Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion rpc:call without being connected?

Received: by 10.204.130.7 with SMTP id q7mr1154155bks.2.1347271016812;
        Mon, 10 Sep 2012 02:56:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: erlang-programming@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.204.4.74 with SMTP id 10ls752280bkq.0.gmail; Mon, 10 Sep 2012
 02:56:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.10.88 with SMTP id o24mr1146630bko.0.1347271016551;
        Mon, 10 Sep 2012 02:56:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.10.88 with SMTP id o24mr1146629bko.0.1347271016536;
        Mon, 10 Sep 2012 02:56:56 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <erlang-questions-boun...@erlang.org>
Received: from hades.cslab.ericsson.net (hades.cslab.ericsson.net. [192.121.151.104])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id 23si2278025bku.1.2012.09.10.02.56.56;
        Mon, 10 Sep 2012 02:56:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of erlang-questions-boun...@erlang.org designates 192.121.151.104 as permitted sender) client-ip=192.121.151.104;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of erlang-questions-boun...@erlang.org designates 192.121.151.104 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=erlang-questions-boun...@erlang.org; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header...@gmail.com
Received: from hades.cslab.ericsson.net (hades [192.121.151.104])
	by hades.cslab.ericsson.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 422BF5C056;
	Mon, 10 Sep 2012 11:56:48 +0200 (CEST)
X-Original-To: erlang-questi...@erlang.org
Delivered-To: erlang-questi...@erlang.org
Received: from mail-ey0-f181.google.com (mail-ey0-f181.google.com
 [209.85.215.181])
 by hades.cslab.ericsson.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73C255C002
 for <erlang-questi...@erlang.org>; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 11:56:46 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by eaan10 with SMTP id n10so717822eaa.40
 for <erlang-questi...@erlang.org>; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 02:56:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=from:content-type:disposition-notification-to
 :content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id:to:mime-version
 :x-mailer; bh=MazebdIPhQ7P7XjjlrNg7WiCaPmILF26RlWapszriSo=;
 b=NmdVuy+z6H6dJPumWpaw2Jt3lZHjImqdJVt8PwqWQfhnbDJgOE8vVs6Kb0/jsmRYRw
 LkeCih9RNIF2JHkDlQggpgC0gspVL8BhkDRqyYDUMGlm62R5bAWptK3xMMta0ZGUhGB+
 6zX17qUTJynbWmpDLmykA+TvXj3W3vllgbN6EG2xG7q9ziqZRzzNut6DQWFvMYvFhaDB
 OxXMc33zPoQsYu2hSYfDN4jKjcnkJ/SaoZpJYdTaLu3lm1Mbk8+1LRo2YxKszKCL3cb9
 MHpEqWGOkD6ZKii2g4lM9ak+Gmw2c5xMOIeG8pHPGDP48VvNoPhvo42TlPuY6Q6tXsuf
 vV4g==
Received: by 10.204.152.27 with SMTP id e27mr3511997bkw.56.1347271005954;
 Mon, 10 Sep 2012 02:56:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.41] (97-120.196-178.cust.bluewin.ch.
 [178.196.120.97])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c18sm6472414bkv.8.2012.09.10.02.56.44
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
 Mon, 10 Sep 2012 02:56:45 -0700 (PDT)
From: Zabrane Mickael <zabra...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 11:56:12 +0200
Message-Id: <C1509867-298C-4367-94DF-A4386FF74...@gmail.com>
To: Erlang Questions <erlang-questi...@erlang.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
Subject: [erlang-questions] rpc:call without being connected?
X-BeenThere: erlang-questi...@erlang.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Erlang/OTP discussions <erlang-questions.erlang.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://erlang.org/mailman/options/erlang-questions>,
 <mailto:erlang-questions-requ...@erlang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:erlang-questi...@erlang.org>
List-Help: <mailto:erlang-questions-requ...@erlang.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions>,
 <mailto:erlang-questions-requ...@erlang.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: erlang-questions-boun...@erlang.org
Sender: erlang-questions-boun...@erlang.org

Hi guys,

Is there any equivalent way (documented or not) to execute a remote function (like "rpc:call") but 
without being connected to the remote node?

Regards,
Zabrane

_______________________________________________
erlang-questions mailing list
erlang-questi...@erlang.org
http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions