Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
GIT 0.99.9e
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  4 messages - Collapse all
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
Junio C Hamano  
View profile
 More options Nov 7 2005, 12:43 am
Newsgroups: fa.linux.kernel
From: Junio C Hamano <jun...@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 05:43:49 UTC
Local: Mon, Nov 7 2005 12:43 am
Subject: GIT 0.99.9e
GIT 0.99.9e maintenance release is found at the usual places:

RPM, tarballs, and deb:

        http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/

With git, fetch maint branch from

        git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git.git/

It contains everything from the master branch.  Since we seem to
be shelving the separate git binary directory idea indefinitely,
what we have here is pretty much what will be in 1.0, from the
source code POV.

 - http-push seems to still have a bug or two but that is to be
   expected for any new code, and I am reasonably sure it can be
   ironed out; preferably before 1.0 but it is not a
   showstopper.

 - I've done the initial round of package splitting for Debian
   side myself, but it probably needs proofreading and fixing by
   experienced Debian person.  Similar RPM package splitting
   that parallels the above is needed.  Although it is not an
   absolute requirement for my sources to have perfect binary
   packaging support (I am just an upstream for binary
   packagers), it is certainly desirable to have RPM specs and
   debian/ files in a presentable shape for 1.0.

 - I still need to go over the tutorial and core-ish
   documentation once for consistency checks.

Changes since 0.99.9d are:

    Johannes Schindelin:
      Allow GIT_DIR to be an absolute path
      http-fetch: do not use curl_message after releasing it

    Jon Loeliger:
      Refactor merge strategies into separate includable file.

    Junio C Hamano:
      test: t4102-apply-rename fails with strict umask (Peter Baumann).
      git-format-patch: silly typo fix.
      Documentation: pull/clone ref mapping clarification (Josef Weidendorfer).
      git-fetch: fail if specified refspec does not match remote.
      Simplify CFLAGS/DEFINES in Makefile
      Package split: Debian.
      Install asciidoc sources as well.
      Further Debian split fixes.
      Debian: test build.
      Merge in http-push first stage.
      Document expat dependency when using http-push.
      ls-files: --others should not say unmerged paths are unknown.
      git-status: do not mark unmerged paths as committable.
      Set up remotes/origin to track all remote branches.

    Nick Hengeveld:
      Add support for pushing to a remote repository using HTTP/DAV
      Verify remote packs, speed up pending request queue
      Support remote references with slashes in their names
      Improve lock handling
      Refresh the remote lock if it is about to expire

    Paul Collins:
      http-push.c: include with angle bracket, not dq.

    Randal L. Schwartz:
      Use fink/darwinport paths for OSX

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Johannes Schindelin  
View profile
 More options Nov 7 2005, 6:44 am
Newsgroups: fa.linux.kernel
From: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schinde...@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 11:44:11 UTC
Local: Mon, Nov 7 2005 6:44 am
Subject: Re: GIT 0.99.9e
Hi,

On Sun, 6 Nov 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>  - http-push seems to still have a bug or two but that is to be
>    expected for any new code, and I am reasonably sure it can be
>    ironed out; preferably before 1.0 but it is not a
>    showstopper.

I am reasonably sure that a run with valgrind will show the way to a
stable http-push. It is just a little memory corruption: the rest works
wonderfully.

Ciao,
Dscho

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Nick Hengeveld  
View profile
 More options Nov 7 2005, 10:49 am
Newsgroups: fa.linux.kernel
From: Nick Hengeveld <ni...@reactrix.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 15:49:32 UTC
Local: Mon, Nov 7 2005 10:49 am
Subject: Re: GIT 0.99.9e

On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 09:43:19PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>  - http-push seems to still have a bug or two but that is to be
>    expected for any new code, and I am reasonably sure it can be
>    ironed out; preferably before 1.0 but it is not a
>    showstopper.

It seems like a minor point, but is this the appropriate name or should
it be dav-push?  Not that there's anything else in the works AFAIK but
it's certainly possible that something else could run over HTTP later
on.

--
For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public
relations, for nature cannot be fooled.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
H. Peter Anvin  
View profile
 More options Nov 7 2005, 12:13 pm
Newsgroups: fa.linux.kernel
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <h...@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 17:13:27 UTC
Local: Mon, Nov 7 2005 12:13 pm
Subject: Re: GIT 0.99.9e

Nick Hengeveld wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 09:43:19PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:

>> - http-push seems to still have a bug or two but that is to be
>>   expected for any new code, and I am reasonably sure it can be
>>   ironed out; preferably before 1.0 but it is not a
>>   showstopper.

> It seems like a minor point, but is this the appropriate name or should
> it be dav-push?  Not that there's anything else in the works AFAIK but
> it's certainly possible that something else could run over HTTP later
> on.

Push over HTTP POST would at least be theoretically possible.

        -hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2008 Google