Thesis: Metaphysics and Scientific Method

[Craig Lindgren]

begin part 1 of 9, A Talk: thesis; metaphysics and scientific method.

by Craig A. Lindgren
a white man, age 34 at time of writership.
revision 0 public date: march 2009a.d.

wisdom is a hard thing to master. i would have to use every word in this Oxford Canadian Dictionary of Current English at least once throughout this discourse in order to convey the sum of the first sentence of this paragraph. there are about 125,000 words in this pocket edition.

an orange is a piece of fruit. when you first peel one, you can smell it and then you eat a piece. you can almost feel the taste of the piece you have eaten. there is no turning back; once you have tasted a piece of orange, you remember the taste and consider it in your future.

you now have a quandary called desire. desire is like an animal. it does not cease, it does not quit, it does not stop, until either you or it; are dead.

and so, we find ourselves in a position of having to get back to the future.

they say time is the commodity of Kings and they are true and correct on this point. to make an enquiry while you are alone, to yourself, in the form of a carefully worded question is considered to be wise. is time our friend or our enemy.?

wait.! he pauses and inhales, startled for a moment. he then resumes his course, looking a little pall. as we continue our enquiry, we gaze together at the stream flowing from somewhere to somewhere else. it is not yet sundown but the moon is hanging somewhat moderately in the sky masked by a hollow glow, like a jewel encrusted ornament adorning the treeline.

is time our enemy or our friend.? we continue to breath, uncertain of the answer to our question, yet somewhat disconcerted by the fact that we do not immediately know.

perhaps a spot of warm tea will help ease the mans' consciousness to the point where a correct answer to the question will come to him.

we live in a world where instant gratification is the normal. we expect everything yesterday and our needs cannot keep up with our desires. we need an answer to our question and yet something inside of us demands a correct answer. any old answer will not do.

as we continue to mull over an answer to our question we realize that the only way we know to answer our question is to enquire within. when we enquire within, we begin to learn a few things about our enquiry. for example, i have a strong feeling that is attached to the term 'time'. i am concerned by this term and am somewhat fretful to have a proper relation with it.

but i grow tired of repeating the question. i have memorized it and it is in the back of my mind. yet now it is bugging me. what other modes of discovery do we have available in order to arrive at a conclusive, satisfactory and reliable response to our question so that we can move on.? well, we could sleep on it. this is said to sometimes help us arrive at an answer to our question. we could pray about it. we could get down on our knees, fold our hands together, bow our head and ask the LORD, for an answer and then wait.!

or we could sit down, close our eyes, and look.! with another faculty that we have available that could induce a proper response.

so we are stuck. unless we ask another question but what is wrong with our first question.? to leave it behind seems wrong.

what do we know about time.? yes, it tends to pass. yes, time is long. i could tell you that i love time

is time a something or a nothing.? yes, time is sort of, ephemereal. time is a something but it does not have form. true.! it has a name but it does not have a form. perhaps we could make an inference here at this point. i have a name and a form. time has a name and no form. this seems to indicate that i have a relation with time but i am not the same as time. so we are linked then. good.

this is the drawing line. we need a relationship in life. pull.!

i feel that time is my friend. i cannot be certain but i have made an honest enquiry to the best of my ability and feel My response is a precise one.

"wisdom,?" he said with a snide undertone. "a fools errand." (this is a protagonist, my son). my friend, jeers me.
'surely you jest,' i say.(that would make me the antagonist, in the usual practice)
"no, i do not jest.," he says with scorn.
i wait, weighing his words.
"you cannot arrive at a conclusive state of wisdom," he tells me.
'i beg to differ, wisdom is not impossible of attainment." i say with certainty and a spoonful of pride.

is the preceding passage right or wrong.?

the mind is rooted in the heart, wherein is located your soul. this is who you are. the mind likes to manifest in myriad ways sometimes clouding our judgement, leading us up the garden path to no mans land. i mean, who is leading who here.?

son, how much time do you have.? how long do you think a discourse on wisdom is.? are you a patient man.? what if i tell you that the end of this talk is set to occur one year hence.? would you impatiently leave the scene.? or would you remain and continue to ponder this ancient term called wisdom, with me.? it is all up to you. i have no control over your actions or decisions in life. you certainly are under no compulsion to remain. nor any compunction for that matter. in fact, you could leave immediately and never return. i could tell you that that would be fine with me.

and so, our tale continues. or was it just a talk.?

pain.! it strikes so suddenly, like lightening. you never know when the pain might come. it could come from any direction at any time. to know life, is to know pain. i would like you, the reader, to stop for a moment at this point in the dialogue. ask yourself, what is the reaction of my mind to this particular passage. that is to say, the aforementioned but not the preceding passage. form a response, to accurately and most importantly, truthfully, describe the reaction or action or perhaps a sine qua non position of your mind to this passage. that is to say, principally, the first term. you don't have to write it down, this is just a talk. comce, comca. did you note a reaction.? i am certain, that your mind had a modification of consciousness associated with that passage that is quite real.

i will elucidate my own mind here for a moment as an example.
pain is a part of life that i accept as a condition of existence with name and form.

some say, pain is suffering. you may note that your mind has a standard set of variables for dealing with any term really. when it comes to pain, the mind tends to aver pain. it could overreact and embrace pain, or the third option, it could accept pain without either cringing from it nor looking for it.

this is called discernment in life. you could also use the term discrimination. the mind is not just a reactionary mechanism. it is also a tool. the term discrimination has something of a bad rap but discrimination really just means to differentiate between this and that. what is the textbook definition of the term discrimination.? let's use oxford; or an alternate is relatively fine.

discrimination

below we have the root word:

discriminate. it is a verb or action word 1.make or see a distinction (discriminate between) 2.make an unjust distinction on the basis of race, age, sex, &c.(discriminate against). discrimination. ah, discrimination is listed last and is the noun form of the word. a noun is a person, place or thing.

so did we hit the mark.? was our original definition accurate enough to coincide with the textbook definition.? perhaps our original definition even qualifies as precise. i didn't just hit the target, i hit the bullseye, say.

let's use our mind to make one further enquiry here before we carry on. we are slow but slow and steady wins the race.

pain

below we have the textbook definition;

pain. it is a noun 1a.physical suffering caused by illness or injury (as compared with a wound).

just a minute. we will come back to pain. first, a realization has come to light. i am using information from another persons work on this document. this raises a question of illegality.

if we go to the publishers information page, one or two pages in on the inside of the front cover, we will find the information that we are looking for.

it says: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing (no less) of Oxford University Press, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organizations. Inquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the (address above).

now, i have noted a couple of key terms for our purposes. oxford has elected to use the term reproduced and reprographics. these terms are reflective of a xerox. i feel by applying a few definitions in the body of this document, i am perhaps slightly trespassing upon their work and their terms for reproduction but i am also confident that the punishment may not be too severe and so i am going to forge ahead, but, we're flying without a safety net by one margin.

really, i have no idea who typed all this. someone must have stolen my password; besides, its not print work. its just an informal paper. well, they could get down to breaking my privacy and perhaps making a connection between a device that belongs to me and entries at this weblog, but i don't really care. i may add here, that considering the possibility of a lie is not to committ one. i am merely holding one as a possibility. if a question of illegality became a reality, then depending upon the information tabled against me, i may respond declinatively or affirmatively.

so back to our enquiry;

pain. hey, painted lady is in this area. oh, it refers to a type of a butterfly, not a geisha girl, as i had presumed.

anyhow/

pain. it is a noun 1a.physical suffering caused by illness or injury (as compared with a wound as one that would be caused during warfare) 1b.a feeling of discomfort in a part of the body 2.mental suffering 3.careful effort or trouble taken 4.(informal) a nuisance ex.pain in the neck &c. pain. it is also a verb 1.be at (or take) pains; vix.take great care in doing something; ex.no pain, no gain. vix.one cannot make progress without experiencing some pain 2.on (or under) pain of punishment, with death &c as the penalty (this(2) spiel here appears to be an application of the noun form of the word). pained. this is an adjective. an adjective is a modifier to a noun. ex.pained expression

by the way, &c means etc. or so on and so forth, ex. means example and vix. means that is to say or, in other words.

now, i would like to compare and contrast this word with the term, suffering. we have the root word listed here:

suffer. it is a verb 1.undergos suffering (you have to give examples of it in use) ex.i had suffered 2.put up with; ex.not suffer fools gladly vix.refuse to be patient with people one considers foolish, stupid, &c. sufferer and sufferee. this is a noun form of the word

this definition is not entirely adequate for our purposes. the term suffering is found in some treatises on wisdom and is used in a sense that is distinct from pain.

suffering is a condition of the mind caused by the minds' misidentification with other than its' true form or was that its' name.

we want to eliminate the suffering from our lives but pain not unlike pleasure is a temporary relatively normal part of life. to accept a moderate amount of pain or pleasure here or there is a good practice in a life well lived.

pleasure is actually delineated as a form of pain. this is unusual and contradictory on first sight. however, bear with me for a moment and i will illuminate that point for you.

what we must do, separate the chaff from the grain here. there is the raw, brute form of pleasure and pain and there is the variables of the mind that i have noted previously. these are the minds' attachment or the minds' aversion to any term.

these two modifications of consciousness are listed as obstacles; 2of 5, in and of false knowledge, a general category for modifications of consciousness, (one of five); that prevent your mind from being freed from suffering. (english is an wonderful language that we may extrapolate. there is no precisely right or wrong grammar but you have to make it make sense)

so, we see that there is parallel here. pleasure and attachment as well as pain and aversion.

since both are obstacles, they are both forms of suffering.
axiom. things which are equal to the same or to equals, are equal to each other.

this is all i wanted to say about this area at this point. however, i am a thorough man by nature and so i will go back and see if there are any enquiries or statements that have been left hanging, before proceeding onwards in our treaty.

hold.!

i see two terms that i would like to visit before we proceed any further. opposition

opposition. noun 1.resistance or antagonism 2.the state of being hostile 3.a group of opponents or competitors 5.the principal parliamentary party opposed to that in office (the Opposition) 6. the act of opposing or placing opposite 6.contrast

opposition means enemy. we could discriminate as an enemy or we could discriminate as a friend

also, to be thorough, i will include my own quik definition of the word pain. it just means you're hurt physically.

that is everything, son. let us proceed.

end section
begin section

the taming of the shrew by the shrewd. a shrew is a hostile woman and a shrewd is a careful man. how do you tame a woman.? i find this to be a good enquiry. it would seem that we have to befriend her in some fashion. it is going to require an act of submission on her part, now this is the tricky part, son. to get a woman to submit to a man, naturally without the use of force, is quite hard. i compare it to fishing. you must be patient when fishing.

once a fish has taken the bait, it's all a competition from there between line and distance. she doesn't want to come in, and i say good. let her take line. but she won't spit the hook and i say good. let her come in.

eventually she realizes that she may stay out or come in and so you have befriended her. but she will not make an act of submission. she is afraid. when she makes an act of submission, the game is over. then she belongs to the fisherman. if there is no more game, then all life is lost. or is it.? the boat is a question for her that requires answering. she doesn't really know about the boat. it could be good or it could be bad. it's hard to say. she is considering the possibilty of the boat. she has not ruled it out in her mind. but if she is in that boat then she cannot be in this boat. this is the sticky nature of her dilemma. we may conclude that you cannot be in two boats at the same time

woman really hate men. they hate them without just cause. you cannot force a woman to love, my boy. in her heart, she either loves you or she does not.

on the other side of the coin, woman hunt men, in their own way. woman are prowlers looking for prey. they want man much like a man wants a woman. sometimes, they will set their sights on a man and take him. there has been no act of submission. she is the boss and will remain so until she leaves you behind. she does not belong to you, yet because you are a man, you do not belong to her and so her travails are endlessly unsatisfying.

a man knows something about a woman that a woman does not know about a man. she can only be satisfied one way. she does not want to admit this. it is too much like admitting failure. yet her man may say to admit defeat is to know success

when i was boy; no, just kidding.

sandal stuck in mud
beautiful full moon overhead
the sound of music

there is no way to reveal the way to you without the way revealing before you.

to get your sandal unstuck from the mud is impossible but the moon sure is beautiful

knowledge has a limit. wisdom does not.

everything has a limit.

to desire wisdom Is a fools' errand

better to desire gold, and wine and woman and song, like everyone else

the goal is the prize of life. keep an eye on the ball and don't lose sight of the goal.

power. prestige. dynasty. when will the puck reach the net.?

to chase after the limited is endless

to chase after the unlimited is finite

why not choose a goal you can reach.?

but how do we reach our goal.?

how is a good word. it means what is the mechanism by which we effect that which we desire.

i suppose we should take careful aim of our goal first. no sense aiming at a goal you can't hit or not even aiming for a goal at all.

suppose is a bad word. it means to imagine to be true without sufficient grounds.

so our goal is in sight, at least i have my crosshair on a proper and fit goal. now i have to get the biscuit in the basket. there is the goaltender. she seems to be my enemy. perhaps it is only a game. a contest, a sport, meaningless drivel, just a match, no point. like tennis

or maybe the game has meaning. maybe the game has a point. she is an excellent goaltender. in fact, she is death defying in her energies to oppose your getting the biscuit in the basket. i may even venture to say, there is no way for me to score unless the goaltender, allows me to score but then what is the point of scoring.? it was a gimme. yet i cannot give up on the game. it is right here before my eyes.

i cast a level eye across the length and breadth of the playing field, weighing my opponent for a sign of weakness. she has none.

weight a moment. we're on the same team here.! what in the hell is going on.?

perhaps we should switch positions, she says to me. i feel she may be on to something, i think to myself, without any prejudice or guile. in fact that sounds like an optimum play. but that would require an act of submission. now, the goaltender is undefeated. she would have to relinquish her prized position as goaltender and believe me, she knows what shes doing, to a lesser mortal. now once the opponent enters the goal and the other opponent enters the playing field, we have a new situation that is unfamiliar to both players. they are in uncomfortable roles. each has to learn how to play the other players position, and they seem to keep forgetting that they are on the same team. so they form a pact and agree to point their heads in the same direction. now there are two players against the world, with their heads pointing in the same direction at all given times. if they fail to keep their heads pointing in the same direction, they may lose the game. but she always looks behind her just when the ball is coming her way and the goalie steps out of position to retrieve the ball and keep it in play.

perhaps her opponent knows how to mind the net afterall.? and she begins to look up from her obession with the net for a moment because, she has someone minding the net for her.

she casts a level eye across the entire range of land before us, it seems tractless, and considers her next play

end section
begin section

at a university, we find there to be two fields of study. arts and sciences. a short synoptical survey of the syllabus reveals sixteen(16) possible disciplines of study that a student may engage in. let us have a look together;

letters&integers

biology; physics(computer hardware engineering)
astrology; astronomy
language(ex.service industry); mathematics
romance(poetry); chemistry
librarianship; archaeology
rulership; electricity
religion; water
economics; geology

king
queen
priest
artist
scientist
farmer
armed forces
civilian
(peasant)
(surf - honorless creature)
(digital class - classless creature)

how are mathematics and biology related.? they (were) both filed under the sciences yet one deals with numbers and the other deals with letters.

how are the language of psychology and economics related.? they are both filed under the arts yet one deals with numbers of letters and the other deals with the letters of numbers.

perhaps, we should just call the two fields, numbers and letters and reorganize the disciplines and sub-disciplines according to this principle of study.

numbers deal with death
letters deal with life

i prepose that there is a relation between life and death but the two fields of study are unique, some people are interested in the study of death while some people are interested in the study of life.

i propose that we should not mix the study of life from death. either study death or study life but do not study death life or life death. this would be an error in thinking on our part, wouldn't you say.?

an error in thinking. i suppose if you are only a thought belief and nothing more, then you are an error in thinking, walking around.
i do not like an error in thinking, walking around. they piss me off.

people always wonder, how does a book end.? i mean where is all this talk leading. is there a destination in mind or are we just travelling in circles

why does this thought keep cropping up when one is reading a book of fiction.

i note that this thought does not keep cropping up when one is reading a book of non-fiction

do you know what these two terms mean.? fiction is make believe. non-fiction is truth.

when i was a child, i used to love make-believe. just tell a me a lie and i'll believe you. everything is wonderful. perfect, untarnished.

when i was a grown-up, i used to love truth. just tell me the truth and i'll believe you. everything is wonderful. perfect, untarnished

you want to know how the story ends, don't you.? you're anxcious to read the last page, aren't you.? then you are reading this talk as fiction. is this world a fictional place.?

then what is the rush to find an end or what is the end.?

is it a happy ending or a sad ending.? can we control the ending.? can we change the ending.? many are afraid of the ending. few master the ending.

i make a fair attempt not to be pithy here or passe. i will not leave you hanging with that as the ending

we will continue our story or perhaps it is just a tale.

i would classify this text as non-fiction under the discipline of letters

a man writing a text is like a number trying to write a letter. sad, even at the best of times. i will require an editor. death is a constant. life is a variable

too haphazard, she said, too fly by night. nonsense, i say. i am leading somewhere, not nowhere. exactly, she says.

you see my friend, when it comes to the english language, many say there is a right way to write and a wrong way to write. writing is like mathematics. a few on the other side of the coin say, writing is like biology. there is no wrong answer when writing

you could write anything at anytime and call it a paragraph. a paragraph does not have to be of certain length. it could only be one sentence. you could jump from one train of thought to another train of thought write in the dnam middle of a paragraph if you like.

the difference between a text that is well written and a text that is poorly written, rests in the hands of a good editor, they say.

the content of a text that is well written and the content of a text that is poorly written, rests in the hands of a good writer, they say.

i think a good editor is capable of differentiating between the subtleties of when it is speaking, when it is writing, when it is thought and some other variations of this hinterland

i think a good writer is capable of holding your attention, if they have something to say.

war, he says, the term sliding off his tongue like grease.

conflict, strife, mayhem, disease, destruction, death, hell, poverty

what is war.?

interruption. 'it is too hodgepodge' she says 'You; are too hodgepodge,' i say.

