<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>fa.linux.kernel Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/fa.linux.kernel</link>
  <description></description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Soft-Lockup/Race in networking in 2.6.31-rc1+195 ( possibly?caused by netem)</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/fa.linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/da20b9d77bee44f8/a57dbe8d215aa87b?show_docid=a57dbe8d215aa87b</link>
  <description>
  Confirmed working from me as well. &lt;br&gt; Thank you for your time, &lt;br&gt; Joao Correia
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/fa.linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/da20b9d77bee44f8/a57dbe8d215aa87b?show_docid=a57dbe8d215aa87b</guid>
  <author>
  joaomiguelcorr...@gmail.com
  (Joao Correia)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:20:17 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: mptsas, msi and the dl585 g2</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/fa.linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/4afac49443c4b6a1/976022bfe04856d5?show_docid=976022bfe04856d5</link>
  <description>
  On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 1:40 PM, James &lt;br&gt; sure. will send out one patch after get some sanity test here. &lt;br&gt; YH
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/fa.linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/4afac49443c4b6a1/976022bfe04856d5?show_docid=976022bfe04856d5</guid>
  <author>
  yhlu.ker...@gmail.com
  (Yinghai Lu)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:19:18 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [PATCH 29/44] includecheck fix: drivers/spi, amba-pl022.c</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/fa.linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/7fb22ef9cf00496a/36edb0a9f5d3ece9?show_docid=36edb0a9f5d3ece9</link>
  <description>
  2009/7/8 Jaswinder Singh Rajput &amp;lt;jaswin...@kernel.org&amp;gt;: &lt;br&gt; Not me I hope (damned I knew this would happen sooner or later). &lt;br&gt; return -ELINWAL &lt;br&gt; Having this name is very convenient, people review my drivers like &lt;br&gt; crazy. &lt;br&gt; Linus Walleij
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/fa.linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/7fb22ef9cf00496a/36edb0a9f5d3ece9?show_docid=36edb0a9f5d3ece9</guid>
  <author>
  linus.ml.wall...@gmail.com
  (Linus Walleij)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:17:57 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>RE: [RFC PATCH 0/4] (Take 2): transcendent memory (&quot;tmem&quot;) for Linux</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/fa.linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/15209fafeda96788/00c11df2a9d0dc15?show_docid=00c11df2a9d0dc15</link>
  <description>
  Although tmem and CMS have similar conceptual objectives, &lt;br&gt; let me try to describe what I see as a fundamental &lt;br&gt; difference in approach. &lt;br&gt; The primary objective of both is to utilize RAM more &lt;br&gt; efficiently. Both are ideally complemented with some &lt;br&gt; longer term &amp;quot;memory shaping&amp;quot; mechanism such as automatic &lt;br&gt; ballooning or hotplug.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/fa.linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/15209fafeda96788/00c11df2a9d0dc15?show_docid=00c11df2a9d0dc15</guid>
  <author>
  dan.magenhei...@oracle.com
  (Dan Magenheimer)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:11:33 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Clock incorrect on 2.6.31-rc2</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/fa.linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/badd226a102bf005/1bf56d005e173927?show_docid=1bf56d005e173927</link>
  <description>
  My system (desktop Ubuntu 9.0) runs fine with 2.6.30, but with 2.6.31-rc2 it does &lt;br&gt; not keep time correctly. Also ntptime reports an error. &lt;br&gt; $ ntptime &lt;br&gt; ntp_gettime() returns code 5 (ERROR) &lt;br&gt; time ce00daf1.8e997000 Thu, Jul 9 2009 14:09:05.557, (.557029), &lt;br&gt; maximum error 25016 us, estimated error 16 us
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/fa.linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/badd226a102bf005/1bf56d005e173927?show_docid=1bf56d005e173927</guid>
  <author>
  shemmin...@vyatta.com
  (Stephen Hemminger)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:10:35 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [PATCH] score: add regsets support for score</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/fa.linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/0e7fad2d311770a0/121833e1f4194909?show_docid=121833e1f4194909</link>
  <description>
  I would not recommend adding PTRACE_{PEEK,POKE}USR to an ABI that &lt;br&gt; doesn&#39;t have it already. It only exists on other arch&#39;s for past &lt;br&gt; compatibility; it&#39;s the poorest interface for this. &lt;br&gt; If you are starting from scratch, then you should define your arch&#39;s &lt;br&gt; user_regset layouts so that everything is nicely represented in one
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/fa.linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/0e7fad2d311770a0/121833e1f4194909?show_docid=121833e1f4194909</guid>
  <author>
  rol...@redhat.com
  (Roland McGrath)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:05:18 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: OOM killer in 2.6.31-rc2</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/fa.linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/1e1ea176bb8fad17/408b26a628dab31f?show_docid=408b26a628dab31f</link>
  <description>
  Yes. &lt;br&gt; I am short approximately 500 megs according to top: &lt;br&gt; Mem: 3634228k total, 3522984k used, 111244k free, 308096k buffers &lt;br&gt; Swap: 8385912k total, 568k used, 8385344k free, 2544716k cached &lt;br&gt; From dmesg: &lt;br&gt; [ 0.000000] TOM2: 0000000120000000 aka 4608M &amp;lt;what is this? &lt;br&gt; [...] &lt;br&gt; [ 0.000000] 2694MB HIGHMEM available.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/fa.linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/1e1ea176bb8fad17/408b26a628dab31f?show_docid=408b26a628dab31f</guid>
  <author>
  gene.hesk...@verizon.net
  (Gene Heskett)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:03:36 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [PATCH 3/5] Show kernel stack usage to /proc/meminfo and OOM log</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/fa.linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/bd9842a6ccceef88/93bce1e9961762ba?show_docid=93bce1e9961762ba</link>
  <description>
  Right.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/fa.linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/bd9842a6ccceef88/93bce1e9961762ba?show_docid=93bce1e9961762ba</guid>
  <author>
  c...@linux-foundation.org
  (Christoph Lameter)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:01:01 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [PATCH 4/5] add isolate pages vmstat</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/fa.linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/bd9842a6ccceef88/f1ff807b3c70bf66?show_docid=f1ff807b3c70bf66</link>
  <description>
  No there is really no alternative to it. &lt;br&gt; Just be aware that what you may increases the cache footprint of key &lt;br&gt; functions in the vm. Some regression tests would be useful (do a page &lt;br&gt; fault test etc).
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/fa.linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/bd9842a6ccceef88/f1ff807b3c70bf66?show_docid=f1ff807b3c70bf66</guid>
  <author>
  c...@linux-foundation.org
  (Christoph Lameter)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:00:29 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Null Pointer BUG in uhci_hcd</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/fa.linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/bbb06ea5d2df08c3/9d2df405bc8e3c53?show_docid=9d2df405bc8e3c53</link>
  <description>
  Hmmm... acpi=noirq stops the memory leak. (???) &lt;br&gt; That&#39;s the easy part - now to figure out why. ;) &lt;br&gt; Then we can go back to this thread; see if there was a real driver problem &lt;br&gt; or this thread was just demonstrating an artifact of the above &amp;lt;whatever&amp;gt;. &lt;br&gt; Mike
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/fa.linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/bbb06ea5d2df08c3/9d2df405bc8e3c53?show_docid=9d2df405bc8e3c53</guid>
  <author>
  l...@morethan.org
  (Michael S. Zick)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 20:59:20 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: CONFIG_VFAT_FS_DUALNAMES regressions</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/fa.linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/dda6d8e0d0e40bb6/ff99b68c6383bf13?show_docid=ff99b68c6383bf13</link>
  <description>
