The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
From: David King <dk...@ketralnis.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2007 18:18:11 -0800
Local: Sat, Nov 17 2007 9:18 pm
Subject: Re: [erlyweb-list] Re: <title>s and other non-component data
>> Then what does my view function look like? [...] I like it. But I'm starting to think that {meta} is a bad word for > I don't think that the view function should receive the meta Vals. The > purpose of the {meta, Val} feature is to pass values "up" to the > 'phased' Fun. If you need to pass the same value to the view function > (and I can't really think of a scenario where you would), you can add > it again as a {data, Data} tuple. Maybe to make things clearer, > instead of adding {meta, Val} values to the list you return from a > controller function, you would return a tuple such as > show(A) -> > ... > {meta, [Val1, Val2], [{data, Data}, {ewc, ..}... ]}. it. It's not very descriptive of what's actually happening. Of course, I don't have any better suggestions :) Maybe {with_properties} or {set_properties} or something? You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||