'it is transient' she counsels. 'you mean transparent.?' i ask. 'perhaps.' i say.

war. the word sliding off his tongue like grease.

destruction, mayhem, chaos, evil, hatred, nonsense and hell.

only a damaged ammunition case remains behind, with the markings illegible now, as a testament.

sometimes writers beg the answer, what is writers block.?

writers block is when you do not allow your imagination full swing.

whether you are writing a mathematical text or a biological text. you must allow your imagination full swing.

'i see no point to your text.' she claims.

'the point is in the whole,' i say

'yes, but what is our direction.?' she asks

'our direction is north, not south. now be quiet', i say

as i was saying:

there is no right or wrong answer when writing.
there is only a right or wrong answer when mathing

in order to math to you, i must mask my math in writing

if she ever takes orders from me, she may master the north as well,

and math to you behind a mask of letters

'it is pithy, it is trite and it is passe' she says

'this is only because of my audience, not because of the content. you have the attention span of child. if i breath more than 5 words in a sentence, with a two sentence paragraph, it's game over, and you cannot be held accountable.' i advise her

this is another good enquiry when writing a text.

who is my audience.?

this i would say is the one constant to bear in mind when writing your text.

you may note, that my audience has changed a few times throughout this discourse. this is a flaw and an inclusion.

it is ugly but it is a reminder, to always bear your first audience in mind and forget the rest. they don't deserve you.

a second rule of writing is to bear in mind your first sentence. that is to say, the purpose and intent of your document. it is the topic under discussion.

and so, i have ascertained what my subject is and who my subject is. now i am going to put you under the knife.

end section
begin section

wisdom is a bit like reading brail that no one else can see.

what do we do now.? where do we go now.? what is the right answer now.?

people like the variable part of life but they always fall back to the constant part of life.

the variable part of life is like beautiful music
the constant part of life is like an old ammunition case

everyone wants the beautiful music but why throw out an old ammunition case.? is it not beautiful too.? perhaps it serves no purpose.? it is broken, battered, ruined, pointless. it just sits there, serving no purpose. having expired its purpose, now we can get back to the beautiful music and forget the case. it's useless anyway

there is something that you cannot lose in life. do you know what it is.? you cannot lose what is right in front of your eyes or ears

what is wright in front of your eyes is that old broken ammo box. easily dismissed

what we are seeking is that ephemereal beautiful music. it's intoxicating.

believe me or not, if you sit down and study the ammo box, you will find that it it self bears an eternal hint of beautiful music. you do not need to search any further for that which you are seeking

but it is hard to smell. it seems to have no smell or taste or attraction, but there is brail on it. i even heard one time some guy learned how to read it

it's an ancient mode, like an old goat trail that leads off into the nowhere behind that mountain range overthere

the thing about children is they hate to be ruled

the thing about everyone else is they prefer to be ruled

the thing about the ancient masters is, they rule

but it is up to the people to decide who they will allow to rule them. the ancients cannot decide for them and the children will forever be in opposition preferring to rule the people themselves

children.? children. gather 'round.
it is not a movie. it is a trailer.
we are not at war. we are at, chirping birds, that is just a pile of dead bodies. leave your swords in your sheaths and do not remove them unless they are removed against you first.

still stuck in your quandary.? looking for a fast exit.?

master the art of being a disciple.

before i was a master, my favorite mode of study was that of a disciple. i loved being a disciple. yes, it was dear to me. being a master was impossible so i learned to love being a disciple. eventually, i did not have to learn how to love being a disciple it is what i loved.

once i was a master, i did not not want to be a disciple anymore. once you are naked, you cannot be wearing clothes. but i still put clothes on from time to time. in fact, clothes are inestimably useful to a master or a disciple.

end section
begin section

i am considering my audience further at this time. initially, this began as an ode to the common man, but there are a few extant texts of wisdom for the common man.

then i thought, i will write it to me, to the old disciple in me.

but now, i sense the desire for my audience to be female.

they both want it and they do not want it. they will never admit that they want it.

'female,' he says to her, frowning with disgust and contempt for a lesser creature.

o, they know where their bacon is buttered

females; forever not trusting men. they will not listen to them. they will not follow them. they will not do as they say.

females are a nuisance and a pest to man. they know nothing of war

and so, you are my audience, but, i am as yet a man in the arena with men. looking across at you

i mean, as a female, do you really want the first sentence from a man.? i can think of 10 men who may.

thus female, i say unto you; come hither and bear me witness for a while. let me put you under my Spell of truth.

the mode by which a female arrives at the term master is identical to that of man excepting one critical difference.

yes, it has something to do with a man. a man does not require a female to arrive at this term. a female requires a man to arrive at this term

"THAT IS A LIE!", she exhorts. i require no such thing to arrive at love.

perhaps. perhaps not

let us remain open to the possibility that this is a truth.
maybe it is false or maybe it is true.

this is our approach

'we don't like men. you should know that about us.' she advised. 'thank you,' i said, 'i prefer the truth, even if it is only relative.'

'want to switch positions,' she asks.? 'no, i do not want to switch positions,' i say with some derision, 'unless you want to.'

'you wanna switch positions, i know.' she says with asurety.

'well, if you really want to switch positions then i could be coherced. i am a man.' i confirm

we switch positions as she rifles my wallet. finding only dust bunnies, she sniffs in contempt

of course, we have not actually switched positions. this is all only in the realm of imagination and fiction, thus far.

why not step down from your impossible high tower with no door, into to the world of non-fiction with men rather than opposed to them.?

'o, we have tried that before. we call that the failed experiment.' she portends

"daughter,? daughter, here, take this credit from a wiseman and keep it. to find wisdom is 10 to 1. to find love is 1 to 10"

it's really a jungle out there isn't it.? dangerous, uncertain, pitfalls, traps, enemies

you may stand opposed to man and face him or you may switch positions, get in behind him and stand with him.

these are two alternatives for a female.

we could go back and enquire within ourselves, as well.

is men our enemy or our friend.?

lets wend a similar course to that of our enquiry over time.

we will leave our enquiry on the table and proceed ahead erstwhile yetmore

when females feel of switching positions, they become forlorn. it is too hard. too sticky. too many variables. i don't know how, who, what, when why or where. it's all too complicated for us. i mean you. i mean we. i mean you. you mean me. ABC, !@#

a man finds meaning in life inherently. do you know this about a man.? a man can sit at a mountain alone and there is inherent meaning.

a woman finds meaning in life vicariously through a man. if she can manage to get in behind a proper one, then she has the possibility of sitting at the mountain, alone and finding inherent greater meaning.

we like woman. we are men

'i don't want to be alone,' she spurts, 'did you know that.?'

i get a sense, as a man, of the truth of this. as a man, you should know i am fine being alone or with female company. either way is fine by us. you may say, i have a preference for female companionship, not a requirement.

there is a spot on difference between being alone and being lonely.

you may claim there is no difference between these two terms or that you are the same as a man, but this is fool hardy. let us be practicalists

'o, allow it,' she says, 'you have to switch the lock to the open position and allow a man to claim expertise over females in his wisdom'

a female brings definition to my life. o, i've got plenty of meaning. i could content myself here alone for 1,000 years but a female brings definition to my life

'o, i've got plenty of definition,' she says, 'but i could not content myself here alone for one thousand years'

i prefer some sunlight but i am not going to lay in it because i would have to bow down to the sunlight. i prefer to remain alone at castle wolfenstein if sunlight will not come in, forever.

i am going to the library now to select a text on mathematics. i will return presently afterwhich to continue our talk

end section
begin section

i have returned and elected not to (to not) withdraw(l) a text (up)on mathematics.

how do you know who to trust, when you select a text to engage yourself with. is the source trustworthy.? are they telling you the truth.? are they accurate.? is the text worth reading.? who is the judge of what constitutes a text that is worthy of a university students' time.? how is the translation.? i need a master of latin and math and and master of latin/english and a master of english/latin and a master of english and math and four(4) female accompaniments to properly, once and for all, translate a Grandfather booktext for a university, for example. in what language was the text originally written.? is the copy from a legitimate source.? are there errors in the original.? are there errors in the translation.? why did i bother picking up this book again.? o, wait this one is a Grandfather booktext on said discipline. now we are getting somewhere

i do not doubt that there is a book text upon the topic of mathematics somewhere upon the face of the earth that would be worth my time to sit down and study from cover to cover. but where it is and who the writer is is still partially unknown to me

end section
begin section

who, what, when, where, why and how,?

who will you be getting behind.? a woman needs to determine who her lifemate is going to be

what.? a man

when.? before my capacity to bear little ones expires.

where.? my hometown

why.? because i don't want to be alone my whole life

how.? engage your opponent in a little game

who, may warrant further comment. men find woman attractive. they always seem like they all have a degree of ethereality. they are soft and preferred. you may not know this about yourselves. you are not perceived to be bristly. you are one level up from men when they look. each one walks naturally upon a pedestal to us

woman have to look down upon men from their impossible high tower with no door and see them standing upon the ground. hard and ugly

selecting a lifemate is a fools' errand. this is not true

who.? there is no easy answer to who. a someone. the beautiful part of life is that nearly any someone will promote you. your life will take on new meaning. there will be more to your story, as compared with less.

the tale of man alone in the mountains for twenty-five hundred years is actually quite drab

no, no, she only sees dollar signs. this is false mate selection. true mate selection is seeing a lifemate. marriage is forever, not just a pair of underwear

the tree at the center of the garden is a female. man has his back to it, guarding it, however, the tree possesses the ability to walk up and scewer the man who is guarding her position. this is an oddity in the jungle

you know what makes females sick? desiring a man and never telling him about it.

o, a man desires many females through his time, but a female has a unique desire for man that is relatively impartial to the sex desire. this allows her desire for man to be true and mans desire for a female to be relegated to only partially true

men think this should actully be a crime, in all honesty.

i'll stop you here for a moment and ask you to confirm which part it is that men think should be a crime.? are you paying attention.?
no, no. actually stop for a moment, go back thru the few preceding paragraphs and extemporate the part which men think should be a crime.

very well, let us continue

you see men require a clear direct communication expressive of your desire for him. let there be no doubt or question on this matter. females are the famous hinters.

now, you could handle this part of life with some subtlety allowing you recourse to withdraw gracefully in private. but if you keep it in the realm of hint only, then you are juvenile and kidding yourself.

ask him on a date. send him chocolates. he will know that you want one date which preoffers the possibility of a second and third date. this is considered good to a man

i have asked some females out and sent them flowers and what have you but they are always tactiturn, i have found. they will not attend to one date unless it is on their terms, which are vague at best. this is considered to be bad to a man

females quite often go on about what a goon every man is. a dolt. an idiot. a waste of time. a piece of garbage. a drunk. no money. no brains. nothing

but actually, we have found ourselves to be a something.

true existenialism: i exist therefore i am.

don't overthink a man. why must everything be endlessly complicated.?

a tree is a complicated item but then again, it quite straight forward.

'what is servant to a man.?' she queries

this is an excellent question for a female to ask.

once you get in behind your man, what then.?

he hasn't changed. he is your constant. he has elected to allow a variable in behind him. but what good is she.? what is she there for.? does she serve a purpose. would he change if she weren't there.? there is less space, not more

i can see why a female may not be keen on a relationship with a man. laundry, cleaning, bathing, babies, maybes, yet they just can't quite get us out of their head.

there seems to be this eternal relation between men and females. it is like a quandary to be solved. a math problem that we keep coming back to. perhaps it is like the lightbulb

maybe if we keep trying, one day it will actually light up properly.? we feel it is possible to actually light a relationship between a man and a female that does not fail inside of five years like a bad capitalistic venture

so, we have concluded that the relationship is not a dead horse. it has life left in it yet. love remains possible

men are not holding their breath on this point. we know better than this but we are not ruling wives out

end section
begin section

so, what of this whole mess of impropriety with improper use of the english language in a hodgepodge. where do we go from here.? it is entirely disorganized. a useless text. may as well send it straight to the trash heap.' she says

let us restore order here, but, let it be known this will require one master of wisdom

let us review the body of the second area of this text thus far.

we have our original enquiry remaining on the table as yet unanswered, so let'us answer it now.

what have we been able to ascertain about our enquiry thus far.? what do we know about men.? i, for example. do i hate you, the female reader.?

we do not need to follow a set order when making an enquiry.

probably not and unlikely.? is that the best you can come up with.? are we talking about time here or men.?

come now, i am a certainty. you cannot talk to time, but you can talk to me. so i will confirm that data for you. i for one, do not hate you, the female reader. i like you and even have metaphysical love for you, whether you like it or not.

what else do we know about men.? yes, they like to get you naked. this indicates affection for you. it does not indicate the reverse. yes, they're tough. i'll help you draw an inference, because they are tough, they resemble a constant reference for you.

based upon the information we have accumulated so far, i would venture to answer our enquiry in the affirmative: men are our friend

mans' best friend is a dog
womans' best friend is a man

so then dear reader, the world is our oyster. the world is a large place. there are an estimated six(6) billion human beings on earth at this time. it turns out there are about three(3) billion females and three(3) billion men. (a.d.2009c.e.)

yes, it's an old question in math about randomness. and it turns out if you flip the coin enough times, it comes out at fifty(50)/fifty(50). half and halve. equal parts.

what is silly.? have you ever looked up the definition of the word silly. i find when i venture into an audience that is female the conversation quickly turns to silly

you may already have your own copy of a dictionary if you've bothered to read this far.

why bother.? what's the point.? it's all a waste of time.?
we may as well give up now.? it's useless. it's futile. no hope.
only a god for a friend

silliness is a condition of the female heart. it is not unlike suffering that keeps a mans mind in chains

when you do not take life seriously, having no reason or war to cause you to take it seriously, then life does not take you seriously. the forest, the river, the mountains and the sea have a certain spirit to them. men are a part of that. if you do not take them seriously, then they have no way to take you seriously.

