Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Erlang Questions
Home
+ new post
About this group
Join this group
Message from discussion Binary pattern matching and optimization
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
David Mercer  
View profile  
 More options Nov 24 2008, 5:30 pm
From: "David Mercer" <dmer...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 16:30:16 -0600
Local: Mon, Nov 24 2008 5:30 pm
Subject: Re: [erlang-questions] Binary pattern matching and optimization
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
That is very good indeed.  I kind of felt a pang of guilt in posting my
questio, because I thought I should test before asking, so I could see for
myself, but really, I ought to have looked in the docs.  Thanks, Vance.

David

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vance Shipley [mailto:van...@motivity.ca]
> Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 16:11
> To: dmer...@alum.mit.edu
> Cc: Erlang Questions
> Subject: Re: [erlang-questions] Binary pattern matching and optimization

> David,

> That seems to be well documented in the efficiancy guide:

>    http://erlang.org/doc/efficiency_guide/binaryhandling.html#4.2

> In R12B appending to binaries is optimized.

>    -Vance

> On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 04:04:26PM -0600, David Mercer wrote:
> }  Follow-up question to the converse problem: assembling binaries.  If
> }  binaries are best handled like lists while reading them, is it also
> true
> }  that binaries are best assembled back-to-front like lists, putting the
> new
> }  binary chunk onto the beginning of the binary instead of the end?

_______________________________________________
erlang-questions mailing list
erlang-questi...@erlang.org
http://www.erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2013 Google