> Interestingly enough, this was a kind of conclusion we've arrived at
> as well -- the good performance of Beam, combined with "perceived
> instability", acted as a serious deterrent for me.
> But Max, wouldn't you like to know if there are any brave souls out
> there that were prepared to go beyond perceptions and successfully
> tried it in "real-life" situation?
> V/
> On 09 Nov 2012, at 3:34 PM, Max Bourinov wrote:
>> Unrelated, but: we were considering to give a try to HiPE but so far
>> there is no need to do it for us because Beam outperforms everything
>> else in our problem domain.
>> Best regards,
>> Max
>> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Valentin Micic <valen...@pixie.co.za
>> <mailto:valen...@pixie.co.za>> wrote:
>> Unrelated, but would be interesting to find out -- are there any
>> commercial-grade (let alone carrier-grade) systems that take
>> advantage of HiPE?
>> V/
>> On 09 Nov 2012, at 2:11 PM, Schneider wrote:
>> > you're right. HIPE generates compiled code.
>> > my mistake.
>> > take a look here for more info's about HIPE:
>> > http://user.it.uu.se/~kostis/Papers/erlang03.pdf
>> <http://user.it.uu.se/%7Ekostis/Papers/erlang03.pdf>
>> > greatz Johannes
>> > On Fr 09 Nov 2012 13:07:49 CET, Matti Oinas wrote:
>> >> Correct me if I'm wrong but doesn't HIPE compile to native code?
>> >> --
>> >> Matti
>> >> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Schneider <j...@globe.de
>> <mailto:j...@globe.de>> wrote:
>> >>> Erlang is a language, which produced byte-code which get'
>> interpreted by the
>> >>> Erlang engine. C++ instead generates mashing-code which has
>> on the one hand
>> >>> a much better performance, on the other hand,
>> >>> some disadvantages like incompatibility between different OSs.
>> >>> greatz Johannes
>> >>> On Fr 09 Nov 2012 09:42:21 CET, hume npx wrote:
>> >>>> Hi, all:
>> >>>> I'am new to erlang, after investigate some benchmark such
>> as at
>> http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u64q/which-programs-are-fastest.php,
>> >>>> I found that erlang compiler is not so good at speed? the
>> benchmark
>> >>>> shows that erlang Hipe is 13x slowdown compared to C++, as
>> compared to
>> >>>> Haskell GHC (3.3x slowdown), go 2.98x slowdown or even
>> javascript v8
>> >>>> is about 1x faster than erlang, I investigated the erLLVM
>> project
>> >>>> which reported similar results to Hipe, you know performance
>> is so
>> >>>> important nowadays, what caused the hard to improve
>> performace of
>> >>>> erlang or just there are not people working on it? Erlang is
>> >>>> attractive to me after several days studying, but with great
>> >>>> performance will be more attractive and competitive to some
>> languages
>> >>>> such as go etc.
>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>> erlang-questions mailing list
>> >>>> erlang-questi...@erlang.org <mailto:erlang-questi...@erlang.org>
>> >>>> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> erlang-questions mailing list
>> >>> erlang-questi...@erlang.org <mailto:erlang-questi...@erlang.org>
>> >>> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > erlang-questions mailing list
>> > erlang-questi...@erlang.org <mailto:erlang-questi...@erlang.org>
>> > http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>> _______________________________________________
>> erlang-questions mailing list
>> erlang-questi...@erlang.org <mailto:erlang-questi...@erlang.org>
>> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questi...@erlang.org
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
