Is there a reason why the erlang emacs mode treats comment (^C^C) and un-comment (^C^U) asymmetrical, comment adds '%% ' and uncomment removes '%'. Pretty annoying if you ask me (but who would even think of doing that :-). It used to work by adding only '%' earlier (maybe very much earlier like in R9 or so).
Cheers -- -- Goran --------------------- May the Snow be with you -------- Goran Bage MobileArts www.mobilearts.se Tjarhovsgatan 56 SE-116 28 STOCKHOLM Sweden goran.b...@mobilearts.se phone: +46 733 358405
________________________________________________________________ erlang-questions mailing list. See http://www.erlang.org/faq.html erlang-questions (at) erlang.org
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Göran Båge <goran.b...@mobilearts.com> wrote: > Hi,
> Is there a reason why the erlang emacs mode treats comment (^C^C) and > un-comment > (^C^U) asymmetrical, comment adds '%% ' and uncomment removes '%'. Pretty > annoying if you ask me (but who would even think of doing that :-). It used > to work by adding only '%' earlier (maybe very much earlier like in R9 or > so).
Have you tried the latest erlang mode, on github or in R13B03?
Both ^U^C^C and ^C^U works for me.
/Dan PS: There are a lot of changes in the latest release of the erlang emacs mode, so if we broke something please report or even better post a patch.
________________________________________________________________ erlang-questions mailing list. See http://www.erlang.org/faq.html erlang-questions (at) erlang.org
Yes it worked in R13B03, adding '%% ' and removing '%% '. Just my kind of timing bringing it up just when it was fixed, it's been bugging me for quite some time before I got around to asking:-). We are very slow moving to new releases as we have long lived products running out there, we still have some R9 based ones and I've not run R13 before, just installed it as a matter of fact.
Dan Gudmundsson wrote: > On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Göran Båge<goran.b...@mobilearts.com> wrote: >> Hi,
>> Is there a reason why the erlang emacs mode treats comment (^C^C) and >> un-comment >> (^C^U) asymmetrical, comment adds '%% ' and uncomment removes '%'. Pretty >> annoying if you ask me (but who would even think of doing that :-). It used >> to work by adding only '%' earlier (maybe very much earlier like in R9 or >> so).
> Have you tried the latest erlang mode, on github or in R13B03?
> Both ^U^C^C and ^C^U works for me.
> /Dan > PS: There are a lot of changes in the latest release of the erlang emacs mode, > so if we broke something please report or even better post a patch.
-- -- Goran --------------------- May the Snow be with you -------- Goran Bage MobileArts www.mobilearts.se Tjarhovsgatan 56 SE-116 28 STOCKHOLM Sweden goran.b...@mobilearts.se phone: +46 733 358405
________________________________________________________________ erlang-questions mailing list. See http://www.erlang.org/faq.html erlang-questions (at) erlang.org
BTW, the erlware erlang mode "erlware-mode" is much better than the erlang mode. Many bugs have been fixed and the skeletons are all edoc'd. It has been well maintained for over 2 years and is now way ahead IMHO. You can find it at erlware.org or over at the google code site code.google.com/p/erlware-mode
Cheers, Martin
On 12/14/09 10:36 AM, "Göran Båge" <goran.b...@mobilearts.com> wrote:
Thanks Dan,
Yes it worked in R13B03, adding '%% ' and removing '%% '. Just my kind of timing bringing it up just when it was fixed, it's been bugging me for quite some time before I got around to asking:-). We are very slow moving to new releases as we have long lived products running out there, we still have some R9 based ones and I've not run R13 before, just installed it as a matter of fact.
Dan Gudmundsson wrote: > On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Göran Båge<goran.b...@mobilearts.com> wrote: >> Hi,
>> Is there a reason why the erlang emacs mode treats comment (^C^C) and >> un-comment >> (^C^U) asymmetrical, comment adds '%% ' and uncomment removes '%'. Pretty >> annoying if you ask me (but who would even think of doing that :-). It used >> to work by adding only '%' earlier (maybe very much earlier like in R9 or >> so).
> Have you tried the latest erlang mode, on github or in R13B03?
> Both ^U^C^C and ^C^U works for me.
> /Dan > PS: There are a lot of changes in the latest release of the erlang emacs mode, > so if we broke something please report or even better post a patch.
-- -- Goran --------------------- May the Snow be with you -------- Goran Bage MobileArts www.mobilearts.se Tjarhovsgatan 56 SE-116 28 STOCKHOLM Sweden goran.b...@mobilearts.se phone: +46 733 358405
________________________________________________________________ erlang-questions mailing list. See http://www.erlang.org/faq.html erlang-questions (at) erlang.org
I guess you haven't tested the new erlang mode either :-) or have you incorporated the fixes we have done?
I used the erlware version myself before Kenneth hit me hard and told me to fix our version and apply the patches we had received.
The one thing I miss is the edoc skeltons which you have and that you broke out the skeletons to a separate file. I don't use distel either so maybe your variant works better with that.
But I have "stolen" some of the fixes you had and done many more and added several large patches from Anders Dahlin and Tomas Abrahamsson into which I think is a better version.
Hopefully now with erlang on github we can join our efforts again, so that we can get the best of the two things. I know that our support of the emacs mode havn't been the best and when time is tight the emacs mode get down prioritized. It will probably happen again but now with erlang on github available it should be easier to apply the improvements the community makes.
