Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Documentation maintainer?

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Pierre Ossman

unread,
Aug 9, 2005, 2:57:10 AM8/9/05
to LKML
Who should be cc:d for document additions? It's a brand new document,
not updates to an existing one. I sent it out without any cc at all
(Subject: [PATCH] ISA DMA API documentation) which got some attention,
but not from anyone with the possibility to commit it would seem.

Rgds
Pierre
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majo...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Jesper Juhl

unread,
Aug 9, 2005, 8:28:55 AM8/9/05
to Pierre Ossman, LKML
On 8/9/05, Pierre Ossman <drzeu...@drzeus.cx> wrote:
> Who should be cc:d for document additions? It's a brand new document,
> not updates to an existing one.

I don't think there's a central documentation maintainer as such.

I recently submitted a brand new document myself and added Andrew
Morton to CC since he's the overall 2.6 maintainer, and Andrew has
been kind enough to add my document to the -mm tree for starters.
Hopefully it'll then migrate onto mainline eventually.

> I sent it out without any cc at all
> (Subject: [PATCH] ISA DMA API documentation) which got some attention,
> but not from anyone with the possibility to commit it would seem.
>
> Rgds
> Pierre


--
Jesper Juhl <jespe...@gmail.com>
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html

0 new messages