I received a number of private messages, including one from Mayank who
also posted here earlier. I would like to see such things discussed
here at the group as well. We may not agree on everything, but at least
we do agree on the need to discuss things and bring issues open for
open and public debate. Too many people seem to write with the sole
intention of flaunting themselves as apologists of the establishment,
so it's refreshing to read something else. As I wrote earlier,
scientists' claim of political-neutrality, objectivity, independence,
etc, is compromised by the fact that they are employed in large numbers
at scientific research labs that are part of an industrial-military
complex, holding the world at ransom. Epistemologists typically turn a
blind eye to this, which makes them part of the problem.
Epistemologists do tend to lock themselves up in the ivory tower,
neglecting their duty to society to point out issues like this that do
deserve more attention.

As I also wrote earlier, I support proposals that reduce the
government's involvement in education, preferably down to zero. This
has been part of some political parties for a long time, specifically
the Libertarian Party.

I have also said that the military should be split up into numerous
pieces, in such a way that they compete with each other in all areas.
Security services should not be monopolized by bureaucrats. People
should not be denied the security services they want, especially where
people are prepared to pay for it and where companies with good
reputations and intentions are willing to offer such services.

In an earlier message, Zinnic seemed to believe that this was
Libertarian politics. I only wish that there were any politicians
supporting this, but sadly I have yet to find the first one! The idea
has been supported by rare individuals who happened to post messages at
libertarian forums, but unfortunately it hasn't been proposed yet by
any political party - as far as I know, but if you have heard
differently, please let me know.