<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/fds-smv</id>
  <title type="text">FDS and Smokeview Discussions Google Group</title>
  <subtitle type="text">
  The Google Discussion Group for Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS) and Smokeview. FDS is a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model of fire-driven fluid flow. Smokeview is a visualization program used to display FDS and CFAST simulations.
  </subtitle>
  <link href="/group/fds-smv/feed/atom_v1_0_msgs.xml" rel="self" title="FDS and Smokeview Discussions feed"/>
  <updated>2010-01-07T18:09:15Z</updated>
  <generator uri="http://groups.google.com" version="1.99">Google Groups</generator>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Glenn Forney</name>
  <email>gfor...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-01-07T18:09:15Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/fds-smv/browse_thread/thread/bb0d86dd89c3efca/f0f4decdf26a554b?show_docid=f0f4decdf26a554b</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/fds-smv/browse_thread/thread/bb0d86dd89c3efca/f0f4decdf26a554b?show_docid=f0f4decdf26a554b"/>
  <title type="text">Re: install help required</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  start an issue on the issue tracker. Make sure you tell us what type &lt;br&gt; of linux install you are using (particularly whether it is 32 or 64 &lt;br&gt; bit) Also attach your pplume5.smv file . Note that if you are using a &lt;br&gt; 64 bit computer/OS both the 32 and 64 versions of FDS will run. &lt;br&gt; However, only a 64 bit version of Smokeview will run on a 64 bit
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Fabian Braennstroem</name>
  <email>f.braennstr...@gmx.de</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-01-07T18:03:12Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/fds-smv/browse_thread/thread/c54f9c921d05d631/262b9db9ab01d517?show_docid=262b9db9ab01d517</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/fds-smv/browse_thread/thread/c54f9c921d05d631/262b9db9ab01d517?show_docid=262b9db9ab01d517"/>
  <title type="text">Re: inquire</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Hi, &lt;br&gt; even for RANS models, this would be not suitable and using a symmetry in &lt;br&gt; LES is not suitable... &lt;br&gt; Fabian
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Fabian Braennstroem</name>
  <email>f.braennstr...@gmx.de</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-01-07T18:03:01Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/fds-smv/browse_thread/thread/c54f9c921d05d631/9fa56e892ccdad57?show_docid=9fa56e892ccdad57</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/fds-smv/browse_thread/thread/c54f9c921d05d631/9fa56e892ccdad57?show_docid=9fa56e892ccdad57"/>
  <title type="text">Re: inquire</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Hi, &lt;br&gt; even for RANS models, this would be not suitable and using a symmetry in &lt;br&gt; LES is not suitable... &lt;br&gt; Fabian
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>wyldckat</name>
  <email>wyldc...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-01-07T16:23:46Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/fds-smv/browse_thread/thread/a97451ed309a17cf/c2165682252ced24?show_docid=c2165682252ced24</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/fds-smv/browse_thread/thread/a97451ed309a17cf/c2165682252ced24?show_docid=c2165682252ced24"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Fds+blender+gbXML?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Hi Fabian, &lt;br&gt; We use snappyHexMesh frequently in our project that gbXML2STL comes &lt;br&gt; from. The first iteration of snappyHexMesh does it&#39;s first approach as &lt;br&gt; a cartesian mesh, based on the enveloping base mesh. A bit of &amp;quot;target &lt;br&gt; practice&amp;quot; for the base mesh might actually provide a very good &lt;br&gt; approach to making an adjusted mesh to the room. The openings are
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Kevin</name>
  <email>mcgra...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-01-07T16:11:43Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/fds-smv/browse_thread/thread/c2fee056b942cbce/edee65b92a3847af?show_docid=edee65b92a3847af</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/fds-smv/browse_thread/thread/c2fee056b942cbce/edee65b92a3847af?show_docid=edee65b92a3847af"/>
  <title type="text">Re: fds accuracy/convergence/stability</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  The algorithms are different. Suppose you have an incompressible flow, &lt;br&gt; del dot u = 0. The momentum equation in FDS is written &lt;br&gt; rho du/dt + F + grad p = 0 &lt;br&gt; Since rho is constant (in this example, not in general), you can take &lt;br&gt; the divergence of the equation &lt;br&gt; del^2 p = -div dot F &lt;br&gt; FDS solves this equation using a direct Poisson solver, so that when
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Kevin</name>
