Received: by 10.204.10.88 with SMTP id o24mr1897412bko.0.1346698623325; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 11:57:03 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: erlang-programming@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.204.143.140 with SMTP id v12ls615978bku.6.gmail; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 11:57:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.10.88 with SMTP id o24mr1897410bko.0.1346698622957; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 11:57:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.10.88 with SMTP id o24mr1897409bko.0.1346698622941; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 11:57:02 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from hades.cslab.ericsson.net (hades.cslab.ericsson.net. [192.121.151.104]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id j4si3407838bkj.3.2012.09.03.11.57.02; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 11:57:02 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of erlang-questions-boun...@erlang.org designates 192.121.151.104 as permitted sender) client-ip=192.121.151.104; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of erlang-questions-boun...@erlang.org designates 192.121.151.104 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=erlang-questions-boun...@erlang.org; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header...@gmail.com Received: from hades.cslab.ericsson.net (hades [192.121.151.104]) by hades.cslab.ericsson.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31AC95C134; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 20:56:57 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: erlang-questi...@erlang.org Delivered-To: erlang-questi...@erlang.org Received: from mail-wg0-f53.google.com (mail-wg0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by hades.cslab.ericsson.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64FE85C002 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 20:56:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: by wgbfm10 with SMTP id fm10so3269918wgb.22 for ; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 11:56:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Q9DdCcvjBv1C0IeDoFpQ4+7lXVjxO9AKfSfFmfXYdb8=; b=is5GfxKaZxWWvAuk1NQhba8MMx6zfTcshohekbPutaG3dUOJdxbkjpHtl3Nt3zFTU3 aCsOkk7+1QP5aoC+ZNzs/9Z5OH28Q3Ql4IHTiBHhF00BFfDILfEoumo2ahKWu292WVSg eaVhOFTmxKiR3i1xpqc6QSBCL+lF7Kt7/EH0D+bFIVc0DIH9UG/QhIVTcKs95XoMN+Lu 5ZH+w8tPVEcBf3eTiF+elDiF7q1ggKUztvS3QIkv8vvuhsUK2OuwNCDxBuuTOkUut3QK Y1/eyJSu1MY4scT/0uhSjNrAak/IAGmwNY2DUaqmKJctfB+WdwU29uOxZ9WnIiscLXaR kPgA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.136.95 with SMTP id v73mr5960408wei.2.1346698615121; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 11:56:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.98.193 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 11:56:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5044FB09.5060...@ninenines.eu> References: <5044FA16.5050...@ninenines.eu> <5044FB09.5060...@ninenines.eu> Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 22:56:55 +0400 Message-ID: From: Max Lapshin To: =?UTF-8?B?TG/Dr2MgSG9ndWlu?= Cc: erlang-questi...@erlang.org Subject: Re: [erlang-questions] What is the right way to update cowboy dispatch rules on-fly? X-BeenThere: erlang-questi...@erlang.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: General Erlang/OTP discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: erlang-questions-boun...@erlang.org Sender: erlang-questions-boun...@erlang.org So what is the good way to go? Maybe somehow flush currently inactive workers? _______________________________________________ erlang-questions mailing list erlang-questi...@erlang.org http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions