Midnight In Paris
5. Moneyball
6. The Tree of Life (Deserves to Win)
7. Hugo
8. The Descendants
9. The Artist (Most Likely to Win)

BEST ACTOR

1. Demiįn Bichir - A Better Life (Least Likely to Win)
2. Gary Oldman - Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy
3. Brad Pitt - Moneyball
4. Jean Dujardin - The Artist (Deserves To Win)
5. George Clooney - The Descendants (Most Likely to Win)

BEST ACTRESS

1. Rooney Mara - The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo (Least Likely to Win)
2. Glenn Close - Albert Nobbs
3. Michelle Williams - My Week With Marilyn (Deserves to Win)
4. Meryl Streep - The Iron Lady
5. Viola Davis - The Help (Most Likely to Win)

BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR

1. Jonah Hill - Moneyball (Least Likely to Win)
2. Max Von Sydow - Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close
3. Nick Nolte - Warrior
4. Kenneth Branagh - My Week With Marilyn
5. Christopher Plummer - Beginners (Most Likely To Win)
(Deserves to win is a non-nominee of Albert Brooks in Drive)

BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS

1. Janet McTeer - Albert Nobbs (Least Likely to Win)
2. Melissa McCarthy - Bridesmaids
3. Jessica Chastain - The Help (Deserves to Win for multiple movies)
4. Berenice Bejo - The Artist
5. Octavia Spencer - The Help (Most Likely to Win)

BEST DIRECTOR

1. Woody Allen - Midnight in Paris (Least Likely to Win)
2. Terrence Malick - The Tree of Life (Deserves To Win)
3. Alexander Payne - The Descendants
4. Martin Scorcese - Hugo
5. Michel Hazanavicius - The Artist (Most Likely to Win)

BEST ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY

1. Bridesmaids (Least Likely to Win)
2. Margin Call
3. A Separation
4. Midnight in Paris (Deserves to Win)
5. The Artist (Most Likely to Win)

BEST ADAPTED SCREENPLAY

1. Hugo (Least Likely to Win)
2. The Ides Of March
3. Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy
4. Moneyball
5. The Descendants (Most Likely to Win)
(I dont have a deserves to win in this category as I felt all of the
scripts adapted from previous material this year has not been of best
quality. Not even one of my favorite films this year Drive based off
of a novel deserves this award for its script. Drive succeeded mainly
on the direction of Refn and other elements but the script was not one
of them.)

BEST CINEMATOGRAPHY

1.The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo (Least Likely to Win)
2. Hugo
3. The Artist
4. War Horse
5. The Tree Of life (Most Likely to Win) (Deserves To Win)

BEST ART DIRECTION

1. Harry Potter (Least Likely To Win)
2. Midnight in Paris
3. Warhorse
4. Hugo
5. The Artist (Most Likely To Win) (Deserves To Win)

BEST COSTUME DIRECTION

1. Anonymous (Least Likely to Win)
2. Jane Eyre
3. W.E.
4. Hugo
5. The Artist (Most Likely to Win) (Deserves to Win)

BEST SOUND MIXING

1. Transformers (Least Likely to Win)
2. Moneyball
3. Warhorse
4. Hugo
5. The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo (Most Likely To Win) (Deserves To
Win)

BEST FILM EDITING

1. Hugo (Least Likely to Win)
2. Moneyball
3. The Descendants
4. The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo
5. The Artist (Most Likely to Win) (Deserves To Win)

BEST SOUND EDITING

1. Transformers (Least Likely To Win)
2. Warhorse
3. Drive (Deserves To Win)
4. Hugo
5. The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo (Most Likely To Win)

BEST VISUAL EFFECTS

1. Transformers (Least Likely to Win)
2. Harry Potter
3. Real Steel
4. Rise Of The Planet of The Apes
5. Hugo (Most Likely To Win)
(Deserves to Win is The Tree of Life and it was a travesty it was not
even nominated. The creation of Earth sequence is one of the most
beautiful and artistic pieces I have ever seen done with special
effects next to Antichrist.)

