Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion State of -extends(Module)?

Received: by 10.204.148.22 with SMTP id n22mr6127114bkv.0.1351503438956;
        Mon, 29 Oct 2012 02:37:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: erlang-programming@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.204.155.71 with SMTP id r7ls6209518bkw.6.gmail; Mon, 29 Oct
 2012 02:37:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.149.65 with SMTP id s1mr6126939bkv.3.1351503438535;
        Mon, 29 Oct 2012 02:37:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.149.65 with SMTP id s1mr6126938bkv.3.1351503438514;
        Mon, 29 Oct 2012 02:37:18 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <erlang-questions-boun...@erlang.org>
Received: from hades.cslab.ericsson.net (hades.cslab.ericsson.net. [192.121.151.104])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id 27si889762bks.3.2012.10.29.02.37.18;
        Mon, 29 Oct 2012 02:37:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of erlang-questions-boun...@erlang.org designates 192.121.151.104 as permitted sender) client-ip=192.121.151.104;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of erlang-questions-boun...@erlang.org designates 192.121.151.104 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=erlang-questions-boun...@erlang.org
Received: from hades.cslab.ericsson.net (hades [192.121.151.104])
	by hades.cslab.ericsson.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69A035C023;
	Mon, 29 Oct 2012 10:37:10 +0100 (CET)
X-Original-To: erlang-questi...@erlang.org
Delivered-To: erlang-questi...@erlang.org
Received: from mailslv1.informatik.hu-berlin.de
 (mailslv1.informatik.hu-berlin.de [141.20.20.51])
 by hades.cslab.ericsson.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B0035C009
 for <erlang-questi...@erlang.org>; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 10:37:09 +0100 (CET)
Received: from central-dogma (brln-4dbaba3a.pool.mediaWays.net [77.186.186.58])
 (authenticated bits=0) by mailslv1.informatik.hu-berlin.de
 (8.14.2+Sun/8.14.2/INF-2.0-MA-SOLARIS-2.10-26) with ESMTP id q9T9b6Fk014593
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
 for <erlang-questi...@erlang.org>; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 10:37:07 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 11:36:25 +0100
From: Magnus =?UTF-8?B?TcO8bGxlcg==?= <mamue...@informatik.hu-berlin.de>
To: erlang-questi...@erlang.org
Message-Id: <20121029113625.28d3c526239d5bbe9289c...@informatik.hu-berlin.de>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.2.0 (GTK+ 2.24.13; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.3 at sigma
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Subject: [erlang-questions] State of -extends(Module)?
X-BeenThere: erlang-questi...@erlang.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Erlang/OTP discussions <erlang-questions.erlang.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://erlang.org/mailman/options/erlang-questions>,
 <mailto:erlang-questions-requ...@erlang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:erlang-questi...@erlang.org>
List-Help: <mailto:erlang-questions-requ...@erlang.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions>,
 <mailto:erlang-questions-requ...@erlang.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============9207576700196096862=="
Errors-To: erlang-questions-boun...@erlang.org
Sender: erlang-questions-boun...@erlang.org

--===============9207576700196096862==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 micalg="PGP-SHA1";
 boundary="Signature=_Mon__29_Oct_2012_11_36_25_+0100_X=4YL/B.KB1ZJWFc"

--Signature=_Mon__29_Oct_2012_11_36_25_+0100_X=4YL/B.KB1ZJWFc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

In the never-ending quest of searching help to program as little as
possible, I found Erlang's -extends(Module) directive. There is little
documentation on it, which makes me believe that it is either
an unwanted or not well-supported feature of the language. Is this
correct? Would you recommend keeping away from it?


Magnus

P.s. Google didn't give me a lot of results when searching for this
except older blog entries (3-4 years old) and a paper from 2007. I
didn't find a discussion of its state.

--Signature=_Mon__29_Oct_2012_11_36_25_+0100_X=4YL/B.KB1ZJWFc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlCOXCwACgkQTx2Lgu47V3xMAQCfXfdretqvAvKCRZLcdRpgTP9b
agYAn3DBEDc064HTAAx05Kth21OFO/OX
=OLwh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Signature=_Mon__29_Oct_2012_11_36_25_+0100_X=4YL/B.KB1ZJWFc--

--===============9207576700196096862==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
erlang-questions mailing list
erlang-questi...@erlang.org
http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions

--===============9207576700196096862==--