fluctuation of my subscribers in numbers from day to day. It is a
little confusing. I'm new to blogging and so I'm trying to get an
determine this. More insight on how I'd be able to do this with
> I wanted to start a discussion about the daily fluctuating
> subscribers. The standard line from Feedburner is that they can only
> count a subscription when someone opens their feed reader, so that the
> reason that your subscriber numbers fluctuate from day to day is
> because some people will open up their feed readers on one day and not
> another.
> However, after looking at the "Feed Readers" stats for all of the
> feeds that I manage, this does not seem to be the case. The number of
> subscribers for Google Feedfetcher and Bloglines will always stay the
> same (or rise with new subscriptions), whereas the fluctuating numbers
> come mostly from Mozilla, "Java-based reader" and "Other readers".
> Therefore, the problem does not seem with subscribers not opening
> their readers on given days, but rather Feedburner's inability to
> completely track subscribers.
> A little background: I manage a couple of dozen feeds through
> Feedburner, the smallest of which averages about 18 subscribers and
> the largest just over 1,000. In all of these, the subscriber numbers
> fluctuate pretty wildly from day to day, but the Google Feedfetcher
> and Bloglines subscribers never change except when new subscribers
> come in, at which point they keep that new, higher number. But they
> don't fluctuate at all. In that ~18 subs feed that I mentioned, it's
> fluctuated between 15 and 22 in recent weeks, but there's *always* ten
> subscribers using Google Feedfetcher and there's *always* one
> subscriber using Bloglines, even on the weekends. Meanwhile, the rest
> of the subs fluctuate wildly.
> I really like the Feedburner service and I don't plan on not using it,
> but I'm getting concerned about how accurate the numbers are.
> Clearly, the "it depends on if subscribers open their feed readers"
> reasoning for fluctuating subscribers doesn't hold up, as it seems to
> depend much more on which kind of feed reader they're using rather
> than whether they open it or not.
> It would be great to hear from an employee of Feedburner on this
> issue: why are statistics for some feed readers accurate and some
> not? And if this is the case, couldn't Feedburner split the users
> into "known" (ie accurate) and "unknown" (possibly not accurate)? For
> non Feedburner employees: has anyone else found the same thing?