BEST MAKEUP

1. Albert Nobbs (Least Likely to Win)
2. The Iron Lady
3. Harry Potter (Most Likely to Win)
(I actually think this is a category that Hugo deserves to win for the
flashback scenes that make Ben Kingsley look so young)

BEST SONG

1. Rio (Least Likely To Win)
2. The Muppets (Most Likely To Win)
(Deserves to win? How about Trent Reznor, Atticus Ross and Karen O's
cover of Led Zeppelin's "Immigrant Song" in The Girl With The Dragon
Tattoo)

BEST SCORE

1.  The Adventures of Tin Tin (Least Likely To Win)
2. Warhorse
3. Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy
4. Hugo
5. The Artist (Most Likely To Win)
(Deserves to win is non nominee DRIVE which is hands down the best
music that fitted with its film)

BEST SHORT FILM ANIMATED

1. Dimanche
2. A Morning Stroll
3. La Luna
4. The Flying Books Of Mr. Morris Lessmore
5. Wild Life
(Pure Guesses)

BEST SHORT FILM LIVE ACTION

1. Raju
2. Pentecost
3. Time Freak
4. Tube Atlantic
(Again pure guesses)

BEST SHORT FILM DOCUMENTARY

1. Saving Face
2. The Barber of Birmingham
3. Incident in New Baghdad
4. The Tsunami and The Cherry Blossom

BEST DOCUMENTARY

1. Undefeated (Least Likely To Win)
2. Hell and Back Again
3. If a Tree falls
4. Pina
5. Paradise Lost 3 (Most Likely To Win)
(Have not seen any documentaries this year besides Buck which was not
deserving)

BEST FOREIGN LANGUAGE FILM

1. Monsieur Lazhar (Least Likely To Win)
2. Footnote
3. Bullhead
4. In Darkness
5. A Separation (Most Likely To Win)

BEST ANIMATED FILM

1. Puss In Boots (Least Likely to Win)
2. Kung fu Panda 2
3. Chico and Rita
4. A Cat in Paris
5. Rango (Most Likely To Win)

Well thats it...

On Feb 4, 12:40 am, "Thorkell A. Ottarsson" <thork...@gmail.com>
wrote:

...

read more »


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Bobby Beksinski  
View profile  
 More options Feb 12, 10:12 pm
From: Bobby Beksinski <BBeksin...@hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 19:12:58 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Feb 12 2012 10:12 pm
Subject: Re: Academy Awards
Im bumping this back up to the top of the thread to find out if Im the
only one playing. so am I? :)

On Feb 4, 8:33 pm, Bobby Beksinski <BBeksin...@hotmail.com> wrote:

...

read more »


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Linda Key  
View profile  
 More options Feb 12, 10:27 pm
From: Linda Key <linda...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 22:27:28 -0500
Local: Sun, Feb 12 2012 10:27 pm
Subject: Re: Academy Awards

No, Bobby. I won't let you win that easily! LOL. I'm busy watching Oscar
movies and will hopefully finish most of the movies by the time the show
starts so I can get my votes in! So far I've only seen THE ARTIST, THE
HELP, TREE OF LIFE, and IRON LADY. I'm half way through EXTREME LOUD AND
INCREDIBLY CLOSE. So I've got a long way to go. =)

On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 10:12 PM, Bobby Beksinski <BBeksin...@hotmail.com>wrote:

...

read more »


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Thorkell A. Ottarsson  
View profile  
 More options Feb 13, 1:32 am
From: "Thorkell A. Ottarsson" <thork...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:32:29 +0100
Local: Mon, Feb 13 2012 1:32 am
Subject: Re: Academy Awards
I will post my list once Linda has posted hers. For some strange
reason it's going to be identical! ;)

Thorkell

...

read more »


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Linda Key  
View profile  
 More options Feb 13, 11:05 am
From: Linda Key <linda...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 11:05:22 -0500
Local: Mon, Feb 13 2012 11:05 am
Subject: Re: Academy Awards

LOL@ Thorkell! i'll make sure to post it last second then. =)

On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Thorkell A. Ottarsson
<thork...@gmail.com>wrote:

...

read more »


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
anne  
View profile  
 More options Feb 13, 2:42 pm
From: anne <waj...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:42:10 +0000
Local: Mon, Feb 13 2012 2:42 pm
Subject: Re: Academy Awards
Just wondering if anyone has agreed to be the judge this year, and which awards are we including?  Apologies if I've missed discussion of this.
Anne

On 13/02/2012 16:05, Linda Key wrote:
LOL@ Thorkell! i'll make sure to post it last second then. =)

On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Thorkell A. Ottarsson <thorkell@gmail.com> wrote:
I will post my list once Linda has posted hers. For some strange
reason it's going to be identical! ;)