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:28 PM, Logan, Martin <MARTIN.LO...@orbitz.com> wrote: > BTW, the erlware erlang mode “erlware-mode” is much better than the erlang > mode. Many bugs have been fixed and the skeletons are all edoc’d. It has > been well maintained for over 2 years and is now way ahead IMHO. You can > find it at erlware.org or over at the google code site > code.google.com/p/erlware-mode
> Cheers, > Martin
> On 12/14/09 10:36 AM, "Göran Båge" <goran.b...@mobilearts.com> wrote:
> Thanks Dan,
> Yes it worked in R13B03, adding '%% ' and removing '%% '. Just my kind > of timing bringing it up just when it was fixed, it's been bugging me for > quite some time before I got around to asking:-). We are very slow > moving to new releases as we have long lived products running out there, > we still have some R9 based ones and I've not run R13 before, just installed > it as a matter of fact.
> Cheers > --Göran
> Dan Gudmundsson wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Göran Båge<goran.b...@mobilearts.com> >> wrote: >>> Hi,
>>> Is there a reason why the erlang emacs mode treats comment (^C^C) and >>> un-comment >>> (^C^U) asymmetrical, comment adds '%% ' and uncomment removes '%'. Pretty >>> annoying if you ask me (but who would even think of doing that :-). It >>> used >>> to work by adding only '%' earlier (maybe very much earlier like in R9 or >>> so).
>> Have you tried the latest erlang mode, on github or in R13B03?
>> Both ^U^C^C and ^C^U works for me.
>> /Dan >> PS: There are a lot of changes in the latest release of the erlang emacs >> mode, >> so if we broke something please report or even better post a >> patch.
> -- > -- Goran > --------------------- May the Snow be with you -------- > Goran Bage MobileArts www.mobilearts.se > Tjarhovsgatan 56 SE-116 28 STOCKHOLM Sweden > goran.b...@mobilearts.se phone: +46 733 358405
The one bug I know about in the emacs mode released with R13B03 is that in a fully qualified function call where the function name is identical to an existing BIF, the function name will be highlighted as a BIF. Example: in foo:hd(X) ‘hd’ will be highlighted.
The new emacs mode supports emacs 21.3 and later versions. It should compile without warnings on 21.3, 22.x and 23.x. If support for 21.3 could be dropped, elisp regexps used for various things in the mode could be improved, but a large company closely involved with Erlang/OTP is stuck on 21.3, so that's not an option :)
Probably the most visual differences are the changes to the syntax highlighting (there's a fourth level and the known set of bifs, guards, keywords etc are near complete) and the fixes to the indentation (guards and type defs improved a lot).
Regarding the skeletons, I'd prefer an option to use edoc compatible or not. Probably type defs should be added as well.
Another difference is not being able to switch between “old style comment indentations”. I did not add that since I think the new style is simply wrong (IMHO), but it's of course easy to add.
For those who like to have different length of the separators used in the skeletons, there's a non-document setting that can be used (the default value is 70):
;; Set the length of the skeleton separators. (setq erlang-skel-separator-length 90)
It would be interesting to know which versions of emacs that the erlang community thinks should be supported and also if there's any functionality missing.
> I guess you haven't tested the new erlang mode either :-) > or have you incorporated the fixes we have done?
> I used the erlware version myself before Kenneth hit me hard and told > me to fix our version and apply the patches we had received.
> The one thing I miss is the edoc skeltons which you have and that you broke > out the skeletons to a separate file. > I don't use distel either so maybe your variant works better with that.
> But I have "stolen" some of the fixes you had and done many more and added > several large patches from Anders Dahlin and Tomas Abrahamsson into > which I think > is a better version.
> Hopefully now with erlang on github we can join our efforts again, so > that we can > get the best of the two things. I know that our support of the emacs > mode havn't been > the best and when time is tight the emacs mode get down prioritized. > It will probably happen again but now with erlang on github available > it should be easier to > apply the improvements the community makes.
> Cheers (I think I owe you one) > /Dan
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:28 PM, Logan, Martin <MARTIN.LO...@orbitz.com> wrote: >> BTW, the erlware erlang mode “erlware-mode” is much better than the erlang >> mode. Many bugs have been fixed and the skeletons are all edoc’d. It has >> been well maintained for over 2 years and is now way ahead IMHO. You can >> find it at erlware.org or over at the google code site >> code.google.com/p/erlware-mode
>> Cheers, >> Martin
>> On 12/14/09 10:36 AM, "Göran Båge" <goran.b...@mobilearts.com> wrote:
>> Thanks Dan,
>> Yes it worked in R13B03, adding '%% ' and removing '%% '. Just my kind >> of timing bringing it up just when it was fixed, it's been bugging me for >> quite some time before I got around to asking:-). We are very slow >> moving to new releases as we have long lived products running out there, >> we still have some R9 based ones and I've not run R13 before, just installed >> it as a matter of fact.
>> Cheers >> --Göran
>> Dan Gudmundsson wrote: >>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Göran Båge<goran.b...@mobilearts.com> >>> wrote: >>>> Hi,
>>>> Is there a reason why the erlang emacs mode treats comment (^C^C) and >>>> un-comment >>>> (^C^U) asymmetrical, comment adds '%% ' and uncomment removes '%'. Pretty >>>> annoying if you ask me (but who would even think of doing that :-). It >>>> used >>>> to work by adding only '%' earlier (maybe very much earlier like in R9 or >>>> so).
