Signed-off-by: Barbaros Tokaoğlu <barbar...@gmail.com>
---
 include/linux/module.h |    5 +++++
 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/module.h b/include/linux/module.h
index fbcafe2..ba9a7d0 100644
--- a/include/linux/module.h
+++ b/include/linux/module.h
@@ -553,6 +553,11 @@ static inline void module_put(struct module *module)
 {
 }

+static inline int ref_module(struct module *a, struct module *b)
+{
+       return 0;
+}
+
 #define module_name(mod) "kernel"

 /* For kallsyms to ask for address resolution.  NULL means not found. */
--
1.7.5.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

        It's usually a good idea to paste the error message into the
commit message for compile fixes: it helps people googling the problem.

In this case, it's particularly important, because I can't find any
users of ref_module() outside module.c itself: it's only exported for
ksplice to use.

Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

You are right, this was not for something in the kernel. I needed
ref_module to add some sort of dynamic dependency between modules but
this caused compile error when CONFIG_MODULES is not set. Another
option was using #ifdef CONFIG_MODULES check but the way in the patch
seemed correct to me.

However, if ref_module is exported only for ksplice, then you can
ignore this patch.

Thanks,
Barbaros

On Aug 6, 2012, at 9:58 AM, Rusty Russell <ru...@rustcorp.com.au> wrote: