Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Suggestions for easy to use super stable lightweight http server?

Received: by 10.204.145.80 with SMTP id c16mr355443bkv.2.1324502194740;
        Wed, 21 Dec 2011 13:16:34 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: erlang-programming@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.204.130.207 with SMTP id u15ls35361993bks.0.gmail; Wed, 21 Dec
 2011 13:16:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.204.152.89 with SMTP id f25mr355584bkw.0.1324502194259;
        Wed, 21 Dec 2011 13:16:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.204.152.89 with SMTP id f25mr355583bkw.0.1324502194231;
        Wed, 21 Dec 2011 13:16:34 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <erlang-questions-boun...@erlang.org>
Received: from hades.cslab.ericsson.net (hades.cslab.ericsson.net. [192.121.151.104])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id e4si5791440bkv.1.2011.12.21.13.16.34;
        Wed, 21 Dec 2011 13:16:34 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of erlang-questions-boun...@erlang.org designates 192.121.151.104 as permitted sender) client-ip=192.121.151.104;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of erlang-questions-boun...@erlang.org designates 192.121.151.104 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=erlang-questions-boun...@erlang.org
Received: from hades.cslab.ericsson.net (hades [192.121.151.104])
	by hades.cslab.ericsson.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06AC75C27B;
	Wed, 21 Dec 2011 22:16:28 +0100 (CET)
X-Original-To: erlang-questi...@erlang.org
Delivered-To: erlang-questi...@erlang.org
Received: from mail-we0-f181.google.com (mail-we0-f181.google.com
 [74.125.82.181])
 by hades.cslab.ericsson.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BA665C00D
 for <erlang-questi...@erlang.org>; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 22:16:26 +0100 (CET)
Received: by werm12 with SMTP id m12so3620583wer.40
 for <erlang-questi...@erlang.org>; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 13:16:25 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.134.232 with SMTP id s82mr10014050wei.19.1324502185728;
 Wed, 21 Dec 2011 13:16:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.180.107.66 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 13:16:25 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <-3218789174950718636@unknownmsgid>
References: <CANsaZAgYJ0WPgaA1cBDJy0SWJ1hRiVdRSHrOkxZWdHN+H_ZF5w@mail.gmail.com>
 <9F76B2D0C7824ADF9AA1269041C7E...@gmail.com>
 <CANsaZAgt8is4-k1_5Ci6YB2Eg+6ZNnfk8ZdRanjpsFf+YMT...@mail.gmail.com>
 <71ED113F-89BD-4E7E-8B03-B0F206541...@gmail.com>
 <CANsaZAi_Ff6c7E4MuYQy2g8VE32w5-sP3=poNfoaGAFbNG2...@mail.gmail.com>
 <AFD2FAC7-7D63-498B-B2AC-698B4EF68...@gmail.com>
 <CALf_jdfjSgU8+DmFGxWug_xEmch8Xh8JMA39b6ra5QW9LiZ...@mail.gmail.com>
 <94664D6F-4834-4020-B2D1-3D5B54160...@licenser.net>
 <CAM5fRypc=GX8PdtseDbwciWNnotHYNy6n4wqmVxREBKDhXi...@mail.gmail.com>
 <-3218789174950718636@unknownmsgid>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 13:16:25 -0800
Message-ID: <CAM5fRyqQyi+NZ2qK9V0voqk7+4yECbwXKGgqiZZMsVed=8-...@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roberto Ostinelli <robe...@widetag.com>
To: Max Bourinov <bouri...@gmail.com>
Cc: "erlang-questi...@erlang.org" <erlang-questi...@erlang.org>
Subject: Re: [erlang-questions] Suggestions for easy to use super stable
 lightweight http server?
X-BeenThere: erlang-questi...@erlang.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Erlang/OTP discussions <erlang-questions.erlang.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://erlang.org/mailman/options/erlang-questions>,
 <mailto:erlang-questions-requ...@erlang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:erlang-questi...@erlang.org>
List-Help: <mailto:erlang-questions-requ...@erlang.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions>,
 <mailto:erlang-questions-requ...@erlang.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4080152221134707520=="
Errors-To: erlang-questions-boun...@erlang.org
Sender: erlang-questions-boun...@erlang.org