>>> Have you tried the latest erlang mode, on github or in R13B03?
>>> Both ^U^C^C and ^C^U works for me.
>>> /Dan >>> PS: There are a lot of changes in the latest release of the erlang emacs >>> mode, >>> so if we broke something please report or even better post a >>> patch.
>> -- >> -- Goran >> --------------------- May the Snow be with you -------- >> Goran Bage MobileArts www.mobilearts.se >> Tjarhovsgatan 56 SE-116 28 STOCKHOLM Sweden >> goran.b...@mobilearts.se phone: +46 733 358405
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:28 PM, Logan, Martin <MARTIN.LO...@orbitz.com> wrote: > BTW, the erlware erlang mode "erlware-mode" is much better than the erlang mode. Many bugs have been fixed and the skeletons are all edoc'd. It has been well maintained for over 2 years and is now way ahead IMHO. You can find it at erlware.org or over at the google code site code.google.com/p/erlware-mode
> Cheers, > Martin
> On 12/14/09 10:36 AM, "Göran Båge" <goran.b...@mobilearts.com> wrote:
> Thanks Dan,
> Yes it worked in R13B03, adding '%% ' and removing '%% '. Just my kind > of timing bringing it up just when it was fixed, it's been bugging me for > quite some time before I got around to asking:-). We are very slow > moving to new releases as we have long lived products running out there, > we still have some R9 based ones and I've not run R13 before, just installed > it as a matter of fact.
> Cheers > --Göran
> Dan Gudmundsson wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Göran Båge<goran.b...@mobilearts.com> wrote: >>> Hi,
>>> Is there a reason why the erlang emacs mode treats comment (^C^C) and >>> un-comment >>> (^C^U) asymmetrical, comment adds '%% ' and uncomment removes '%'. Pretty >>> annoying if you ask me (but who would even think of doing that :-). It used >>> to work by adding only '%' earlier (maybe very much earlier like in R9 or >>> so).
>> Have you tried the latest erlang mode, on github or in R13B03?
>> Both ^U^C^C and ^C^U works for me.
>> /Dan >> PS: There are a lot of changes in the latest release of the erlang emacs mode, >> so if we broke something please report or even better post a patch.
> -- > -- Goran > --------------------- May the Snow be with you -------- > Goran Bage MobileArts www.mobilearts.se > Tjarhovsgatan 56 SE-116 28 STOCKHOLM Sweden > goran.b...@mobilearts.se phone: +46 733 358405
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Joe Armstrong <erl...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'd missed this. Seems to work very nicely apart from a bug in func9 - > tab on the commented line indents > like this:
> func9(Term, [${|T]) -> > % above should be highlighted correctly > % all function body lines should not indent further on tab > T.
> And not like this:
> func9(Term, [${|T]) -> > % above should be highlighted correctly > % all function body lines should not indent further on tab > T.
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:28 PM, Logan, Martin <MARTIN.LO...@orbitz.com> wrote: >> BTW, the erlware erlang mode "erlware-mode" is much better than the erlang mode. Many bugs have been fixed and the skeletons are all edoc'd. It has been well maintained for over 2 years and is now way ahead IMHO. You can find it at erlware.org or over at the google code site code.google.com/p/erlware-mode
>> Cheers, >> Martin
>> On 12/14/09 10:36 AM, "Göran Båge" <goran.b...@mobilearts.com> wrote:
>> Thanks Dan,
>> Yes it worked in R13B03, adding '%% ' and removing '%% '. Just my kind >> of timing bringing it up just when it was fixed, it's been bugging me for >> quite some time before I got around to asking:-). We are very slow >> moving to new releases as we have long lived products running out there, >> we still have some R9 based ones and I've not run R13 before, just installed >> it as a matter of fact.
>> Cheers >> --Göran
>> Dan Gudmundsson wrote: >>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Göran Båge<goran.b...@mobilearts.com> wrote: >>>> Hi,
>>>> Is there a reason why the erlang emacs mode treats comment (^C^C) and >>>> un-comment >>>> (^C^U) asymmetrical, comment adds '%% ' and uncomment removes '%'. Pretty >>>> annoying if you ask me (but who would even think of doing that :-). It used >>>> to work by adding only '%' earlier (maybe very much earlier like in R9 or >>>> so).
>>> Have you tried the latest erlang mode, on github or in R13B03?
>>> Both ^U^C^C and ^C^U works for me.
>>> /Dan >>> PS: There are a lot of changes in the latest release of the erlang emacs mode, >>> so if we broke something please report or even better post a patch.
>> -- >> -- Goran >> --------------------- May the Snow be with you -------- >> Goran Bage MobileArts www.mobilearts.se >> Tjarhovsgatan 56 SE-116 28 STOCKHOLM Sweden >> goran.b...@mobilearts.se phone: +46 733 358405
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Joe Armstrong <erl...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'd missed this. Seems to work very nicely apart from a bug in func9 - > tab on the commented line indents > like this:
> func9(Term, [${|T]) -> > % above should be highlighted correctly > % all function body lines should not indent further on tab > T.
> And not like this:
> func9(Term, [${|T]) -> > % above should be highlighted correctly > % all function body lines should not indent further on tab > T.
