<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>Face Recognition Research Community Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/face-rec</link>
  <description>Face Recognition Research Community (scientific and technical discussions on face recognition research and technology).</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>Re: PCA for high huge data</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/face-rec/browse_thread/thread/972c6b9c6f2b6387/f1f83df57af99604?show_docid=f1f83df57af99604</link>
  <description>
  You have again not specified the number of samples you have. If would &lt;br&gt; have to arrange your data into a matrix, how large would that be. &lt;br&gt; 64x100000? If so, tah you simply compute the 64x64 covariance matrix &lt;br&gt; and combine it with the data to produce the principal components. &lt;br&gt; While I agree that SVD would be an alternative, as it owrk on non-
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/face-rec/browse_thread/thread/972c6b9c6f2b6387/f1f83df57af99604?show_docid=f1f83df57af99604</guid>
  <author>
  vitost...@gmail.com
  (hulijo)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 12:56:47 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: PCA for high huge data</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/face-rec/browse_thread/thread/972c6b9c6f2b6387/3de72add85bbc6a9?show_docid=3de72add85bbc6a9</link>
  <description>
  You may want to look at Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) for your &lt;br&gt; PCA implementation instead of the Covariance matrix method. SVD is &lt;br&gt; more stable and works well better for high dimensional data. if you &lt;br&gt; have Matlab use the svd() command &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Hachim
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/face-rec/browse_thread/thread/972c6b9c6f2b6387/3de72add85bbc6a9?show_docid=3de72add85bbc6a9</guid>
  <author>
  elkhiya...@gmail.com
  (elkhiyari)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:19:25 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: help Diagonal PCA</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/face-rec/browse_thread/thread/adcdee31bccebfcb/c9e21efb9ca1f21b?show_docid=c9e21efb9ca1f21b</link>
  <description>
  check the published version from sciencedirect? &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;-- &lt;br&gt; W.W. ZOU &lt;br&gt; HKBU, Ph.D Candidate
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/face-rec/browse_thread/thread/adcdee31bccebfcb/c9e21efb9ca1f21b?show_docid=c9e21efb9ca1f21b</guid>
  <author>
  zwil...@gmail.com
  (Zou Wilman)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 04:30:57 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>help Diagonal PCA</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/face-rec/browse_thread/thread/adcdee31bccebfcb/a9faefc33eb9b50b?show_docid=a9faefc33eb9b50b</link>
  <description>
  Did any one read this paper &amp;quot;Diagonal principal component analysis for face recognition&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://cs.nju.edu.cn/zhouzh/zhouzh.files/publication/pr06a.pdf&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;   &lt;br&gt; I do understand the paragraph between Eq.1 and Eq.2 &lt;br&gt;   &lt;br&gt; the size of G should be (mn X mn) or (M X M) not n X n because we have M training images each one is of size (m X n) and m&amp;gt;n
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/face-rec/browse_thread/thread/adcdee31bccebfcb/a9faefc33eb9b50b?show_docid=a9faefc33eb9b50b</guid>
  <author>
  humanfacew...@yahoo.com
  (Xue)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 04:17:03 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: PCA for high huge data</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/face-rec/browse_thread/thread/972c6b9c6f2b6387/04c082a52b418cc2?show_docid=04c082a52b418cc2</link>
  <description>
  Dear Tuan, &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;the kind of data analysis you want to do can be done using hierarchical &lt;br&gt; networks. Take a look at the mdp library: &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://mdp-toolkit.sourceforge.net/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;then take a look at: mdp.nodes.PCANode, and mdp.hinet.Layer and &lt;br&gt; mdp.hinet.Switchboard &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Regards, &lt;br&gt; Alberto
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/face-rec/browse_thread/thread/972c6b9c6f2b6387/04c082a52b418cc2?show_docid=04c082a52b418cc2</guid>
  <author>
  alberto.nicolas.escala...@gmail.com