  <email>mcgra...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-01-07T15:51:44Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/fds-smv/browse_thread/thread/6bece3cb69f3813d/0b8d48ef6ba2bc5d?show_docid=0b8d48ef6ba2bc5d</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/fds-smv/browse_thread/thread/6bece3cb69f3813d/0b8d48ef6ba2bc5d?show_docid=0b8d48ef6ba2bc5d"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Problem using for Window 64 bit</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Whenever you have trouble with the 64 bit version of FDS, try the 32 &lt;br&gt; bit version. If that fails, submit the case to the Issue Tracker.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Kevin</name>
  <email>mcgra...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-01-07T15:47:21Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/fds-smv/browse_thread/thread/c08bff67749d1ca8/1eb20429dcd69bb5?show_docid=1eb20429dcd69bb5</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/fds-smv/browse_thread/thread/c08bff67749d1ca8/1eb20429dcd69bb5?show_docid=1eb20429dcd69bb5"/>
  <title type="text">Re: inquire</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  You cannot do that. Just add the ISOF line and you will get output for &lt;br&gt; all meshes.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Kevin</name>
  <email>mcgra...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-01-07T15:45:19Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/fds-smv/browse_thread/thread/e25085da4d3026a2/52a29e0757f977f1?show_docid=52a29e0757f977f1</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/fds-smv/browse_thread/thread/e25085da4d3026a2/52a29e0757f977f1?show_docid=52a29e0757f977f1"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Leakage location</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  The idea of the leakage model is to approximate the leak from a &lt;br&gt; compartment that is not necessarily concentrated in one place. I &lt;br&gt; usually apply the leak area to the entire wall, or door, or whatever. &lt;br&gt; It was not designed to distinguish between the floor and ceiling. It &lt;br&gt; might be possible to include local pressure or stratification effects,
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Julien</name>
  <email>julien.hassan...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-01-07T15:09:04Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/fds-smv/browse_thread/thread/c2fee056b942cbce/8bbea6e353c76cbe?show_docid=8bbea6e353c76cbe</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/fds-smv/browse_thread/thread/c2fee056b942cbce/8bbea6e353c76cbe?show_docid=8bbea6e353c76cbe"/>
  <title type="text">Re: fds accuracy/convergence/stability</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  I made a mistake in my previous message. &lt;br&gt; In the second line the word &amp;quot;converged&amp;quot; as to be replaced by &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;correct&amp;quot;. &lt;br&gt; Sorry, &lt;br&gt; Julien &lt;br&gt; Julien a écrit :
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Julien</name>
  <email>julien.hassan...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-01-07T15:01:15Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/fds-smv/browse_thread/thread/c2fee056b942cbce/83c13e33f67b6a73?show_docid=83c13e33f67b6a73</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/fds-smv/browse_thread/thread/c2fee056b942cbce/83c13e33f67b6a73?show_docid=83c13e33f67b6a73"/>
  <title type="text">Re: fds accuracy/convergence/stability</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Christopher, &lt;br&gt; I totally agree with you. If the residuals reach the trigger values, &lt;br&gt; that does not mean that the solution is &amp;quot;converged&amp;quot;. However, in my &lt;br&gt; opinion, monitoring these values (without setting any trigger level) &lt;br&gt; is important and give a first clue of the &amp;quot;goodness&amp;quot; of the solution. &lt;br&gt; In a nutshell, my original question was: As there is no way to monitor
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Fabian Braennstroem</name>
  <email>f.braennstr...@gmx.de</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-01-07T13:36:53Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/fds-smv/browse_thread/thread/a97451ed309a17cf/1396adf40169f314?show_docid=1396adf40169f314</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/fds-smv/browse_thread/thread/a97451ed309a17cf/1396adf40169f314?show_docid=1396adf40169f314"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Fds+blender+gbXML?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Hi Bruno, &lt;br&gt; as you are already using OpenFOAM... do you have experience with &lt;br&gt; snappyHexMesh and what do you think about it&#39;s ability to create &lt;br&gt; cartesian meshes based on STL geometries? With some additional &lt;br&gt; programing this might be quite powerful for FDS &#39;OBST&#39; approach (though &lt;br&gt; I am not sure, if FDS is able to handle hanging nodes with its FFT solver)?
