Received: by 10.213.26.206 with SMTP id f14mr260748ebc.15.1331738714208;
        Wed, 14 Mar 2012 08:25:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: erlang-packages@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.213.103.4 with SMTP id i4ls438165ebo.8.gmail; Wed, 14 Mar 2012
 08:25:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.87.165 with SMTP id az5mr1474914wib.4.1331738713740;
        Wed, 14 Mar 2012 08:25:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.87.165 with SMTP id az5mr1474913wib.4.1331738713730;
        Wed, 14 Mar 2012 08:25:13 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <christophe.rom...@process-one.net>
Received: from server1.process-one.net ([212.43.199.110])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id f7si2348413wie.3.2012.03.14.08.25.13;
        Wed, 14 Mar 2012 08:25:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning christophe.rom...@process-one.net does not designate 212.43.199.110 as permitted sender) client-ip=212.43.199.110;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning christophe.rom...@process-one.net does not designate 212.43.199.110 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=christophe.rom...@process-one.net; dkim=pass header...@process-one.net
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by server1.process-one.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B29E4A7B93
	for <erlang-packages@googlegroups.com>; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 16:25:12 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=process-one.net;
	s=default; t=1331738712;
	bh=3u+zDXGJvq7hKibdjIpr8lOEjzybRr+XLUL+7X5bU1Y=;
	h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:
	 Content-Type:In-Reply-To;
	b=FvDG/vOQJ6mSYphPiZxyBntWLkmHfJoAa74jgUou2Y0B9QwucQxdrJ2SgycJ9msMk
	 HmlAL/tQhvn0mpO+HYMIN21T3NUbh734wLY5GauzSji7+vVJ0/GNMoD0V2NUkdtsW4
	 kCvEHFaSNZB8gcGQ8GSN2u2oMxnjqCcSP/hy7BkU=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at server1.process-one.net
Received: from server1.process-one.net ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (server1.process-one.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with LMTP id 4NzgJPn3cu1G for <erlang-packages@googlegroups.com>;
	Wed, 14 Mar 2012 16:25:03 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (cromain [10.0.100.103])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by server1.process-one.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 04B8DA7B8F
	for <erlang-packages@googlegroups.com>; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 16:25:02 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=process-one.net;
	s=default; t=1331738703;
	bh=3u+zDXGJvq7hKibdjIpr8lOEjzybRr+XLUL+7X5bU1Y=;
	h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:
	 Content-Type:In-Reply-To;
	b=TTq7kW9rdI4WfGV6nSM5WZHD4dx1RYUJkgKuz9iLd2VycHegThewC9f9KoZRJTZi/
	 RODMIwtY5BD+IpdRSKFybkuzhxtlqifEZfMJQJi+WmnFZf/XBSUAXAQQEF3vf5v5dQ
	 HXF4YVLdAQWCaPQf2owqhSgKUaNDq0EbSZiJJn+0=
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 16:24:30 +0100
From: Christophe Romain <christophe.rom...@process-one.net>
To: erlang-packages@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Packaging Discussion at erlware-questions
Message-ID: <20120314152430.GH603@localhost>
References: <87d391e77u.wl%ericbmerr...@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87d391e77u.wl%ericbmerr...@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

Hello

I followed the thread with some delay.
there are indeed interesting stuffs, but i did not get enough time to
participate.
CEAN-2.0 covers parts of what is said, and can be extented/improved the
way you mention in the thread, this looks to me this is going to the
right direction as well.
But people do not use CEAN-2.0(see http://cean.process-one.net/stats/).
Anyway i use it daily and am happy with the flexibles features it provides.

Unfortunately, this is not good schedule for me at the moment, i can not
give time on this by now.