Message from discussion
linux-libc-headers 2.6.10.0
Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!transit.nntp.hccnet.nl!transit1.nntp.hccnet.nl!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!uio.no!nntp.uio.no!ifi.uio.no!internet-mailinglist
Newsgroups: fa.linux.kernel
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+linux-kernel=40ifi.uio.no-s261188abvah...@vger.kernel.org>
From: Mariusz Mazur <mma...@kernel.pl>
To: lkml <linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] linux-libc-headers 2.6.10.0
Original-Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 16:13:27 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-2"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Original-Message-Id: <200501081613.27460.mmazur@kernel.pl>
Sender: linux-kernel-ow...@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
X-MailScanner-Information: This message has been scanned for viruses/spam. Contact postmas...@uio.no if you have questions about this scanning
X-UiO-MailScanner: No virus found
X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=0, required 12)
Organization: Internet mailing list
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 15:15:31 GMT
Message-ID: <fa.fihm8vu.jgmois@ifi.uio.no>
Lines: 38
Available at http://ep09.pld-linux.org/~mmazur/linux-libc-headers/
Changes:
- updated to 2.6.10
- switched to using svn and now ChangeLog is back :)
- some minor changes here and there (made some headers ansi C compatible)
Two weeks after 2.6.10, but you can blame Linus for releasing 2.6.10 just
before Christmas.
Like I've said two months ago - my scripts for testing new versions now do
separate asm-i386-ansi and asm-i386-noansi checks, so any ansi degradation in
linux or asm-i386 (like the one from 2.6.9) won't go unnoticed.
One more thing - llh is now officially one year old (first commits are from
December 2003). That's a long time for any hack to live. Especially a hack
this big and one that even has a couple of vendor specific variants. A couple
of discussions took place concerning this matter (in the last one Linus even
said, that he'll be accepting patches) and still I see no movement. I'd
really like to see glibc guys figuring out a way not to duplicate definitions
and structures from linux and starting to submit patches. That'd be a really
good (and much needed - glibc's and linux' headers conflict in lots of ugly
ways) first step.
Anybody?
Happy New Year.
--
In the year eighty five ten
God is gonna shake his mighty head
He'll either say,
"I'm pleased where man has been"
Or tear it down, and start again
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|
