I've been using a "goodbye" patch for the gproc application to help move some of the cleanup work to the client side and lessen the work of the centralized gproc server.
Not (quite) sure if this is helpful to your use case or not.
- Joe N.
On Nov 9, 2011, at 11:00 PM, Max Lapshin wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Ulf Wiger_______________________________________________
> <ulf.wi...@erlang-solutions.com> wrote:
>> It's true that link/1 has that advantage.
>> The disadvantage is that if the server crashes, and is linked to, say, 100K processes, the EXIT signal will be duplicated that many times, likely forcing an OOM crash.
> I understand. But I don't have anything to do, except hoping that
> And 100 K of messages is not a reason for OOM. Dumping these messages
> By the way, have you seen my previous claim about non-atomic process startup?
erlang-questions mailing list
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.