  (Alberto Escalante)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:31:46 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: PCA for high huge data</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/face-rec/browse_thread/thread/972c6b9c6f2b6387/17a56047c08ec582?show_docid=17a56047c08ec582</link>
  <description>
  I think is idea  at the end will bring new random features which may be un related at all to human face as what orginal eigenfaces do &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;To: &amp;quot;Face Recognition Research Community&amp;quot; &amp;lt;face-rec@googlegroups.com&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Hi, &lt;br&gt; Thanks Hulijo and Kamal for your suggestions. &lt;br&gt; Let me describe my problem a little more in detail. As Kamal realized,
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/face-rec/browse_thread/thread/972c6b9c6f2b6387/17a56047c08ec582?show_docid=17a56047c08ec582</guid>
  <author>
  humanfacew...@yahoo.com
  (Xue)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 08:44:57 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: PCA for high huge data</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/face-rec/browse_thread/thread/972c6b9c6f2b6387/06cd55e4e3d4b2e3?show_docid=06cd55e4e3d4b2e3</link>
  <description>
  Hi, &lt;br&gt; Thanks Hulijo and Kamal for your suggestions. &lt;br&gt; Let me describe my problem a little more in detail. As Kamal realized, &lt;br&gt; it&#39;s a mapping problem. It&#39;s not that I want to PCA on the pixels. I &lt;br&gt; have done some stuff to extract the features of the images already. &lt;br&gt; 1. Now assume I have a set of 64 features, which is 0 or 1.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/face-rec/browse_thread/thread/972c6b9c6f2b6387/06cd55e4e3d4b2e3?show_docid=06cd55e4e3d4b2e3</guid>
  <author>
  snow.whit...@gmail.com
  (Dao Thanh Tuan)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 06:38:21 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: PCA for high huge data</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/face-rec/browse_thread/thread/972c6b9c6f2b6387/8fa03c7b10f056e4?show_docid=8fa03c7b10f056e4</link>
  <description>
  Hi all, &lt;br&gt; I am nor sure I understand your problem. What are you working on? The &lt;br&gt; dimensionality should never explode like that. If you have lets say &lt;br&gt; imillion face images of a few tousand people and the images are lets &lt;br&gt; say 100x100 pixels, then the covariance matrix needed for PCA would be &lt;br&gt; 10000x10000, which should be feasable to hold in RAM. On the other
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/face-rec/browse_thread/thread/972c6b9c6f2b6387/8fa03c7b10f056e4?show_docid=8fa03c7b10f056e4</guid>
  <author>
  vitost...@gmail.com
  (hulijo)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 09:39:46 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Any body help me in WPD program</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/face-rec/browse_thread/thread/b315cbca46ef1b6f/cc6031ca100510fa?show_docid=cc6031ca100510fa</link>
  <description>
  Dear Nilima Kachare, &lt;br&gt; U can try to find it in google. U will get some samples. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Regards, &lt;br&gt; Sarker Monojit Asish &lt;br&gt; Software Engineer
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/face-rec/browse_thread/thread/b315cbca46ef1b6f/cc6031ca100510fa?show_docid=cc6031ca100510fa</guid>
  <author>
  asish.s...@gmail.com
  (sarker asish)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 07:53:39 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Any body help me in WPD program</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/face-rec/browse_thread/thread/b315cbca46ef1b6f/a6e30f97d3c604e4?show_docid=a6e30f97d3c604e4</link>
  <description>
  Hello everybody, &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Does anybody have Wavelet packet decomposition program in matlab....?? If &lt;br&gt; yes pls reply me. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Regards, &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Nilima Kachare &lt;br&gt; MTech -CSE, &lt;br&gt; College of Engg, Pune
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/face-rec/browse_thread/thread/b315cbca46ef1b6f/a6e30f97d3c604e4?show_docid=a6e30f97d3c604e4</guid>
  <author>
  kacharenil...@gmail.com
  (nilima kachare)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 07:41:09 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: PCA for high huge data</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/face-rec/browse_thread/thread/972c6b9c6f2b6387/12e5946bbaa874b8?show_docid=12e5946bbaa874b8</link>
  <description>
  To: face-rec@googlegroups.com &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Hi &lt;br&gt;   &lt;br&gt; if it is highly correlated data then it should work. This method seems to be like data mapping method. You can study some dataware housing algo also because there they take care for huge data like what you are suggesting &lt;br&gt;   &lt;br&gt;   &lt;br&gt; kamal
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/face-rec/browse_thread/thread/972c6b9c6f2b6387/12e5946bbaa874b8?show_docid=12e5946bbaa874b8</guid>
  <author>
  shah.ka...@yahoo.com
  (kamal shah)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 07:37:42 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: PCA for high huge data</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/face-rec/browse_thread/thread/972c6b9c6f2b6387/a8887d76f22b2c36?show_docid=a8887d76f22b2c36</link>
  <description>
  Hi &lt;br&gt;   &lt;br&gt; if it is highly correlated data then it should work. This method seems to be like data mapping method. You can study some dataware housing algo also because there they take care for huge data like what you are suggesting &lt;br&gt;   &lt;br&gt;   &lt;br&gt; kamal &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;To: &amp;quot;Face Recognition Research Community&amp;quot; &amp;lt;face-rec@googlegroups.com&amp;gt;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/face-rec/browse_thread/thread/972c6b9c6f2b6387/a8887d76f22b2c36?show_docid=a8887d76f22b2c36</guid>
  <author>
  shah.ka...@yahoo.com
  (kamal shah)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 07:32:12 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: PCA for high huge data</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/face-rec/browse_thread/thread/972c6b9c6f2b6387/c0a8154aba1e4e0e?show_docid=c0a8154aba1e4e0e</link>
  <description>
  Hi all, &lt;br&gt; Thanks for so many helpful suggestions. &lt;br&gt; I&#39;ve been looking around and the nearest proposal seem to be able to &lt;br&gt; deal with thousands of dimensions. Typically the cost of constructing &lt;br&gt; the covariance matrix is so high, or the limit of memory when the &lt;br&gt; number of individuals in the dataset goes more than several
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/face-rec/browse_thread/thread/972c6b9c6f2b6387/c0a8154aba1e4e0e?show_docid=c0a8154aba1e4e0e</guid>
  <author>
  snow.whit...@gmail.com
  (Dao Thanh Tuan)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 06:01:28 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: 3D-reconstruction from Stereo Images</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/face-rec/browse_thread/thread/b5388df4580da5e3/3661bbc858e9f9f2?show_docid=3661bbc858e9f9f2</link>
  <description>
  Hi, &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;If you read the paper Stereo from uncalibrated cameras by Richard &lt;br&gt; Hartley et al or the book Multiple View Geometry. You´ll find your &lt;br&gt; answers. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;The most important problem to solve it is the uncertainity in the 3D &lt;br&gt; position of the points. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Ok, I hope you can accomplish your mission. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Regards,
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/face-rec/browse_thread/thread/b5388df4580da5e3/3661bbc858e9f9f2?show_docid=3661bbc858e9f9f2</guid>
  <author>
  aesalaz...@gmail.com
  (Augusto Enrique Salazar Jiménez)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 14:43:11 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: PCA for high huge data</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/face-rec/browse_thread/thread/972c6b9c6f2b6387/97825bc01618e9cc?show_docid=97825bc01618e9cc</link>
  <description>
  hi &lt;br&gt;   &lt;br&gt; How many diffrent subjects you have? &lt;br&gt;   &lt;br&gt; If you can reduce the poses per subject than database can be manageble or you can use transforms to reduce the data &lt;br&gt;   &lt;br&gt; Kamal Shah &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;To: &amp;quot;Face Recognition Research Community&amp;quot; &amp;lt;face-rec@googlegroups.com&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Awesome.  I&#39;ve been needing to know this, too.  It appears that SciPy
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/face-rec/browse_thread/thread/972c6b9c6f2b6387/97825bc01618e9cc?show_docid=97825bc01618e9cc</guid>
  <author>
  shah.ka...@yahoo.com
  (kamal shah)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:51:31 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
