Note: Section 2 is composed of the vocabulary from the poem: Robert
Haas, “The Problem of Describing Color,” The New Yorker, 25 April 2005,
77.
http://www.santababylonia.net/untitled4N-w.pdf - with Note
http://www.santababylonia.net/untitled4-w.pdf - without Note
I'm of two minds on whether to include the Note when submitting this
poem to editors for publication. One mind enjoys the sneakiness of not
including it. The other mind wishes to invoke the intertextuality and
constructionism of including the Note.
WHERE I'M COMING FROM:
Sondheim's recent "apoplexy" post to the Poetics list motivated me to
get back over here to wryting-l.
I've been on various lists (beat-l, poetics, bohemian-l, invent-l,
intertheory, wryting-l), some now defunct, off and on, mostly lurking,
since 1997, so I'm familiar with many on this list.
I live in New York City and my day job is Network Architect for a large
magazine publishing conglomerate. I've had poems appear in Peter
Ganick's POTEPOETZINESEVENTEEN (1999) and in ~Coffeehouse: Writings
from the Web~ eds. Levi Asher and Christian Crumlish (Manning, 1997).
Gregory Severance
Wonder if including the note would create intellectual property issues in
the minds of conservative editors? It's a moot and maybe silly point. I
love the parasitic quality of conversion - Alan
( URLs/DVDs/CDroms/books/etc. see http://www.asondheim.org/advert.txt )
> in the minds of conservative editors?
I imagine it would. If I were savvy, I wouldn't submit to conservative
editors. I have a series of these where the second of three sections is
composed of a converted "New Yorker poem". I think I'll do both: submit
some with a note and some without a note. - Gregory Severance
It would be interesting, some time or other, to submit the _same_ work
under two different names to the New Yorker, for example - to see if the
return are consistent, or if the 'plagiarism' (?) would be caught!
- Alan