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:28 PM, Logan, Martin <MARTIN.LO...@orbitz.com> wrote: >> BTW, the erlware erlang mode "erlware-mode" is much better than the erlang mode. Many bugs have been fixed and the skeletons are all edoc'd. It has been well maintained for over 2 years and is now way ahead IMHO. You can find it at erlware.org or over at the google code site code.google.com/p/erlware-mode
>> Cheers, >> Martin
>> On 12/14/09 10:36 AM, "Göran Båge" <goran.b...@mobilearts.com> wrote:
>> Thanks Dan,
>> Yes it worked in R13B03, adding '%% ' and removing '%% '. Just my kind >> of timing bringing it up just when it was fixed, it's been bugging me for >> quite some time before I got around to asking:-). We are very slow >> moving to new releases as we have long lived products running out there, >> we still have some R9 based ones and I've not run R13 before, just installed >> it as a matter of fact.
>> Cheers >> --Göran
>> Dan Gudmundsson wrote: >>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Göran Båge<goran.b...@mobilearts.com> wrote: >>>> Hi,
>>>> Is there a reason why the erlang emacs mode treats comment (^C^C) and >>>> un-comment >>>> (^C^U) asymmetrical, comment adds '%% ' and uncomment removes '%'. Pretty >>>> annoying if you ask me (but who would even think of doing that :-). It used >>>> to work by adding only '%' earlier (maybe very much earlier like in R9 or >>>> so).
>>> Have you tried the latest erlang mode, on github or in R13B03?
>>> Both ^U^C^C and ^C^U works for me.
>>> /Dan >>> PS: There are a lot of changes in the latest release of the erlang emacs mode, >>> so if we broke something please report or even better post a patch.
>> -- >> -- Goran >> --------------------- May the Snow be with you -------- >> Goran Bage MobileArts www.mobilearts.se >> Tjarhovsgatan 56 SE-116 28 STOCKHOLM Sweden >> goran.b...@mobilearts.se phone: +46 733 358405
________________________________________________________________ erlang-questions mailing list. See http://www.erlang.org/faq.html erlang-questions (at) erlang.org
:-) Well I am glad that the regular mode benefited from it. The thanks for the Erlware mode really goes out to Dave Peticolas who owns it and maintains it quite well. He has added quite a lot of new support for things like flymake and a bunch of other cool stuff which does not spring to mind right now.
Perhaps there is a way we can collaborate more actively now with Erlang up on github as you say.
Cheers, Martin
P.S I will take that "owe me one" in the form of a beer next year at EUC ;-)
I guess you haven't tested the new erlang mode either :-) or have you incorporated the fixes we have done?
I used the erlware version myself before Kenneth hit me hard and told me to fix our version and apply the patches we had received.
The one thing I miss is the edoc skeltons which you have and that you broke out the skeletons to a separate file. I don't use distel either so maybe your variant works better with that.
But I have "stolen" some of the fixes you had and done many more and added several large patches from Anders Dahlin and Tomas Abrahamsson into which I think is a better version.
Hopefully now with erlang on github we can join our efforts again, so that we can get the best of the two things. I know that our support of the emacs mode havn't been the best and when time is tight the emacs mode get down prioritized. It will probably happen again but now with erlang on github available it should be easier to apply the improvements the community makes.
Cheers (I think I owe you one) /Dan
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:28 PM, Logan, Martin <MARTIN.LO...@orbitz.com> wrote: > BTW, the erlware erlang mode "erlware-mode" is much better than the erlang > mode. Many bugs have been fixed and the skeletons are all edoc'd. It has > been well maintained for over 2 years and is now way ahead IMHO. You can > find it at erlware.org or over at the google code site > code.google.com/p/erlware-mode
> Cheers, > Martin
> On 12/14/09 10:36 AM, "Göran Båge" <goran.b...@mobilearts.com> wrote:
> Thanks Dan,
> Yes it worked in R13B03, adding '%% ' and removing '%% '. Just my kind > of timing bringing it up just when it was fixed, it's been bugging me for > quite some time before I got around to asking:-). We are very slow > moving to new releases as we have long lived products running out there, > we still have some R9 based ones and I've not run R13 before, just installed > it as a matter of fact.
> Cheers > --Göran
> Dan Gudmundsson wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Göran Båge<goran.b...@mobilearts.com> >> wrote: >>> Hi,
>>> Is there a reason why the erlang emacs mode treats comment (^C^C) and >>> un-comment >>> (^C^U) asymmetrical, comment adds '%% ' and uncomment removes '%'. Pretty >>> annoying if you ask me (but who would even think of doing that :-). It >>> used >>> to work by adding only '%' earlier (maybe very much earlier like in R9 or >>> so).
>> Have you tried the latest erlang mode, on github or in R13B03?
>> Both ^U^C^C and ^C^U works for me.
>> /Dan >> PS: There are a lot of changes in the latest release of the erlang emacs >> mode, >> so if we broke something please report or even better post a >> patch.
> -- > -- Goran > --------------------- May the Snow be with you -------- > Goran Bage MobileArts www.mobilearts.se > Tjarhovsgatan 56 SE-116 28 STOCKHOLM Sweden > goran.b...@mobilearts.se phone: +46 733 358405
> :-) Well I am glad that the regular mode benefited from it. The thanks > for the Erlware mode really goes out to Dave Peticolas who owns it and > maintains it quite well. He has added quite a lot of new support for things > like flymake and a bunch of other cool stuff which does not spring to mind > right now.
> Perhaps there is a way we can collaborate more actively now with Erlang up > on github as you say.
