The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
From: Richard Carlsson <carlsson.rich...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 23:45:21 +0200
Local: Tues, Oct 16 2012 5:45 pm
Subject: Re: [erlang-questions] Pmods, packages, Unicode source code and column numbers in compiler - what will happen in R16?
On 2012-10-16 23:29 , Robert Virding wrote:
> Doesn't this mean that now the syntax for parametrised modules is
It also seems ass-backwards to me that the syntax will be dropped, but > still there but becomes meaningless? Or rather it will mean whatever > the writer of a module chooses it to mean. That really won't > encourage clarity. Or what am I missing? the hack that we used for the proof-of-concept implementation will be immortalized as "tuple modules". Drop the parameterized modules if you like, but don't make the apply-hack a documented feature; the old {M,F} was bad enough. /Richard
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||