Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Dushistov <dush...@mail.ru>
Cc: Steven <steve...@yahoo.com>
---
diff --git a/fs/ufs/super.c b/fs/ufs/super.c
index 0072cb3..14605c0 100644
--- a/fs/ufs/super.c
+++ b/fs/ufs/super.c
@@ -131,6 +131,8 @@ static void ufs_print_super_stuff(struct super_block *sb,
printk(KERN_INFO" cs_nffree(Num of free frags): %llu\n",
(unsigned long long)
fs64_to_cpu(sb, usb3->fs_un1.fs_u2.cs_nffree));
+ printk(KERN_INFO" fs_maxsymlinklen: %u\n",
+ usb3->fs_un2.fs_44.fs_maxsymlinklen);
} else {
printk(" sblkno: %u\n", fs32_to_cpu(sb, usb1->fs_sblkno));
printk(" cblkno: %u\n", fs32_to_cpu(sb, usb1->fs_cblkno));
@@ -1060,8 +1062,8 @@ magic_found:
uspi->s_bpf = uspi->s_fsize << 3;
uspi->s_bpfshift = uspi->s_fshift + 3;
uspi->s_bpfmask = uspi->s_bpf - 1;
- if ((sbi->s_mount_opt & UFS_MOUNT_UFSTYPE) ==
- UFS_MOUNT_UFSTYPE_44BSD)
+ if ((sbi->s_mount_opt & UFS_MOUNT_UFSTYPE) == UFS_MOUNT_UFSTYPE_44BSD ||
+ (sbi->s_mount_opt & UFS_MOUNT_UFSTYPE) == UFS_MOUNT_UFSTYPE_UFS2)
uspi->s_maxsymlinklen =
fs32_to_cpu(sb, usb3->fs_un2.fs_44.fs_maxsymlinklen);
--
/Evgeniy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majo...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> If create symlink on UFS2 filesystem under Linux,
> it looks wrong under other OSes, because of max symlink length
> field was not initialized properly, and data blocks were not
> used to save short symlink names.
>
> Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Dushistov <dush...@mail.ru>
> Cc: Steven <steve...@yahoo.com>
>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/fs/ufs/super.c b/fs/ufs/super.c
> index 0072cb3..14605c0 100644
> --- a/fs/ufs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/ufs/super.c
> @@ -131,6 +131,8 @@ static void ufs_print_super_stuff(struct super_block *sb,
> printk(KERN_INFO" cs_nffree(Num of free frags): %llu\n",
> (unsigned long long)
> fs64_to_cpu(sb, usb3->fs_un1.fs_u2.cs_nffree));
> + printk(KERN_INFO" fs_maxsymlinklen: %u\n",
> + usb3->fs_un2.fs_44.fs_maxsymlinklen);
I assume this needs conversion via fs32_to_cpu() before we print it.
> } else {
> printk(" sblkno: %u\n", fs32_to_cpu(sb, usb1->fs_sblkno));
> printk(" cblkno: %u\n", fs32_to_cpu(sb, usb1->fs_cblkno));
> @@ -1060,8 +1062,8 @@ magic_found:
> uspi->s_bpf = uspi->s_fsize << 3;
> uspi->s_bpfshift = uspi->s_fshift + 3;
> uspi->s_bpfmask = uspi->s_bpf - 1;
> - if ((sbi->s_mount_opt & UFS_MOUNT_UFSTYPE) ==
> - UFS_MOUNT_UFSTYPE_44BSD)
> + if ((sbi->s_mount_opt & UFS_MOUNT_UFSTYPE) == UFS_MOUNT_UFSTYPE_44BSD ||
> + (sbi->s_mount_opt & UFS_MOUNT_UFSTYPE) == UFS_MOUNT_UFSTYPE_UFS2)
> uspi->s_maxsymlinklen =
> fs32_to_cpu(sb, usb3->fs_un2.fs_44.fs_maxsymlinklen);
>
--
sparse wouldn't have helped it in the current state. The thing is, it
doesn't understand printf-style formats. We probably ought to implement
that - would have a benefit of being able to get rid of gcc stupidity
in that area and actually define conversion specifiers of our own for
things like u64, dma_addr_t, etc. without having gcc scream at us...