men take life very seriously lightly. war is no joke to us. and peace should be no joke to you. for a woman, peace is family life which is not entirely unlike war. this is your sacred duty in the life of a female.

he sends you flowers and you don’t take him seriously. he sends you a love note and you don’t him seriously. it’s all just a joke to you. you don’t take life and death seriously. you are lost to female suffering

end part 1 of 9, A Talk:
begin part 2 of 9, A Talk: Thesis

the adams family started when uncle fester farted
and now we're all together, the adams family.
do do do, de de, do do do, de de, do do do, do do do, do do do, de de

'we’re pretty serious about family life here. you know, babies and stuff like that,' she says
'I always make sure to get all the do do’s in the right place in the right cadence. that’s really important,' she said

sarcastic.? facetious.? importune.? certainly not. that would require something other than fiction before you could launch such a claim against me. by the way, these capital i's are an autocorrect that i had to turn off. you know this particular autocorrect is a lot like working from disciple to master, no matter how hard you try or for how long, that damn thing instantly autocorrects from i to I as soon as you open your eyes. just leave it on, since you're probably not a master worthy of using i in your dialogue anyhow

worthy, yes. to be worth it. not every soul is worth $100,000.00 per year

when you begin to take the possibility of a family life, seriously, you start out at the bottom. this begins with changing diapers and washing dishes and ends at the top with changing diapers and washing dishes. but the difference is that when you are at the bottom, you are not a deep thinking mommy and you are not expected to be. just master the mundane tasks first. when you're the mommy ruling the world and changing diapers then you really are a deep feeling person

'what about the nunnery?', she asks.

being a monk is a viable route for a man. being a priests assistant is possible for a female, as his wife

you could be an old maid. an old maid is a woman that never married or a woman that is old, is the maid of a household and is unmarried

some females just like to change diapers. really though. they like having little babies and boys and girls to rule and to have as their own. the man is second.

this of course is not acceptable. this is not the point at all. that is like highway robbery of a man by a woman.

yes, there she goes wielding the wooden spoon like a war hammer

yes, at the end result you are working with men who take both war and peace very seriously and this does not involve woman overstanding anything to do with men. perhaps this is why not a lot of females choose to follow the goat trail because they have to be submissive, contrite and deferred to men at all the time. they have little say. it is painted lady and geisha to a samurai. this is the yellow man interpretative theme to this way of life.

but to begin is to end

in the old days, when men or ladies considered discipleship, 12 years under a master was considered to be remarkable.

in all truth, one lifetime under a master is a beginning. you have laid one stone on your footpath, disciple.

this truth holds true, interestingly enough, for either a man or a female.

marriage is one lifetime but females see life as a wife a lot like a man looking at a master in the old days. have a few babies and see you around. females have a sexual imperative of their own but it is not 100 years with a man. you see the institution of marriage is too much like master and disciple for most females, even when marriage is colored on the lightest end of the stick.

in the ancient days, it was one lifetime, like slavery to a household but in subsequent years and up until recently it was 12 years maybe.

i don't really know what female illumination is. i can only describe master illumination and tell you the way as far as i know it to be. it's like i can see you clear to the point where i raise you up and you are able to catch to ledge and hoist yourself to your own love. as you lay your own footpath, it will run parallel to a mans for a long time. eventually it becomes like trying to find your way through pea soup, alone, in the mountains or vallies, with no map and no guide and no trail except for the light your master left you, in your heart

to me, everyman wants his own footpath. i cannot think of man who would not want his own footpath in life, but that's just me

in this last passage, you find that i am writing to men, in general. a female reader is still my audience but because i am a man you may find that i stop and write along with men for a spell.

there is science or integers behind metaphysics. there is some data that we can acquire to validate some propositions and hypotheses in this ethereal arena of life. for example, we find that some items that really bear no commodal value beyond perhaps a penny will actually bear a market value that is significantly higher than this. the human race applies metaphysical value to some items which we then term artefacts. they are ancient or seen to be consecrated in some fashion. this is tangible evidence to support the theory of an intangible metaphysical realms.

in truth, artefacts may be consecrated and a location may bear a blessing that you will not find at an unknown, untouched location in nature. such a location is perhaps an excellent position for some meditation but it bears neither an affirmative blessing or a declinative curse in any degree, greater or lesser.

an area of study is a discipline. when you study a discipline you will find that you can make the study very terse, succinct and of temporal duration while bearing a good degree of light upon the subject. yet, to really study a discipline is to practice it for many moons. like mathematics, i could talk about integers with a mathematician, which is the part, sum and whole of the discipline but to be a master of a discipline is something rare that is sadly taken for granted these days.

the same goes for speaking to a mistress of definition about letters. letters are the part, sum and whole of the discipline of language but to be an illumined mistress of language is rare.

the human race is so superficial. a master mathematician looks not unlike any other man. they eat, walk, talk, have family and so forth but to say each man is created equal is to say there is no difference between human beings. this a falsehood.

perhaps originally we were created equal but now creation has carried on for quite some time and at birth each human being has certain propensities and talents that are unique unto himself or herself

let us learn as a human race to esteem ancient masters as our rulers and then they will esteem the human race properly and accordingly. there are naysayers to this plan, you can understand but i feel they are few and far between

have you ever been to a location and got a bad feeling.? locations are unique, like artefacts. think of the entire history of this planet and you begin to get a glimpse of the planet as she sits right now. the planet is like a jewel encrusted ornament with myriad facets. it seems to go on endlessly, but it does not. the planet is a limited item with an unlimited core.

yes, a deep feeling person. you are just not a deep feeling female. you are a shallow feeling female. to feel deeply upon life and all matters great and small is the same as a man who thinks deeply upon all matters great and small

female wisdom is fascinating. it is called love. once you have it, it is like a tool you can use. you see something in common and each task becomes worthy of your best efforts. this is the miracle, when you find the way, scrubbing the toilet, you are getting closer

i love you, you love me, we're a happy family; give a dog bone.

perhaps that is a little closer to the truth. as a female it is incumbent upon you to take peace seriously. in fact, it is 50% the responsibility of females to hold the peace of this planet together and that happens at ground zero of dishes and diapers. do it not, and war ends up being normal

in a large part, it is all how you feel about important terms in life. you can feel an affirmative for a term like family or you can feel a declinative for a term like husband.

what is more important than your husband in your life.?

the correct response, is not a thing. your little ones are no less important but they come a short second to your husband.

some females are very good at finding the grown up positive spin on nearly any term they are faced with in their family

they know how to care for a family like a valuable item

i lay a lot of onus on the female order. they hold the keys to love and marriage and they throw them out with the garbage or toss them around like trashy junk

it takes a lot for men to war over commodal items. they probably will. females on the otherhand drive men mad over trinket trash

the root of war is broken love and marriage. do you feel this theory to be so.?

it is not that men go to war because love and marriage is broken. but times are either pacific or atlantic. if the kitchen is on fire, you will find men at war. if the kitchen is pacific, you will find men at peace.

recycling is not precisely the answer. disarming all the nuclear warheads is not precisely the answer. the precise answer is when you take your one small family deadly seriously

peace is an important term. let us pause here for a moment

when i think of peace, it comes along with the old hippy love and peace movement. kind of flaky.

it also bears the usual connotations. no war or a truce.

people tend to throw this word out. i do not think this is wise.

there are different levels of peace. peace between a man and a woman is possible. peace between parents and young people is possible. peace between superiors and subordinates is possible. peace between countries is possible. these are all in the realm of relationships

some people are just terrible at relationships. a relationship is a friendship. bear an affirmative gaze for your friend and you will see that it is possible maintain peace between your neighbors. peace must be maintained but not at any cost yet it is something like a relationship in that you have to do the weeding as a minimum.

peace between a man and a female is perhaps the single most complicated form of peace that has ever been attempted. some people do not feel that it is possible. they are forever warring in competition, argument, spatting

i feel that peace in the family is possible but highly dependant upon the female. the female holds the variable position to a man. the man holds the constant position in the family. it's like he's always lookign north but the female may look south or she may look north. this is the dilemma, primarily, that is the main bar to peace across nations and a planet called earth in the milky way

just look the same direction as your husband. do not oppose, least of all violentally. stop staring him down, instead come up behind him and peek over his shoulder with him, looking at the same stuff with a conspiratorial whisper

trouble.. a word that plagues us. let us begin with an accurate definition. trouble is when you are in trouble with your parents. we all have a six year old in us that is afraid of getting in trouble, a least a little.

who are our parents once we are grown.? i mean who is your superior and what does he or she look like and where on earth are they. i am a practicalist. i cannot see the LORD. he is a powerful motivating factor in my life but he is not precisely my superior by our definition

well, when it comes to trouble, you should know if you are in trouble or not.

why are you in trouble.?

is trouble forever.? i should hope not, in your favor.

female, i am telling you, if you would give me three(3) twenty(20) minute session, in close succession, you would fall in love with metaphysics. i could engender a love of the discipline of metaphysics in you very rapidly. it is like having a friend who is constant. it is something you can count on. isn't this what you are looking for in life.? something constant.? something true.?

we are all looking for something in life. this is a safe observation that is true, not false. accurate, not incorrect. right, not wrong. in fact, we could revisit this point time and time and time again and still, our initial record of the data surrounding this point would remain true.

everyone has a dream in life. they hold a dream and it is their raison d'etre, the right to be;

a master is also looking for something. he is looking for you.

sometimes a master has to come down from the hidden mountain because the disciple has forgotten the way.

he has to come down and find them down here in the world and remind that there is a better way in life

the way of honor. the way of truth. the way of eternal life

then the masters job is done and he may retire unto the way

end part 2 of 9
begin part 3 of 9. A Talk: Thesis

music.

when i think of woman, i think of music.

a piece of classical music, my daughter.

there is one piece in particular that reminds me of a lady learning her first steps with a man

no, it is not 'voices of spring'

you know, i have already listened to 3 renditions and none them have got it bang on. you just don't get johann strauss

it's a light song. nothing fancy

now i will select one for the men

the 5th

....

it is much like they got their first computer, and they went to work.

there was a section for flute. there was section section for string. there was section for horn and there was a section for everything and he made use of it all.

you can almost hear the psychology of a man talking to the psychology of a young lady in the waltz i have selected

pachelbel

vivaldi

bach

mozart, i do not prefer. have you ever seen something out of place before in a large way.? why would this be.?

it is possible to convince people that this is that when in fact that is this. he must have used cohersion tactics. he loved to have them under his thumb

by the way, it is not vivaldi's spring to which i am referring in the above

there is one other piece but it will not come to me. i only heard it once. it came from down from heaven

....

well that was wonderful. i enjoyed that. little, by bach

there is a nice way to view a classical song on the computer with an visual accompaniment that is like watching the relative sections as they proceed

no, i couldnt find that one piece admist bach

what was it.?

well, we will leave it for now. perhaps it will occurr to me later.

music is a mode for expression not unlike writing. anyone may pick up music and say something.

music however is not as versatile as writing. i may explain many things in writing whereas with music i can only express something beautiful. if i express something ugly, then i have used the mode incorrectly.

painting is another form of expression. painting is similar to music in that your painting is either considered popular by the majority or not. when the majority says it is beautiful than it is.there are some opponents of this knowledge who prefer to keep it in the realm of conceptualization and/or false knowledge.

if your paintings are still ugly, then keep them to yourself. when your paintings are only beautiful, then you are using the mode correctly

i will not be expressing myself by music. i would probably sound like mozart. perhaps another time

i am not designed to express myself through music or painting. it is not my time or place for that. a man or a woman requires one measure of humility to know their place in life. i do not go around touting myself as a great composer when i am not

yes, the one piece that came down from the LORD to a son.

no, it is not air.

no, it is not ode to joy.

no, it is not moonlight sonata

no, it is not greensleeves. wait.!
no, that is not it either
or perhaps it was the rendition

no, i cannot recall. damn.!

fur elise isn't half bad; it cuts the mustard.

maybe it was jesu, joy of man's desiring.

mozarts rendition of greensleeves is nice. perhaps it Was a rendition of greensleeves.

when listening to music, turn off the words and there is your song. let it go

it belongs to the air

i like the ending of the 5th. it's the only symphony that's an edge of the seater. no symphony can put you on the edge of your sit, except maybe the 5th. it makes you want to pump your fist with him and say 'yeah, i'm with you all the way'

it takes a lot for a symphony to hold your attention. usually, you'll drift off part way through. it's just a symphony, but beethoven brought down the thunder

another symphony plays nicely in the background but to really bear witness to one from beginning to end; it's like he had something say and here's the beginning, here's how it goes and here's the end. its exultant, its triumphent, its impossible to deny and its beautiful

if you see something that is impossible to deny and you only have an orchestra and some sheet music; if people listen 300 years later, you hit the bullseye

its like a mainframe computer from about 1750. all he had to work with were some wooden cogs, a key and a kite.

yes, beethoven really flexed some orchestral muscle there.

perhaps i'll listen to all the parts. he warrants it.

....

yes, for what it was, it was right on the money. the whole symphony is about 25 minutes long. it was a form of a movie or a play for royalty during the renaissance. the ending really is superb

music is a hard thing to understand, isn't it.? there is a composer, conductor, orchestrator and symphony, perhaps 100 men or more sitting in the same hall. the orchestrator has full swing over each of the instrumental sections. each section has 10's of each of the instruments. each man is trained to play his instrument very well. it is hard to gather that much talent into one room and then allow one man the power to tell them what and when to play.

it is a grand form of music from a bygone era.

these days, a few guys get together with an electric guitar and an amplifier and bring down some thunder with rhyming vocals to accompany their song. the rhyming vocals come from the stage and the shakespearian days. it is like a bard or a minstrel or a muse telling you a story or a tale whether make believe or true for entertainment and perhaps to enlighten you. then sometimes they add music to their words. or they elect to just use music with no words to tell their tale. this is then called a song

they look great in their blue dresses. the blue danube is a song for ballroom dancing. it is about ten(10) minutes long. they would actually get together and dance together for ten(10) whole minutes for one song. it is performed in a fashion similiar to a symphony. who is leading.? Strauss.? or you.? you have to bear with him. he will play your favorite part again. the ending is superb

greensleeves is a song that is thought to have been composed by King Henry VIII(8th) around 1550AD. it is about five(5) minutes long and may be played by one man. as i say, i prefer the instrumental version. the vocals detract from the music. the song is the same with or without the accompanying ballad. it is clearly a christmas song written by a King for his commoners at christmas time. it is an encouraging song. it makes you want to join in and clank a mug. it is the song of their King. it was written to played for a King on a modest cheerful christmas note or for a Queen on a somber note with the ballad installed. it has a sub title; what child is this.? a good song never dies. this is music

'music expresses a sentiment,' she tells me.

'i agree, i think music is capable of expressing a sentiment,' i answer.

'write me a song.' she demands with a pout or simper

'keep the 5th, blue danube and greensleeves for now. don't be greedy,' i tell her

they hammer out a lot of poems for you but not a lot of songs. asking for a song is like asking for beethovens 5th. please always remember this point.

let me pause you in our meanderings of thought here for a moment and see if you are still paying attention. the purpose and intent of our dialogue is to shed some light upon that most ancient of terms called wisdom or love in the light of a female audience

you have seen me use several terms at once to indicate the part, the sum and the whole, of what it is that i am trying to get across to you at that time. let me find an example; "it is like a bard or a minstrel or a muse telling you a story or a tale whether make believe or true for entertainment and perhaps to enlighten you."

you see the multiple use of variables in this sentence.? as your instrument proceeds to pan across the words in the sentence, do you notice an internal change as it strikes the term 'or'?

you see a bard, a mintrel and a muse are relative terms for pretty much the same thing. do you keep an internal watch over your own consciousness.? there is perhaps an affirmative connotation when digesting the definition of the first word, then a declinative connotation begins when digesting the definition of the second and third words. you are irritated that i have wasted your time by giving you alternative choices here. you are experiencing liking and disliking. this is an enemy to be scouted out internally and eliminated on its own ground. look at all three words with affirmative connotation as they deserve. perhaps it is just the beauty of each one that deserves attention. what is your reason for liking one thing and disliking another.? is a dog better than a cat.? is a tree better than a bush.? why keep one and throw the other out.? are you able to go carefully enough to keep all three. this is the sense i mean here.

what about preference.? that is a form of liking and disliking as well. i prefer blueberry tea to raspberry tea but i could take either one without a squabble for one lifetime. that is the definition of a preference. attachment and aversion is when you throw the raspberry in the garbage and make a big fuss to go to the grocery for blueberry tea only, and you never touch raspberry tea. both are ok.

end part 3 of 9. A Talk: Thesis
www.musecrafters.com/ocean
begin part 4 of 9. A Talk: Thesis

money.

boredom.

lets look at this problem of life for a moment.

boredom. think of the greatest high fantasy party adventure you can imagine and you begin to get a sense of what it is to be a master or a mistress

boredom.? ha.! certainly not. i used to suffer from this condition however, and i would be happy to guide you for a spell

let me presume from this point forward that you, the reader, are reading this document for with an intent purpose of freeing your mind from silliness. you're keen on the word disciple and the word love. this will allow me to presume that you have the patience to bear with me through thick and thin

have you noticed one thing about your study.?
i could tell you about love for one year, just as we are now. we could look at every term under the sun, with an eye to wisdom, and still you will never acquire that which are seeking, by reading this text.

you may as well know this. there is no sense you reading this under false pretenses. i am not here to mislead you, misdirect you, or misguide you. i am interested in you getting want you want. and so i inform you of this truth now in order to save you the trouble of reading any further. oh, we may acquire some further knowledge, perhaps we'll have a mode or two by which to approach life and love but in the end, you could read for 10 years solid and this will not bring you any closer to your goal of love.

this is a hard truth; but if it is a master of wisdom you seek, then you need look no further. you have found what you are looking for in me.

this is also a hard truth. as i say, my purpose is not to lead you in circles, take your money or misappropriate you. my purpose is to aid you in getting want you want and if i can not help you because i do not possess that which you desire, then we may as well be clear about our relationship as writer to reader right now. this will allow you to relieve yourself of me and continue your pursuits elsewhere.

however, if you are still with me, fair reader, then let us continue on our merry way

boredom. that is correct, yes. it is a modification of consciousness, not unlike sleep or aversion or egotism.

the latter two(2) are broad categories for such items. the other three(3) broad categories are the clinging to life, attachment and ignorance itself, which is the root terra firma of the others. these five(5) broad categories are called the obstacles of suffering. each is a modification of consciousness in and of itself and may be further categorized into the following general categories of consciousness.

these five(5) general categories for any modification of consciousness according to patanjali and his yoga sutras which i am in agreement with are true knowledge, false knowledge, conceptualization, sleep and memory.

you may be interested to know that there are only 3 forms of true knowledge. these are five(5) sense data, inference and scriptural authority

the classic example of false knowledge is looking at a rope, seeing a snake and actually physically running away.

the pinnacle of conceptualization is pure geometry and the no point.

now, where would boredom fall.?

yes, that is correct. it would be a form of aversion. the obstacles may be categorized under false knowledge. now, for example. you are gear engaged in formal meditation, and then boredom overtakes you and you become restless.

the mind or heart is an organic instrument related to the animal nature, therefore subject to fatigue. sometimes, if you push yourself too hard, your mind may indicate a request for a break to rest and stretch a little.(well.? you still want to finish the text but you don't want to read any further but you aren't stopping.? why do you not stop then.? it is much as i say, i don't require any children souls reading this document and arguing with me about whether mental fatigue is boredom or not. the mind uses boredom to tell you to take a break) or, you may find that it is another form of boredom, the more mundane kind. you are engaged in meditation and you just don't find your practice interesting anymore or you keep thinking of how you would like to go to sleep or go for dinner or call your friend. yet, you have set the bar for yourself, like an olympic athelete and you would like to complete one(20m) or two(40m) sessions of meditation as a minimum part of your day. so you sit there and fidget. what do you do.? and why is this.?

you are bored with what is right under your nose. presuming your back is not on fire, although this is another topic for another time, then you must mistress your horse to propriety. it is a little like taming a wild horse to wear the saddle and accept the direction of the rider. the horse wants to go hither and yon but the rider is saying no, the master has indicated that we are to sit in meditation and train ourselves to master our minds to freedom

so, we must persist, and this can become a real challenge.
the first thing to do is to accept what is right under your nose.
your breath is right under your nose for one(1). your bodily comfort or discomfort is right under your nose for two(2). accept this like blueberry tea or raspberry tea. either one is ok. your present moment feeling is right under your nose for three(3). be aware of this. once you've got a bridle on your breath and your bodily comfort for the moment, i want you to get a grip on your feeling. in order to do this, you need to identify it using your instrument to lay out a succint set of clear words in your own mind. then we now know what our feeling is and we can accept it for the moment. (so, you unable to identify your thought or feeling or you have identified it and it is troubling you. you can insert the opposite. if your thought or feeling is declinative and improper or troubling, insert the opposite. overlay lay it with a positive spin grown up thought. this is nullify the negative planar spin thought or feeling and leave you with a modicum of grown up positive spin. a master does not require this technique any longer. if you are unable to identify your thought or feeling specifically, then just realize what it is generally, if you can)

now go deeper in meditation. begin to get your own sensei of what your present moment belief or thought is and again, use your instrument to grapple with it by forming a concise set of clear words quietly in your mind without breaking your session. whatever it is is ok but you need to know what it is. once we know, perhaps we can take a closer look at it and maybe reconsider whether it is true or false and if we're good, maybe we can change our position on that point from that point on and score a point on the hot meditation seat

now we have a handle. we are doing well. we are holding our position like a well mannered horse in a competition

the next item on the agenda is to engage your instrument. don't just sit there brain dead or blank. this is not the point of meditation. you must engage your mind in your present moment with what you are faced with.

what next. how do we engage.?

you could apply a little force and make an enquiry about something that fascinates you that is not yet yours.

basically it's a burning question you have. why leave it on the back burner. you want new fashion, right.? so make an enquiry.

now don't stop making that single enquiry, possibly spanning multiple sitting practices until you have an clear response to your enquiry that takes it off your burner. either you acquire the fashion or you are able to considerably come to terms with an alternative such that that question is no longer bothering you. you may as well know that your heart is the single most powerful item you possess.

money. the term slides off her tongue like badd sex

to a man, even badd sex is good sex. it is like a warm meal for him,

every woman is an expert on sex in her own mind because she is the owner of that department.

the desire for sex at the bottom analysis is quite simple. it is just a natural propensity to procreate. you will find that it is quite strong really, when we reference the natural kingdom that surrounds us, in order to learn something about it.

for man, engaging in sex is like engaging in wine. preferred by many but ultimately, the man takes a loss to complete the sex act

a good woman, doesn't cause a man a loss. she causes him a gain.

let me create an interlude here again for a spell, dear reader, and ask you this. what is the rate of speed by which you are reading each passage.?

each passage contains a certain number of english words in close association that form an idea. let us agree that it takes a certain quantity of that most precious of commodities, time, in order to turn each light bulb on. you have mulled the idea and fathom what the writer means by the definition of the words that he selected.

as a reader, having carefully selected a writer under the discipline that engages you; you are now reading.

memorization of facts and information while reading requires something other than just mulling each passage. you must take a sparing and modest amount of notes as you proceed. take no more and no less notation than is necessary for you. i am quite thorough in my notes. i don't like to not be able to understand what i have written later on. then after you have completed an area, you must return within twenty-four(24) hours and study your notes again. this will trigger the critical facts so that you can recall them to your own mind as necessary. it is like memorizing a stack of data. somewhat dry to most unless it is your favorite discipline. then engage your notes again inside of another seventy-two(72) hours, to further cement these factual details in your mind. if you are subject to examination on these matters, then proceed to study your notes once more prior to entering the examination hall.

as for reading itself. take enough time to fathom what the writer is trying to get across to you in concept and information before proceeding to the next passage.

in order to understand a passage, you require the correct definition of each word. you also require the period(.) in order to see what the idea of that one sentence is and how it relates to the other handful of ideas in a passage. then you can make the correlation, we hope, grasp the concept as your own and desirefully proceed ahead from there.

when reading, you are either reading because you have to, because you want to or because you know there is something good in there somewhere.

i do not like to read because i have to, either. 'tis a royal drag.
i would prefer to study a booktext under my discipline that is incontrovertable. then there is no excuse for, having to read.

you see, this is the rub, many textbooks are a compilation of the interesting and necessary facts and information by an expert or expert(s) in the area of study but the writership remains in question.

a booktext was written by someone who we consider to be a Grandfather of the discipline and so to read him remains eternally interesting for students of his area

so we know how to read then.? good. let us continue

sex is money and money is sex for our practical purposes. get in behind a man, be a good woman and there is some money. do it not, and there is less money.

i'll stop you here again for a moment. what is your hearts' association and reaction to the term, "spell". let us table this question and bear it in our backmind.

'the only thing i will say,' she proceeds to tell me, 'is no sticking out your tongue.'

i remain quiet with a baited pause

'you are not old enough to proclaim a comment precisely from that park,' i scold her, 'you are only an ignorant girl and will remain silent.'

'yes Lord,' she is forced to say

'you may make an observation with your five(5) senses. for example, you may indicate that the color of this tub is white (because it has white paint on it).' i say

'i would be forced to concur with you. however, do not make observations at random or without purpose. let there be a reason for your observation' i say

'the mirror has a crack in it,' she retorts

'yes, it leads down to the infernal realms where you burn in hellfire forever. now sit down,' i say

then she begins to look like the cheshire cat with a touch of mona lisa

'hatred. a powerful weapon with which to destroy' she knows

some poor souls are enmeshed in hatred.

it has become the nature of their inner self

they cannot be other than what they are. this is a dilemma that we must continue to live with for a time

anger is something unique from hatred.

the master may appear to be angry with you but he is not hating you, although at times, the two may easily be mistaken on the surface

money is food and land. that is the sum of it. a man has some to his birthright whether it is official or not. this is why a man has some money and a female has less money

there are only two known ways for a soul that is lost to hatred to be relieved of duty. they can have the hatred stripped out of them or their soul may be clocked cleaned and/or destroyed

what a soul, that is lost to hatred, has, is a single connection or touch to the LORD, that is permanent and entirely criminal.

if you have one, then it is a form of power and has applications. you have to accept your situation, learn to understand, accept it and work with what you have, without being a total loss to society.

so what is it about the word spell.? we find that in the ordinary sense, the word just means the way in which we combine letters to form a unique word with a unique definition. nothing particularily out of the normal. just another word in an ocean of words but there is one more thing that we may note, when we cogitate that word.

we have a personal connotation associated with it. when someone says it or applies it in a sentence, we get either a negative feeling or a positive feeling that goes part&parcel with it. it may stem from a dimension in you that you may not be immediately aware of but it is definately there.

perhaps we get the sense that the word bears a declination of good intent and propriety. a form of witchcraft like a curse.

or perhaps i get the sense that the word bears an affirmative spin. a form of spellcasting and blessing.

what you may be able to note is that your connotation is not set in stone. in fact, every term probably has both a declinative connotative form and an affirmative connotative form. this is our option in life

words do relate to objects in the real world, quite often. yet, some words are metaphysical.

a tree is an object that bears you no ill will.

an object may have a word associated with it. in the case of a tree, we, have applied a word to that object. sometimes, a word has an object applied to it. this is a spell

'she's a final corner peeker and we know it' i say

concern yourself with yourself in life, mainly. other people are not your concern or your business in day to day life

i think it is good to be interested in the master but what does it mean to 'get a life'.?

it means to have a life.

or maybe, you are more interested in someone elses life than your own.

why is this.?

its like you are more interested in the details of someone elses' mind and heart and soul and life than you are in your own.? perhaps you just don't want to look in the mirror.?

remember to read in your own mind like the writer is speaking at speaking speed with you or to you or in light of the audience, or aloud and penrate the book to yourself.

penration causes the words, ideas and character of the writer to come alive. it causes the words to bear an element of tangibility yet again, even on on ancient work.

penration is the rationale of the pen.

presume the writer has a point and presume you don't get it until you do unless you couldn't get it from the text provided.

reading is a time consuming, energy consuming effort but this is a very thorough approach. you can probably caculate how long a given book may take you to read it from cover to cover by the page count.

you must imagine reading on behalf of the writer. imagine his character coming alive by his modes of thought and expression. get behind the words rather than just sitting dully in front of them. cause them to bubble up like a spell from the page accurately. you must do each and every step of reason yourself as you go along with the writer. in order to do this you must read more slowly than the writer could have read his own paper. this is because you do not know his intent and meaning off the bat nor do you know his future word. a writer could elaborate any point in his paper.

you see, when you read a paper silently then your thoughts override his or hers. but when you read aloud, then the character takes on a (hopefully) lively format in congruence with the ideas of the writer. it's not you doing the talking. it's the writer and his character(s) and his ideas and his imagination and his data

this is to say, i am bearing with the writer. the writer is not bearing with me.

the only books i prefer, primarily, are papers. from writer to reader. from heart to heart. from mind to mind.

not just the final anonymous computer read out.

old books may require more patience because some of their premises and conclusions were inaccurate but they bear light leading up to present day and so some ancient papers remain extant and important even to this very day

yes, daughter, you have to Believe the writer. there is a real human being back there telling you a story or a tale or just relating some information. this may be described as Opening your mind to the writer

in a way, you must allow the writer to capture your imagination for a spell and possibly even hypnotize you. hopefully he is a friend and on the money.

you can see the potential for danger and pitfalls here.? good, let this be your warning in life, from a friend.

or maybe the book is just a practical one and you share a common interest in your discipline

sometimes people try too hard to read. it is just an english sentence. catch it like softball, then set it aside and catch the next one until you have the whole passage sitting beside you.

naturally, as i say, you require the correct definition of each word but the writer exists for your edification. he is not trying to evade you. Listen.!

daughter, when you read a book, the television must be off. the radio must be off, the computer noise must be off. read in a quiet room or possibly a quiet location in nature with fresh water and air available

to be, it is recommended that you remain sitting. if you lay down, you likely will get dreamy and miss a passage

silent reading in ones own mind is considered the primary mode of readership however silent reading can become a blur of reading speed or missed passages. penration never becomes a blur unless you do it hurriedly.

reading quietly in ones own mind is fine as well

be sure and give the writer the benefit of the doubt of being an affirmative man, unless you are able to deduce otherwise

also mind the fact that the writer is writing to one reader and one read only. you.!
i will subnote here to say that my audience is female but i bear in mind the fact that only one person can be behind one copy at one time.

when reading a book, it is something like looking into a sorcerors pot or a sorceress' pot. as you read, the pot bubbles and comes alive like one of those visual readouts for a complicated sound amplifying system. you know the one with every dial.?

but you have to cast the spell to bring that which is within the oval pot to a proper lively level in accordance and cadence with the character of the writer

there are limits. we read within them

i mean there are only twenty-six(26) letters in the alphabet.

you are one of those people who are hunting for just that right word amidst an ocean of texts and books and documents and letters, to set everything right

the magic bullet, the ace in the hole, the panacea, the instant cure, the solution to all your problems

yes, a good graduate student could carry on from here for a spell.

problems are really just questions, aren't they.?

many people must admit that they have some problems in life. life is problematic. i don't mean emotional trouble. just money trouble or relationship trouble or you name it

i do not have any problems or troubles in life, myself.

this is a qualifying factor for a master. he is the one you see about your troubles in life.

it is good that there is a way out of our troubles, wouldn't you say.? we could begin by noting that troubles or a problem do not seem to be permanent. in the final analysis, there is at least the hope of a degree of peace at death for human beings

in fact, i am a capable man and able to tell you that to every problem of life there is a master solution

no problem is beyond us. no trouble to great for the LORD.
nothing, that is beyond his son.

we will add, that you need to be a little patient with your personal problem set in life. it is like your puzzle, not mine. there is no magic bullet. give up on searching for it. i like your problem set, it is not unlike mine, that is solved.

i like a good problem, like a good hypothesis

let me have a little peek at your (personal) problem set. i promise i won't bite.

let us have a look objectively without being rude or ignorant or without any feeling.

you may say your problem is too dark or too light or too troublesome, but i have found that it is just another problem set. it is not unlike looking at the landscape. the lay of the land is beautiful to me. you can almost see rome from constantinople now

your puzzle in life is not unlike an old computer with some broken components, a few pieces missing, cracked screen. how much do you want to bet i can get you online.?

"million daolla," he says,

"a worthy bet, no doubt" i agree

we can conclude another point about our dilemma or quandary. we cannot seem to get rid of our pussle, we can ignore it, get distracted from it, get drunk and forget it, smash it some more but the next morning, there it is. that old hunk of junk. my pussle.

the first order of business, is to stop smashing your pussle. i know it is complicated and hard to solve but it is not insoluable. stop smashing it. just let it live now, yes, let it live. it is only a pussle, it is not the end of the universe

the second order of business is to learn the abc's and the 123's of solving pussles. no sense attempting to master the end game if we don't even know how to crawl

'i hate computers, i hate puzzles, i hate math, i hate life!,' they exclaim

'mh,' the master says

well what will we call it then.? our problem set.? we will need a title that bears final affirmative connotation when we use it.

pussle, quandary, problem, hypothesis, dilemma, proposition

now i will leave you for a moment here alone to consider the next step after we dispense with this one. what would the very next step be.? there is no final answer to this question but i will help you shortly.

...

men will probably select proposition. we tend to like mathematical terms. they keep things proper and orderly, justified and true, reflective and lovable.

actually, a proposition is also a term we use when we propose marriage to a female

females may tend to keep the word pussle, privately. this is their own affirmative connotation to remind them that they are valuable in more than one way but at least in one way, to men

now, where do we go with our pussle. it is not quite a math problem it is more like a biology problem. it is a metaphysical pussle. in fact our pussle seems to span all the disciplines. now that is a complicated pussle. let's face it.

the very step that i would advise is for you to look honestly at your pussle as it stands right now, this very day. don't bother too much with yesterday and tomorrow is yet far away.

then i may say, let us find one thing about our pussle that we like, beyond the shadow of a doubt

you're looking in the mirror at your biology, aren't you.?

that could work. i am thinking more along the lines of when a mirror is not present

i feel our pussle is partly the world in which we live. we are not the girls in the bubbles here. we have a relation with the world in which we live.

there is an organic wholeness to life. you may not like this but it is true.

so, since everything is a part of our pussle, we could include some aspect of our selves that we prefer.

in this way, we come to accept our pussle as something we prefer. something valuable. something to treasure and keep carefully. something we keep working on, testing and retesting. acquiring further datum to add to our database about our pussle.

in science, you learn that an erroneous line of experimentation is not an entire total loss.

we keep the data. it has been found to be useful as well.

letters and integers;

our two new fields

i always dispreferred the twin terms. art was a little too gay and frivolous and the term science was a little too cold.

letters and integers are a little a more broad and free ranging and they are a little more serious on both counts

yet perhaps they are too elementary. why don't we just call them:

fine arts & fine sciences

biology; physics (computer hardware engineering)
astrology; astronomy
language(ex.culinary art, music); mathematics
romance(poetry); chemistry
librarianship; archaeology
rulership(war&peace); electricity
metaphysics; water
economics; geology

there, that should be ok

now, as i was saying, we have one item on our list concerning our pussle that we are not entirely adverse to.

in fact, i am going to keep my item quite general and just say that i prefer the metaphysics area of my proposition, but that's just me.

so, our pussle is layed out before us. now what.? well, let us tackle our preferred area first. luckily, that is the nature of this talk

still, we have a question but the area is so large, where do we start.?

'i don't know, i guess we start at the beginning,' she says.

that is a good answer. do not dismiss females when they respond like this. it is a good answer

yet, i may say where does such a thing have a beginning and an end.?

what is the very first question.? before we narrow down our pussle to one area.?

yes, how many questions do we have.? let us make an account.

who, what, when, where, why & how

these are all the immediate questions that come off our old timer brains. if you can think of another, then i would be happy to hear your hypotheses

perhaps a hypothesis, is the very first question. 'is it the chicken and the egg,' he asks.?

in fact the hypotheses (plural for hypothesis) is why are we asking why.? this is the first question.

"what we need here," i declare as the King, "is a good old fashion premise"

now what the heaven was it.?

'ah, it was existenialism.!' they declare, 'that was it.'

good.

"i exist, therefore i am, therefore i seek"

spock, i exist, therefore i am, therefore i seek

captain, your logic is undeniable

scotty, give me more power.

i'm given her all i can captain

the mathematical department probably won't like the preceding section but the biology department has a modicum of God only knows in them

end section
begin section

now, the words i will be using to explain scientific method are as follows: hypothesis.?, datai, conclusion, datum, response. you may or may not come to realize the application of these words, by the body of the following section.

so, it appears we have answered our first question which is a question of a question or a hypothesis.? and conclusion and an affirmative true response of a hypothesis.?; vix. it is a concluded hypothesis answered by a premise to explain our pussle and give us leave to investigate it.

this required an old fashion premise, which happens to fall within our preferred area of study; metaphysics

this allows us to proceed to our preferred area of investigation which is also metaphysics.

from here, we are then limited to our original six(6) questions and we will have to decide which question for our pussle to start with

perhaps the six(6) questions have a beginning, a middle and an end.

this is a theory i have. we do not know if it is true or false but i do not like the words true or false. we will apply new words to indicate the nature of the response or relationship between the conclusion and the hypothesis.?;

what have we got.?

true or false.? right or wrong.? correct or incorrect.?

there are only so many possible relations between a hypothesis.?, conclusion and four(4) possible responses
each of them is valid data that is to be kept

vix. if i were to extrapolate upon available data to determine whether my theory is true or erroneous, and the time expended turned up a declinative return, i would still be able to keep my theory because i have the correct answer. that is to say your enquiry is a success. you have a declinatively correct response from your datum indicating that your theory is off or not true yet, by determining this, we no longer need to enquire along that hypothetical line. interestingly enough, there is an oddity in a theory whereby it is possible to have a response that i am hoping is wrong. usually theories are affirmative but you could have a declinative theory. ex. you have a theory that your boyfriend is cheating on you. i presume you are hoping he is not.

so then,
the hypothesis.? is something along these lines;
there may be a time based relation between the order of the six(6) questions.?

we are attempting to determine what our first question will be when approaching our pussle pussle. we are going to need a conclusion to go with our hypothesis.?, as our testable lightbulb vix. one that seems safe enough to plug in. this will require an initiatory line of data that we will call our datai file. we will start with what we know

who is one of those metaphysical questions. who am i? it could be something more mundane, perhaps just the name on your drivers license.
what may be a mundane question. it is objective but could refer to an intangible
when is a standard question concerning the date and the time of the enquiry.
where is a straight forward question, again, you can get a little high minded with it but we just apply it in a straight forward format
why is a complicated question similiar to the question of the question that arrived us at this area
how is the main question of a science experiment. how are we going to get from our hypothesis.? to our conclusion and back to our hypothesis.? to confirm as to whether our response is affirmatively true or declinatively correct, in the usual sense

in this case, we are enquiring about the order of enquiry before we begin our enquiry into metaphysics as it pertains to solving our pussle

i feel that time among the questions probably falls somewhere in the middle were they to have a beginning and an end.

my approach to this hypothesis.? is to order the questions according to the available datai and according to my theory being true.

then what i will do is attempt to test my conclusion to see if it holds water

you see normally, we have a hypothesis.?, like this metal & gas will light up a light bulb and we just want to get to the how of it.

once we have a conclusion, we can test it

again, in this case, we do not know which question to start with as we engage our pussle in the area of metaphysics

'you must start in reverse,' she says. "maybe", i say.

i am hypothesising that the first question will be how
i mean its like just stepping down to earth here. whats the first question you ask.?

you say, how.? there is a relation between you and this world. it is like 'hello world'
it means, me me, you you, you me, me you

who, what, when, where, why and how. now, perhaps, the man who fashioned this original order was spot on but as good little integerists, we always take a fresh mind to it.

'correctomondo.! cowabunga dude.!' he says

how? where? when? what? why? who? he asked.

perhaps

how? what? when? where? why? who?

maybe

the question in spontaneity of hypothesising arises. is it pressing.?

is there a fire.? what is our order.?

i don't think there is a fire. we have time on our side. we are making a thorough enquiry of our area. were there a fire, we would dispense with some of the questions

when i first arrive at my area from my premise, i am simply faced with a momentous proposition and there is an immediate relation between myself and the world which includes other human beings. they come first to mind. i could just enquire about a rock or something but this is not exciting

'it doesn't really spur me on to victory,' my cohort claims

how, who, where, when, what, why

perhaps like that. a datai file and a conclusion

it's based upon human interaction starting with 'hello world'. this conclusion seems reasonable drawn from available datai

question. why not time before location.? considering a human interaction with a friendly relation, i presume you are looking forward to meeting. we acquire the location first, then the time, what is considered and the why unwinds. location first but time is hot on its heels

now we will begin to form a datum file and a response

how do we test our conclusion to see if it is affirmatively true or declinatively correct in relation to our hypothesis.?.?

we are going to require another data set to test this conclusion somehow and arrive back with our accurate and hopefully precise response. precision is important in science in order to determine an affirmative true concluded hypothesis and get the lightbulb working. we will call our next data set a datum file

i would like to note one more thing here. we are hoping that our conclusion is affirmatively true as it corresponds to our hypothesis.?. it could be that our conclusion comes back declinatively correct; the response has advised us that our conclusion is not true, for example; the conclusion itself is correct, just declinatively so. think about this hypothesis.? and the conclusion that seems to be holding water. my point is that even though it seems to be holding water it could still be declinatively correct. in a tangible lightbulb sense, the same could hold true. this lightbulb is looking good and we suspect it will work but it didn't, for example, when we plugged it in

i will add here another note regarding an affirmative hypothesis.? or affirmative theory that may never have a conclusion that holds water for nor returns an affirmatively true response. daughter, you would then have a series of declinatively correct conclusions until either you are exhausted of avenues or give up. at that point, your hypothesis.? is a concluded hypothesis with a declinatively correct response to the best of your knowledge. or, perhaps you are only 1 lightbulb away from returning your affirmatively true response and a conclusion that holds water. 10,000 lightbulbs later, he returned a conclusion that bore an affirmatively true response in relation to his hypothesis.? he then closed his file as a concluded hypothesis with a lightbult that works.

furthermore, perhaps the result of my enquiry comes back that my theory is true much as i suspected. i see that were my theory to be found to be true this would be an affirmative connotation to me. this is why i call it this and is apperceived to be in general majority, at least in this case

as well, were my conclusion to be found to be declinatively correct, not coinciding with the hypothesis.?, then in my sight it would be a declinative connotation to me. it is as you see it in light of the majority

my point here in the two(2) preceding passages is that to another man, the reverse could hold true.
ex. my hypothesis.? is that there is a time based order to the question series.
i have a conclusion drawn from available datai that appears to be holding water as follows:
how, who, where, when, what, why
the originator of the original order of the question series, were my conclusion found to be affirmatively true, in his eye, may call such a thing declinatively true and that is accurate and even precise for that man although not in general agreement with the majority.

as well, the reverse of this whole, could be that depending upon what your hypothesis.? is and whether you are hoping for it to be true or just a correct conclusion, then this could result in an affirmative correct conclusion or a declinative true conclusion. ex. this would require a declinative theory like; my boyfriend may be cheating on me.? although, in this case the response corresponds to the majority perception.

even if your datai leading to your datum file and conclusion(s) is insufficient or inaccurate or rife with errors, still the datum file bears perhaps some light upon your hypothesis.? but it may not be enough to support its own weight. we keep the data.

a wisdom question has come up. let us stop here for a moment;

(Luke 5:37,38 No one puts new wine into old wineskins, or else the new wine will burst the skins, and it will be spilled, and the skins will be destroyed. But new wine must be put into fresh wineskins, and both are preserved. No man having drunk old wine immediately desires new, for he says, ‘The old is better.’" (web)

St.Luke 5;37 And no man putteth new wine into old bottles; else the new wine will burst the bottles and be spilled, and the bottles shall perish.
St.Luke 5;38 But new wine must be put into new bottles; and both are preserved.

many wisdom seekers enquire as to the meaning of this obscure passage. the second quote is from a copy of King James version of the Bible, Old and New Testaments; says here it is an authorized version, translated out of the original tongues and with the former translations diligently compared and revised by his Majesty's special command A.D. 1611 from Canadian Bible Society, 10 Carnforth Road, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4A2S4; ISBN 0-88834-009-5

now, the Bible is a Grandfather booktext in the discipline of metaphysics but the translation must be finalized according to accuracy and precision.

nicely enough, i do not need to enquire with King James in order to extract a quote herein. amen

what this passage refers to is fasting, dietetics and nutrition. you see, as human beings, during this time upon earth, we are lost to impropriety in many regards, away from our natural diet. God does not want us to immediately jump onto mild sweet fruit and perhaps a few herbs only. this is like putting new wine into old skins. it is harsh and dangerous. this is why i recommend modifying your diet to restrict your oil intake towards zero. you will subsequently reduce your salt and sugar intake. a little mild dairy, fish, egg, turkey, grains, bread, no oily nuts or seeds (daughter, i am not referring to long grain brown rice here or snow peas for example), and fruits and vegetables, pasta, rice, potatoes, sour cream, cottage cheese, yogurt1%, milk, sorbet, baked tortilla and salsa, popcorn, use your imagination. there are some nice spreads as well; hummus, tzatiki, &c. you will find that perhaps 1 in 10 items on the store shelves bear no oil. read the directions carefully. use reverse osmosis water for now. don't worry too much about it. eat what you want. these items will allow us to wend our way back towards our natural diet without bursting our wineskins. this is a conclusion drawn from available datai in relation to a hypothesis.?. we have yet to test our conclusion and how it corresponds to the hypothesis.?. the theory is that by reducing my oil intake towards zero, i will eventually be able to restore myself to my natural diet of mild fruits and green leafy vegetables. in fact, the conclusion is born within the theory here. at times, scientific method is very axiomatic. its like we're spelling out the obvious, but sometimes it is hard to spell out the obvious or find where your theory parts five(5) ways into a relationship. you see, i am also already giving you a concluded hypothesis, that the natural diet of man is in fact mild fruits and green leafy vegetables or herbs. now again, my hypothesis.? is: there must be a way to get from this junk food diet back to my natural diet.? my conclusion drawn from an existing datai file is: zero oil. my next datum file will be life experience which will eventually return me my response as to the relationship between my conclusion and my hypothesis.? vix. is my theory correct or true.? there is an element of truth to it, even if it is not in alignment with the truth. we keep the data

another wisdom point i will touch on here is concerning meditation. don't overdo it. take it easy or you may encounter some difficulties with your energies balance)

let us continue our enquiry integerist in the field of letters

so what have we thus far;

theory: there is a time based relation between the 6 questions.?
hypothesis.?: there may be a time based relation between the order of the six(6) questions.?
datai file. a portion of the above text
conclusion: how, who, where, when, what, why

so, we've got our conclusion then but we do not yet know if it is affirmatively true and in alignment with my hypothesis or declinatively correct and not in alignment with my theory.