Thorkell

On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 4:27 AM, Linda Key <lindaw81@gmail.com> wrote:
> No, Bobby. I won't let you win that easily! LOL. I'm busy watching Oscar
> movies and will hopefully finish most of the movies by the time the show
> starts so I can get my votes in! So far I've only seen THE ARTIST, THE HELP,
> TREE OF LIFE, and IRON LADY. I'm half way through EXTREME LOUD AND
> INCREDIBLY CLOSE. So I've got a long way to go. =)
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 10:12 PM, Bobby Beksinski <BBeksinski@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Im bumping this back up to the top of the thread to find out if Im the
>> only one playing. so am I? :)
>>
>> On Feb 4, 8:33 pm, Bobby Beksinski <BBeksin...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> > makes sense with the new way and how you explained it.
>> >
>> > OK, Well I'm ready to start it off to get the ball rolling. my
>> > predictions are (drumroll......)
>> >
>> > BEST PICTURE
>> >
>> > 1. Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close (Least Likely to Win)
>> > 2. Warhorse
>> > 3. The Help
>> > 4. Midnight In Paris
>> > 5. Moneyball
>> > 6. The Tree of Life (Deserves to Win)
>> > 7. Hugo
>> > 8. The Descendants
>> > 9. The Artist (Most Likely to Win)
>> >
>> > BEST ACTOR
>> >
>> > 1. Demián Bichir - A Better Life (Least Likely to Win)
>> > 2. Gary Oldman - Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy
>> > 3. Brad Pitt - Moneyball
>> > 4. Jean Dujardin - The Artist (Deserves To Win)
>> > 5. George Clooney - The Descendants (Most Likely to Win)
>> >
>> > BEST ACTRESS
>> >
>> > 1. Rooney Mara - The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo (Least Likely to Win)
>> > 2. Glenn Close - Albert Nobbs
>> > 3. Michelle Williams - My Week With Marilyn (Deserves to Win)
>> > 4. Meryl Streep - The Iron Lady
>> > 5. Viola Davis - The Help (Most Likely to Win)
>> >
>> > BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR
>> >
>> > 1. Jonah Hill - Moneyball (Least Likely to Win)
>> > 2. Max Von Sydow - Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close
>> > 3. Nick Nolte - Warrior
>> > 4. Kenneth Branagh - My Week With Marilyn
>> > 5. Christopher Plummer - Beginners (Most Likely To Win)
>> > (Deserves to win is a non-nominee of Albert Brooks in Drive)
>> >
>> > BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS
>> >
>> > 1. Janet McTeer - Albert Nobbs (Least Likely to Win)
>> > 2. Melissa McCarthy - Bridesmaids
>> > 3. Jessica Chastain - The Help (Deserves to Win for multiple movies)
>> > 4. Berenice Bejo - The Artist
>> > 5. Octavia Spencer - The Help (Most Likely to Win)
>> >
>> > BEST DIRECTOR
>> >
>> > 1. Woody Allen - Midnight in Paris (Least Likely to Win)
>> > 2. Terrence Malick - The Tree of Life (Deserves To Win)
>> > 3. Alexander Payne - The Descendants
>> > 4. Martin Scorcese - Hugo
>> > 5. Michel Hazanavicius - The Artist (Most Likely to Win)
>> >
>> > BEST ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY
>> >
>> > 1. Bridesmaids (Least Likely to Win)
>> > 2. Margin Call
>> > 3. A Separation
>> > 4. Midnight in Paris (Deserves to Win)
>> > 5. The Artist (Most Likely to Win)
>> >
>> > BEST ADAPTED SCREENPLAY
>> >
>> > 1. Hugo (Least Likely to Win)
>> > 2. The Ides Of March
>> > 3. Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy
>> > 4. Moneyball
>> > 5. The Descendants (Most Likely to Win)
>> > (I dont have a deserves to win in this category as I felt all of the
>> > scripts adapted from previous material this year has not been of best
>> > quality. Not even one of my favorite films this year Drive based off
>> > of a novel deserves this award for its script. Drive succeeded mainly
>> > on the direction of Refn and other elements but the script was not one
>> > of them.)
>> >
>> > BEST CINEMATOGRAPHY
>> >
>> > 1.The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo (Least Likely to Win)
>> > 2. Hugo
>> > 3. The Artist
>> > 4. War Horse
>> > 5. The Tree Of life (Most Likely to Win) (Deserves To Win)
>> >
>> > BEST ART DIRECTION
>> >
>> > 1. Harry Potter (Least Likely To Win)
>> > 2. Midnight in Paris
>> > 3. Warhorse
>> > 4. Hugo
>> > 5. The Artist (Most Likely To Win) (Deserves To Win)
>> >
>> > BEST COSTUME DIRECTION
>> >
>> > 1. Anonymous (Least Likely to Win)
>> > 2. Jane Eyre
>> > 3. W.E.
>> > 4. Hugo
>> > 5. The Artist (Most Likely to Win) (Deserves to Win)
>> >
>> > BEST SOUND MIXING
>> >
>> > 1. Transformers (Least Likely to Win)
>> > 2. Moneyball
>> > 3. Warhorse
>> > 4. Hugo
>> > 5. The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo (Most Likely To Win) (Deserves To
>> > Win)
>> >
>> > BEST FILM EDITING
>> >
>> > 1. Hugo (Least Likely to Win)
>> > 2. Moneyball
>> > 3. The Descendants
>> > 4. The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo
...

read more »


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Thorkell A. Ottarsson  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options Feb 13, 3:49 pm
From: "Thorkell A. Ottarsson" <thork...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:49:06 +0100
Local: Mon, Feb 13 2012 3:49 pm
Subject: Re: Academy Awards
No one has offered to be a judge so the position is open, if you would
like it Anne.

Last year the winner got an extra host month. We could do the same if
everyone agrees. If two or three end up winning then I think they
should all get the month together. Each could nominate one or more
directors/themes.

Thorkell

...

read more »


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Linda Key  
View profile  
 More options Feb 13, 9:18 pm
From: Linda Key <linda...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:18:07 -0500
Local: Mon, Feb 13 2012 9:18 pm
Subject: Re: Academy Awards

I just finished THE DESCENDANTS and EXTREMELY LOUD AND INCREDIBLY CLOSE. I
have to say, this is a sad sad year for the Oscars, IMHO. Not just the
movies are quite average, the movie themes are all so depressing! Anyone
else agrees?

P.S. I don't mind doing the tally if no one else wants to. :)

Linda

On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Thorkell A. Ottarsson
<thork...@gmail.com>wrote:

...

read more »


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Thorkell A. Ottarsson  
View profile  
 More options Feb 14, 2:29 am
From: "Thorkell A. Ottarsson" <thork...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:29:04 +0100
Local: Tues, Feb 14 2012 2:29 am
Subject: Re: Academy Awards
I don't mind sad subjects but yes the films are not very good. You are
welcome to it Linda.

...

read more »


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Mindy Arbo  
View profile  
 More options Feb 14, 4:28 am
From: "Mindy Arbo" <mindya...@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 04:28:44 -0500
Local: Tues, Feb 14 2012 4:28 am
Subject: Re: Academy Awards

Yes, what a bad year. I can't remember this long a stretch w/o being drawn to the theatre.
Of all the films we saw earlier this year, I thought Tree of Life and especially Take Shelter- were the oscar-worthy works.
Has anyone seen The Artist? The previews look so slapstick that they put me off,
but it has rcvd star reviews across the boards. what did you think of it?
thnx,
mindy

From: Thorkell A. Ottarsson
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 2:29 AM
To: film-club@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Academy Awards

I don't mind sad subjects but yes the films are not very good. You are
welcome to it Linda.

...

read more »


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Thorkell A. Ottarsson  
View profile  
 More options Feb 14, 4:30 am
From: "Thorkell A. Ottarsson" <thork...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:30:46 +0100
Local: Tues, Feb 14 2012 4:30 am
Subject: Re: Academy Awards
The Artist is a very cute and sweat film. A charmer.

Thorkell

...

read more »


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Josh Waterman  
View profile  
 More options Feb 14, 10:04 am
From: Josh Waterman <joshizz...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:04:46 -0500
Local: Tues, Feb 14 2012 10:04 am
Subject: Re: Academy Awards

Are we doing shorts? It's usually just a guess for me, since they're often
pretty inaccessible.

On Tuesday, February 14, 2012, Thorkell A. Ottarsson <thork...@gmail.com>
wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Thorkell A. Ottarsson  
View profile  
 More options Feb 14, 10:12 am
From: "Thorkell A. Ottarsson" <thork...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:12:10 +0100
Local: Tues, Feb 14 2012 10:12 am
Subject: Re: Academy Awards
Yes everything!


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Linda Key  
View profile  
 More options Feb 14, 11:54 am
From: Linda Key <linda...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:54:19 -0500
Local: Tues, Feb 14 2012 11:54 am
Subject: Re: Academy Awards

Sometimes you can find the shorts on youtube, Josh.

THE ARTIST is amazing! I hope it wins best picture.

