Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
fa.caml
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
New camlp4
Options
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
   3 messages - Collapse all
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
Nathaniel Gray  
View profile
  More options Jun 23 2006, 12:05 am
Newsgroups: fa.caml
From: "Nathaniel Gray" <n8g...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 04:05:04 UTC
Local: Fri, Jun 23 2006 12:05 am
Subject: [Caml-list] New camlp4
Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
I'm about to start a new project using camlp4 and I'm wondering
whether to use the "beta" updated version of camlp4 [1] or the version
that comes with 3.09.  If the beta version is truly going to become
the  official version of camlp4 in the future then I'll go that way,
but I don't recall seeing any official word to that effect.

Can anybody clear this up or make a recommendation?

Thanks,
-Nathan

[1] http://gallium.inria.fr/~pouillar/camlp4-changes.html

--

>>>-- Nathaniel Gray -- Caltech Computer Science ------>
>>>-- Mojave Project -- http://mojave.cs.caltech.edu -->

_______________________________________________
Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list
Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Nicolas Pouillard  
View profile
  More options Jun 23 2006, 4:52 am
Newsgroups: fa.caml
From: "Nicolas Pouillard" <nicolas.pouill...@inria.fr>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 08:52:31 UTC
Local: Fri, Jun 23 2006 4:52 am
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] New camlp4
Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
On 6/23/06, Nathaniel Gray <n8g...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm about to start a new project using camlp4 and I'm wondering
> whether to use the "beta" updated version of camlp4 [1] or the version
> that comes with 3.09.  If the beta version is truly going to become
> the  official version of camlp4 in the future then I'll go that way,
> but I don't recall seeing any official word to that effect.

> Can anybody clear this up or make a recommendation?

The integration in the official CVS repository is imminent, just a few
days to wait :)

--
Nicolas Pouillard

_______________________________________________
Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list
Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Nathaniel Gray  
View profile
  More options Jun 26 2006, 6:24 pm
Newsgroups: fa.caml
From: "Nathaniel Gray" <n8g...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 22:24:44 UTC
Local: Mon, Jun 26 2006 6:24 pm
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] New camlp4
Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
On 6/23/06, Nicolas Pouillard <nicolas.pouill...@inria.fr> wrote:

> On 6/23/06, Nathaniel Gray <n8g...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I'm about to start a new project using camlp4 and I'm wondering
> > whether to use the "beta" updated version of camlp4 [1] or the version
> > that comes with 3.09.  If the beta version is truly going to become
> > the  official version of camlp4 in the future then I'll go that way,
> > but I don't recall seeing any official word to that effect.

> > Can anybody clear this up or make a recommendation?

> The integration in the official CVS repository is imminent, just a few
> days to wait :)

Great!  Thanks!

--

>>>-- Nathaniel Gray -- Caltech Computer Science ------>
>>>-- Mojave Project -- http://mojave.cs.caltech.edu -->

_______________________________________________
Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list
Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2008 Google