Newsgroups: fa.caml
From: Benedikt Meurer <benedikt.meu...@googlemail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 18:43:03 UTC
Local: Fri, Nov 19 2010 1:43 pm
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Native toplevel? (was: OCamlJit 2.0)
On Nov 19, 2010, at 19:30 , Ashish Agarwal wrote: > On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Hezekiah M. Carty <hca...@atmos.umd.edu> wrote: This was actually the main motivation for OCamlJit, tho we did not specifically need a competitor to Matlab (we use tuareg mode most of the time, to prototype term rewriting/typing stuff, but also for some complex LaTeX generation tasks). After thinking about it for a few days now, I think a native toplevel would indeed solve the problem, in a better way than a byte-code JITter. I'll try to look into the remaining issues with the native toplevel, but I have some other stuff to finish first. > ocamlscript is certainly a wonderful tool, for prototyping and > Right. > Also, I should mention that a high-performance toplevel, combined with new libraries like OCaml-R, would essentially make OCaml a competitor to Matlab and R. This would really expand OCaml's scope to an important area. Benedikt You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||