The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
From: Tomas Morstein <t...@idea.cz>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 00:57:18 +0200 (CEST)
Local: Sun, Oct 14 2012 6:57 pm
Subject: Re: [erlang-questions] (Non)Parametrized modules, inheritance, and R15B02 issues?
> Given that the underlying mechanism stays, and only the syntactical
I think this is exactly what Ulf meant by the code presented on Github.
> conveniences are under threat: to what extent can the current pmod > handling be replaced by / emulated with a parse_transform? We also do some transforms in our database project, so we can do one more new easily, but it has some limitations. > If it's possible to do it that way, that might provide the best of
It's just a few minutes I was remsh-connected to a live system and did
> two worlds: the existence of the pmod feature without having the > maintenance burden in the compiler. some manual data updates of our data objects (based on pmods). AFAIK, this wouldn't be possible with transforms, so transforms are only partial solution, if we'll simply omit their other disadvantages. I'd wait for what OTP team is going to publish within the upcoming week..
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||