Received: by 10.204.128.201 with SMTP id l9mr573794bks.8.1352811312114;
        Tue, 13 Nov 2012 04:55:12 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: erlang-programming@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.204.153.24 with SMTP id i24ls1685775bkw.7.gmail; Tue, 13 Nov
 2012 04:55:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.204.145.215 with SMTP id e23mr961223bkv.0.1352811311601;
        Tue, 13 Nov 2012 04:55:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.204.145.215 with SMTP id e23mr961222bkv.0.1352811311586;
        Tue, 13 Nov 2012 04:55:11 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <erlang-questions-boun...@erlang.org>
Received: from hades.cslab.ericsson.net (hades.cslab.ericsson.net. [192.121.151.104])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id l1si816100bka.2.2012.11.13.04.55.11;
        Tue, 13 Nov 2012 04:55:11 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of erlang-questions-boun...@erlang.org designates 192.121.151.104 as permitted sender) client-ip=192.121.151.104;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of erlang-questions-boun...@erlang.org designates 192.121.151.104 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=erlang-questions-boun...@erlang.org
Received: from hades.cslab.ericsson.net (hades [192.121.151.104])
	by hades.cslab.ericsson.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA2715C081;
	Tue, 13 Nov 2012 13:55:02 +0100 (CET)
X-Original-To: erlang-questi...@erlang.org
Delivered-To: erlang-questi...@erlang.org
Received: from mail-ie0-f181.google.com (mail-ie0-f181.google.com
 [209.85.223.181])
 by hades.cslab.ericsson.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 769255C001
 for <erlang-questi...@erlang.org>; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 13:55:00 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-ie0-f181.google.com with SMTP id 16so10718882iea.40
 for <erlang-questi...@erlang.org>; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 04:54:59 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=5iTnifyCzJtEPWYHxDFWyAkKSHyT8d5ZV6W0n1WuKZ4=;
 b=uyYuq4sqHS9uqeUJa9dtbAvrAG3mqfnD2PCenV/WTY/B/YFQhPzNkDMJVZnEFXU/d+
 lI0yduPa6ACctlmcd3JGBYouchR4KA+uvdMxvS3snwCkZRiWy4raanSrnqbwCsnvTqdk
 A7mb/aoNJoWkhfkqBDrzBunjirqIrF+c7RtoHDxtz8aieVrnvs+MVvEguyicZivUqGFd
 71MepKIDXnDgQoAseoxUxFQvwPKobxgUQ3c7F5PnqgDhaep2junasY8d3AIDmTr4/dZr
 5mEPh6LoBugIiyoWgSu1NwecVjpYLuv6I1oWG0LGcPMIbLV6LRn/IT3CB1qs0h43f/5a
 oVOw==
Received: by 10.42.39.197 with SMTP id i5mr21099184ice.27.1352811299401; Tue,
 13 Nov 2012 04:54:59 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.0.114 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 04:54:19 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <9C028843-770F-47A8-A776-FACC2141B...@gmail.com>
References: <CAOvwQ4gxVqXrPf8GMk8UpenqGaTZob=WjybgX=y+rXxQouS...@mail.gmail.com>
 <50A11D70.4090...@ninenines.eu>
 <9C028843-770F-47A8-A776-FACC2141B...@gmail.com>
From: Tuncer Ayaz <tuncer.a...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 13:54:19 +0100
Message-ID: <CAOvwQ4iYjmri0-Av4RJqv4E6m-37DQvn+atmYSrxuo5BWCt...@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tim Watson <watson.timo...@gmail.com>
Cc: "erlang-questi...@erlang.org" <erlang-questi...@erlang.org>
Subject: Re: [erlang-questions] rebar help COMMAND
X-BeenThere: erlang-questi...@erlang.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Erlang/OTP discussions <erlang-questions.erlang.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://erlang.org/mailman/options/erlang-questions>,
 <mailto:erlang-questions-requ...@erlang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:erlang-questi...@erlang.org>
List-Help: <mailto:erlang-questions-requ...@erlang.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions>,
 <mailto:erlang-questions-requ...@erlang.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: erlang-questions-boun...@erlang.org
Sender: erlang-questions-boun...@erlang.org

On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Tim Watson wrote:
> It would help plugin authors a lot if this behaviour was implemented
> in terms of reading some module metadata rather than being fixed to
> a subset of internal modules only. If that is something you'd
> consider.

That's actually pretty much what the current draft looks like.
FYI, there's an ongoing discussion on the rebar list concerning
implementation details.

Thanks everybody for the feedback.

> On 12 Nov 2012, at 16:01, Lo=EFc Hoguin wrote:
>
>> On 11/12/2012 04:40 PM, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
>>> Is there enough interest that I should try to get this into the
>>> next release?
>>
>> Yes. You shouldn't need to ask this. Rebar is too opaque today for
>> people to figure out all the things you can do with it without
>> looking at the source or cruising the web looking for the info.
>> That needs fixing.
_______________________________________________
erlang-questions mailing list
erlang-questi...@erlang.org
http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions