1. Capture Digibeta content via SDI using a Blackmagic Decklink card,
the Blackmagic Media Express software, on Linux. I am capturing
uncompressed v210 files in an AVI container at 16:9 FHA.
2. Transcode the uncompressed AVI file to IMX50 MXF files using FFmbc.
The Blackmagic Media Express software only supports PAL capture at
720x576 (even though the Blackmagic SDI supports VITC capture, this
has not been included in Media Express 2.3.1). Therefore, I can see
that FFmbc is padding the top of the file by 32 lines to created valid
720x608 PAL IMX50 files.
However, the resulting IMX50 MXF file is being rejected by the
facility I am delivering to. This is because the file has a PAR 1:1
and a DAR 45:38. These need to match, and should ideally be 16:9 or
4:3, according to the feedback I am receiving.
Any ideas what's going on here? Happy to upload a small test of both
captured uncompressed and transcoded IMX50.
> 1. Capture Digibeta content via SDI using a Blackmagic Decklink card, > the Blackmagic Media Express software, on Linux. I am capturing > uncompressed v210 files in an AVI container at 16:9 FHA.
> 2. Transcode the uncompressed AVI file to IMX50 MXF files using FFmbc.
> The Blackmagic Media Express software only supports PAL capture at > 720x576 (even though the Blackmagic SDI supports VITC capture, this > has not been included in Media Express 2.3.1). Therefore, I can see > that FFmbc is padding the top of the file by 32 lines to created valid > 720x608 PAL IMX50 files.
> However, the resulting IMX50 MXF file is being rejected by the > facility I am delivering to. This is because the file has a PAR 1:1 > and a DAR 45:38. These need to match, and should ideally be 16:9 or > 4:3, according to the feedback I am receiving.
What do not match ? PAR and DAR almost never match basically.
> Any ideas what's going on here? Happy to upload a small test of both > captured uncompressed and transcoded IMX50.
I don't know.
FFmbc version 0.6-rc7 Copyright (c) 2008-2011 Baptiste Coudurier and the FFmpeg developers Input #0, mxf, from 'UndercoverDebtCollectorTest.mxf': Metadata: timecode: 00:00:00:00 Duration: 00:01:00.04, start: 0.000000, bitrate: 62567 kb/s Stream #0.0(und): Video: mpeg2video, yuv422p, 720x608i tff [PAR 608:405 DAR 16:9], 50000 kb/s, 25.00 fps
The mpeg-2 stream is correctly marked as 16:9 according to that, and MXF seems to contain the same PAR/DAR.
I don't know why they are rejecting it. I need more information. Can you upload the file somewhere ?
> The mpeg-2 stream is correctly marked as 16:9 according to that,
> and MXF seems to contain the same PAR/DAR.
I think that's their point though, in the above file the PAR and DAR
do not match. PAR 608:405 and DAR 16:9.
I'll see what happens with this new file and whether it is an absolute
that PAR and DAR must match. If so, I will upload a test file for you
to have a look.