From: "Yariv Sadan" <yarivsa...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 21:36:20 -0800
Local: Sat, Nov 24 2007 12:36 am
Subject: Re: [erlyweb-list] Re: <title>s and other non-component data
Hi,
I took a few days off for Thanksgiving and now I'm back to working on ErlyWeb. As I went back to working one the phased_vars feature, it occurred to {with_phased_vars, you would return {response, The 'response' tuple already lets you return values that aren't passed What do you think? Yariv On Nov 17, 2007 6:35 PM, David King <dk...@ketralnis.com> wrote: > > Yeah, I agree. I think 'with_properties' and 'set_properties' sounds > I like with_phased_vals, that's relatively clear You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||