  No need for pettiness. Andrew&#39;s already intimated that he&#39;s still &lt;br&gt; working the patch, and he&#39;s a very clever lad and knows if it corrupts &lt;br&gt; it needs more work. &lt;br&gt; What I don&#39;t understand is how anybody could be satisfied with the &lt;br&gt; status quo. We cannot leave vfat unchanged, for that will perpetuate a &lt;br&gt; pool of victims to be sued, and Linux loses credibility every time that
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/fa.linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/dda6d8e0d0e40bb6/ff99b68c6383bf13?show_docid=ff99b68c6383bf13</guid>
  <author>
  dav...@davidnewall.com
  (David Newall)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 20:57:27 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>2.6.29.5: Oops when unplugging Moschip 7840/7820 USB serial device</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/fa.linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/458c2abbab40beec/3daadfee20d2b03a?show_docid=3daadfee20d2b03a</link>
  <description>
  I unplugged a Moschip 7840/7820 USB serial adapter, and it oopsed. I had been using it &lt;br&gt; with picoterm, but it was not open at the time I unplugged it. &lt;br&gt; Thanks, &lt;br&gt; J &lt;br&gt; BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000000000000b4 &lt;br&gt; IP: [&amp;lt;ffffffff81029eb5&amp;gt;] __ticket_spin_lock+0x9/0x1a &lt;br&gt; PGD 12e19c067 PUD 12e19d067 PMD 0
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/fa.linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/458c2abbab40beec/3daadfee20d2b03a?show_docid=3daadfee20d2b03a</guid>
  <author>
  jer...@goop.org
  (Jeremy Fitzhardinge)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 20:57:05 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>[PATCH] cfq-iosched: no need to keep track of busy_rt_queues</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/fa.linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/6f508a85cdc65286/636bcea24374ed1a?show_docid=636bcea24374ed1a</link>
  <description>
  Resending as had forgotten to put &amp;quot;[PATCH]&amp;quot; in subject line. &lt;br&gt; o Get rid of busy_rt_queues infrastructure. Looks like it is redundant. &lt;br&gt; o Once an RT queue gets request it will preempt any of the BE or IDLE queues &lt;br&gt; immediately. Otherwise this queue will be put on service tree and scheduler &lt;br&gt; will anyway select this queue before any of the BE or IDLE queue. Hence
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/fa.linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/6f508a85cdc65286/636bcea24374ed1a?show_docid=636bcea24374ed1a</guid>
  <author>
  vgo...@redhat.com
  (Vivek Goyal)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 20:51:43 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>cfq-iosched: no need to keep track of busy_rt_queues</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/fa.linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/6f508a85cdc65286/a5a301b3f718a62a?show_docid=a5a301b3f718a62a</link>
  <description>
  o Get rid of busy_rt_queues infrastructure. Looks like it is redundant. &lt;br&gt; o Once an RT queue gets request it will preempt any of the BE or IDLE queues &lt;br&gt; immediately. Otherwise this queue will be put on service tree and scheduler &lt;br&gt; will anyway select this queue before any of the BE or IDLE queue. Hence
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/fa.linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/6f508a85cdc65286/a5a301b3f718a62a?show_docid=a5a301b3f718a62a</guid>
  <author>
  vgo...@redhat.com
  (Vivek Goyal)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 20:49:35 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [PATCH 5/5] add shmem vmstat</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/fa.linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/56cf56737d98b82f/8ebc69e9819232ba?show_docid=8ebc69e9819232ba</link>
  <description>
  &amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; Recently we encountered OOM problems due to memory use of the GEM cache. &lt;br&gt; Generally a large amuont of Shmem/Tmpfs pages tend to create a memory &lt;br&gt; shortage problem. &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; We often use the following calculation to determine the amount of shmem &lt;br&gt; pages: &lt;br&gt; shmem = NR_ACTIVE_ANON + NR_INACTIVE_ANON - NR_ANON_PAGES
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/fa.linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/56cf56737d98b82f/8ebc69e9819232ba?show_docid=8ebc69e9819232ba</guid>
  <author>
  c...@linux-foundation.org
  (Christoph Lameter)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 20:46:54 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
