Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon.
Switch to the new Google Groups.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion leading slowly in 2
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post will appear after it is approved by moderators
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Richard Schmeidler  
View profile  
 More options Jul 13 2009, 12:12 am
From: Richard Schmeidler <richard_l_schmeid...@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 21:12:24 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Mon, Jul 13 2009 12:12 am
Subject: Re: [fasola-discussions] Re: leading slowly in 2

Thank you, Tom.

I have cruelly edited what you wrote to bring out two points.  

First, I do know what Mr. McGraw teaches, but that is not what was taught at Camp Fasola last month -- at least in one class I attended.  What was taught there (and buttressed, when I questioned it, by reference to the plain text of the 1991 rudiments) was that the beginning of the beat of one occurs at the bottom of the downstroke.  

Two other people had earlier reported to this list the emphasis on the 1991 rudiments at Camp Fasola last month, and I was chiming in to give a specific instance of that emphasis.

Second, is it possible to get a copy of your dissertation?

--- On Wed, 7/8/09, Thomas Malone <shapen...@gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Thomas Malone <shapen...@gmail.com>
> Subject: [fasola-discussions] Re: leading slowly in 2
> To: wadekot...@yahoo.com, ga...@chem.uga.edu, "Warren Steel" <mu...@olemiss.edu>, "Will Fitzgerald" <will.fitzger...@gmail.com>
> Cc: fasola-discussions@googlegroups.com
> Date: Wednesday, July 8, 2009, 12:40 PM
> WARNING : This is a long email.
> Please skip it if you are not interested!
>  Thanks! If you are interested please go
> slowly, I packed a lot of stuff in here.  Whoo-wee!!!!
>   

. . .

> I have worked closely with Hugh McGraw on this exact
> question, and he has demonstrated to me numerous times that
> in four four time, the muscial counts of one and two are on
> the downward stroke, and three and four are on the upward
> stroke. therefore "down-down, up-up" completes a
> measure of four four time.  (again see attached
> graphic)

> This is not to say that everyone does it this
> way --  : )

. . .

> P.S.S. Yes, I just finished a dissertation on exactly this
> question. So plese orgive the length and throughness of my
> reponse, as well as any typoes or inconsistencies with quotes or spacing, I have learned that I am better at content than formatting.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.