A crazy thoughts about structure of Electron.

[socr...@bezeqint.net]

A crazy thoughts about structure of Electron.
=.
Electron isn’t a point.
Electron has a geometrical form.
Electron’s geometrical form isn’t static, isn’t firm.
Electron’s geometrical form can be changed by his own inner spin.
Electron’s own inner spin can be described with three ( 3 ) formulas:
Plank: h=Et,
Einstein: h=kb,
Goudsmit-Uhlenbeck: h*=h/2pi.
The speed of photon is minimal : c=1.
The speed of electron is c>1
Quantum of light, photon and electron are one and the same
particle in different conditions.
=.
Question:
Where did electron come from?
Answer:
Electron came from the Kingdom of Coldness: T=0K.
=.
All the best.
Israel Socratus
===.

[Craig Weinberg]

On May 5, 12:17 am, "socra...@bezeqint.net" <socra...@bezeqint.net>
wrote:

> A crazy thoughts about structure of Electron.
> =.
> Electron isn’t a point.
> Electron has a geometrical form.

Maybe not. Maybe we infer geometry because of measurement using
geometric instruments.

> Electron’s geometrical form isn’t static, isn’t firm.

Which would be the case if that form wasn't literally an object.

> Electron’s geometrical form can be changed by his own inner spin.

When we stimulate matter in particular ways, it changes our
instrument's detection (vicarious imitation) of that stimulation.

> Electron’s own inner spin can be described with three ( 3 ) formulas:
> Plank: h=Et,
> Einstein:  h=kb,
> Goudsmit-Uhlenbeck: h*=h/2pi.
> The speed of photon is minimal : c=1.
> The speed of electron is c>1
> Quantum of light, photon and electron are one and the same
>  particle in different conditions.

Or different moods of atoms or even molecules.

> =.
> Question:
> Where did electron come from?
> Answer:
> Electron came from the Kingdom of Coldness: T=0K.
> =.

Why not from Kingdom of Difference? T= perception(0K↔∞K)

Craig

[socr...@bezeqint.net]

Electron’s fine structure constant.
=.
It is interesting to understand the Sommerfeld formula:
a= e^2 / h*c, where {a} is fine structure constant: 1/137
Feynman expressed (a ) quantity as
‘ by the god given damnation to all physicists ‘.
But the fine structure constant is not independent quantity,
it is only part of formula of an electron: e^2=h*ca .
The constant {a} is only one of three constants which
belong to the formula of electron: e^2=h*ca.
(a), (c), (h*) are three constants which created the electron.
And if we don’t know (a) then we don’t know what electron is.
Therefore in the internet is possible to find 100 different models
of electron. For example.
The book "What is the Electron?"
Volodimir Simulik
Montreal, Canada. 2005. /
In this book:
‘ More than ten different models of the electron are presented here.
(!!!)
More than twenty models are discussed briefly. (!!!)
Thus, the book gives a complete picture of contemporary theoretical
thinking (traditional and new) about the physics of the electron.’

ftp://210.45.114.81/physics/%CA%E9%BC%AE/What%20Is%20the%20Electron%20by%20Volodimir%20Simulik%20.pdf

All of these models are problematical.
We can read hundreds books about philosophy of physics.
But how can we trust them if we don’t know what electron is.
And somebody wrote:
If I well remember Einstein once said about particle physics:
"why do we study some many particles?
Understand really what is an electron would be enough."
. . .
‘ Finding the structure of the electron will be the key
to finding the origin of the natural laws.’
=.
By my peasant logic at first it is better to understand
the closest and simplest particle photon /electron and
then to study the far away spaces and another particles.
=.
Best withes.
Israel Sadovnik Socratus

==.

[socr...@bezeqint.net]

What is the electron configuration ?

Is the electron a photon with toroidal topology?

http://www.cybsoc.org/electron.pdf

==.

[socr...@bezeqint.net]

#
A New Limit on Photon Mass.

http://www.aip.org/pnu/2003/split/625-2.html

===.