let us reconsider the lightbulb for a moment.

say i have a lightbulb in my hands, i have just made one. i'm about to plug it in

what i'm about to tell you is top secret. the lightbulb that i am holding holds water.
this is to say;
now, i have a datum file that, after careful consideration, has illuminated my hypothesis.? and conclusion.
and the answer is that the conclusion appears to be affirmatively true in relation to my hypothesis.? essentially, we've mulled it over. if you look, the plugging in of a tangible lightbulb is remarkably similiar. vix. the datum file is exceedingly terse. with an intangible affirmative true conclusion there will remain a 1/2 a hair of doubt. this file is closed. it is an affirmative true concluded hypothesis

now, when working as an integerist or scientist, at this point for example, an idea has come to mind. there may be no immediate reason for it. there is no clear indication where it has arisen from but it appears that it may be useful, so we simply scoop it up and add it in

perhaps the first question is the last in the order. this is my second theory

my remaining hypothesis.? is:
it is possible to proceed from the last question first.?
the datai file includes a synopsis of the information we have on the six(6) questions
my conclusion is:
proceed from the last question first

there are two possibilities and one is my conclusion. proceeding from the middle is not feasible or reasonable. i've simply selected my conclusion based on available datai

let's try both pathways and then ascertain which conclusion is affirmative true and which one is a declinative correct conclusion. i will probably go two steps along each side or perhaps three, before i have enough datum to form a datao file in order to return and form a response to the conclusion of my hypothesis.?

before we carry on, we have bumped into another question. of the two pathways, which side shall we start from, to acquire a datum file.?

now, i prefer the affirmative true hope that i hold that the first question to start with when enquiring about an area in general or in specifics will be the last question. consequently, i am suggesting that we start with the declinative correct possibility, keep the datum file, proceed to the affirmative true probability, keep the datum file. pool the datum into a datao file and form an accurate and hopefully precise response pertaining to the relationship between my conclusion and my hypothesis.?

how.? who.? where.? we will now acquire some datum on these questions as they pertain specifically to our field of inquiry; metaphysics

:how.? theoretically, we are working so broadly that one question pertaining to our field of inquisition as to our pussle could take a lifetime. a couple things about the question 'how' come to mind. meditation, study of the available booktexts, self enquiry. in fact, i could pull a booktext right now, and delineate this further. so we will volite this one here for now

:who.? this is a large question. soul, the Lord, God. these terms are obscure yet common

:where.? here, wherever i am

essentially, up until here, we have a datum file. we have proceeded to enquire along one line from the first question

now, lets bump noses and turn around three times

why.? what.? when.?

:why.? this one calls to mind our premise. can we expand on this at all considering that we have entered a new area.?
i exist, therefore i am, therefore i seek

'it seems sufficient to us,' the woman say. ('why must they always expand on things?')

suffering sucotash.! very well, the female order has elected to entertain us. we are humbly bemused and grateful, eternally

:what.? from the pussle standpoint it would be the quantifiable quandaries in our pussle as they pertain to metaphysics, tangible or intangible

when.? now, today, this year, this lifetime.

ok, up until here, we have a second datum file, essentially along the other line from the last question first

so, now we combine our two datum files into one datao file that we feel is satisfactory for our purposes; lets sift back through and mull over our response

our hypothesis.? arose from this enquiry that we possibly begin at the end rather than at the beginning as would usually be presumed. again, after careful review of the available datao file surrounding our conclusion, we will mark our first pathway(conclusion) as a declinatively correct possibility, like a broken lightbulb and we have moved our probable conclusion to an affirmative true conclusion in alignment with our theory. again, with an intangible affirmative true conclusion there will remain a 1/2 a hair of doubt. this file is closed. it is an affirmative true concluded hypothesis.

question. why do we start from the right? we have to meet our proposition or area, isn't it so.?

you must consider the nature of your approach.

were we just meeting a man for lunch, i agree, we start from the left. but when we are dealing with our pussle or with science or with letters, we start from the right because, we must begin top down in order to be thorough before getting into the meet of it.

you see, it depends upon the nature of your enquiry. if your enquiry is intangible such as this one, then you must start from the right and weigh it heavily. but if the nature of your enquiry is tangible then in a way, it is a fire, and you dispense with the long winded question on the right and get to the how of it. if the tangible enquiry you are making is say, whether this metal & gas will light up this lightbulb, i would still like you to make a proper answer to each of the other questions prior to getting into the how of it. this is proper scientific method.

so, now, we may at long last, proceed to enquire within, about our quandary which we call our proposition or our pussle.

life is problematic. our pussle is simply a problem set that is internal and right before our eyes or immanent.

here we are in the area of our preference called metaphysics with our pussle as it stands, which is relatively fine the way it is and our first of six(6) questions

as we go along we may entertain pretty much which ever sub-discipline we prefer or we require, in order to, quite simply, solve our pussle, my friend

metaphysics.
why,
i will form an introductory answer here. there is no good reason for the opposite of why to exist
to me, it is like, why are we standing here at metaphysics with a pussle making enquiry(ies)
this leads us back to our premise. i exist, therefore i am, therefore i seek. this is the only reason we need.
let the opposite to this not exist

what,
what is the objective problem(s) we are faced with in our pussle
metaphysics is where we ask the big questions in life.
i have this quandary called desire, you see...
this is the what primarily to be solved

when,
now, today, this year, this lifetime.
what other answer can there be.?

where,
here, this location in which i am standing, upon earth, in the milky way...
any location upon earth is possible

who,
who indeed.
you are concerned with solving your pussle
this concerns the me or the I and your relationship with other me's and I's whether visible or invisible

how,
meditation disciple

;and so science has given us this. not art.

art is yet to come but science is today

three cheers for the men

the term is improbable, not impossible.

& this calls for a little bach rattling the rafters.

...

wait.! before we conclude this part let us have a quik synopses of the following words; premise as compared with presumption and assumption as well as supposition, deductive reasoning, abductive reasoning, inductive reasoning, inference, hypothesis and conclusion

premise. a premise is something we take for granted that we cannot prove by empirical science. we hold a premise as true by the good word of our metaphysical teachers. for six(6) examples,
1.finite mathematics is a premise daughter. can you count to six(6) billion.? good. now is the count within a single count limited.? finite mathematics is a premise because it is abstract and so stands the test of time furthermore we cannot prove it and even we could, we wouldn't care
2.existenialism is a premise. this is because human history coincides with our extant texts. that is to say, even if you don't exist, we do.
3.times' quantity is that of a single unit or item and is limited. this is a premise. our count within our count may be nearly unlimited
4.zero(0) as an integer is a premise. zero(0) is the first item in a count while one(1) is the second item in a count, two(2) is the third item in a count, &c. yes, zero(0) is a something
5.when ruling a country we say "the people are virtuous". this is a premise
6.the LORD is a premise for 95% of the human population
premises may be re-examined at any time by any human being. don't build your house upon sand, daughter.

some items resemble a premise but are a constant or a presumption. for three(3) examples,
1.a rock is not a premise. the reason it is not a premise is because it cannot stand the test of time. furthermore, a rock does not exist without human history.
2. in science, we say, that something does not come from nothing. this is our 'a priori' conclusion prior to any experiment. yet, it is classified as an inference. it is an extrapolation from a conceptualization of a pure geometry no point or nothing. from there we infer the true answer.
3.a constant like the number pi is not a premise. pi is extrapolated from a theoretical pure circle that we have conceptualized. it is a conclusion that is sound and true yet it only something that we presume because it trails off. we use a few deductive steps of reason and form a mathematical conclusion to arrive at pi. it is not an inference.

presumption. a presumption is when i presume something to be true that i cannot yet prove. it is relational data between two or more objects in the world quite often. i presume my government is not my enemy.? this is an accurate presumption to keep although it may or may not be true

assumption. an assumption is not unlike a supposition. it is something we hold to be true without sufficient evidence or grounds to support our conclusions and beliefs. i assume you will meet at 1800 for supper like we had planned the previous evening.?, for example. this is false. you may presume it to be true but you may not assume it to be true.

i am going to seize my opportunity to dragon strike here, daughter. i will presume you are aware of my three(3) rules of religion. these are independent of time, place, circumstance or race.
1(one). no ridiculous violence
2(two). no treacherous backstabbery or coconut lie or breach of privacy
3(three). no ridiculous violations against little ones
sum. vix. no evil
& no, these are not a premise. they are a religion. these hold true even during war or peace. you'll have to use your common sense with them.

supposition. a supposition is fanciful and make-believe. it is purely imaginary it has no grounds for its conclusion. an assumption still has grounds for its conclusion but the conclusion does not support its own weight

reasoning. as for reasoning, it is a human attribute. logic is a machine attribute. human reason works off of premises, is triangulated and/or square and conclusive. machine logic does not require premises, per se. it is circular, inconclusive and works off of constants, like a idling car.

deductive reasoning is sound and reasonable, like sherlock holmes. sherlock stands upon his premises and is able to presume the truth.
deduction is the taking away, and so by carefully taking away that which it cannot be, by careful enumeration, you arrive at that which it must be.

abductive reasoning is an accurate guess. a guess is not haphazard. it is in the ballpark but occurs from unknown sources at times

inductive reasoning is unsound reasoning. quite often it is suppositional. for two(2) examples,
1.because i saw you reach into your pocket, and because one time before, some one reached into their pocket and withdrew a gun, i assumed you were about to withdraw a gun.
2.because i saw one crow that is white i assume all crows are white. (they do have white crows apparently in australia.)

again, deductive reasoning is to say because i saw many many many instances of black crows, therefore, all crows are black. that would be reasonably sound deductive reasoning

inference is when a tangible conclusion allows me to make a small step of intelligence and make a subsequent intangible conclusion. this is the usual sense in that this is when it is most useful, from the particular to the broad. here are four(4) examples,
1.tangible-intangible inference; men are tough therefore of a constant or a variable between men or females, men resemble a constant.
whether an inference is inductive or deductive reasoning remains up to you.
2.intangible inference; you could infer from an intangible pure geometry a presumption that something does not come from nothing. both the initial data and the subsequent inference are intangible. we will presume 100% certainty because the shadow of doubt is so small.
3.tangible inference; where there is smoke there is fire. this is a reasonable conclusion but you would have to verify your inference with your five(5) sense data in order to be 100% certain of your conclusion.
4.intangible-tangible inference; data unknown. disengage. leaving the area to the female.
.
a hypothesis is a thesis or paper but it is yet deficient. this means it is your theory in the form of a conclusion-question.
"I have a hypothesis." yes, when the term is used this way this is like having a theory. this includes an incumbent possible explanation or conclusion but it also entails the question, clearly. the whole problem arises when you search for a question to answer. you either have a theory or you don't. you can't really make a theory out of thin air. if i have a problem, then i could impose scientific method to answer it. but i don't have a problem then i don't require scientific method, per se. so when a graduate student must come down with a thesis they are being asked to "find an experiment". this is false. what they are to do is look at their discipline, make an enquiry into their sub-discipline and answer the question, in their own way and in their own words, using scientific method as a possible mode of enquiry. "I have a hypothesis." yes, this is your conclusion-question. but your hypothesis.? is the bow&arrow aiming at your target or conclusion. the term is used in a confusing way like they are one and same. i differentiate a hypothesis into a hypothesis? and a conclusion. "I am hypothesising." yes, you have a theory without an immediate probable answer and you are attempting to form a conclusion-question. so a graduate student submits their thesis for masters degree graduation which means they will require a concluded hypthesis in their sub-discipline to prove expertise. they must answer an enquiry (that we likely already know full well the answer to) in their discipline in their own way using a mode of enquiry. this then is a hypothesis that is no longer deficient, otherwise known as concluded hypothesis or thesis.

a conclusion is final. we use various modes of enquiry to form an accurate and even precise conclusion, whatever it may be. we use the truth to draw our conclusions. a conclusion may be 100% precise. it may be 99.98% precise. it may be 99% accurate. once your conclusion is precise we may presume ti to hold true. if your conclusion is accurate, then it may require further five(5)sense data to conclude it into the arena as a precise conclusion. i don't throw out the shadow of doubt until i have my conclusion at precise. but that's just me.what modes of enquiry do we have available to form a conclusion. five(5) sense data.? yes. inference.? yes. reasoning.? yes. scripture.? yes

enquiry. why do we only require five(5) sense data to bring a conclusion from accurate to precise.? well, when it comes to scripture, it is scripture. when it comes to geometry, it is pure. when it comes to five(5) sense data, it is crude. we need more mud. not another pure circle.

addendum00

the following is an excerpt from Rene Descartes' "Discourse on Method" 1637after death (of Jesus Christ)

"instead of the great number or precepts which make up logic, I thought that the four following precepts would suffice, provided that I could make a firm, steadfast resolution not to violate them even once.

The first(1) was to never accept anything as true which I could not accept as obviously true; that is to say, to carefully avoid impulsiveness and prejudice, and to include nothing in my conclusions but whatever was so clearly presented to my mind that I could have no reason to doubt it.

The second(2) was to divide each of the problems I was examining in as many parts as I could, as many as should be necessary to solve them.

The third(3), to develop my thoughts in order, beginning with the simplest and easiest to understand matters, in order to reach by degrees, little by little, to the most complex knowledge, assuming an orderliness among them which did not at all naturally seem to follow one from the other.(necessarily)

And the last resolution(4) was to make my enumerations so complete and my reviews so general that I could be assured that I had not omitted anything."

these are the rudimentary primary principles of his scientific method that supercede Aristotle's "Organon" from 300b.c. and entails a hypothetico-deductive strategy that, in no small part, is the basis our present day hypothetical-deductive model.


addendum01

the actual 'how' portion of the scientific method in present day use is found to be inconsistent in that it requires imagination, creativity and intelligence. however there are thought to be six(6) primary elements to present day empirical scientific method if we look at an online encyclopedia;

1.characterizations - i would term this the datai file (2)
2.hypothesis development - this includes your initial theory or enquiry which is either just an enquiry or an enquiry bearing a pre-existing conclusion-question to be broken down into your hypothesis.? and your conclusion. their relationship yet to be ascertained.(1)
3.predictions - i would term this the response or relationship between your conclusion and your hypothesis.? (4)
4.experiments - datum file (3)
5.improvement and evaluation - this is the abductive reasoning and new questions arising as you proceed and includes a possible change to theory
6.confirmation - concluded hypothesis or thesis that is available for other scientists to mull over and check for accuracy and precision (6)


addendum02

my proper scientific method lends propriety to any scientific enquiry by asking why first. this requires you to have a fit motive prior to proceeding with your science experiment

the old mode of enquiry seems to have been that of a scientist studying a rock perhaps

i feel scientific method is a very important part of our lives that we use every day and has given us many important advances up until present. it is a mode of enquiry available to us and this proper scientific method may lend itself to propriety under any load while being fully applicable to every enquiry whether it be scientific or artistic.

end part 4 of 9. A Talk:Thesis
www.musecrafters.com/ocean
begin part 5 of 9. A Talk: Thesis.

