On 10/19/05, Jason Lang <jasonlang2...@yahoo.com> wrote:

  As long as you're incapable of producing even a single argument, you're
only pointing out that you have nothing to say. All your accusations of
"failings" have been responded to and there turned out to be nothing wrong
with my porposals.

Why wouldn't a free market system without vouchers be preferable to a

previous situation. Eventually, prices of services will come down to such an
extent that no vouchers may be necessary, but it's hard to predict how
things will eventuate. That's the very essence of NOT prescribing how the
education system should operate in detail, but instead leaving room for
competition and customer choice to sort things out. Alternatively to prices
becoming so low that good schools will be affordable (even to the poor)
without vouchers, the poor may be less interested in classroom teaching and
instead prefer apprenticeships, trainee programs, online self-learning or
self-employment combined with on-the-job learning. Initially, the key is to
create differentiation, so that people will be able to choose those
alternatives that work best, while competition will ensure that services
improve in quality and decrease in price.
 Sam