Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon.
Switch to the new Google Groups.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion leading slowly in 2
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post will appear after it is approved by moderators
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
John Garst  
View profile  
 More options Jul 9 2009, 3:47 pm
From: John Garst <ga...@chem.uga.edu>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 15:47:43 -0400
Local: Thurs, Jul 9 2009 3:47 pm
Subject: [fasola-discussions] Re: leading slowly in 2
Sorry, Will.  This was meant to go here. - John

*****

Moods/Modes of Common Time must have something in common or they
woulnd't all be called "Common Time."

If we ask how many notes of equal duration can fill a measure, the answer is

1 2 4 8 16 32 etc.

for each of the modes of Common Time.

If we ask where the accents fall, the answer is that the major accent
falls at the beginning of the first note of a "2" measure, that a
minor accent falls at the beginning of the second note of a "2"
measure, and that these accents persist in the same places in "4",
"8", "16", "32", and related compound measures (measures in which not
all notes are of equal duration), except when altered by syncopation.

Each of the above is true whether the time signature is 2/2, 4/4, or 2/4.

These are the things that characterize time as "Common."

2/2, 4/4, and 2/4 represent increasing tempos.  In some of the older
books there was at least one more mode of Common Time (yet another
tempo).

Any mode of Common Time can be beat in two (or in one, or in four, or
in eight, etc.)

It is debatable, I think, what the top numeral means.  Some take it
to mean the number of beats in a measure, and that's OK with me.  A
leader may or may not mark each of those beats.

I prefer to think that the numerator gives instead the number of
notes of the denominator type that it takes to fill a measure.  Thus,
2/4 means that two quarter notes will fill a measure, and 4/4 means
that it takes four quarter notes.  This deals with notation, not
beats or leading.

Fundamentally, I see all the modes of Common Time as the same,
differing only in tempo.

John

--
john garst    ga...@chem.uga.edu


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.