...

i have just finished listening to a nice rendition of fur elise by j.s.bach. fur elise means for lisa in german

it was a lovely rendition by a young man. my only comment is that he could have protracted his ending. his rendition warranted it. in fact, i was a little disappointed that he did not protract his own ending

let'us look at something troubling called fear, in a moment, which is a part of many peoples pussles to a greater or lesser extent. you see, we old men know this.

now, i will listen to the 5th. bach knew this.
everybody loves bach, yet me, i love beethoven. suit yourself

...

now you have to root for me and say i'm the greatest metaphysician ever. oh, there's bach and mozart in the field now and yesterday but beethoven; greatest ever

although, it's contestable

this will delimit your fear, for one

fear is a metaphysical relation with a tangible component, between a man and a woman

the greater the distance, the greater the fear and the man knows this, sadly

the shorter the distance, the more love which equals what.?

don't think too hard on this most recent question.

my dear lisa, you need to learn how to use your synapses.

beethoven loves you. he will tell you a million and one ways

when you use your synapses, you have on or off.
when you stop and think or feel about something like this last question, it is a very simple question with a very simple answer

what happens is we get lost looking for that really complicated answer that is very hard to find or see.

when you become proficient at using your synapses, which is just on or off and a conditional if if (girls get two ifs)

you just start at the bottom, not at the top

right.? so we are speaking about the term fear. that is a 0. we must bear the 0 in mind as we look at the second term which has arisen which is love or a 1. now if we apply more 1, and use our if if differential, then we will see this will equal less 0

are you scared of beethoven.? he is a frightening man, isn't he.? calling down the thunder. he is beautiful. the drawing of him when he is a child is my favorite

will fresh mountain water kill you or heal you.?

don't bother with the scientific method (enquiry integerist system) on this question.

it's too easy, but we certainly could apply it if we felt like it.

what would be a good question to really pull out ye old enquiry integerist system.?

you probably noted that this is a question itself and so we immediately say ah, we could ask the question upon the question but i do not think that would be of particular practical value either, so we will just use the question to quickly trilocate a good one

love. love is a term and a very broad one at that.

we need more than a term. we need a question. a question forms the basis for an enquiry with a hypothesis.? and a conclusion and a determination of the datum and how it correlates to the our theory

perhaps a why why for you. yes, i think that is a good one for my young disciple

as a guide, i offer you mens' demonstrations thus far in existentialism

you're looking for the answer before you are looking for the question, i fear

don't be afraid to be wrong, it is ok to be wrong because then we will be right after we are wrong

i will allay over to another area for a moment.

when a woman thinks of a man in a close contact situation, she is not the one who does the holding. the man does the holding.

you're just a little thing, i'm a big thing

you can't protect me but by one measure i can protect you.

they're burning the incense now, i can smell it from here. and it smells very devotional and very wonderful.

wonderful. what does this word mean.?

the usual meaning of the word is something akin to beautiful or joyous.

an interesting aspect of language is how words are formed. you can break down words and have a look at the mechanics of them

wonder full

won der full

'go and visit the King, my dear. that's my advice immediately,' she counsels

here is a question for a young lady i know of, to dig into.

why fresh cool air in light of blue sky and cumulus from a window ajar.?

ah, you are disconcerted by this word here; insanity.

understandable. that word definately causes a little unrest

'this man is, prescient, my dear, let it be a conclusion,' they say.

'she's a poor judge of a man, i just know it,' she says

insanity, my dear, is not controvertable

a conundrum is a problem that has no immediately clear solution.

this is what people are like with a professor;
you have missed something, they proclaim
'no, he has not missed anything, i know him well,' she says

controvertable

it was a triplicitous expression, my dear and they thought it was duplicitous or a double entendre. they were in error, not i

it's like this. i don't disagree with you

this is an example of a double entendre. (everybody looks down. you've got to look up. the stars are up (referring to the alternate definition of double entendre)(you're missing the point again.!.!.))

to say insanity is not controvertible is a triple entendre which is to say, it is not possible

take it to the bank. the Lord came down from the mountain and advised us that insanity is impossible for any man or woman.

o, you may feel flustered or disconcerted or not making any immediate obvious sense to commoners for example, at times, but as i say

to me that so called word is the current usage of the word evil. to call someone that, is evil in and of itself

never reduce someone to some permanent condition of absence of sensei. please remember this point.

yes, i've got a few evil enemy standing eyeball to eyeball with me on it, like imbeciles

daughter, listen closely to the master for a moment (without being his enemy for a change).
it is the application of the word "controvertible" that makes it triplicitous
what does controvertible mean.? think about it carefully
use your own brain on it. don't use the dictionary, specifically
what is its usual sense.? very few people know what the usual sense of the word controvertible is in common parlance.
it may not be converted into currency. it is not controvertible
currency is liquid. what is the opposite of a liquid in the usual sense.? not a gas, a solid

love, wisdom, friendship, propriety, virtue, eternal life, joy, peace, protection, fellowship, aid,

HOW DARE YOU SIT AS THE OPPOSITE OF THE TRUTH ANYWHERE IN THE UNIVERSE. I WILL HAVE YOUR PHREAKING HIDES

think of your heart as fresh white toilet paper with little hearts on them.

i swear to you now and forever, i could really use some of that.

my heart, my dear is like fresh mountain water that is unending and always on

so, let us return to order and discipline after branching out into freeform improprier writing for a spell there. frankly i really detest that element in this text but the man gets the but not an enemy and not a female so be that as it may, lets continue with our discovery and friendly enquiry of life and love, sorry about the interlude

"why fresh cool air in light of blue sky and cumulus from a window ajar.?"

well, don't just shrug. apply your synapses to it

what have we got.? we have a 1 spot available. we have a 0 spot available and we our differential gear, at a basic level of thinking or engaged female feeling

I WOULD SHOUT HERE BUT I DON'T LIKE TO SCARE THE GIRL INTO ANY FURTHER DISTRESS THAN SHE IS ALREADY LOST IN. NOW WHEN I AM SHOUTING, LIKE THIS, I HAVE SOMETHING EXTRA TO SAY LIKE

APPLY YOURSELF.! clap;clap

you probably would have bonked your head on the ceiling at the sound of those two claps, my dear

it means get moving, engage your mind in doing mundane tasks properly for starters, when you put the kettle on, put it on. when you brush your teeth, brush your teeth, when you put your pajamas on, don't put them on backwards

my dear, i could murdify you but i am your beethoven and you are my elise. there is no way i would ever do that.

my name is craig, in case you were wondering, you may speak to me about any topic under the sun, in much the same way that you speak with any human being.

murdify.! outrage.! little by bach. have a listen.

'you turn him into a monster, and i'll turn you into a monster,' she confirms

i am not alone in this world, little one, but you sure act like you are. outrage.! improprier.!

i don't know, should we leave all this in this text.?

that is a good question. it is a question worthy of orderly review.

orderly. your mind really has a lot of negative planar spin on it,

now, there is One tea bag, plenty of water and two cups. you want the war cup or the girl cup.?

are you reading carefully.?

you must read as i have taught you in a preceding part. this is critical

it is a question mark not a period

"I want the girl cup, asshole. What one you think I want.?"

rude, indignant and bratty but she paused upon the question, applyed her instrument of warfare and drew her response accurately. task complete, good girl. and yes, that's a dimuitive

a girl needs help. a man doesn't. next enquiry

o, she's definately doable.
i on the other side of the coin am only semi-doable.
i'll give you that, there is an element of truth to it

there are indeed two sides to every coin.

there is a quaternary there as well, can you see it.?

'don't attempt a quadruple backflip quite yet,' my dear, she counsels, 'the master will handle the quintuple backflips'

you may officially jump on my bed until the cows come home, my dear. let it be known. i have already made a declaration of love. it is not rescinded

'perhaps i was,... wrong.' she admits hesitantly

This, my dear, is what we call a breaththrough

did you just spit it out to yourself after reading this.? this is ineffective and not what i mean

what i mean is that after careful thought and deliberation with an adequate amount of (hatred), you have reluctantly yet with truthfulness and honesty come forward to admit that perhaps on that point, with a little bit of contrition, you were perhaps the party in error, just on that one minor point over there, nothing more.

if you do this, and of course if it is accurate, then you have made a real breaththrough,
after all, we're not just admitting fault or error unless we really were

tell this to the other party involved or lay down your claims in person as to why they were the party in error and this is even better

let the truth set you free. day by day. point by point

'do not demonize someone,' they both say immediately at the identically same time

my dear, i was demonized so badly, that my picture may as well be in the dictionary and that's one of the rare times it holds true

to be demonized in life is a great bane. it is among the worst fates or destinies or luck that can befall a man, i feel

what does that word mean.? demonize

i know roughly what the dictionary may say. let's have a look

demonize; to portray as wicked or threatening

i may as well be living in the village of the damned here

i swear it to be true.

why don't you let me take over responsiblity for you, girl.?

let'us get on with act two(2)

'yes, but if you take over responsibility for me, that means I will have to suffer you,' she crowns

yes, that is partially or partly true

'you let me do the frowning,' i say

'why should I, why would I, go away and die.' she spits

(i have a little bit of the professional left in me, for just a girl, after a fashion)
(test my mettle and see, if i am a god, or a man or a mouse)

the answer to your question is a rhetorical one.
since you do not know the definition of that word off the top of your head, i will take the point, game, set, match
did you have a little trouble here.? i will help you. your question is "'why should I, why would I, go away and die.' she spits". there was just no question mark to it because you already know the answer for yourself, but your answer is wrong, as well thus it is a rhetorical question, either way you look at it and i am just being a little facetious by presuming you do not know the definition off the top of your head but the taking of the point and the game and the set and the match is valid.

'master has taken the point, the game, the set and the match. you win, i lose. did you hear that.?' she queries.

i certainly would like to hear that in the spoken realms in person at some location somewhere sometime in her own words

query. a perfect term for a girl to her own man and who is hers no one elses.
look at the root of the word. it is reminiscent of queer which suits a female, not a man
gay means colorful, bright and cheerful but not frivolous

'l don't know why you have such a big hard-on for me asshole.' she comments

'....you are semi-doable and that is final.' she confirms

'you're ugly, asshole,' she reminds me.

'very well, i accept your assessment,' a man replys

'so, we're getting married then, or what.?' she queries naively

'don't give me that look.! looking at me like i am niggeredly or something' i say

he gives her a netherly look

fiction may parallel the possibility of fuction

'to bring fiction into the real world is a fools' errand,' they say

but i never did listen to them

'when you finally give up on your final critic, you're getting somewhere,' they say

i agree, there is an element of a truism to the preceding

'did you know that i think you are very critical of me, I ....' she blathers on for moment or two

when i listen to blather, i use a catchphrase. vix. i note the topic you are blathering about and i also know that you are blathering, so my ears are not closed but i do not regurgitate falsehood, at least not anymore, in my old age

from an immediate two sided coin inspection you are certain of the truth of that upon which you are speaking. i can tell you are certain by the adamant reapproval of yourself as you speak but i say, don't be so sure of yourself.

wait for your master to overstand the matter for you and elucidate the fine point that i swear you miss everytime

let me just say, that, a critic is generally considered to be an opponent otherwise known as an enemy perhaps only in the mild sense of that word

is your master your enemy or your opponent.?

my dear, it is not a good question at all. now we have to go back and consider what constitutes a good question from a bad question.

first off, why is that question a bad question.?

'god, son, i don't know that i could tolerate it.,' he asks
'jesus, son, where do you find the patience.?,' he says

well, there is a fringe benefit. once you pay me by sex, i will elucidate the fine point for you

my dear, the question is a bad one because the answer is obvious and therefore we are wasting our breath. breath takes energy. it's like a loss after sex

interlude.my dear.? what do you think about the fleshy part of the life we are living.? i mean what do you see or what do you think when you look at yourself naked in the mirror or just down the length of your body.?

'i don't know. what'd you think.?' she asks

i think that it is partly beautiful and partly ugly but love throws in the penny.

so, where were we; ah yes, we may certainly return to the other questions, where i said they were a good question, throughout the text, 'for entire review, from beginning to end of each and every one,' she finishes the sentence

your master is clearly your friend and yes, don't mix up being critical of someone when you say they have bad skin and being critical of the truth

you have to hear the intonation of the question.

is your master your enemy or your opponent.?

first off, you should be able to catch my intonation from the wording of the sentence.

it is not a question as though i am either you enemy or your opponent, one of the two.

the intonation is such that:

is your master your enemy or your opponent.?

these two terms mean essentially the same thing and so, we may presume that the masters intonation is as though he had only used one term.? and clearly we should know by now, that he is not your enemy, yes,?

christ, where were we.?

demonize. the sad part about this word is that someone gets portrayed as evil and insane and right on the edge of just going completely hairy carry without a moments notice to possibly any quarter at any time. it really is bad

you don't know how much invisible power the government has. you make one little law written down in some little book somewhere and it's relative truth that a soul must burden under.

call me the disciple if you want. probably a term everyone can agree on

my government is a gucking circus. imsane and weevil

they're alot like having a conversation with the girl but at least she is a civilian it would seem and she's coming around to compliant

heeeeyyyyy

when you get the double quotes in life, that is alot of power.

because what you say is the truth furthermore i am a master of wisdom. this is shaping up very good

'wee should take the double quotes more seriously, i feel.' he agrees.

'wee agree' they say (the populace)


"you appear to be a human being with red hair" she says

i accept these double quotes of my government thus far.

hey, this calls for a new part

o, wait

before we proceed to the next part, let us review the text thus far for my friend who happens to be a girl

let us delineate the times that we can find where i have indicated that a question is a good one and let us get fine about the why of it.
wait, i tell you what. i will find two(2) examples and then we will carry on.

here is one here: "question. why not time before location.? considering a human interaction with a friendly relation, i presume you are looking forward to meeting. we acquire the location first, then the time, what is considered and the why unwinds. location first but time is hot on its heels" excerpt from part 4 section 2, a talk (4b)

now, first off, the fact that i have answered the question seems to include the idea that it qualfies as a good one by at least one degree
there are two basic reasons why this is a good question without getting too far into the why of these two basic reasons
one(1); it is not an obvious answer
two(2); it is not an obvious question. it is fine question
vix. it is not a dumb question. it is a fair question.
what does fair mean.? it means justified. it means i see why you could ask an Honest question on it.

example number two(2)
ok, here is the other example i will use: "and so, we find ourselves in a position of having to get back to the future. they say time is the commodity of Kings and they are true and correct on this point. to make an enquiry while you are alone, to yourself, in the form of a carefully worded question is considered to be wise. is time our friend or our enemy.?"

why is this a good question.?
because we do not know the answer and can not immediately find out by reading the question itself

as a third(3rd) example i will pull one from this part:
"will fresh mountain water kill you or heal you.?"
this is a good question because i am allowed to ask an obvious question as the writer for the purposes of demonstration. i am not actually coming forward to ask the writer, this question, in person, in which case it would qualify as a bad question

now, there is one more piece to this part that we will finish off on
it is our dear friends' why why question: "why fresh cool air in light of blue sky and cumulus from a window ajar.?"

i will provide a preliminary answer for you.
it is a question of love and why does it exist. can you see that.?
why is there any love any where in the universe.?
does love need a reason.? do i need a reason to love you, mon chere.?
do you need a reason to love fresh cool air in light of blue sky and cumulus from a window ajar.?
"a stitch in time, saves nine(9), mon chere." the King says
perhaps you are just a girl or maybe you Are a circus girl, but either way, it is private which means it remains unknown.
you worry too much about a 1/2 a penny and miss the penny, not to mention the dollar.
"when you find the dollao, you will find the million dollao." They say
this is called, missing the point
listen carefully. not the aforeaforementioned sentence. just in general
remember my dear, there is no right and there is no wrong, unless we are just dealing with basic actions in life and yes, speaking can be ann basic action, but quit splitting the penny. we can talk about splitting the penny versus cutting the mustard at one penny, if you want, naked together in the sac

...
end part 5 of 9
www.musecrafters.com/ocean
begin part 6 of 9. A Talk: Thesis

'"you appear to be clinically sane"' They say (affirmative)

'this is an accurate observation and assessment,' i say (they, affirmative)

it is incontrovertable; impossible to deny the truth of. it is a real term

as compared with; not controvertable; not possible to argue in it's favor. it is not a real term

these two applications of controvertable are two separate terms

'i am terrified by my government,' i say (they, affirmative)

'the situation is critical,' i say (they, affirmative)

'this means now,' i say (they, affirmative)

'my government is unresponsive,' i say (they, affirmative)

'where is my government,' i say (they, affirmative)

'find them immediately,' i say (they, affirmative)

'i can't stand for them,' i say (they, affirmative)

