Split Cowboy's acceptor and HTTP code - Erlang Programming

The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Message from discussion Split Cowboy's acceptor and HTTP code
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of erlang-questions-boun...@erlang.org designates 192.121.151.104 as permitted sender) client-ip=192.121.151.104;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4F7AE069.1030...@ninenines.eu>
References: <4F7AE069.1030...@ninenines.eu>
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 17:18:40 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJNb-9oS3=BBf0KS3sVvMMm2Q97uqXvsanp4bgQBH1UNSFd...@mail.gmail.com>
From: Benoit Chesneau <bchesn...@gmail.com>
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Lo=EFc_Hoguin?= <es...@ninenines.eu>
Cc: Erlang Users' List <erlang-questi...@erlang.org>
Subject: Re: [erlang-questions] Split Cowboy's acceptor and HTTP code
Precedence: list
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: erlang-questions-boun...@erlang.org
Sender: erlang-questions-boun...@erlang.org

+1 for splitting it out. It will make the life easier for people who
are using only the acceptor part . Also it's better to do that early I
guess.

On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Lo=EFc Hoguin <es...@ninenines.eu> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have received a lot of feedback on Cowboy recently, especially at the
> Erlang Factory. The main concern people seem to have today is that many of
> you seem to want to use Cowboy's acceptor code and transport abstraction,
> but don't want to include the HTTP components.
>
> I argued until now that you can always remove the HTTP modules from the
> release if you want, and that it's easier to work on improving both sides=
 at
> the same time without the dependency, while still keeping in mind that the
> two parts would eventually get split before 1.0.
>
> Considering the feedback, I'm wondering if now would be the time to split
> them.
>
> Most people use rebar nowadays, so the dependency should be handled
> automatically. But I did receive a few comments before from people who li=
ked
> the fact that Cowboy was a single package.
>
> If the split happens, it will be right after the next version tag, 0.6.0,
> and will most likely include a renaming of most modules all in a single
> commit. People who follow master will need to update their code immediate=
ly
> (I'll give a script to do that automatically), while others staying at 0.=
6.0
> will have some time to make it happen.
>
> If you don't want the split to happen at this point, you should probably
> reply to this mail so we can all discuss what should happen and when.
>
> I hope it won't be too much trouble on everyone, the module renaming scri=
pt
> should take care of most of it.
>
> Thanks for your feedback, as always!
>
> --
> Lo=EFc Hoguin
> Erlang Cowboy
> Nine Nines
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questi...@erlang.org
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
_______________________________________________
erlang-questions mailing list
erlang-questi...@erlang.org
http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
Account Options
