The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
Newsgroups: fa.caml
From: Richard Jones <r...@annexia.org>
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 07:05:38 UTC
Local: Wed, Apr 2 2008 3:05 am
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: ANNOUNCE: ocaml bitmatch (Erlang-style bitstrings for OCaml)
On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 12:17:22AM +0000, Sylvain Le Gall wrote: There's lots of room for optimization in the current code. It mainly > I have two questions: > * do you think you can get something efficient (part of the paper you > are linking, talked about performance) aims to be working. > * is there a way to retain part of the data structure... E.g TCP/UDP At the moment you cannot define and reuse patterns, but it's certainly > packet has the same IP part (the one you describe) + a TCP/UDP > header... something which could be added (as in micmatch). However it is easy to modify the examples so they match over TCP and Rich. -- _______________________________________________ You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||