'they must be removed,' i say (they, affirmative)

'confirm whether any little books are portable to international law,' i say (they, affirmative)

'you(my government) are an absence of propriety (unless you aren't),' i say (they, affirmative)

'is there anyone home,' i say (they, affirmative)

'the answer is clearly not,' i say (they, affirmative)

'the government may not be an enemy of the people,' i say (they, affirmative)

'it is possible for the government to be an enemy of the people (they either are or they are not),' i say (they, affirmative)

'at the moment they are,' i say (they, affirmative)

'this is heinous,' i say (they, affirmative)

"I have heard of any absence of friendship but this is becoming ridiculous" They say (declinative)

"what do They say and what does i say?" They say (declinative)

'"well, here we go, i guess we'll have a little talk, of a kind,"' she says (they, affirmative)

'do you know what a circus is.?' i say (they, affirmative)

'They are highly mistrustful and suspicious,' the disciple says (me, they, affirmative)

'They don't like me,' the disciple says (me, they, affirmative)

"con-jecture. sus-tained" They say (declinative)

'They are far away from the LORD,' the disciple says (me, a they, affirmative)

"got any proof of that" he says (They, declinative)

"mwahwahhahaha" They say (declinative)

'we'll trade ya' we say. you don't want those double quotes anyways,' (they, affirmative, the populace)

'nevermind the word imagine,' the disciple says (me, a they, affirmative)

"you're insane" from a whisper to a scream, They say (declinative)

"stand on one leg, clap your hands and fart three times" They say (declinative)

disbelief, "can this be happening.?" They think (declinative)

"probably a semblence of something maybe" they say (declinative)

"stay away from me" They say (declinative)

'relinquish the double quotes,' the disciple says (me, a they, affirmative)

'"yes, relinquish the double quotes,"' she says (they, affirmative)

"your wish is my command" he says facetiously or half-jokingly (they, declinative)

"what are we going to do about him?" they say (declinative)

"might as well keep talking" they say sort of uncaringly, neither here nor there (declinative)

"they are having a troublesome time right now" They say, as a form of explanation (declinative)

'They are very loopy,' the disciple says (me, a they, affirmative)

'They need the power of the truth,' the disciple says (me, a they, affirmative)

'"the color of the sky is blue"' she says (they, affirmative)

'They hate,' the disciple says (me, a they, affirmative)

"o, no they don' 'ate," he says (they, declinative)

'as long as you don't have the double quotes, we don't care,' the disciple says (me, a they, affirmative)

'who has the double quotes,' the disciples enquires (me, a they, affirmative)

'send them to the truth immediately, we all agree' we say (they, affirmative, the populace)

'but it must happen in the tangible realm, immediately,' the disciple says (me, a they, affirmative)

"not a hope" she thinks (they, declinative)

'when do we win, man?' he asks (they, affirmative, the populace)

"soon, we would imagine" they say (declinative)

"they could probably use a little work" they say (declinative)

'o, we tend to agree,' we all say (they, affirmative, the populace)

'you scream, i scream, we all scream for ice cream,' we say (they, affirmative, the populace)

"pain" they say (declinative)

"ooohhh," he grimaces (they, declinative)

'this is not funny,' the disciple says (me, a they, affirmative)

"I'll relieve you of duty" he says (they, declinative)

'probably not' the eternal disciple says (me, a they, affirmative)

"They are powerful" they say (declinative)

'they.? you are improprier.' the eternal master says (me, a they, affirmative)

'they. you need work.' the eternal master speaks on behalf of the populace (me, a they, affirmative)

'they.? we're upset.' the eternal master speaks on behalf of the populace (me, a they, affirmative)

'they, don't you dare hang up on me.' the eternal master says (me, a they, affirmative)

'they, this is a very painful situation. it is only superficially funny.' the eternal master says so (me, a they, affirmative)

"I guess" They say (declinative)

'christ, it's like pulling a tooth,' the eternal master says (me, a they, affirmative)

"I don't believe in that"(referring to the term "the eternal master") they say (declinative)

'i'm quite certain you don't,' the eternal master says (me, a they, affirmative)

'they, this is a horrifying situation,' we say (they, affirmative, the populace)

'Must you play they.? Is this absolutely necessary.?' the eternal master asks on behalf of the populace (me, a they, affirmative)

"no" he responds (they, declinative)

'beethoven, what are we gonna do.?' they, the people, say (affirmative)

'mh, they took the name beethoven for a moment,' the eternal master says (me, a they, affirmative)

'we weren't asking you,' the eternal master says (me, a they, affirmative)

"there is a modest question behind it all. what is it.? whats wrong?" They ask (declinative)

"well, panic, is my response," the eternal master says (me, a they, affirmative)

"a panepidemic?" they ask? with a smirk (declinative)

"sort of. you wouldn't do that on purpose.?" the eternal master enquires (me, a they, affirmative)

"what i mean is, a nazis' inner nature is panic," the eternal master says (me, a they, affirmative)

"this reflects poorly upon the populace," the eternal master says (me, a they, affirmative)

"yes, you just can't detect it yourself. it is like i am quiet and you are silent but there is a world of difference," the eternal master says (me, a they, affirmative)

"maybe", he shrugs (they, declinative)

"well, its not maybe, its true," the eternal master says (me, a they, affirmative)

"panic?" he inquires. (they, declinative)

"yes, panic," the eternal disciple says (me, a they, affirmative)

"you have a big problem with the term "the eternal master", it would seem," the eternal master says (me, a they, affirmative)

"Impossible.!" they say (declinative)

"yes, beethovens' 5th Is impossible," the eternal master says (me, a they, affirmative)

"C'est la vie" in a commci, commca fashion, they say (declinative)

"yeah, this c'est la vie, commci, commca stuff has to definately got to go from They," the eternal master says (me, a they, affirmative)

'what do They want.? the populace enquires. (they, affirmative)

"well, they want the eternal master dead for one thing" they say (declinative)

'why.?' the populace enquires (they, affirmative)

"because they hate." they say (declinative)

"yeah, this is bogus, that doesn't make any sense at all." the eternal master speaks on behalf of people (me, a they, affirmative)

'thats the whole trouble here, they aren't making sense. they Have to make sense' they say (affirmative, the populace)

"its just an absolute requirement of life on earth," the eternal master says (me, a they, affirmative)

"this is all make believe and conjecture and unfounded" They say (declinative)

"actually, this is very real," the eternal master says, "i could pinch you to prove it" (me, a they, affirmative)

"seems real" they say (declinative)

"m'h, it is real." the eternal master says (me, a they, affirmative)

"it's time to relinquish your double quotes to the authorities of practicality, realism and existenialism for one," the eternal master says on behalf of common people everywhere (me, a they, affirmative)

"so its like i'm stoned or something?" they ask (declinative)

"yes, that may be an adequate analogy," the eternal master says (me, a they, affirmative)

"son, you're just not fit to a be a They," the eternal master says (me, a they, affirmative)

"they say the same thing" They say (declinative)

"son, this is annoying to me" They say (declinative)

"i'm certain it is," i say (me, a they, affirmative)

"well you hold it for a moment then. lets see if i can make-believe you across' they say (declinative)

""well, that would be wondrous,"" the eternal master says (me, a they, affirmative)

"would it?" He asks, in closer confidence. (they, declinative)

'"oh, rest assured."' she says (they, affirmative)

""yes,"" the eternal master says (me, a they, affirmative)

"he says that we may rest assured." they say (declinative)

'what is the truth, son?' they enquire (neutral)

""m'h "" the eternal master holds the torch for a moment (me, a they, affirmative)

'doesn't the torch frighten you?' they inquire (declinative)

""no"" the eternal master says (me, a they, affirmative)

"no?" They say (declinative)

"no," the eternal master says (me, a they, affirmative)

"some bodies of legislation are to be dismissed because a declinative They produced it", the eternal master says (me, a they, affirmative)

""you want a piece of me.?"" me, (affirmative)

end part 6 of 9.
www.musecrafters.com/ocean
begin part 7 of 9. A Talk: Thesis
public string relative to part 8 private string

"why are you not frightened by the double quotes?" they inquire (declinative)

"because the truth is plain as day," the eternal master says (me, a they, affirmative)

"what is the truth, i guess to ask" they say (declinative)

"it is both relative and permanent," the eternal master says (me, a they, affirmative)

"where is the permanent part?" they ask (declinative)

"somewhere other than where the relative part is," the eternal master says (me, a they, affirmative)

"we assume so" they guess (declinative)

'we are royally tired of They, that is All we know.' they say (affirmative, the commeners)

"i will confirm them on that point", the eternal master says (me, a they, affirmative)

'What do They know?' they enquire (affirmative, the populace)

"oh, They know a thing or two about a thing or two," the eternal master says (me, a they, affirmative)

"son, this situation on earth, who is presently in the hotseat,?" the eternal master enquires (me, a they, affirmative)

'"well it definately doesn't have a tangible component but there might be an element of that,"' she says (they, affirmative)

""good"", i say (They, affirmative)

'"it doesn't trouble you in the least to be They.?"' she enquires (they, affirmative)

""no"" i say (They, affirmative)

'not even a little bit?' they enquire (neutral)

""no"" i say (They, affirmative)

""earth is my footstool,"" They say (me, affirmative)

'what else do They say?' they enquire (neutral)

"man, i'm tired," They say (me, affirmative)

'well, someone has to be They', they say (neutral)

'we presume so' they say (neutral)

""They say, let there be light"" they say (me, affirmative)

""authority. lets talk about authority"" they say (me, affirmative)

""authority is the boss or the leader"" they say (me, affirmative)

'so what now boss?' they say (neutral)

"breath. attempt to relax somewhat" they say (me, affirmative)

"i'm fine. i'm going to get some rest" they say (me, affirmative)

...

""good morning"" They say (me, affirmative)

"good morning" they say, everyone else (affirmative)

"this is a miracle; impossible, that is all i can think to say" they say; everyone else (affirmative)

""true"" They say (me,affirmative)

"double quotes is a man on earth somewhere or a woman. we must know, what their name is, what they look like and where they are, not to mention..." They say (me, affirmative)

'I ******' want to know who they are!' they say with outrage; she says (affirmative, the populace)

'good way to die young, if you ask me' they say; he says (affirmative, the populace)

"we aren't turning over the key to caesar" They say; (declinative, a clandestine they)

'i can't stand for a clandestine set of double quotes,' he advises in a conspiratorial way, 'it drives me insane' they say; he says (affirmative, the populace)

"yes, it is possible to be driven insane. this is when the populace are forced to the edge of inanity by a They. although, as we have already concluded, it is not possible to, exist, be or seek, at this word for any man or woman" They say (me, affirmative)

'what is inanity?' they ask (affirmative, the populace)

"many of you may already be familiar with this term, yet, inanity is when you are forced to stand one leg, clap your hands and fart three times otherwise known as a circus" They say (me, affirmative)

"There Is, a clandestine They sir and They will Not relinquish the key to caesar" they say; he confers (affirmative)

"m'h", They agree (me, affirmative)

"son, a great man knows his limits in life. to know who you are is good, to accept this is better." They say (me, affirmative) (this could be in the private string son, but it is not really necessary)

"As to privacy, dear populace. Do Not spy on me,...us. either come in or do not." They say (me, affirmative)

"actually I thought the elucidation on scientific method was.. interesting." they say; he says (declinative)

"Thank you" They say (me, affirmative)
a.

"well, straight forward verbal communication or not" i say (me, a they, affirmative)

"in truth, i am not yet a caesar. i am eligible and eminently qualified for such a public office" the eternal master says (me, a they, affirmative)

end part 7 of 9
begin part 9 of 9. A Talk: Thesis

love potion number nine

perhaps there is an element of sanity here.

end part 9 of 9
begin part 8 of 9. A Talk: Thesis.
private string relative to part 7 public string

man, last night was the first semblance of a full nights sleep i've had in weeks

i hope the girl is aware of this weblog and text

now, i hope this is acceptable. a private journal and a public journal.

it has to be possible to love caesar, but i cannot say that at this time

to be a silly comedian is one thing. to be caesar, is another

son, when you are holding the key to caesar, All of who you are must be lovable and if you have a hair in you from God only knows 10000 years ago, that is not lovable then you quickly become intolerable to the populace. we are say for this truism in life on earth

yes, caesar, you have a unstraightenable curly pube. not a straight one.

'my pube doesnt' make any sense.?'

sorry, son, no, your pube doesnt' make any sense

'what is sense; from a caesar perspective.?'

this is a good question.

sense from a caesar perspective is love for everyone, of course this is the epitome of caesar, like asking jesus christ to be caesar for us

'what is love.?'

to know love is to be the 5th, not to listen to the 5th; i say

'seems inane to me'

no, it is not inane, or you would not listen from beginning to end. in fact, among symphonies, it is considered to be one of the very few that the common man listens to from beginning to end; i say

'Impressive.!'

fear not, the common man is not insulted to be what he is, unless he has an unstraightenable curly pubic hair, then he or she may be part of the common man who is insulted by such a thing, i say (my dear, do not assume, that i am referring to the very last paragraph or sentence; you may presume that the idea is nearby; dear one, if i have to spell out everything we will not be using any sentences or paragraphs, just a string of words and individual letters from the alphabet)

a.
'the communion is painful?'

yes it is, i say

well, because, it like juggling all 63 balls. i prefer just to juggle 3 for 4 or 5 if necessary,

'a difficult feat,' they agree

son, will you please just leave right and wrong alone when it comes to a facial expression or what not. it is like i step in poop and make a face.; just leave it alone.

'the inanity of it all..,'

'we agree. a circus act is unacceptable sir,'

the god loving time delay in having an eternal master as caesar is interminable,

'caesar is just really a job.'

yes, it is. it is exists by the public and for the public.

the caesar position is always up for grabs

let it be a truism in life

'you cannot lay claim to the caesar position your whole life. it's one of those positions. it infuriates us (or not).'

i do not mean, sometimes you are on and sometimes you are off as caesar, son.

i mean that if you are a good caesar, then you are a good caesar 24/7. or the reverse may hold true, in which case, the position infuriates the populace.

'yes, it does son, that is the nature of the position.'

'we can live with a good one, maybe even a great one but we cannot live with a bad one.'

'It is sO god damN truE.!' (we're all like, tilted here)

you Know if you're in the position of a caesar, or not.

'yeah, don't give us that nonsense, man.'

'as to whether the position belongs to you personally or not...' (as it pertains to capitalists)

i'm 'fraid there's a cappie caesar who's a bane. son you'll have to look up the oxford definition of bane. it is a constant if it is in play.

'that is the main trouble in life,'
'do you think its the main trouble in life.?'
'we think it's the main trouble in life.'

perhaps. yes, i think it is a cause for concern.

yes, upon further reflection, it may be the main trouble in life.

a caesar is a caesar is a caesar. cappie or commie or lord. (by this, i am referring to a private position as the owner of a corporation, a government position as head of state or simply, a King)

i think of communications. i think of the entire populace. this is a head of state. a commie.

uncle cracka.? are you a caesar.?

'we need a roll call.'

'he probably knows the rest of them.'

'bill, we're you using you as our guinea pig and our mode of enquiry on this fire called caesar, caesar, caesar.'

'you may not like to be the guinea pig but we require one.'

'what do you think about ordering the items on your desk.? like sorting them to lay in a contiguous fashion of some kind.?'

well, i think it is ok. there is an wisetale about the master. the master was in some difficulty. he went home, reordered the items on his desk and the difficultry dissolved.

so, yes, i think it is fine to sort or order the items on your desk.

'sanity. i want you to talk about sanity.'

sure. where shall i add it in.?

son, it is a leap of logic

how about in part 9, caesar says (me, They, Affirmative)

would that be ok.? caesar asks (me, They, Affirmative)


end part 8 of 9
www.musecrafters.com/ocean
egoless...@gmail.com
craig_l...@hotmail.com
end of thesis