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>rmcdermo</name>
  <email>randy.mcderm...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-01-07T13:23:49Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/fds-smv/browse_thread/thread/50d97267ec0a9895/e785f2db6605d2e1?show_docid=e785f2db6605d2e1</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/fds-smv/browse_thread/thread/50d97267ec0a9895/e785f2db6605d2e1?show_docid=e785f2db6605d2e1"/>
  <title type="text">Re: How to simulate a fire of highland</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Ann, &lt;br&gt; Search the User&#39;s Guide for P_INF and Y_O2_INFTY. &lt;br&gt; Cheers, &lt;br&gt; R
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>cwood</name>
  <email>christopher.w...@firelinkllc.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-01-07T12:40:18Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/fds-smv/browse_thread/thread/d4ec241aaa6bb48d/a954192fa345a7dd?show_docid=a954192fa345a7dd</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/fds-smv/browse_thread/thread/d4ec241aaa6bb48d/a954192fa345a7dd?show_docid=a954192fa345a7dd"/>
  <title type="text">Re: More on RESTART &#39;issues&#39;</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  I would use the time to calculate the 100 steps, when FDS normally &lt;br&gt; outputs a message about status, as a guide from the .out file. I have &lt;br&gt; not previously done timings with reading in the restart file, but &lt;br&gt; would look at the number of cells, meshes and particles. I would then &lt;br&gt; have to make an estimate about setup time, but I do not have a
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>wyldckat</name>
  <email>wyldc...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-01-07T12:02:03Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/fds-smv/browse_thread/thread/6bece3cb69f3813d/ea4e933a301346b3?show_docid=ea4e933a301346b3</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/fds-smv/browse_thread/thread/6bece3cb69f3813d/ea4e933a301346b3?show_docid=ea4e933a301346b3"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Problem using for Window 64 bit</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Greetings Avalaki, &lt;br&gt; The folder &amp;quot;c:\Program Files&amp;quot; is a protected folder, so users without &lt;br&gt; administrative powers cannot write in files and folders inside that &lt;br&gt; folder. So you have 3 options: &lt;br&gt; - start FDS with administrative powers (right click on the icon or &lt;br&gt; executable and pick &amp;quot;Run as administrator...&amp;quot;), but this isn&#39;t very
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>wyldckat</name>
  <email>wyldc...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-01-07T11:50:01Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/fds-smv/browse_thread/thread/a97451ed309a17cf/18ab6be317b4b173?show_docid=18ab6be317b4b173</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/fds-smv/browse_thread/thread/a97451ed309a17cf/18ab6be317b4b173?show_docid=18ab6be317b4b173"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Fds+blender+gbXML?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Greetings to All, &lt;br&gt; Shariq, I&#39;m also a mechanical engineer and currently working for &lt;br&gt; blueCAPE in Portugal. We are working on a software development project &lt;br&gt; for simulating inside buildings modeled by applications such as Revit &lt;br&gt; and ArchiCAD. A byproduct as come during the project, a tool to export &lt;br&gt; from gbXML to STL (stereolithography). Sadly, FDS isn&#39;t currently able
  </summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
