Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
Message from discussion parameterized pattern
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
brogoff  
View profile
 More options Nov 8 2006, 8:48 pm
Newsgroups: fa.caml
From: brogoff <brog...@speakeasy.net>
Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2006 01:48:22 UTC
Local: Wed, Nov 8 2006 8:48 pm
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] parameterized pattern

On Thu, 9 Nov 2006, Lukasz Stafiniak wrote:
> You can do this kind of ad-hoc polymorphism with with G'Caml:

> http://web.yl.is.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~furuse/gcaml/

> BTW, I think that G'Caml deserves more attention on this list (see
> http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/1278). (I've even thought that it
> is still a patch to OCaml 2.0, but it seems to be up-to-date now.)

The GCaml docs say (and have said for at least a year) that it doesn't support
all of OCaml, neither objects nor polymorphic variants. I'd guess that
it doesn't support recursive modules either.

It's a pity, as I've often wished that OCaml supported the extensional
polymorphism that GCaml has, but I don't think that's going to happen.
It would probaby make more sense to create a separate language at this
point, since OCaml is complicated enough.

-- Brian

_______________________________________________
Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list
Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2008 Google