--===============4080152221134707520==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6dd97a548db9304b4a0b277

--0016e6dd97a548db9304b4a0b277
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Max Bourinov <bouri...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Roberto,
>
> That statement was not about misultin but about our approach in general.
> Please, don't take it personaly. Actually I like API of misultin.
>
> We will use webmachie only because we have experience with it. So, if
> something will go wrong in one place something similar should be expected
> everywhere and if everything is alright there are much less chances that
> something will go wrong because of less code involved in the service
> delivery process. This is what I believe in.
>
> So, I promise if there are any problems with web interface in my project,
> misultin will be the man and I will write about in this mail list.
>


Hi Max,

I think you misunderstood me, I was not referring to your email. A library
choice is obviously in developer's hands, who choose one for its features,
performance, code usability, and such. I think only good things of
webmachine, mochiweb, yaws, and cowboy.

Instead, I was referring to Heinz [snippet of his email]:

On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Heinz N. Gies <he...@licenser.net> wrote:

>  I was using misultin before (admitedly a pretty old version like 6 month
> old) and updating broke my entire code to a point where migrating was less
> effort.



I've dedicated a lot of attention in not breaking backwards compatibility
on misultin. Since AFAIK Heinz did not file any issues regarding this (I do
realize that actually contributing to an open source project is much more
time consuming than just plain stating opinions on a mailing list), I'm
just curious to have some feedback on how that could happen, should Heinz
be willing to share that information with me.

I just don't like receiving public criticism of my work in this way, as I
always hope to get constructive criticism. Otherwise, I might as well just
keep my source closed, for that matters.

r.

--0016e6dd97a548db9304b4a0b277
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Max Bourinov <s=
pan dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:bouri...@gmail.com">bouri...@gmail.co=
m</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margi=
n:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor=3D"#FFFFFF"><div>Hi Roberto,</div><div><br></div><div>That sta=
tement was not about misultin but about our approach in general. Please, do=
n&#39;t take it personaly. Actually I like API of misultin.</div>
<div><br></div><div>We will use webmachie only because we have experience w=
ith it. So, if something will go wrong in one place something similar shoul=
d be expected everywhere and if everything is alright there are much less c=
hances that something will go wrong because of less code involved in the se=
rvice delivery process. This is what I believe in.</div>

<div><br></div><div>So, I promise if there are any problems with web interf=
ace in my project, misultin will be the man and I will write about in this =
mail list.<br></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>
Hi Max,</div><div><br></div><div>I think you misunderstood me, I was not re=
ferring to your email. A library choice is obviously in developer&#39;s han=
ds, who choose one for its features, performance, code usability, and such.=
 I think=A0only good things=A0of webmachine, mochiweb, yaws, and cowboy.</d=
iv>
<div><br></div><div>Instead, I was referring to Heinz [snippet of his email=
]:</div><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On =
Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Heinz N. Gies=A0<span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=
=3D"mailto:he...@licenser.net">he...@licenser.net</a>&gt;</span>=A0wrote:<b=
r>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin-top:0px;margin-right:0px;=
margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color=
:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">=A0I was using =
misultin before (admitedly a pretty old version like 6 month old) and updat=
ing broke my entire code to a point where migrating was less effort.</block=
quote>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div>I&#39;ve dedicated a lot of attention in=
 not breaking backwards compatibility on misultin. Since AFAIK=A0Heinz did =
not file any issues regarding this (I do realize that actually contributing=
 to an open source project is much more time consuming than just plain stat=
ing opinions on a mailing list), I&#39;m just curious to have some feedback=
 on how that could happen, should Heinz be willing to share that informatio=
n with me.</div>
<div><br></div><div>I just don&#39;t like receiving public criticism of my =
work in this way, as I always hope to get constructive criticism. Otherwise=
, I might as well just keep my source closed, for that matters.</div><div>
<br></div><div>r.</div></div></div>

--0016e6dd97a548db9304b4a0b277--

--===============4080152221134707520==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
erlang-questions mailing list
erlang-questi...@erlang.org
http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions

--===============4080152221134707520==--