> Cheers, > Martin
> P.S I will take that "owe me one" in the form of a beer next year at EUC > ;-)
> -----Original Message----- > From: Dan Gudmundsson [mailto:dan...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 2:32 AM > To: Logan, Martin > Cc: erlang-questi...@erlang.org > Subject: Re: [erlang-questions] erlang emacs mode question
> Hi Martin
> I guess you haven't tested the new erlang mode either :-) > or have you incorporated the fixes we have done?
> I used the erlware version myself before Kenneth hit me hard and told > me to fix our version and apply the patches we had received.
> The one thing I miss is the edoc skeltons which you have and that you broke > out the skeletons to a separate file. > I don't use distel either so maybe your variant works better with that.
> But I have "stolen" some of the fixes you had and done many more and added > several large patches from Anders Dahlin and Tomas Abrahamsson into > which I think > is a better version.
> Hopefully now with erlang on github we can join our efforts again, so > that we can > get the best of the two things. I know that our support of the emacs > mode havn't been > the best and when time is tight the emacs mode get down prioritized. > It will probably happen again but now with erlang on github available > it should be easier to > apply the improvements the community makes.
> Cheers (I think I owe you one) > /Dan
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:28 PM, Logan, Martin <MARTIN.LO...@orbitz.com> > wrote: > > BTW, the erlware erlang mode "erlware-mode" is much better than the > erlang > > mode. Many bugs have been fixed and the skeletons are all edoc'd. It > has > > been well maintained for over 2 years and is now way ahead IMHO. You can > > find it at erlware.org or over at the google code site > > code.google.com/p/erlware-mode
> > Cheers, > > Martin
> > On 12/14/09 10:36 AM, "Göran Båge" <goran.b...@mobilearts.com> wrote:
> > Thanks Dan,
> > Yes it worked in R13B03, adding '%% ' and removing '%% '. Just my kind > > of timing bringing it up just when it was fixed, it's been bugging me for > > quite some time before I got around to asking:-). We are very slow > > moving to new releases as we have long lived products running out there, > > we still have some R9 based ones and I've not run R13 before, just > installed > > it as a matter of fact.
> > Cheers > > --Göran
> > Dan Gudmundsson wrote: > >> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Göran Båge<goran.b...@mobilearts.com> > >> wrote: > >>> Hi,
> >>> Is there a reason why the erlang emacs mode treats comment (^C^C) and > >>> un-comment > >>> (^C^U) asymmetrical, comment adds '%% ' and uncomment removes '%'. > Pretty > >>> annoying if you ask me (but who would even think of doing that :-). It > >>> used > >>> to work by adding only '%' earlier (maybe very much earlier like in R9 > or > >>> so).
> >> Have you tried the latest erlang mode, on github or in R13B03?
> >> Both ^U^C^C and ^C^U works for me.
> >> /Dan > >> PS: There are a lot of changes in the latest release of the erlang emacs > >> mode, > >> so if we broke something please report or even better post a > >> patch.
> > -- > > -- Goran > > --------------------- May the Snow be with you -------- > > Goran Bage MobileArts www.mobilearts.se > > Tjarhovsgatan 56 SE-116 28 STOCKHOLM Sweden > > goran.b...@mobilearts.se phone: +46 733 358405
Org-mode is amazing "some people spend their entire life in org-mode" - it turns emacs into a proper folding editor/organiser.
Warning: org-mode is addictive
What I'd like is "org mode erlang editing"
hit tab on the first line of a function definition hides or reveals the body of the function. hit meta-uparrow on the first line of a function move the function up in the file.
This could be integrated with a refactoring program to move functions between modules with one keystroke
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 7:13 PM, Dale Harvey <d...@arandomurl.com> wrote: > while people are mentioning feature requests, I would love to be able to > make > -spec( not quite as visually distracting/prominent as they are now
> but thanks for the work, Ive been using erlware mode for a while now, would > love to see it get folder back in to core erlang
> 2009/12/15 Logan, Martin <MARTIN.LO...@orbitz.com>
>> :-) Well I am glad that the regular mode benefited from it. The thanks >> for the Erlware mode really goes out to Dave Peticolas who owns it and >> maintains it quite well. He has added quite a lot of new support for things >> like flymake and a bunch of other cool stuff which does not spring to mind >> right now.
>> Perhaps there is a way we can collaborate more actively now with Erlang up >> on github as you say.
>> Cheers, >> Martin
>> P.S I will take that "owe me one" in the form of a beer next year at EUC >> ;-)
>> -----Original Message----- >> From: Dan Gudmundsson [mailto:dan...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 2:32 AM >> To: Logan, Martin >> Cc: erlang-questi...@erlang.org >> Subject: Re: [erlang-questions] erlang emacs mode question
>> Hi Martin
>> I guess you haven't tested the new erlang mode either :-) >> or have you incorporated the fixes we have done?
>> I used the erlware version myself before Kenneth hit me hard and told >> me to fix our version and apply the patches we had received.
>> The one thing I miss is the edoc skeltons which you have and that you broke >> out the skeletons to a separate file. >> I don't use distel either so maybe your variant works better with that.
>> But I have "stolen" some of the fixes you had and done many more and added >> several large patches from Anders Dahlin and Tomas Abrahamsson into >> which I think >> is a better version.
>> Hopefully now with erlang on github we can join our efforts again, so >> that we can >> get the best of the two things. I know that our support of the emacs >> mode havn't been >> the best and when time is tight the emacs mode get down prioritized. >> It will probably happen again but now with erlang on github available >> it should be easier to >> apply the improvements the community makes.
>> Cheers (I think I owe you one) >> /Dan
>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:28 PM, Logan, Martin <MARTIN.LO...@orbitz.com> >> wrote: >> > BTW, the erlware erlang mode "erlware-mode" is much better than the >> erlang >> > mode. Many bugs have been fixed and the skeletons are all edoc'd. It >> has >> > been well maintained for over 2 years and is now way ahead IMHO. You can >> > find it at erlware.org or over at the google code site >> > code.google.com/p/erlware-mode
>> > Cheers, >> > Martin
>> > On 12/14/09 10:36 AM, "Göran Båge" <goran.b...@mobilearts.com> wrote:
>> > Thanks Dan,
>> > Yes it worked in R13B03, adding '%% ' and removing '%% '. Just my kind >> > of timing bringing it up just when it was fixed, it's been bugging me for >> > quite some time before I got around to asking:-). We are very slow >> > moving to new releases as we have long lived products running out there, >> > we still have some R9 based ones and I've not run R13 before, just >> installed >> > it as a matter of fact.
>> > Cheers >> > --Göran
>> > Dan Gudmundsson wrote: >> >> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Göran Båge<goran.b...@mobilearts.com> >> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi,
>> >>> Is there a reason why the erlang emacs mode treats comment (^C^C) and >> >>> un-comment >> >>> (^C^U) asymmetrical, comment adds '%% ' and uncomment removes '%'. >> Pretty >> >>> annoying if you ask me (but who would even think of doing that :-). It >> >>> used >> >>> to work by adding only '%' earlier (maybe very much earlier like in R9 >> or >> >>> so).
>> >> Have you tried the latest erlang mode, on github or in R13B03?
>> >> Both ^U^C^C and ^C^U works for me.
>> >> /Dan >> >> PS: There are a lot of changes in the latest release of the erlang emacs >> >> mode, >> >> so if we broke something please report or even better post a >> >> patch.
>> > -- >> > -- Goran >> > --------------------- May the Snow be with you -------- >> > Goran Bage MobileArts www.mobilearts.se >> > Tjarhovsgatan 56 SE-116 28 STOCKHOLM Sweden >> > goran.b...@mobilearts.se phone: +46 733 358405
I'm glad the default mode is now getting some love. Going forward, I think it would be best to combine efforts and avoid a separate fork if possible, it's just easier for everyone that way. It sounds like the main remaining difference is the skeletons? Is there any plan to roll the erlware skeletons into the main version? And did you also incorporate flymake support? That's really quite handy.
Logan, Martin wrote: > :-) Well I am glad that the regular mode benefited from it. The thanks for the Erlware mode really goes out to Dave Peticolas who owns it and maintains it quite well. He has added quite a lot of new support for things like flymake and a bunch of other cool stuff which does not spring to mind right now.
> Perhaps there is a way we can collaborate more actively now with Erlang up on github as you say.
> Cheers, > Martin
> P.S I will take that "owe me one" in the form of a beer next year at EUC ;-)
> -----Original Message----- > From: Dan Gudmundsson [mailto:dan...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 2:32 AM > To: Logan, Martin > Cc: erlang-questi...@erlang.org > Subject: Re: [erlang-questions] erlang emacs mode question
> Hi Martin
> I guess you haven't tested the new erlang mode either :-) > or have you incorporated the fixes we have done?
> I used the erlware version myself before Kenneth hit me hard and told > me to fix our version and apply the patches we had received.
> The one thing I miss is the edoc skeltons which you have and that you broke > out the skeletons to a separate file. > I don't use distel either so maybe your variant works better with that.
> But I have "stolen" some of the fixes you had and done many more and added > several large patches from Anders Dahlin and Tomas Abrahamsson into > which I think > is a better version.
> Hopefully now with erlang on github we can join our efforts again, so > that we can > get the best of the two things. I know that our support of the emacs > mode havn't been > the best and when time is tight the emacs mode get down prioritized. > It will probably happen again but now with erlang on github available > it should be easier to > apply the improvements the community makes.
> Cheers (I think I owe you one) > /Dan
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:28 PM, Logan, Martin <MARTIN.LO...@orbitz.com> wrote: >> BTW, the erlware erlang mode "erlware-mode" is much better than the erlang >> mode. Many bugs have been fixed and the skeletons are all edoc'd. It has >> been well maintained for over 2 years and is now way ahead IMHO. You can >> find it at erlware.org or over at the google code site >> code.google.com/p/erlware-mode
>> Cheers, >> Martin
>> On 12/14/09 10:36 AM, "Göran Båge" <goran.b...@mobilearts.com> wrote:
>> Thanks Dan,
>> Yes it worked in R13B03, adding '%% ' and removing '%% '. Just my kind >> of timing bringing it up just when it was fixed, it's been bugging me for >> quite some time before I got around to asking:-). We are very slow >> moving to new releases as we have long lived products running out there, >> we still have some R9 based ones and I've not run R13 before, just installed >> it as a matter of fact.
>> Cheers >> --Göran
>> Dan Gudmundsson wrote: >>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Göran Båge<goran.b...@mobilearts.com> >>> wrote: >>>> Hi,
>>>> Is there a reason why the erlang emacs mode treats comment (^C^C) and >>>> un-comment >>>> (^C^U) asymmetrical, comment adds '%% ' and uncomment removes '%'. Pretty >>>> annoying if you ask me (but who would even think of doing that :-). It >>>> used >>>> to work by adding only '%' earlier (maybe very much earlier like in R9 or >>>> so). >>> Have you tried the latest erlang mode, on github or in R13B03?
>>> Both ^U^C^C and ^C^U works for me.
>>> /Dan >>> PS: There are a lot of changes in the latest release of the erlang emacs >>> mode, >>> so if we broke something please report or even better post a >>> patch. >> -- >> -- Goran >> --------------------- May the Snow be with you -------- >> Goran Bage MobileArts www.mobilearts.se >> Tjarhovsgatan 56 SE-116 28 STOCKHOLM Sweden >> goran.b...@mobilearts.se phone: +46 733 358405
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 3:54 AM, Dave Peticolas <d...@krondo.com> wrote: > I'm glad the default mode is now getting some love. Going forward, > I think it would be best to combine efforts and avoid a separate > fork if possible, it's just easier for everyone that way. It sounds > like the main remaining difference is the skeletons? Is there any > plan to roll the erlware skeletons into the main version? And did > you also incorporate flymake support? That's really quite handy.
> thanks, > dave
> Logan, Martin wrote:
>> :-) Well I am glad that the regular mode benefited from it. The thanks >> for the Erlware mode really goes out to Dave Peticolas who owns it and >> maintains it quite well. He has added quite a lot of new support for things >> like flymake and a bunch of other cool stuff which does not spring to mind >> right now. >> Perhaps there is a way we can collaborate more actively now with Erlang up >> on github as you say.
>> Cheers, >> Martin
>> P.S I will take that "owe me one" in the form of a beer next year at EUC >> ;-) >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Dan Gudmundsson [mailto:dan...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December >> 15, 2009 2:32 AM >> To: Logan, Martin >> Cc: erlang-questi...@erlang.org >> Subject: Re: [erlang-questions] erlang emacs mode question
>> Hi Martin
>> I guess you haven't tested the new erlang mode either :-) >> or have you incorporated the fixes we have done?
>> I used the erlware version myself before Kenneth hit me hard and told >> me to fix our version and apply the patches we had received.
>> The one thing I miss is the edoc skeltons which you have and that you >> broke >> out the skeletons to a separate file. >> I don't use distel either so maybe your variant works better with that.
>> But I have "stolen" some of the fixes you had and done many more and added >> several large patches from Anders Dahlin and Tomas Abrahamsson into >> which I think >> is a better version.
>> Hopefully now with erlang on github we can join our efforts again, so >> that we can >> get the best of the two things. I know that our support of the emacs >> mode havn't been >> the best and when time is tight the emacs mode get down prioritized. >> It will probably happen again but now with erlang on github available >> it should be easier to >> apply the improvements the community makes.
>> Cheers (I think I owe you one) >> /Dan
>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:28 PM, Logan, Martin <MARTIN.LO...@orbitz.com> >> wrote:
>>> BTW, the erlware erlang mode "erlware-mode" is much better than the >>> erlang >>> mode. Many bugs have been fixed and the skeletons are all edoc'd. It >>> has >>> been well maintained for over 2 years and is now way ahead IMHO. You can >>> find it at erlware.org or over at the google code site >>> code.google.com/p/erlware-mode
>>> Cheers, >>> Martin
>>> On 12/14/09 10:36 AM, "Göran Båge" <goran.b...@mobilearts.com> wrote:
>>> Thanks Dan,
>>> Yes it worked in R13B03, adding '%% ' and removing '%% '. Just my kind >>> of timing bringing it up just when it was fixed, it's been bugging me for >>> quite some time before I got around to asking:-). We are very slow >>> moving to new releases as we have long lived products running out there, >>> we still have some R9 based ones and I've not run R13 before, just >>> installed >>> it as a matter of fact.
>>> Cheers >>> --Göran
>>> Dan Gudmundsson wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Göran Båge<goran.b...@mobilearts.com> >>>> wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> Is there a reason why the erlang emacs mode treats comment (^C^C) and >>>>> un-comment >>>>> (^C^U) asymmetrical, comment adds '%% ' and uncomment removes '%'. >>>>> Pretty >>>>> annoying if you ask me (but who would even think of doing that :-). It >>>>> used >>>>> to work by adding only '%' earlier (maybe very much earlier like in R9 >>>>> or >>>>> so).
>>>> Have you tried the latest erlang mode, on github or in R13B03?
>>>> Both ^U^C^C and ^C^U works for me.
>>>> /Dan >>>> PS: There are a lot of changes in the latest release of the erlang emacs >>>> mode, >>>> so if we broke something please report or even better post a >>>> patch.
>>> -- >>> -- Goran >>> --------------------- May the Snow be with you -------- >>> Goran Bage MobileArts www.mobilearts.se >>> Tjarhovsgatan 56 SE-116 28 STOCKHOLM Sweden >>> goran.b...@mobilearts.se phone: +46 733 358405
Dan Gudmundsson wrote: > My plan was to fix the bugs that I could, and depend on the community > to add new cool stuff and fix the hard parts that I can't.
> So please send patches/improvements and I promise to be more active > and give them some love.
> /Dan
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 3:54 AM, Dave Peticolas <d...@krondo.com> wrote: >> I'm glad the default mode is now getting some love. Going forward, >> I think it would be best to combine efforts and avoid a separate >> fork if possible, it's just easier for everyone that way. It sounds >> like the main remaining difference is the skeletons? Is there any >> plan to roll the erlware skeletons into the main version? And did >> you also incorporate flymake support? That's really quite handy.
>> thanks, >> dave
>> Logan, Martin wrote: >>> :-) Well I am glad that the regular mode benefited from it. The thanks >>> for the Erlware mode really goes out to Dave Peticolas who owns it and >>> maintains it quite well. He has added quite a lot of new support for things >>> like flymake and a bunch of other cool stuff which does not spring to mind >>> right now. >>> Perhaps there is a way we can collaborate more actively now with Erlang up >>> on github as you say.
>>> Cheers, >>> Martin
>>> P.S I will take that "owe me one" in the form of a beer next year at EUC >>> ;-) >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Dan Gudmundsson [mailto:dan...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December >>> 15, 2009 2:32 AM >>> To: Logan, Martin >>> Cc: erlang-questi...@erlang.org >>> Subject: Re: [erlang-questions] erlang emacs mode question
>>> Hi Martin
>>> I guess you haven't tested the new erlang mode either :-) >>> or have you incorporated the fixes we have done?
>>> I used the erlware version myself before Kenneth hit me hard and told >>> me to fix our version and apply the patches we had received.
>>> The one thing I miss is the edoc skeltons which you have and that you >>> broke >>> out the skeletons to a separate file. >>> I don't use distel either so maybe your variant works better with that.
>>> But I have "stolen" some of the fixes you had and done many more and added >>> several large patches from Anders Dahlin and Tomas Abrahamsson into >>> which I think >>> is a better version.
>>> Hopefully now with erlang on github we can join our efforts again, so >>> that we can >>> get the best of the two things. I know that our support of the emacs >>> mode havn't been >>> the best and when time is tight the emacs mode get down prioritized. >>> It will probably happen again but now with erlang on github available >>> it should be easier to >>> apply the improvements the community makes.
>>> Cheers (I think I owe you one) >>> /Dan
>>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:28 PM, Logan, Martin <MARTIN.LO...@orbitz.com> >>> wrote: >>>> BTW, the erlware erlang mode "erlware-mode" is much better than the >>>> erlang >>>> mode. Many bugs have been fixed and the skeletons are all edoc'd. It >>>> has >>>> been well maintained for over 2 years and is now way ahead IMHO. You can >>>> find it at erlware.org or over at the google code site >>>> code.google.com/p/erlware-mode
>>>> Cheers, >>>> Martin
>>>> On 12/14/09 10:36 AM, "Göran Båge" <goran.b...@mobilearts.com> wrote:
>>>> Thanks Dan,
>>>> Yes it worked in R13B03, adding '%% ' and removing '%% '. Just my kind >>>> of timing bringing it up just when it was fixed, it's been bugging me for >>>> quite some time before I got around to asking:-). We are very slow >>>> moving to new releases as we have long lived products running out there, >>>> we still have some R9 based ones and I've not run R13 before, just >>>> installed >>>> it as a matter of fact.
>>>> Cheers >>>> --Göran
>>>> Dan Gudmundsson wrote: >>>>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Göran Båge<goran.b...@mobilearts.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> Is there a reason why the erlang emacs mode treats comment (^C^C) and >>>>>> un-comment >>>>>> (^C^U) asymmetrical, comment adds '%% ' and uncomment removes '%'. >>>>>> Pretty >>>>>> annoying if you ask me (but who would even think of doing that :-). It >>>>>> used >>>>>> to work by adding only '%' earlier (maybe very much earlier like in R9 >>>>>> or >>>>>> so). >>>>> Have you tried the latest erlang mode, on github or in R13B03?
>>>>> Both ^U^C^C and ^C^U works for me.
>>>>> /Dan >>>>> PS: There are a lot of changes in the latest release of the erlang emacs >>>>> mode, >>>>> so if we broke something please report or even better post a >>>>> patch. >>>> -- >>>> -- Goran >>>> --------------------- May the Snow be with you -------- >>>> Goran Bage MobileArts www.mobilearts.se >>>> Tjarhovsgatan 56 SE-116 28 STOCKHOLM Sweden >>>> goran.b...@mobilearts.se phone: +46 733 358405
Joe Armstrong <erl...@gmail.com> wrote: > What I'd like is "org mode erlang editing"
> hit tab on the first line of a function definition hides or reveals > the body of the function. > hit meta-uparrow on the first line of a function move the function up > in the file.
You can configure outline mode to do this, sort of. Put this in .emacs. Instead of <tab> as you suggested, use C-left / C-right.
This way it shows / hides each function clause as a separate item, but you probably want to treat the complete function as one entity. I'm sure it is doable...
(defun show-onelevel () "show entry and children in outline mode" (interactive) (show-entry) (show-children))
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 9:15 PM, Martin Bjorklund <m...@tail-f.com> wrote: > Hi,
> Joe Armstrong <erl...@gmail.com> wrote: >> What I'd like is "org mode erlang editing"
>> hit tab on the first line of a function definition hides or reveals >> the body of the function. >> hit meta-uparrow on the first line of a function move the function up >> in the file.
> You can configure outline mode to do this, sort of. Put this in > .emacs. Instead of <tab> as you suggested, use C-left / C-right.
> This way it shows / hides each function clause as a separate item, but > you probably want to treat the complete function as one entity. I'm > sure it is doable...
> (defun show-onelevel () > "show entry and children in outline mode" > (interactive) > (show-entry) > (show-children))
