Received: by 10.204.130.7 with SMTP id q7mr1892913bks.2.1347441536086;
        Wed, 12 Sep 2012 02:18:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: erlang-programming@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.204.13.17 with SMTP id z17ls1313103bkz.5.gmail; Wed, 12 Sep
 2012 02:18:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.129.81 with SMTP id n17mr1897584bks.3.1347441535826;
        Wed, 12 Sep 2012 02:18:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.129.81 with SMTP id n17mr1897583bks.3.1347441535812;
        Wed, 12 Sep 2012 02:18:55 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <erlang-questions-boun...@erlang.org>
Received: from hades.cslab.ericsson.net (hades.cslab.ericsson.net. [192.121.151.104])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id k7si4306590bks.2.2012.09.12.02.18.55;
        Wed, 12 Sep 2012 02:18:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of erlang-questions-boun...@erlang.org designates 192.121.151.104 as permitted sender) client-ip=192.121.151.104;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of erlang-questions-boun...@erlang.org designates 192.121.151.104 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=erlang-questions-boun...@erlang.org; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header...@gmail.com
Received: from hades.cslab.ericsson.net (hades [192.121.151.104])
	by hades.cslab.ericsson.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BC8E5C143;
	Wed, 12 Sep 2012 11:18:42 +0200 (CEST)
X-Original-To: erlang-questi...@erlang.org
Delivered-To: erlang-questi...@erlang.org
Received: from mail-pb0-f53.google.com (mail-pb0-f53.google.com
 [209.85.160.53])
 by hades.cslab.ericsson.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 790605C136
 for <erlang-questi...@erlang.org>; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 11:18:40 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by pbbro2 with SMTP id ro2so2158944pbb.40
 for <erlang-questi...@erlang.org>; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 02:18:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :cc:content-type;
 bh=c0myH9u1CALcqdbAq4BvhfsiK/67Gft/gPjD9xKm5aM=;
 b=OVVDXwZ0HA9mKRMtrd2MldUlDKEdFCR2UsrShWflBs1iEIJlNUkSGSiUnh2nvBj67q
 wnKn1j5NOYcJBieMCngY15za4p/YK9JhFHM5MvLgaKS1T3X8tdR+6vrUkImmyxlFU3Hh
 bd2V0b3YOn3jpBdQELjCA/5hJkhJMwqNExE2fVgplLSMSdvwJ47OK1SzPsOisSYj4Iib
 btYAwDSu9r0PLA1c/BeqiuVFXzm6wj8G6dInkqK0Vd8CQoqnPKQg7hvVbfO99VwCj2iC
 HJoHQ68H1M8QF0JjvytL5lm9JKtw4taxn17dGxvqPN+reHdfz/9hN4x4uY1GpET0YWez
 i6yA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.195.230 with SMTP id ih6mr16329876pbc.100.1347441519504;
 Wed, 12 Sep 2012 02:18:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.66.12.105 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 02:18:39 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <505051E9.1090...@llaisdy.com>
References: <033F5A3A-C60B-4E7B-8A65-A37A8D55D...@cs.otago.ac.nz>
 <CAF=0zKvk4b24mERoutNwH2Gz9FCk2=kEj6WzCzYwW5bz-ZY...@mail.gmail.com>
 <1347439329.5588.21.camel@seasc0057>
 <D5D668E1-D298-4163-9DF4-76584A304...@pixie.co.za>
 <505051E9.1090...@llaisdy.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 11:18:39 +0200
Message-ID: <CANY8u7GFhDhzOfzj24rebbTHutm9jkpZAYbNQEcVE-BEsA2...@mail.gmail.com>
From: Pierpaolo Bernardi <olopie...@gmail.com>
To: Ivan Uemlianin <i...@llaisdy.com>
Cc: erlang-questi...@erlang.org
Subject: Re: [erlang-questions] Style wars: junk comments
X-BeenThere: erlang-questi...@erlang.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Erlang/OTP discussions <erlang-questions.erlang.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://erlang.org/mailman/options/erlang-questions>,
 <mailto:erlang-questions-requ...@erlang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:erlang-questi...@erlang.org>
List-Help: <mailto:erlang-questions-requ...@erlang.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions>,
 <mailto:erlang-questions-requ...@erlang.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: erlang-questions-boun...@erlang.org
Sender: erlang-questions-boun...@erlang.org

On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Ivan Uemlianin <i...@llaisdy.com> wrote:
> If you are reading code on paper, it helps if functions are positioned
> predictably in the stack of paper.  Alphabetic ordering of functions and
> grouping functions into sections are two good ways of doing this.

"Reading code on paper" has already been mentioned some times in this thread.
But really people read code on paper, nowadays?

(Except illustrative code in books, of course).

P.
_______________________________________________
erlang-questions mailing list
erlang-questi...@erlang.org
http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions