Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon.
Switch to the new Google Groups.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion leading slowly in 2
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post will appear after it is approved by moderators
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
John Plunkett  
View profile  
 More options Jul 10 2009, 6:56 am
From: John Plunkett <jhplunke...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 06:56:50 -0400
Local: Fri, Jul 10 2009 6:56 am
Subject: Re: [fasola-discussions] leading slowly in 2

Forgot about this little tidbit from JS James 1909 (Union Harp)
rudiments...p 45.

If the song is in 4 shapes=common time is in 2=d (d) u (u)
If the song is in 7 shapes or round notes..okay to beat d-l-r-u !!!!

Also think it's interesting that he says triple time should be d-l-u  (how
Raymond Hamrick leads in triple time)

John Plunkett

On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 3:47 PM, John Garst <ga...@chem.uga.edu> wrote:

> Sorry, Will.  This was meant to go here. - John

> *****

> Moods/Modes of Common Time must have something in common or they
> woulnd't all be called "Common Time."

> If we ask how many notes of equal duration can fill a measure, the answer
> is

> 1 2 4 8 16 32 etc.

> for each of the modes of Common Time.

> If we ask where the accents fall, the answer is that the major accent
> falls at the beginning of the first note of a "2" measure, that a
> minor accent falls at the beginning of the second note of a "2"
> measure, and that these accents persist in the same places in "4",
> "8", "16", "32", and related compound measures (measures in which not
> all notes are of equal duration), except when altered by syncopation.

> Each of the above is true whether the time signature is 2/2, 4/4, or 2/4.

> These are the things that characterize time as "Common."

> 2/2, 4/4, and 2/4 represent increasing tempos.  In some of the older
> books there was at least one more mode of Common Time (yet another
> tempo).

> Any mode of Common Time can be beat in two (or in one, or in four, or
> in eight, etc.)

> It is debatable, I think, what the top numeral means.  Some take it
> to mean the number of beats in a measure, and that's OK with me.  A
> leader may or may not mark each of those beats.

> I prefer to think that the numerator gives instead the number of
> notes of the denominator type that it takes to fill a measure.  Thus,
> 2/4 means that two quarter notes will fill a measure, and 4/4 means
> that it takes four quarter notes.  This deals with notation, not
> beats or leading.

> Fundamentally, I see all the modes of Common Time as the same,
> differing only in tempo.

> John

> --
> john garst    ga...@chem.uga.edu

  DSCN0737.JPG
857K Download

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.