Linda

On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Thorkell A. Ottarsson
<thork...@gmail.com>wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
anne  
View profile  
 More options Feb 14, 2:40 pm
From: anne <waj...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:40:41 +0000
Local: Tues, Feb 14 2012 2:40 pm
Subject: Re: Academy Awards
I have to diagree with a previous comment, I thought 2011 was a pretty good year for film. 
These, in no particular order, are films from 2011 I think were good.  The Artist, La piel que habito, Tropa de Elite 2 - O Inimigo Agora É Outro, The Guard, The Iron Lady, The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo, Elle s'appelait Sarah, My Week with Marilyn, We Need to Talk About Kevin, Anonymous, Storm, Midnight in Paris, Jodaeiye Nader az Simin (A Separation), Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy, Killing Bono, The Inbetweeners Movie, Attack the Block and Source Code.  I haven't included any 2010 films that first saw light of day outside film festivals in 2011, just films that are dated 2011 on IMDb.  And I haven't seen Hugo yet....
Anne


On 14/02/2012 15:12, Thorkell A. Ottarsson wrote:
Yes everything!

On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Josh Waterman <joshizzle3@gmail.com> wrote:
Are we doing shorts? It's usually just a guess for me, since they're often
pretty inaccessible.


On Tuesday, February 14, 2012, Thorkell A. Ottarsson <thorkell@gmail.com>
wrote:
The Artist is a very cute and sweat film. A charmer.

Thorkell

On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Mindy Arbo <mindyarbo@comcast.net>
wrote:
Yes, what a bad year. I can't remember this long a stretch w/o being
drawn
to the theatre.
Of all the films we saw earlier this year, I thought Tree of Life and
especially Take Shelter- were the oscar-worthy works.
Has anyone seen The Artist? The previews look so slapstick that they put
me
off,
but it has rcvd star reviews across the boards. what did you think of it?
thnx,
mindy

From: Thorkell A. Ottarsson
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 2:29 AM
To: film-club@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Academy Awards

I don't mind sad subjects but yes the films are not very good. You are
welcome to it Linda.

On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 3:18 AM, Linda Key <lindaw81@gmail.com> wrote:
I just finished THE DESCENDANTS and EXTREMELY LOUD AND INCREDIBLY CLOSE.
I
have to say, this is a sad sad year for the Oscars, IMHO. Not just the
movies are quite average, the movie themes are all so depressing! Anyone
else agrees?

P.S. I don't mind doing the tally if no one else wants to. :)

Linda


On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Thorkell A. Ottarsson
<thorkell@gmail.com>
wrote:
No one has offered to be a judge so the position is open, if you would
like it Anne.

Last year the winner got an extra host month. We could do the same if
everyone agrees. If two or three end up winning then I think they
should all get the month together. Each could nominate one or more
directors/themes.

Thorkell

On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 8:42 PM, anne <wajret@gmail.com> wrote:
Just wondering if anyone has agreed to be the judge this year, and
which
awards are we including?  Apologies if I've missed discussion of
this.
Anne


On 13/02/2012 16:05, Linda Key wrote:

LOL@ Thorkell! i'll make sure to post it last second then. =)

On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Thorkell A. Ottarsson
<thorkell@gmail.com>
wrote:
I will post my list once Linda has posted hers. For some strange
reason it's going to be identical! ;)

Thorkell

On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 4:27 AM, Linda Key <lindaw81@gmail.com>
wrote:
No, Bobby. I won't let you win that easily! LOL. I'm busy watching
Oscar
movies and will hopefully finish most of the movies by the time
the
show
starts so I can get my votes in! So far I've only seen THE ARTIST,
THE
HELP,
TREE OF LIFE, and IRON LADY. I'm half way through EXTREME LOUD AND
INCREDIBLY CLOSE. So I've got a long way to go. =)


On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 10:12 PM, Bobby Beksinski
<BBeksinski@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Im bumping this back up to the top of the thread to find out if
Im
the
only one playing. so am I? :)

On Feb 4, 8:33 pm, Bobby Beksinski <

  


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Linda Key  
View profile  
 More options Feb 14, 4:43 pm
From: Linda Key <linda...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:43:45 -0500
Local: Tues, Feb 14 2012 4:43 pm
Subject: Re: Academy Awards

Yes Anne, overall it's not too bad, but a lot of the movies you mentioned
are not nominated for Oscars. Also, I didn't enjoy some of the ones you did
mention, but I know my taste is limited. I haven't heard of some of the
ones you mentioned - so thanks for mentioning them! Maybe I'll find some
more I like. :)

-Linda


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Messages 1 - 25 of 36   Newer >
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »